Bloomberg's Fred Kempe: Obama 'Center-Right on Foreign Policy'

Photo of Brent Baker.

Barack Obama's overseas trip this past week proved “he's not a left-wing ideologue” or a “dove” and, “if anything, he's center, even center-right, on foreign policy issues,” Bloomberg News world affairs columnist Fred Kempe, a veteran of the Wall Street Journal, declared on this weekend's Political Capital show which airs several times Friday night and Saturday on Bloomberg TV.

Host Al Hunt, formerly Executive Washington Editor of the Wall Street Journal, opened the segment with Kempe by showing video of Obama shooting a basketball as he enthused, “You might call it the shot heard 'round the world: Barack Obama, at a military base in Kuwait, meeting with the troops and sinking a three-pointer.” Asked his assessment of Obama's trip, Kempe echoed: “If it weren't a three-point shot, I would have called it a slam dunk. In any case, wherever he went he had perfect pitch.” Hunt concluded the segment: “From a three-point shot to 200,000 people in Berlin, it was an extraordinarily memorable week.”

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

The full quote from Kempe, President of the Atlantic Council of the United States, on what the trip to Afghanistan, Iraq, Israel, Germany and France revealed about Obama's ideology:

I think in general he's shown people he's not a left-wing ideologue. If anything, he's center, even center-right, on foreign policy issues in the way he was talking on this trip.

Kempe based his assessment on how Israeli Prime Minister Olmert's office was “hugely impressed with him” and how in his speech in Berlin he called upon Europeans to provide more troops for Afghanistan. Plus:

He's moved the debate to Afghanistan. He's saying this is the new area, this is the front in the war on terror. He's saying “I'm not a dove, I just think we put the troops in the wrong place. I'm going to put more troops in Afghanistan.” So he showed he could stand up to the military and talk to the Generals, but he also said I'm willing to put troops where they ought to be, but I don't think that they should be in Iraq as much as Afghanistan.

Kempe's Atlantic Council bio highlights his Wall Street Journal career:

Kempe left the Wall Street Journal following more than a quarter century of distinguished work. He was most recently assistant managing editor, International, and "Thinking Global" columnist for the Wall Street Journal, based in New York. He was previously for seven years the longest serving editor and associate publisher ever of the Wall Street Journal Europe and was European editor for the global Wall Street Journal from 2002 to 2005, also overseeing Middle Eastern reporting.

—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Raindance

Obama is trying to pull a raindance. Back in January, the Taliban declared they were building up to launch an offensive in the summer. Put simply, they're trying to fight their way out of the box they've been in since 2002. The point is, the US military has been trying to shift resources to Afghanistan, to the degree that they're able.

Now Obama comes along to exploit this. He starts by trying to reinforce the myth that Bush is exclusively focused on Iraq (as if Afghanistan and North Korea were forgotten?). Obama then claims that unless we shift resources to Afghanistan, things could flare up there, as if he was being prescient about it.

Sure enough, when the Taliban offensive begins, and the military builds up to address it, Obama claims that they're following his plan. It's a raindance. Shifting resources to Afghanistan was coming anyway, but Obama wants to take credit for it. This is just a cheap raindance.

Will the reality be reported? I'm not holding my breath. The media can't remember one day to the next, and certainly won't call Obama on anything.

On the contrary

Really, Mr. Kempe?  The speech I heard in Berlin, made in front of thousands of Europeans who are MORE than happy to hear from an American who desperately wants to make America as weak and as whiny on the world scene as possible, suggests otherwise.   

Foreign policy is my #1-10 concern when voting for President.  For that reason alone I won't be voting for Obama.

Whoever casts a vote for Barack Obama is nothing more than a common thief.  Whoever fails to vote against him is nothing more than a moral coward.

Exactly what vote that

Exactly what vote that Obama has made does Kempe think makes anything other than a far left, out-of-touch socialist?

If he is basing his opinion on just the photos of the Obama Make-Believe-President-Tour then he should seek a new profession. Because not even his words qualify him as center-right (or even center).  

 

 

I think it was that bit in

I think it was that bit in his speech in Berlin (?) about it not being fair that some countries have a lot and some are really poor.....isn't that a center-right position? <sarc>

It doesn't matter what they say. Right after the primaries, they started describing him as a "centrist."

Because there are no lefties...only so-called "centrists" and far-right extremists.

 

I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows. -Bart Simpson

Let's not forget

"Just this past week, we passed out of the U.S. Senate Banking Committee, which is my committee, a bill to call for divestment from Iran"

And the whole world wondered after the beast.

  • LYDSEXICS UNTIE

The electoral college will save us!

Well...let's be happy (I suppose) that McCain has 270 electoral votes to win to be President, while Obama has to get 277. 

:-) 

Whoever casts a vote for Barack Obama is nothing more than a common thief.  Whoever fails to vote against him is nothing more than a moral coward.

Hey Fred, you vote for him

Hey Fred, you vote for him then..

Notice that the polls did not move much??

(for such a slam dunk??) 

 

Ronald Reagan, 1962: I did not leave the Democratic party, the party left me.

Insert: your name, 2008, and the Republican party.

Romney / Jendil  2012 (if,we survive)

Kempke PROVES he's in the

Kempke PROVES he's in the tank with the rest of them.

Like thats news.

The lefties

"Liberals" are always trying to prove that they are NOT liberal.  I wonder why. Hmmmm...

NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"

He's center-right? In

He's center-right? In comparison to what? American right or European right? There is a HUGE difference in the two.

"He's center-right? In

"He's center-right? In comparison to what?"

He must mean compared to:

  1. William Ayres

  2. Bernardine Dorhn

  3. Reverend Wright

  4. Louis Farrakhan

  5. Stalin

  6. Mao

  7. Hitler

  8. Pol Pot

  9. Castro Bros.

  10. Michelle

 

Ooooooooooh! I like that,

Ooooooooooh! I like that, can he come up with some good, decent folks? Nah, don't think so, the MSM will cover no matter what! Good post!

"Nuke 'em 'til they... oh hell, just shoot 'em!"

Kempe's commentary is an example of Leftist...

Kemps commentary is a example of Leftist taqiyya. The Left's claim that Obama is center-right conforms to Muslim taqiyya. That is, they are under no obligation to be truthful with the unbelievers. Well?

If the Bloomberg

If the Bloomberg TV programming, when not broadcasting market news and commentary, is any reflection on Bloomberg, this network is as liberal as MSNBC.  For example, the editorial pundit that was fired from the Wall Street Journal, Al Hunt, has a program on Blommberg TV.  He was run off the WSJ because he failed to keep an audience on one of the most conservative editorial pages in the country. 

Heck, I don't even watch Bloomberg TV during market hours.  It is the new Fox Business Channel for me.  It's great. 

Ahhhh...I see... Kempe is a

Ahhhh...I see... Kempe is a Citizen of the World too....!

Lovely...just lovely.

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

When a WAR is WON, you normally withdraw some Troops

What I can't figure out, is when one of the talking Heads start preaching that Maliki is coming over to, Bush is coming over to, McCain is coming over to BHO's Withdrawal plan, is WHY doesn't someone point out that at the END of a War, at the END of fighting, of course you'd start talking about withdrawal.

We're there now, and Obama has done nothing to Help....even his Visit was too late to help.

Obama was wanting to Withdraw Troops in Defeat, two years ago.....Big difference.

The Republican Revolution will not be Televised