Just days after a Rasmussen Reports survey was released showing more than three times as many likely voters “believe most reporters will try to help Obama with their coverage” than help John McCain, a Fox News/Opinion Dynamics poll taken July 22-23 of 900 registered voters discovered six times as many think “most member of the media” want Obama to win than wish for a McCain victory. On Thursday's Special Report, FNC's Brit Hume relayed: “67 percent of the respondents think most media members want Obama to win. Just 11 percent think most in the media are for McCain.”
A FoxNews.com article added this damning finding: “Only about 1 in 10 (11 percent) volunteers the belief that the media is neutral on the race to become the 44th President of the United States.” Those polled recognize the tilt in action: “When asked to rate the objectivity of media coverage of the campaigns, Americans feel Obama gets more of a positive spin by a better than 7-to-1 margin (46 percent more positive toward Obama; 6 percent more positive toward McCain).”
Hume announced Thursday night, July 24, after a story which cited other findings from the poll:
Most of the people who participated in that new Fox News poll think journalists want Obama to win and many believe they are giving him better coverage: 67 percent of the respondents think most media members want Obama to win. Just 11 percent think most in the media are for McCain. 46 percent believe Obama's campaign is receiving more positive coverage, just 6 percent say that about McCain. 36 percent believe the media have covered both objectively.
Even the overwhelming majority of Democrats assume journalists are pulling for Obama. A PDF of the full poll results shows that in response to the question, “Which presidential candidate -- Barack Obama or John McCain -- do you think most members of the media want to win the election?”, 61 percent of Democrats said Obama, compared to 77 percent of Republicans and 63 percent of independents. A mere 14 percent of Democrats believe members of the media want McCain to win.
Back in September of 2004, 46 percent thought journalists wanted John Kerry to win compared to 26 percent who believed reporters preferred George Bush.
My July 22 NewsBusters item, “Half See Pro-Obama Bias and Say Media Make Economy Seem Worse,” recounted:
More than three times as many Americans see a media tilt in favor of Democrat Barack Obama than toward Republican John McCain. A Rasmussen Reports telephone survey released Monday, of 1,000 likely voters, "found that 49 percent of voters believe most reporters will try to help Obama with their coverage, up from 44 percent a month ago," compared to a piddling 14 percent who "believe most reporters will try to help John McCain win" while "just one voter in four (24%) believes that most reporters will try to offer unbiased coverage."
Exactly half, 50 percent, "believe the media makes economic conditions appear worse than they really are," a separate Rasmussen Reports telephone survey posted on Monday determined. That poll discovered "a plurality of Americans (41%) similarly believe that the media has tried to make the war in Iraq appear worse that it really is, while 26 percent say reporters have made it look better than reality and 25 percent think they've portrayed it accurately."
The "How the Public Views the Media" section of the MRC's "Media Bias Basics" lists many more surveys of how the public perceive journalists and the news media.
—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center





















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Who are the 11 out of 100
July 25, 2008 - 03:18 ET by rubylensWho are the 11 out of 100 people who are blind or stupid enough to be convinced that the media is trying to get McCain elected?! I can sort of forgive the 11% who don't know -- they're probably just not paying attention to the presidential race. But who could possibly think at this point that the media's in the tank for McCain? That's just insane.
why are the 11 out of 100 ??
July 25, 2008 - 09:23 ET by abeautifulpersonunless someone likes a train wreck. with all this media attention on obama, how is it, mccain continues to insert foot into mouth on a regular basis.
i'm not conservative, but i kinda feel bad for conservatives right now. they don't have a decent candidate. while i want a left leaning person in the white house, at least i want a good fight to get there.
SO....
July 25, 2008 - 09:48 ET by mbuelYou like socialism?
Obama's speech in Germany has been compared to previous greats, like Kennedy and Reagan. Both of them spoke against communism (socialism taken to it's logical extent), and how dangerous it was to the world.
Reagan even made his famous pronouncement, "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down that wall!"
What did Obama do? He tore down the wall of capitalism, built a wall of capitulation. Then proceeded to tell us that, in spite of that, he 'still loves america'.
It doesn't sound like it to me!
I am curious though... How do you see McCain sticking his foot into his mount? He's been FAR more consistent than Obama, and what's amazing, even with the overwhelming media bias, they are still STILL polling neck and neck, with McCain even seeing an advantage in some polls!
The conservatives don't
July 25, 2008 - 09:49 ET by KarmaThe conservatives don't have a candidate, period. There is a socialist/communist and a Republican who leans left.
You don't think Obama is putting up a good fight?
"unless someone likes a
July 25, 2008 - 11:35 ET by ckc1227"unless someone likes a train wreck.
with all this media attention on obama, how is it, mccain continues to
insert foot into mouth on a regular basis.
i'm not conservative, but i kinda feel bad for conservatives right
now. they don't have a decent candidate. while i want a left leaning
person in the white house, at least i want a good fight to get there. "
How is it, with all this media attention and hundreds of millions spent, Obama, the great democrat candidate, barely has a lead(that continues to slip) over our crappy candidate?
I have no doubt you feel bad, but not for the reason you give. I would too. I recommend you avoid sharp objects on election day. You'll thank me later.
Thanks Fox News . . .
July 25, 2008 - 04:38 ET by DoktorFrankenBut I really don't think 99.9% of intelligent people needed a poll for this particular subject.
Statistically, 77% of Americans know that. That is, not counting the "Friends of Olby" - who can't count anyway.
American Journalists are Trampling the Sacrifice
July 25, 2008 - 07:06 ET by ZachJonesIsHomeAmerican Journalists
are Trampling the Sacrifice of Our Fathers, Mothers, Sisters and Brothers
(Unfortunately, the
Journalists taking part in this travesty far outnumber the headstones at Normandy) from
zachjonesishome.wordpress.com
Specifically:
http://zachjonesisho...
zachjonesishome.wordpress.com
I wish we'd seen a poll like this earlier...
July 25, 2008 - 08:12 ET by sarcasmoEven though it might have revealed things Fox News may not have found so convenient (such as the increasingly obvious fact that they were totally in the tank for Rudy G.) with properly asked questions.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
you're obviously one candle short of a birthday cake
July 25, 2008 - 08:59 ET by MrltavernOf course, the major flaw in your comment and the point that youre missing is that Fox News is only ONE station. The survey was taken in all corners of American News media. You also forgot to mention that Fox's Rupert Murdoch has given large sums of money to both Hillary CLinton and Barack Obama's campagns and O'Reilly is kissing obama's ass on a daily basis in order to get him on his show for an interview which is never going to happen.
Fox News isn't conservative enough for me.
Mr.L
Nope. Try again.
July 25, 2008 - 09:20 ET by sarcasmoRupert was also in the tank for Hillary, but he owed Rudy due to cable deals when Rudy was mayor. I stand by all my words, as usual, and Fox News is still way too antilibertarian biased, for me. They have a long way to go before fair & balanced, and my critique of them here in no way absolves the other networks for their own biases.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
They also don't adequately
July 25, 2008 - 11:24 ET by ckc1227They also don't adequately cover the skinhead point of view, while clearly being in the tank for race hustlers and militant Islam. Seems they have even further to go than any of us could ever imagine.
1992 all over again
July 25, 2008 - 08:33 ET by MrltavernWow, just like 1992 all over again when Clinton was running. They asked journalists the same questions and pretty much was the same results. All the libs in the newsrooms accross America were for Clinton.
Mr.L
considering the alternative...
July 25, 2008 - 09:06 ET by abeautifulperson... its obama by default.
loving someone too much is dangerous.
July 25, 2008 - 09:19 ET by abeautifulpersonnow that it has been established that there is a love affair with obama, what are the chances NB can talk about something else?
jon stewart has lampooned it, FOX has tagged it. if you were to strip away the op-eds about obama's media bias, there'd barely anything else, here.
That is what this site is about ABP
July 25, 2008 - 09:46 ET by Dee BunkWhat else are they supposed to do stories on?
let's call it the "bashing the obama lovefest"
July 25, 2008 - 11:24 ET by abeautifulpersoni just figured NB was about uncovering or bringing attention to something that everyone else is not.
when even the left is laughing about it, it really isn't 'exposing' much at all.
I'm sorry to hear that mean
July 25, 2008 - 11:12 ET by danboI'm sorry to hear that mean old Newsbusters has forced you to read this.
Limited Disclosure: I used to belong to the Sierra Club untill they went crazier. Worse of all, I was bribed by Exxon with free New Orleans Saints glasses with fill ups in the 70's.
ABP - only problem is they (the media) used to love
July 25, 2008 - 09:44 ET by Dee BunkMcCain. So it's not by default for them. It's purely partisan.
that's because mccain hasn't been consistent.
July 25, 2008 - 11:26 ET by abeautifulpersonit wasn't long ago that coulter was screeching about NOT voting for mccain. now mccain needs the support of the bush crowd, he is shifting.
“Change you can’t depend on”
July 25, 2008 - 23:26 ET by needleDee Bunk wrote: “[The] only problem is they (the media) used to love McCain. So it's not by default for them.”
I would add that the media used to “love” McCain only as a Republican candidate most like a liberal, not as someone they want to see elected as President.
But in any case your [as usual] non-sequitur response was even more off-the-wall than usual. You apparently imply criticism of McCain because “he is shifting” wrt some of his previous positions; but accordingly you must admire him as by far the more reliable candidate. Obama on the other hand is running all over the place like water from a broken vessel. Or is Obama the just candidate for the non-sequitur type of person who looses track of what the subject is from one moment to the next?
Impunitas semper ad deteriora invitat.
No one ever said the media has to be fair
July 25, 2008 - 09:48 ET by AndyRWe expect newscasters to do their job and report the news in an even handed manner. We expect newspapers to give the who, where, what, why, when and how when writing stories. Thing is, most stories today are either written by former Demcorat officials or the AP, Reuters and Al Jazeera who have no committment to ethical standards in journalism. In addition, with competition for prime real estate on the airwaves and in the print media, "journalists" have taken to editorializing their stories to get them noticed.
Freedom of the press does not necessitate fairness of the press.
you're absolutely right. i fully agree.
July 25, 2008 - 11:28 ET by abeautifulpersonthis is the result of media consolidation in the hands of large corporations with vested interests.
FOX is a genuine example. its unacceptable no matter which side it falls on. unfortunately, it seems one side becomes more polarized to counter the other.
Look Deeper into this poll.
July 25, 2008 - 10:58 ET by danbon = 900
Although they over sampled the dems in this poll Obama supporters and McCain supporters were pretty much matched.
To the question of if the elections were today.
McCain would retain 82% of the republican vote to Obama retaining 74% of the democrats. With all of the talk of McCain losing his base. Is Obama losing even more of the democratic base?
Limited Disclosure: I used to belong to the Sierra Club untill they went crazier. Worse of all, I was bribed by Exxon with free New Orleans Saints glasses with fill ups in the 70's.
closer to reality
October 20, 2008 - 23:14 ET by mbuelI think your interpretation is much closer to reality. I've heard ALOT of democrats stating they won't vote for Obama.
reasons:
1) Trust. They don't trust him, lack of experience.
2) Socialism. They don't like the idea of punishing success.
3) War on Terror. They don't like his lack of military experience.
It seems to me that the media polls are going to err far more than the typical 9 - 12 point liberal lead that they typically have especially if more polls are skewed like this.
Democrats make up 43.4% of the poll, republicans 35.4% and 19.7% independents.
Extrapolating further:
1) Only 35 independents voted for Obama (I'm assuming the majority of them make up the "undecided" vote.)
if we even out the numbers though it becomes even more interesting.
(taking numbers down to 300 - and throwing out independents.)
Obama n = 270 - 45% of vote
McCain n = 324 - 54% of vote
This of course is without the independent vote. I honestly think that Joe the Plumber will be the straw that will break the working class' back as far as that is concerned.
How much do voters think Obama and McCain differ?
July 25, 2008 - 13:42 ET by kj.444http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=aXLIlaf_2bbhd2AIUDxZkkIA_3d_3d
This survey is ridiculously one-dimensional
July 25, 2008 - 23:34 ET by needleI advise skipping it.
Impunitas semper ad deteriora invitat.
needle
July 25, 2008 - 23:48 ET byi should have listened to you
"You can not support the Troops if you do not support their Mission"
Media Compliance Voting
October 20, 2008 - 19:35 ET by pbr90It would be a shame if America shows it has so little spine than to vote as desired by media and its hype.
Nothing would be more sheep-like than to fall in line with the media who has pronounced yet another Lord Fauntleroy the favorite.