FNC's Brit Hume led his Wednesday night “Grapevine” segment by marveling that though “you might have thought it was big news Tuesday when the administration reported to Congress that Iraq had made satisfactory progress on 15 of 18 political benchmarks set by the U.S.,” up from progress on only eight a year earlier, “the Media Research Center says there was not a word about the report on the CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News or ABC's World News Tonight.”
Hume added that “the New York Times also ignored the story, and the Washington Post relegated its coverage to page eight,” before he expressed astonishment at the AP's spin:
And this -- and I'm not making this up -- is how the Associated Press began its story on the report: “No matter who's elected President in November, his foreign policy team will have to deal with...the slow pace with which the government in Baghdad operates.”
Indeed, that is how the July 1 AP dispatch by Washington, DC-based reporter Anne Flaherty began, though it was headlined on Yahoo and elsewhere: “New Iraq report: 15 of 18 benchmarks satisfactory.”
Wednesday's Boston Globe, however, put a headline over Flaherty's article which better reflected her lead: “Baghdad makes progress at achingly slow pace.” The subhead for the AP story on page A-2 of the July 2 newspaper: “US declares efforts 'satisfactory' on 15 of 18 benchmarks.”
My Tuesday night NewsBusters/Wednesday MRC CyberAlert item, “Hume Correctly Predicts Only FNC Would Report Progress in Iraq,” recounted:
After leading Tuesday's Special Report with how "last year the administration reported satisfactory progress on only about eight of 18 benchmarks" while this year, in a report disclosed Tuesday, the administration determined "there has been satisfactory progress on 15 of the 18," FNC's Brit Hume doubted "word of this progress is going to get through" to the public as he predicted: "I suspect that this broadcast tonight -- and maybe some others on this channel -- are the only ones who are going to make a headline out of this. This is not going to be a big story elsewhere."Indeed, neither the CBS Evening News nor NBC Nightly News mentioned Iraq while on ABC's World News anchor Charles Gibson read a short update about "increasing dangers for U.S. troops in Afghanistan" since "in the month of June there were 28 American fatalities in Afghanistan, just one less than died in Iraq last month." CNN's Anderson Cooper 360 was also silent Tuesday night about the benchmarks....
I also held out hope the ABC, CBS and NBC evening newscasts might catch up on Wednesday night: “The assessment of the benchmarks broke late Tuesday afternoon, so there's a chance others will catch up on Wednesday, particularly ABC's World News which was the only broadcast network evening newscast to notice benchmark achievements back in January and February.”
They all let me down. The MRC's Brad Wilmouth has informed me there was “nothing about the benchmarks tonight [Wednesday] on ABC, CBS or NBC.” (Brad's toiling at the MRC while I enjoy a few days by a lake in New Hampshire.)
Full transcript of Hume's lead “Grapevine” item on the Wednesday, July 2 Special Report with Brit Hume:
You might have thought it was big news Tuesday when the administration reported to Congress that Iraq had made satisfactory progress on 15 of 18 political benchmarks set by the U.S. Just last year, there was said to be progress on only eight of those benchmarks, and war critics have repeatedly cited the lack of political progress in their arguments against the troop surge. But the Media Research Center says there was not a word about the report on the CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News or ABC's World News Tonight. The New York Times also ignored the story, and the Washington Post relegated its coverage to page eight.
And this -- and I'm not making this up -- is how the Associated Press began its story on the report: "No matter who's elected President in November, his foreign policy team will have to deal with...the slow pace with which the government in Baghdad operates."
—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center





You might have thought it was big news Tuesday when the administration reported to Congress that Iraq had made satisfactory progress on 15 of 18 political benchmarks set by the U.S. Just last year, there was said to be progress on only eight of those benchmarks, and war critics have repeatedly cited the lack of political progress in their arguments against the troop surge. But the Media Research Center says there was not a word about the report on the CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News or ABC's World News Tonight. The New York Times also ignored the story, and the Washington Post relegated its coverage to page eight.










Editor at Large

Comments Policy
Brent.... I heard the
July 3, 2008 - 02:44 ET by bigtimerBrent....
I heard the Grapevine tonight...I was tickled at the report by Brit...
What is past sad is we all knew this is what the rest of the msm would do...ignore the good news...
What is worse for me, is the absolute disrespect it shows out military and the President.
It is past infuriating really...it is treasonous to me because it is agenda driven...they could give a rats rear less if we are making progress or have a Victory...let alone the freedom of the Iraqi's and the progress their army has made..heck they are in even in al Sadr's area now, Basra I thik it is... and have control of it.
I also said I only thought Fox would report this....
Despicable really...but I am ashamed for the msm, for all the good that will do...especially with Independence Day coming in two days.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
Don't waste your time being
July 3, 2008 - 07:01 ET by motherbeltDon't waste your time being embarrassed for them bt....they are completely shameless.
Shoot 'em all; let God sort 'em out! - Marge Simpson
Crunch Time?
July 3, 2008 - 08:24 ET by BacchusThe tv network news departments regularly fail to meet simple benchmarks for journalistic integrity. But I think it's crunch time. They used to enjoy a monopoly - they must still think they do - but their lies and omissions are increasingly harder to cover up. In the print media, the lefty newspapers are all cutting news staff -- boo-hoo. Agenda news, supported by lies and omissions, simply doesn't sell.
"About Me" from my profile
July 3, 2008 - 09:17 ET by jpatch"Free thinking patriot who thinks that most people have problems putting things in historical context, and that the MSM is becoming an active, evolving, and calculating enemy of the United States."
I guess I need to erase the word "becoming".
Let's keep up the good fight, we can win this yet. They can't hide the truth forever, no matter how hard they try.
Media Research
July 3, 2008 - 15:46 ET by TruthMongerMedia Research Center?!?!?!?
never heard of em
lunatic right wing swift boaters or something...?
Fox News
July 3, 2008 - 03:23 ET by ambyThe great Fox News. Is this the same Fox News that featured photos of the two New York Times reporters on July 2 that were digitally altered -- the journalists' teeth had been
yellowed, their facial features greatly exaggerated, and one had portions of his hair moved further back on his head? This speaks volumes as to the ethical and accurate reporting of Fox News.
OK Amby...
July 3, 2008 - 04:47 ET by 3strikespost a link. Not saying that it didn't happen, but since every Foxnews screw up is blasted by the rest of the media, I would like to see it and judge it for myself.
Is this the best argument against this story that you can come up with? That was a nice red herring you threw there. You can't argue the merits of the article so you attempt to discredit the article by discrediting the organization that produced the article.
By your own standards we could discredit everything that is reported at CBS, Reuters, and well pretty much every news organization as well as blog that espouses your ideology.
Figuring this was yet-another drive-by lefty
July 3, 2008 - 05:08 ET by sarcasmoWho is uninterested in debate, I dug around and found this. Looks like Media Matters nailed 'em legitimately this time, and the Faux photoshop-job wasn't even all that good. And it's all for a dumb story about Fox's declining ratings...Uh, Fox Newsdroids, maybe of you'd focus a bit more on (gasp!) actual journalism instead of your increasing BS & fluff habit, you'd have less need to worry about low-ratings-stories in the first place?? Nah, couldn't be, it sounds too simple...
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
I didn't look at Media
July 3, 2008 - 05:31 ET by bamananaI didn't look at Media Matters, but-- F&F said during its broadcast this was photoshopped. So, great job "busting" 'em. This has nothing to do with nobody but Fox reporting on this
I agree that it has nothing to do with this story
July 3, 2008 - 05:38 ET by sarcasmoBut I have long been tired of Fox News fluff, and photoshopping definitely qualifies as fluff, IMO. I'm sure they admitted photoshopping the poodle-stuff since that was obvious, but did they admit photoshopping everything, since that's apparently what they did? I didn't see the actual story.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
C'mon Amby
July 3, 2008 - 05:45 ET by expatriotSarc,
There is a lot of fluff on some of the Fox shows and we all will admit that. I will even go so far as to postulate that some of the news anchors are center left leaning and show their biases. Sheppard Smith comes to mind. With that aside, Amby is truly throwing a red herring out here and this discussion is tracking away from the thread. No one else is admitting that things are improving in Iraq and progress is being made. That is except Fox.
That's fine
July 3, 2008 - 05:49 ET by sarcasmoI'm still curious if they admitted to all the photoshopping, and suspicious that they didn't. I don't watch them all enough to monitor relative Iraq-coverage, so let's just assume NB's right on that issue.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
Deal
July 3, 2008 - 06:00 ET by expatriotI did not see the episode so I cannot comment with any authority. I can agree to assume NB being right and let it flow from there.
Fox and Friends
July 3, 2008 - 05:39 ET by DontFeedTheTrollsFox and Friends is not a straight news show. Media Matters is a smear site. If you can't tell the difference, you shouldn't watch TV or use the internet. Enough whining.
D
Keep the ILLEGALS out, join NumbersUSA to send free faxes to your reps.
That same excuse
July 3, 2008 - 05:45 ET by sarcasmoWorks for Olberloon, The View, and all sorts of other NB-targets. 1 standard.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
I am curious, are you
July 3, 2008 - 09:21 ET by BDI am curious, are you similarly outraged by the end of show humor segment that Brit Hume does on SPecial Report? They usually will show a few seconds of Jimmy Kimmels show or a humourous outtake from a press conference.
I personnlly think it is ia nice way to end the tension of the show.
Where's the "outrage"?
July 3, 2008 - 09:33 ET by sarcasmoI'd just prefer less fluff, as I've repeatedly-said. And a well-deliniated humor segment isn't the same as photoshopping with or without fully informing the audience of it. What happened to the hike??
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
My four year old can only
July 3, 2008 - 09:52 ET by BDMy four year old can only go so far before she sits down and wants me to carry her. We got back in last night.
I imagine over time she will go furhter and further, but now is not the time.
so because it is on media
July 3, 2008 - 06:05 ET by Ryan Mc.so because it is on media matters web site we automatically accept it? Sorry, not me. I actually believe the accusation less now than before the media matters link was posted.
The other problem is that Fox could have shown the pictures on a story about another news outlet altering the pictures or part of a late night skit and media matters would never mention it. They have no credibility so I won't consider anything they say. When Osama has a new video I react the same way I do to media matters, more propoganda, more lies.
I'm not a photo expert, but
July 3, 2008 - 07:10 ET by motherbeltI'm not a photo expert, but to me those photos look like it was a bad job of resizing, causing them to elongate...both faces are noticably thinner and longer, and the "hair moved back" is not moved back on the forehead, but stretched up at the crown.
Of course, even that could be deliberate, I suppose.
Just sayin....
Shoot 'em all; let God sort 'em out! - Marge Simpson
why amby why didn't you add..........
July 3, 2008 - 11:32 ET by larry on LI............slanty eyes and spectacle glasses,while you were at it.a newby troll me thinks.27 weeks,first post i've seen.
i hope i didn't offend anyone,hee heee
why amby why didn't you add..........
July 3, 2008 - 11:33 ET by larry on LI............slanty eyes and spectacle glasses,while you were at it.a newby troll me thinks.27 weeks,first post i've seen.
i hope i didn't offend anyone,hee heee
why amby why didn't you add..........
July 3, 2008 - 11:33 ET by larry on LI............slanty eyes and spectacle glasses,while you were at it.a newby troll me thinks.27 weeks,first post i've seen.
i hope i didn't offend anyone,hee heee
the MRC nailed it again. Apparently Brit pays attention here?
July 3, 2008 - 08:35 ET by c5thenFNC is heads and shoulders above all the other "news" networks just because they actually report ALL the news, instead of editing out the parts they don't like.
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Alan Keyes '08.
Just wait until Obama funds
July 3, 2008 - 10:04 ET by gopsteveJust wait until Obama finds a way to shut down FOX and the radio...then it will all be over
Gopsterver...I think the Constitution will stop that One....
July 3, 2008 - 23:20 ET by JayTeeObama couldn't win a Flatulating contest in a Mexican Church.....3 weeks after eating refried Tacos.
He's a Loser...and ONLY the MSM sees him as a Winner.....see banner Below..Don't beleive what you see, on ABSee
The Republican Revolution will not be Televised
The AP is totally retarded.
July 3, 2008 - 22:02 ET by needleThe AP may call Baghdad’s pace slow, but the AP is totally retarded.
Impunitas semper ad deteriora invitat.
Watch IRAQ DRILL their Way out of a Recession..
July 3, 2008 - 22:56 ET by JayTeeCongress is NOT smarter than a 5th Grader....
If MORE GOLD is discovered, will the Price Drop ?
If MORE intelligent people run for Office, Will Pelosi Drop her Eyelids ?
WINNING A WAR, AND NOT BEING TELEVISED ON THE MSM IS ABSOLUTELY THE *&*^^% THING I HAVE EVER $#@%$ ING SEEN !!!
It's unbelievable, what the USA has as a NEWS media....CLICK.
End of message.
The Republican Revolution will not be Televised
Yup JT..
July 3, 2008 - 23:23 ET by upcountrywaterAnd if they keep taxes low, man oh man what a powerful economy will be formed there.. Look at Hong Kong.. low taxes NO NATURAL resourses... ( well before the commies took over) boom town..
I'd like to open a bar in Bagdad .. call it... Booze, Boobs & Boar..
Well maybe not this year ..Pork and beer, and hooters... just might bug em..
Liberals62%
IranianUranium