Proving the old saw that a “gaffe” is when a politician stumbles into the truth, ABC's World News, which has showcased Americans whining about the inability to afford “joy rides” or breakfast, on Thursday night led with former Senator Phil Gramm's observation that “this is a mental recession”and “we've sort of become a nation of whiners.” In relaying the comments from the economic adviser to the McCain campaign, anchor Charles Gibson conceded “the fundamentals of the economy may be sound, as Gramm argues,” but: “There are a lot of people suffering right now. So, Barack Obama was quick to pounce, and John McCain was quick to renounce.”
Reporter David Wright featured a soundbite of Obama asserting “we need somebody to actually solve the economy. It's not just a figment of your imagination. It's not all in your head,” and then backed him up: “That certainly's what voters seem to think.” A man on the street insisted: “I think it's way more than just our imagination. It's in our face. And we need help.” Wright concluded with how Gramm's “point seems to be that while consumer confidence has been at record lows, other economic indicators are pretty good -- that the fundamentals are sound.” Wright, naturally, countered: “That's no consolation to folks who worry about their mortgages and who are paying these high prices at the pump.”
Meanwhile, on the CBS Evening News after a look at Gramm/McCain, Jeff Greenfield suggested that Jesse Jackson's violent intentions toward Barack Obama -- “I want to cut his nuts off” -- will benefit Obama:
Well, think back to 1992 when candidate Bill Clinton went after a rap singer, Sister Souljah for anti-white remarks and did it in front of a black audience. It was a signal to some people that Clinton might not be beholden even to a loyal Democratic group, a kind of independent. So here you have Barack Obama trying to argue "look, I'm not the black candidate." Being attacked by kind of a symbol of an older race-based identity-based politician and being attacked for calling on the black community to be more personally responsible. It's the kind of attack I'm sure the Obama campaign would welcome every single day.
ABC's World News has delighted in highlighting silly whining from hapless Americans. Two examples:
My May 20 NewsBusters item, “ABC's Latest Gas Price Victim Can 'No Longer Take Joy Rides,'” recounted:
Six days after ABC's World News fretted over a New Jersey woman who said she must skip breakfast to put $4 a day toward gas, Monday's newscast featured an even more hapless woman, a Massachusetts resident who to afford gas sacrifices a "much needed" $45 prescription, says she can "no longer take joy rides on my days off" and, horror of horrors, has been forced into "buying store brands instead of name brands." Rosaria Giamei complained in a soundbite: "I don't get out and enjoy things anymore. I just kind of sit at home and only go to and from work and, like, grocery shopping and that's it." How about taking a walk or riding a bike?...
My May 13 NewsBusters posting, "ABC Showcases Hapless Woman Who Skips Breakfast to Afford Gas," reported:
A week after ABC focused a story on two pitiable Minnesota families living in the dark because higher energy and food prices mean they "can no longer afford to pay for electricity," Tuesday's World News highlighted the replies from sad case stories solicited on ABCNews.com, starting with a woman who says she must skip breakfast to put $4 a day toward gas. ABC displayed "FEELING THE PAIN" on screen as Charles Gibson set up the story that David Muir started by fretting about "the price of a gallon of gas jumping more than a dime in just the last week" -- which is a piddling $2 more to fill a 20-gallon tank. Nonetheless, he asserted "the e-mails we've received show the pain is being felt far and wide. Single mother Caroline Saunders wrote to us from New Jersey." He read aloud from her e-mail with her quote on screen: "I now skip breakfast to save the extra $4 per day. That gives me an extra $20 added to my gas budget."...
And ABC's Good Morning America has repeatedly made up “recession” news. The June 25 NewsBusters item by Scott Whitlock, “ABC Talks Up Non-Existent 'Recession' Eight Times in Three Days,” began:
The U.S. is not in a recession, but viewers wouldn't know it from watching Good Morning America. In the span of three days, the ABC program has eight times proposed cures in its "Recession Rescue" segment. On June 24 alone, GMA fretted about the "recession" five times. This is despite the fact that America hasn't had one quarter of negative growth, let alone the two necessary for there to be a recession...
The Thursday, July 10 stories on ABC and CBS (NBC Nightly News also aired a full piece on Gramm/McCain, but not as its lead):
ABC's World News:
CHARLES GIBSON: Good evening. So, how bad is the economy? Not all that bad, says a key economic adviser of John McCain. Former Texas Senator Phil Gramm said today, America is in a “mental recession. You've heard of mental depression,” said Gramm, “this is a mental recession.” Adding, “we've become a nation of whiners.” Well, the fundamentals of the economy may be sound, as Gramm argues. But there are a lot of people suffering right now. So, Barack Obama was quick to pounce, and John McCain was quick to renounce Gramm's remarks. David Wright reports, tonight, from Washington. David?
DAVID WRIGHT: Good evening, Charlie. This isn't the first time in this race that a top adviser has stepped all over his candidate's message. And for John McCain, it's a serious consideration because the economy is the number one issue for voters. And he has been working hard this week to show people he gets it.
McCain: How are you? Nice to see you.
WRIGHT: Today, John McCain was in one of the hardest-hit areas of the rust belt, trying to convince voters he feels their pain.
McCAIN: People are hurting. People are hurting very badly.
WRIGHT: But one of his top economic advisers was sharply at odds with McCain's message.
PHIL GRAMM, IN WEB VIDEO: You've heard of mental depression. This is a mental recession.
WRIGHT: Former Senator Phil Gramm suggested to the Washington Times that the bad economy is just a figment of people's imagination.
GRAMM: You just hear this constant whining, complaining. [edit jump] We've sort of become a nation of whiners.
WRIGHT: The former Texas Senator enjoys cult status among many fiscal conservatives.
McCAIN, FEBRUARY 29: There is no one more respected on the issue of economics than Senator Phil Gramm.
WRIGHT: But today, McCain couldn't distance himself quickly enough.
McCAIN: Phil Gramm does not speak for me. I speak for me.
WRIGHT: Knowing his rival, Barack Obama, would be ready to pounce.
BARACK OBAMA: America already has one Dr. Phil. We don't need another one when it comes to the economy.
McCAIN: You're talking about Dr. Phil, he's Dr. No. And I've been leading us forward, with plans of action to address our economy and our need for energy independence. He's Dr. No.
OBAMA: We need somebody to actually solve the economy. It's not just a figment of your imagination. It's not all in your head.
WRIGHT: That certainly's what voters seem to think.
MAN: I think it's way more than just our imagination. It's in our face. And we need help.
WOMAN: What do I whine about? High grocery prices, you know, the price of milk and eggs.
ANOTHER WOMAN: It's real, not just mental.
WRIGHT: Today, in light of the controversy, McCain was asked, is he still seriously considering Phil Gramm to be his Treasury Secretary?
McCAIN: I think Senator Gramm would be in serious consideration, for ambassador to Belarus. Although, I'm not sure the citizens of Minsk would welcome that.
WRIGHT: But Gramm himself is standing by his remarks. And his point seems to be that while consumer confidence has been at record lows, other economic indicators are pretty good -- that the fundamentals are sound. Of course, Charlie, that's no consolation to folks who worry about their mortgages and who are paying these high prices at the pump.
GIBSON: David Wright reporting from down in Washington tonight. Thanks.
CBS Evening News:
KATIE COURIC: Phil Gramm, the former Texas Senator, is now a top member of the McCain economic team and in an interview with the Washington Times he suggested the economy's not as bad as we've been led to believe. Gramm said: “You've heard of mental depression; this is a mental recession.” He went on to say, quote: “We have sort of become a nation of whiners...complaining about a loss of competitiveness, America in decline.” Barack Obama wasted no time responding.BARACK OBAMA: America already has one Dr. Phil. We don't need another one when it comes to the economy. We need somebody to actually solve the economy. It's not just a figment of your imagination.
COURIC: And John McCain made clear he doesn't agree with his old Senate colleague, either.
JOHN MCCAIN: Phil Gramm does not speak for me, I speak for me.
COURIC: After a town meeting in Michigan, Senator McCain was asked if there might be a spot for Gramm in a McCain administration.
McCAIN: I think Senator Gramm would be in serious consideration for ambassador to Belarus.
COURIC: Jeff Greenfield is our CBS News senior political correspondent. Jeff, John McCain and Phil Gramm go way back. Is this a case of loyalty, personal loyalty trumping political strategy?
JEFF GREENFIELD: Well, in fact, John McCain endorsed Gramm for President in '96 and knows that Phil Gramm's passion is economics, which is not John McCain's passion. The problem is what Gramm says about economics is in direct contrast to a lot of what McCain has been arguing about CEO pay and Wall Street greed. Gramm is a passionate deregulator, thinks that this is class warfare. And when your top economic advisor is talking about a nation of whiners when your message this week is "I feel the pain of the average American," not so hot.
COURIC: Yeah, the McCain campaign did not need this. Meanwhile, as you know, one of Barack Obama's allies is having to apologize for something he said about his own candidate. Let's listen to that.
JESSE JACKSON, WHISPERING IN FNC VIDEO (words of text on screen, most of “nuts” bleeped): See, Barack been, um, talking down to black people on this faith based. I want to cut his n_ts off.”
COURIC: Yikes, hand gesture and all. I mean, there's been a lot of talk out there though today in the stratosphere that this might inadvertently help Barack Obama. How so?
GREENFIELD: Well, think back to 1992 when candidate Bill Clinton went after a rap singer, Sister Souljah for anti-white remarks and did it in front of a black audience. It was a signal to some people that Clinton might not be beholden even to a loyal Democratic group, a kind of independent. So here you have Barack Obama trying to argue "look, I'm not the black candidate." Being attacked by kind of a symbol of an older race-based identity-based politician and being attacked for calling on the black community to be more personally responsible. It's the kind of attack I'm sure the Obama campaign would welcome every single day.
COURIC: All right. Jeff Greenfield. Jeff, thanks so much.
—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center





Well, think back to 1992 when candidate Bill Clinton went after a rap singer, Sister Souljah for anti-white remarks and did it in front of a black audience. It was a signal to some people that Clinton might not be beholden even to a loyal Democratic group, a kind of independent. So here you have Barack Obama trying to argue "look, I'm not the black candidate." Being attacked by kind of a symbol of an older race-based identity-based politician and being attacked for calling on the black community to be more personally responsible. It's the kind of attack I'm sure the Obama campaign would welcome every single day.
Six days after ABC's World News fretted over a New Jersey woman who said she must skip breakfast to put $4 a day toward gas, Monday's newscast featured an even more hapless woman, a Massachusetts resident who to afford gas sacrifices a "much needed" $45 prescription, says she can "no longer take joy rides on my days off" and, horror of horrors, has been forced into "buying store brands instead of name brands." Rosaria Giamei complained in a soundbite: "I don't get out and enjoy things anymore. I just kind of sit at home and only go to and from work and, like, grocery shopping and that's it." How about taking a walk or riding a bike?...
The U.S. is not in a recession, but viewers wouldn't know it from watching Good Morning America. In the span of three days, the ABC program has eight times proposed cures in its "Recession Rescue" segment. On June 24 alone, GMA fretted about the "recession" five times. This is despite the fact that America hasn't had one quarter of negative growth, let alone the two necessary for there to be a recession...
DAVID WRIGHT: Good evening, Charlie. This isn't the first time in this race that a top adviser has stepped all over his candidate's message. And for John McCain, it's a serious consideration because the economy is the number one issue for voters. And he has been working hard this week to show people he gets it.
MAN: I think it's way more than just our imagination. It's in our face. And we need help.
JESSE JACKSON, WHISPERING IN FNC VIDEO (words of text on screen, most of “nuts” bleeped): See, Barack been, um, talking down to black people on this faith based. I want to cut his n_ts off.”









Editor at Large

Comments Policy
Juan mc RINO, is bummin me out... Running to LOSE
July 10, 2008 - 22:27 ET by upcountrywaterMcCAIN: I think Senator Gramm would be in serious consideration for ambassador to Belarus.
Why would he quit his REAL job??
You've heard of mental depression. This is a mental recession.
The former Texas Senator enjoys cult status among many fiscal conservatives.
ya got that right.
Liberals62%
IranianUranium
I could not believe McCain
July 11, 2008 - 08:07 ET by motherbeltI could not believe McCain said that in answer to Tumulty's question.
He not only distanced himself from Gramm's remarks, he insulted the man. Real class act, there.
Way to go, John. Was that your nice way of saying Gramm isn't any kind of adviser any more? Another conservative under the bus.
This man continues to infuriate me! He continues to show a complete lack of class and loyalty.
I'm sorry, Sen. McCain, but your POW status is only going to shield you for so long.
Shoot 'em all; let God sort 'em out! - Marge Simpson
I agree
July 11, 2008 - 09:29 ET by mbuelBut we must remember what is really at stake here.
If Obama wins we can forget even coming close to gaining ground in sanity in the supreme court.
Remember Bush's legacy... as much as the man gaffes, he gave us TWO conservative judges who absolutely helped the gun rights issue forever.
If Gore had been elected... who is less liberal than Obama, the ruling would've gone the other way.
If Kerry won... same situation.
That's just ONE issue at stake this election. Not to mention:
1) The end of the Bush tax cut. McCain has promised to extend it. (I know can we trust him?)
2) The promise of NO DRILLING. I think this will be one of the NUMBER ONE issues this fall... it's why some democrats including Obama are starting to change positions to match what voters want. They won't deliver though.
3) The promise of taxes, er I mean "fees" to help stop the globe from warming. While McCain stands the same on this issue, I think once he's in office he won't push it. (I've got to have some hope!)
As for Gramm? I agree with the man completely. The media controls the outlook for the majority of Americans.
I believe Phil Gramm is
July 10, 2008 - 23:00 ET by fitzfongI believe Phil Gramm is right in calling it a "mental recession". It's an election year, the Democrats and their media mouthpieces have been talking down the economy for some time now...purely for political purposes. Now that we've reached a difficult economic period, and it falls during an election year, it serves media and DNC purposes to repeat negative interpretations of every bit of economic news ad nauseum. The cheap "man on the street" stunt is a particularly dishonest technique designed to create the impression that Republicans are either out-of-touch with or benefitting from the demise of "the common man". This is meant to make people think that life is only going to get worse and that the "common man's" only hope is a Democrat sweep in November. When they've totally destroyed the country from within by November, the DNC parrots in the media will seize the opportunity to congratulate the Democrats for making even slight improvements on the utter destruction they created. This is entirely political. I detest Obama, but the more that economic illiterate chastises his intellectual superiors on fiscal matters, the less I like him, and the less likely I will vote for him.
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan
fitzfong.blogspot.com
Exactly, fitz...they talk
July 11, 2008 - 06:34 ET by motherbeltExactly, fitz...they talk "recession" for weeks (months?) then go out and do polls, which are nothing more than "damage assessments" to see if their reporting has worked. Lo and behold: people think we are in a recession!
I really want to know how thy manage to plant in voters' minds that high gas prices are the fault of Republicans, George Bush and Halliburton, when the Democrats took control of Congress two years ago on a promise of "a common sense plan to lower gas prices."
Shoot 'em all; let God sort 'em out! - Marge Simpson
On Target MB
July 11, 2008 - 08:23 ET by HeavyChevyThe Dems been screwing us -and not in a ooh baby call me tommorrow kind of way- since they took over and its still the Repub/conserv fault? By the way where the hell is this mythical beast the Dems called the "common sense plan to lower gas prices." I guess it must have eluded them, but I heard the Dems may be on to bigfoot.
"9 out of 10 doctors agree that flag burning is the number one killer of liberals."
Pelosi's false promises
July 11, 2008 - 09:15 ET by DontFeedTheTrollsHere is Pelosi's own promise that, if elected, the Democrats will use their power as the majority party to lower gas prices. And here is her blaming it all on Bush, now that the Democrats are in the majority.
EDIT: Looks like Michelle Malkin did a nice little chart showing the rise in gas prices since the Democrats took over.
D
Keep the ILLEGALS out, join NumbersUSA to send free faxes to your reps.
Of course, you notice that
July 11, 2008 - 12:42 ET by motherbeltOf course, you notice that Her Speakerness doesn't bother to point out what the price of gas was when she promised that "common sense plan" (it was $2.09 in January 2007 when the Dem congress opened).
I posted a link to MM's chart in another thread yesterday too. Hopefully people who didn't see it then will today.
Shoot 'em all; let God sort 'em out! - Marge Simpson
Need someone to "solve the
July 11, 2008 - 01:19 ET by mattmNeed someone to "solve the economy," Mr. Hussein?
That's easy. All we have to do is repeal all the socialism of the past 75 years.
That would not only "solve the economy" but it would improve every aspect of American society, including education, and we'd never have to endure a presidential candidate moronic enough to use an utterly stupid phrase like "solve the economy."
Ya left out 'lofty.'
July 11, 2008 - 09:09 ET by pbanks7My first reaction to "solve the economy" was "What?" The second was that this is a typical "lofty ideal" statement from the Obamessiah. We're going to solve the economy, unify the country, have world peace and free health care. Blah blah blah lalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalala.......
MSM - shaping all the perceptions you need to believe, then confirming it with a poll.
"Change" Definition: "All that will be left in our pocket..."
July 11, 2008 - 09:31 ET by Hunter12I think the "Change" Obama is chanting refers to what will be left in our pockets after he placates the idiots who voted for him if he gets elected president.
"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last." - Sir Winston Churchill
Breakfast for $4?!? I can
July 11, 2008 - 01:43 ET by HermanoBreakfast for $4?!?
I can buy a box of cereal and a gallon of milk for under $7 and the cereal and milk will last a t least five days. Add to it $0.10 for a tea bag and breakfast costs me $1.50. Add a banana and some grapes and I still haven't made it to $2.
I think we are all aware that prices are going up. We simply need to make wise purchasing decisions when this happens. Recession though? We still do not have even one quarter of economic contraction and the MSM has been preaching we are in a recession for well over a year now. Psychological? Oh yeah.
John McCain will lose this election.
July 11, 2008 - 05:37 ET by JWFHe has to reply to remarks from Phil Gramm? We have not had a single negative quarter of growth. Yea, we squeaked by the last couple of quarters. But it counts. We have 95% of the people that want a job, they have a job. People are losing their homes. But they still have their jobs. Phil Gramm is dead on. The MSM are in a full on war to discredit the current administration, and John McCain is catching the flak and is playing their game.
In the meantime, Mr. gaffe himself, Barack nmn Obama is again telling us what to do. He is not even President and making demands on what we should be doing. Now he wants us to learn Spanish. NO! I will not learn Spanish. Nor will I have a dialogue about race, or change my themostat, or get rid of my SUV, or stop eating foods I enjoy. STOP TELLING ME WHAT TO DO! YOU ARE NOT THE PRESIDENT YET!
Half of the people in this country pay no taxes at all and BHO is teaching them that you can vote in entitlements you don't have to pay for. We'll get the rich to pay for it. The rich did not get rich by being stupid. They will leave the country, hide their money, or dig in, wait it out and simply stop producing.
John McCain is doing nothing to counter this, instead he is backing away from a smart man telling the truth. It is insane.
Sen. Gramm is correct as
July 11, 2008 - 06:20 ET by ConservativeRexSen. Gramm is correct as usual. This country reminds me of ol' Milk Drop Moore I worked with more than 30 years ago. Ol' Milk Drop would show up for work looking fit as a fiddle. Since we were young smart-asses at the time, one of us would ask ol' Milk Drop how he was feeling. He usually started off by saying just fine thank you. Well, about the fifth one of us asking Ol' Milk Drop how he felt would get Milk Drop to thinking. Then one of us would throw in a " Milk Drop you look a little peaked", before you knew it ol' Milk Drop would start complaining that he didn't feel all that well. Well, before long Milk Drop would be telling the boss man that he'd have to go home as he was feeling mighty poor. And us knowing all along there was absolutely nothing wrong with him.
Same way with this economy and this country. You tell 'em long enough on how bad it/they is/are presto, they are sure enough bad.
Mental recession, too bad
July 11, 2008 - 10:08 ET by dscottMental recession, too bad Senator Gramm didn't "refine" that remark to say the Dems and their mouthpieces, the MSM propagandizing to hide the failed liberal policies with negative results for those who tried them. There is no national recession, there is however pockets of local and sector recession - all of them controlled by liberals.
1. The print side of the MSM is undergoing massive layoffs and companies are verging on bankruptcy, they claim of course it's the economy or the internet competition. We all know it's neither, it's their failed business model of being mouthpieces for the Dem party. Capitalism punishes mediocre and sloppy products, that's why Socialism is popular to losers.
2. California is experiencing high unemployment, EL Centro is 19.2% and Yuma, AZ next door is 17.6% (most of AZ is less than 4%). Again, due to the failed liberal policies of open boarders, sanctuary cities, high taxes, AGW laws and welfare. 19.2% is not a recession, it's a friggin depression! Displacing low skilled citizens (who then go on welfare) in favor of low skilled foreigners is the height of stupidity.
3. Michigan is experiencing high unemployment and the car manufacturers are closing plants. Wonder Why? Failed liberal policy of deliberately raising fuel prices by restraining supply. Duh! This on top of high taxation and years of unions extorting money from the car companies under the guise of sharing the profits (killing the goose that laid the golden egg).
4. Donations to charities and non profits like PBS are off, not due to the economy but to Dems siphoning money for their media campaigns to get Obama elected. You wonder why Obama is forgoing public financing? Where do you really think the money came from? Liberals are statistically proven to be known tight wads when it comes to giving, they redirected their resources to something far less beneficial. Nothing new there.
This is just to name a few.
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.
Here's a nice example of
July 11, 2008 - 10:11 ET by dscottHere's a nice example of point #1, McClatchy stock is still diving. At this rate, in a month or two it will be a penny stock worthy of delisting from the NYSE, it was already delisted from the Russell 1000 index.
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.
"Meanwhile, on the CBS
July 11, 2008 - 08:36 ET by ckc1227"Meanwhile, on the CBS Evening News after a look at Gramm/McCain,
Jeff Greenfield suggested that Jesse Jackson's violent intentions
toward Barack Obama -- “I want to cut his nuts off” -- will benefit
Obama:"
I agree. Anything that distances Obama from Jackson can only be a good thing. The comment certainly isn't going to hurt Obama.
Interesting email I got
July 11, 2008 - 10:51 ET by dscottInteresting email I got from the McCain campaign:
McCain's economic program, coincidental with distancing himself from Gramm's comment?
http://www.johnmccain.com/economicbriefing/
He has some ideas but also says some vague things that leave a sickening feeling in the pit of my stomach, euphemisms frequently do that to me.
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.
Single mother Caroline
July 11, 2008 - 09:44 ET by Hunter12Single mother Caroline Saunders wrote to us from New Jersey." He read aloud from her e-mail with her quote on screen: "I now skip breakfast to save the extra $4 per day. That gives me an extra $20 added to my gas budget."...
I may be wrong, but this sounds like a fast food item, picked up and eaten on the way to work, while driving through rush hour traffic. I think I've seen this woman, waving an Egg McMuffie in one hand, cup of coffee in the other, steering with her knee, with her cell phone cradled between her shoulder and one of her chins, complaining to a friend that her derriere is expanding as she cuts you off in traffic.
"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last." - Sir Winston Churchill
Gramm stepped in it
July 11, 2008 - 10:36 ET by CrashGramm stepped in it plain and simple, that's why he isn't running for president.
NEWSFLASH: This is an election year and politicians should know better than to say what's on their mind.
On another foot, did the MSM pick up Obama's dumb American's should "learn to speak Spanish" or "Merci beaucoup” bit?
$4 breakfast?
July 11, 2008 - 11:02 ET by SpikerI agree with how ridiculous that is. You know she feels deprived not hitting the drive thru for some junk every morning. Along with a box of cereal, there's also the option of a dozen eggs for under $2. Hard boiled eggs are a quick and nutritious breakfast. I think a lot of people are used to eating out constantly, and don't realize just how expensive that is. Don't even get me started on the $7 Starbucks every morning that people just can't "live" without!
MSM Sets the table...
July 11, 2008 - 11:09 ET by AmericanEnergist...and Senator Gramm cleans it off.
Think about the majority of the MSM headlines over the past 7 1/2 years: no matter the TRUE state of the economy, they called it the 'Bush Ressession', not meeting 'Wall Street estimates' and 'the economy only created 105,000 jobs this month'. You get the picture.
Now, with much of the population completely indoctrinated that we are doomed, Senator Gramm calls us 'whiners'. Who could blame Mr. & Mrs. J. Q. Public? Hearing the 'bad' news for over seven years can take its toll on a psyche.
Leave it to the MSM to play both sides of the argument - a damned if you do/damned if you don't position. These hand-wringers need a slap of reality that most Americans are more positive than they care to report. Personally, I think the MSM may have gotten to Senator Gramm; he seems to believe that the whole US population is on the brink of mass-suicide.
Note to MSM and clueless politicians: we are doing fine, but will do better if you get a clue - and fast!
Mike
www.ArmchairEnergist...
Gramm was right but he
July 11, 2008 - 12:17 ET by Chris NormanGramm was right but he shouldn't have said it. It plays right into the Democrats hands as portraying the GOP as callous to human economuc misery. You just can't call people whiners - it sounds too much like Jimmy Carters "national malaise". Gramm, as an ex-Senator should know this. It seems like every week, political types, who should no better, say something that hurts the campaigns. I just don't get it.
McNotObama '08
I have to disagree with
July 11, 2008 - 14:26 ET by fitzfongI have to disagree with you, Chris. The real problem is that Republicans have turned gutless. Many are frankly incompetent when it comes to articulating conservative principles. They simply assume that their inability to get conservative messages across to the average American is down to one of two things: 1) an intellectual deficiency on the part of the average American, or 2) that conservative economic policy is not "realistic". Either way, the "leadership" of the Republican Party has surrendered the argument on the economy to the ill-meaning socialists in the media and the Democratic Party. The real problem is that too many of our elected Washington Republicans are either economically illiterate or they're so afraid that their words will get twisted that they act like a bunch of cowards, sticking to a phony populist position. John McCain is an abysmal Presidential candidate. He knows nothing about economics. Phil Gramm made a perfectly accurate comment, and instead of supporting his surrogate and further pushing the argument, McCain runs away from it like a guy avoiding responsibility for an SBD fart. McCain may have been a war hero, but he's a disgrace as a Senator and an embarrassment as a Presidental nominee.
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan
fitzfong.blogspot.com
I know what you're saying,
July 11, 2008 - 15:08 ET by Chris NormanI know what you're saying, Fitz, but in politics, making controversial statements like Gramm's - no matter the correctness of the statement - is a distraction that no campaign needs. I know that the GOP is gutless, but they are gutless in deed as well as words - deeds being the more important. I just don't think using the word "whiners", was helpful or showed guts, particularly. Rather, it showed carelessness. Gramm has been around long enough to know how words can be twisted by the other side and he should have been more careful how he phrased it.
As far as McCain goes, yes, I know he's not a great candidate. By no means was he on my list of choices - for that matter, no one running really was, except for Thompson, and he disappointingly proved to be not up for the race. However, McCain is the nominee and I will take him over Obama anyday. Hell, I'd have taken Hillary over Obama. I will not willingly let Obama get in to destroy everything in sight just to send a message of my unhappiness to the GOP. I am a diehard conservative, but not a scorched earth conservative.
McNotObama '08
Chris, I appreciate what
July 11, 2008 - 17:24 ET by fitzfongChris, I appreciate what you're saying, but I still disagree. The Republicans are not going to make any friends in the media...no matter what they say. At this point, they need to stop trying to get a fair shake from the media. They won't get it. And McCain publicly chastising Phil Gramm just makes the media more relevant than they should be. The Republican Party needs to realize that it is essentially going to have to go around the media to get its message out there. Quit alienating your base and appeasing the "Inside Washington" brigade by showing up on Meet the Press, the Situation Room and Face the Nation to dance around hostile questions. Start finding alternative venues to show your conservative audience that you are there. Instead of throwing Phil Gramm under the bus for "moderates" and "independents" who won't vote for him anyway, McCain should have positively clarified Gramm's statement for conservative audiences to show that he gives a rat's a** about them and about conservative fiscal policy. You must take for granted that the media is going to twist your words...because that's what they do. Then you go on the offensive...appealing to your base. That's what Democrats do.
Whenever a Democrat says something that causes general hand-wringing, the machine goes to work to turn the mirror back on the accuser. Remember the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth? They made a lot of accusations about John Kerry that he could not credibly deny...so the Democrats turned Kerry into the victim and the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth into the liars...digging up personal dirt in an effort to discredit them, etc. After a while, the term "Swift Boating" was crafted to imply a false accusation. Remember how Jim McGreevey put the lives of the citizens of New Jersey in jeopardy by hiring his boyfriend to a Homeland Security position to cover up his gay extramarital affair? By the time his resignation press conference had taken place, his demise was our fault because we weren't ready to accept a "Gay American" as a Governor. For God's sake, Clinton managed to make himself the victim of every scandal he orchestrated. Democrats go to work turning intemperate behavior and remarks into base-rallying gold. McCain Republicans apologize to the general public...on our behalf, mind you...for accurate remarks that media twists for the other party's benefit. McCain should quit trying to get the media to like him and start getting those of us who sacrifice and keep America working to like him.
As I see it, if the Democrats win both Houses of Congress again...as, incredibly, is being predicted...it really isn't going to matter who's elected President. McCain will be neutered (for which he'll have himself to thank), the Democrats will get their way...and the Republicans will be blamed for the failures. If not caring whether McCain wins or loses is "scorched earth", screw McCain. It's time the party filed bankruptcy and reorganized under competent management.
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan
fitzfong.blogspot.com
I understand what you're
July 11, 2008 - 18:23 ET by Chris NormanI understand what you're saying. You're right in your appraisals. However, Gramm could have said exactly the same thing, without giving them the rope to hang him. It's a fantasy of mine too, for the GOP to field a candidate who pulls no punches - but this nominee isn't the guy. With the lackadaisical campaign he's running, this kind of comment from an advisor was sure to turn around and bite them in the butt. My opinion on this is based on this campaign and this nominee. I don't think he will win unless he miraculously changes into a different candidate (however, I thought the same thing about Bush i and II and i was wrong). I still plan on dutifully voting for him, as I did for Ford, Dole, Bush I, etc. We keep complaining about McCain, but face it: no star power conservative ran this time and, for the life of me, I can't name one conservative politician who could've run who could've won the general election this time. Can you? Without a strong and inspiring conservative in the race, McCain won by default. He won it fair and square and, unfortunately, is the nominee. I'll vote for him in the small hope of keeping Obama out and the Democrats from owning the political landscape completely. What I'm worried about is there are really no future conservative stars waiting in the bullpen. People here toss out names but I don't see any of them as having a chance of aspiring to anything other than congressmen. I have some hopes for Bobby Jindahl in the future, but, as of right now, there are no Ronald Reagans out there.
McNotObama '08
Chris, I don't think we
July 12, 2008 - 00:12 ET by fitzfongChris, I don't think we necessarily have to have heard of the next Reagan yet. One of the strange things about the Republican Party is that there's often a "wait your turn" mentality when it comes to future Presidents. We expect our next nominee to be a high-profile Senator or a big state Governor that we all know. The Democrats, on the other hand, often seize on the candidate who has "it". JFK was a young Senator. If you knew Bill Clinton before 1992, you were either from Arkansas or you saw him get booed at the 1988 DNC. How long was BO a Senator before he ran for President? 3 Months? The stars are out there for the Republican Party...they just need to be allowed to cut in line ahead of the established leadership.
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan
fitzfong.blogspot.com
Gramm's Fairy Tales!
July 11, 2008 - 12:36 ET by Jack BauerSPOT THE DIFFERENCE?
Mr Gramm, you have your opinion. But this is an election, not an economic debating society.
So with the greatest respect on your knowledge of the quarterly cycles of recessions, please engage brain pre-mouth, unless you have something to uplift and inspire.
I assume you want your candidate to defeat the socialist Obama, and to inspire citizens to vote for your candidate.
To be honest, he ain't doing that great with your help.
Pa Ingalls
July 11, 2008 - 19:41 ET by GrannyGrump42Pa Ingalls is spinning in his grave. Read the "Little House" books for a little perspective.
Laura's first doll was a corn cob wrapped in a hankie; no box full of the offerings of Toys R Us. Ma made her a rag doll out of scraps and Laura treasured it.
Grasshoppers ate one crop just as it was coming ripe, and the next crop just as it came out of the ground. Pa put on his patched boots and walked east until he found an area that hadn't been hit by the plague of locusts and worked, spending weeks away from his family.
The trains couldn't run all through the long winter of 1888. There was no coal. There was no wood. The families in town twisted hay into "sticks" to heat their homes and cook their meals. There was nothing to eat but seed wheat, which two young men risked their lives to get.
And all of this was just how life was.
Now, if you can't afford a $4 coffee as you roll to the office in air-conditioned comfort, you whine about how hard life is.