35% of Democrats see pro Obama bias. That's a remarkable figure, considering most Democrats will support Obama.  It supports the near unassailable contentions that on air media bias today is unprecedented.

One can argue that in the depths of Watergate the media displayed tremendous emnity towards Nixon. But even in those days, there were professional standards for reporting. 

Now the network “newsmen” are former party hacks. Tim Russert and Chris Matthews at NBC, Chris Cuomo and George Stephanopolous at ABC. Diane Sawyer, although she worked for Richard Nixon has done a very good job of remaking herself as a liberal Democrat. The advocacy is open and unabashed now. I don’t think these “journalists” even realize it. 

This is a little old and a little long from Ken Blackwell but worth reading from Ken Blackwell - Columnist for the New York Sun and former Ohio Secretary of State.

  
  It's an amazing time to be alive in America . We're in a year of firsts in this presidential election: the first viable woman candidate; the first viable African-American candidate; and, a candidate who is the first front-running freedom fighter over 70. The next president of America will be a first.
 We won't truly be in an election of firsts, however, until we judge every candidate by where they stand. We won't arrive where we should be until we no longer talk about skin color or gender. Now that Barack Obama steps to the front of the Democratic field, we need to stop talking about his race, and start talking about his policies and his politics.
 The reality is this: Though the Democrats will not have a nominee until August, unless Hillary Clinton drops out, Mr. Obama is now the frontrunner, and its time America takes a closer and deeper look at him. Some pundits are calling him the next John F. Kennedy. He's not. He's the next George McGovern. And it's time people learned the facts.
 Because the truth is that Mr. Obama is the single most liberal senator in the entire U.S. Senate. He is more liberal than Ted Kennedy, Bernie Sanders, or Mrs. Clinton.    Never in my life have I seen a presidential frontrunner whose rhetoric is so far removed from his record. Walter Mondale promised to raise our taxes, and he lost. George McGovern promised military weakness, and he lost. Michael Dukakis promised a liberal domestic agenda, and he lost. Yet Mr. Obama is promising all those things, and he's not behind in the polls. Why? Because the press has dealt with him as if he were in a beauty pageant..  Mr. Obama talks about getting past party, getting past red and blue, to lead the United States of America . But let's look at the more defined strokes of who he is underneath this superficial "beauty." 
 Start with national security, since the president's most important duties are as commander-in-chief. Over the summer, Mr. Obama talked about invading Pakistan, a nation armed with nuclear weapons; meeting without preconditions with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who vows to destroy Israel and create another Holocaust; and Kim Jong II, who is murdering and starving his people, but emphasized that the nuclear option was off the table against terrorists - something no president has ever taken off the table since we created nuclear weapons in the 1940s. Even Democrats who have worked in national security condemned all of those remarks. Mr Obama is a foreign-policy novice who would put our national security at risk.
 Next, consider economic policy. For all its faults, our health care system is the strongest in the world. And free trade agreements, created by Bill Clinton as well as President Bush, have made more goods more affordable so that even people of modest means can live a life that no one imagined a generation ago. Yet Mr. Obama promises to raise taxes on "the rich." How to fix Social Security? Raise taxes. How to fix Medicare? Raise taxes. Prescription drugs? Raise taxes. Free college? Raise taxes. Socialize medicine? Raise taxes. His solution to everything is to have government take it over. Big Brother on steroids, funded by your paycheck
 Finally, look at the social issues. Mr. Obama had the audacity to open a stadium rally by saying, "All praise and glory to God!" but says that Christian leaders speaking for life and marriage have "hijacked" - hijacked - Christianity. He is pro-partial birth abortion, and promises to appoint Supreme Court justices who will rule any restriction on it unconstitutional. He espouses the abortion views of Margaret Sanger, one of the early advocates of racial cleansing. His spiritual leaders endorse homosexual marriage, and he is moving in that direction. In Illinois , he refused to vote against a statewide ban - ban - on all handguns in the state. These are radical left, Hollywood , and San Francis co values, not Middle America values.
 The real Mr. Obama is an easy target for the general election. Mrs. Clinton is a far tougher opponent. But Mr. Obama could win if people don't start looking behind his veneer and flowery speeches. His vision of "bringing America together" means saying that those who disagree with his agenda for America are hijackers or warmongers. Uniting the country means adopting his liberal agenda and abandoning any conflicting beliefs. 
 But right now everyone is talking about how eloquent of a speaker he is and - yes - they're talking about his race. Those should never be the factors on which we base our choice for president Mr. Obama's radical agenda sets him far outside the American mainstream, to the left of Mrs. Clinton.
 It's time to talk about the real Barack Obama. In an election of firsts, let's first make sure we elect the person who is qualified to be our president in a nuclear age during a global civilizational war.
  
Subject: Kind of scary, wouldn't you think Remember--"God is good, and is in time, on time,every  time."
 According to The Book of Revelations the anti-christ is:
 The anti-christ will be a man, in his 40s, of MUSLIM descent, who will deceive the nations with persuasive language, and have a MASSIVE Christ-like appeal....the prophecy says that people will flock to him and he will promise false hope and world peace, and when he is in power, will destroy everything.    Is this anti-christ,.......... OBAMA??
 I STRONGLY URGE each one of you to repost with this email as many times as you can!  Each opportunity that you have to send it to a friend or media outlet...do it!  If you think I am crazy,.  I'm sorry but I refuse to take a chance on the "unknown" candidate.

Bruzilla: Hillary Clinton has been one of the most disreputable people in our political history.

Sometime in the spring of 2007, I noticed that Hillary's Wikipedia entry had a "Controversies" section. There were around 16 entries - some were joint with Bill, but others were hers alone. Then I checked Bill's entry along with the other recent presidents. The most any of them had was around 8.

Don't bother looking for that section now - it's been scrubbed.

A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.
- George Bernard Shaw, 1944