Weeks before Linda Douglass announced she would be jumping aboard the Barack Obama presidential campaign as a senior strategist, the former CBS News and ABC News Washington correspondent was already aiding the Obama campaign. Back on the May 4 Reliable Sources on CNN, for instance, she became defensive: “I hate to keep being in the position of defending Barack Obama...” Yet that's exactly what she did on a panel with Amy Holmes and Joan Walsh. On that Sunday, the weekend after Obama held a press conference to denounce Jeremiah Wright, she pronounced media attention on Wright to have “been too much” and contended: “To make your judgments about how to cast a vote for President based upon the statements of this pastor seems to be a bridge too far.”
After host Howard Kurtz played a clip of Bill Moyers complaining that “white preachers are given leeway in politics that others aren't,” Douglass agreed: “That is actually a point that we should be discussing,” as she contended “Republican candidates have routinely associated themselves with white pastors who have made similarly incendiary statements.” As to attention to how Obama does not (at that time) wear a flag pin, a flustered Douglass countered:
I hate to keep being in the position of defending Barack Obama, but on this question, John McCain does not wear a flag pin. Hillary Clinton does not wear a flag pin. And yet questions about his patriotism come up all the time...
No wonder the Obama team saw Douglass as an ally.
My earlier NB posting: “Douglass Joins Obama's Campaign, Reported from Left at ABC & CBS.”
Excerpts from the May 4 Reliable Sources, brought to my attention by the MRC's Clay Waters, Editor of our TimesWatch site on the New York Times:
KURTZ: Short answer from everyone. Linda Douglass, the media have treated this as a huge story that could sink Barack Obama's candidacy. Are journalists going overboard here?LINDA DOUGLASS, CONTRIBUTING EDITOR, NATIONAL JOURNAL: Well, it's a legitimate issue because it certainly raises questions about his judgment. However, you know, as Robin Toner in the New York Times wrote this morning, there's a fixation on this. It has been the number one story, and I think that it has been too much.
….
KURTZ: Linda Douglass, the press loves to get into the character game. What does this tell us about Barack Obama's values? Is that fair? This was, after all, somebody with whom he was associated for 20 years.
DOUGLASS: Well, this was the pastor of his church. And this was a guy who came to Christianity by virtue of going to this church. He had this lifelong search for who he was. He was an African- American guy with a white mother, white grandparents, grew up in Hawaii, went to Indonesia looking for himself. And he found himself, if you read his autobiography, in this church where he became a Christian. So in that sense, that association is somewhat relevant. But I have to say that to make your judgments about how to cast a vote for President based upon the statements of this pastor seems to be a bridge too far.
….
KURTZ: Well, Bill Moyers took a lot of criticism from me, among others, for not pressing Reverend Wright in a full hour on many of his most controversial statements. Now, he talked about this on his PBS show on Friday, and he did say that there were some offensive comments -- which he hadn't say earlier -- that there was this absurd charge by Reverend Wright about the U.S. government having manufactured the AIDS virus to kill blacks. Here's some of what else Moyers had to stay.
VIDEO CLIP OF BILL MOYERS ON PBS'S BILL MOYERS JOURNAL: This is crazy and wrong. White preachers are given leeway in politics that others aren't. All the rest of us should hang our heads in shame for letting it come to this in America, where the gluttony of the nonstop media grinder consumes us all and prevents an honest conversation on race.
DOUGLASS: Well, I think that that is actually a point that we should be discussing. E.J. Dionne wrote this very interesting column this week about how it is that Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson routinely have blamed all the woes of the United States on homosexuality and other kinds of things, and Presidents, Republican candidates, have routinely associated themselves with white pastors who have made similarly incendiary statements, and it hasn't come back to haunt them. Now, this is a much more personal association with Barack Obama.
….
KURTZ, AFTER CLIP OF OBAMA DEFENDING NOT WEARING A FLAG PIN: Have the media done a less than stellar job here in that so many people seem to believe these rumors about Obama and patriotism, or is it not the fault of the media?
DOUGLASS: Well, I hate to keep being in the position of defending Barack Obama, but on this question, John McCain does not wear a flag pin. Hillary Clinton does not wear a flag pin. And yet questions about his patriotism come up all the time. He does do the Pledge of Allegiance, but he didn't put his hand over his heart during the singing of the National Anthem, which became a practice that originated under the times of Ronald Reagan, where you put your hand over your heart when you're singing the Star-Spangled Banner. So all of these questions, again, go -- fill the vacuum in people's minds who don't know enough about him.
—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center





DOUGLASS: Well, this was the pastor of his church. And this was a guy who came to Christianity by virtue of going to this church. He had this lifelong search for who he was. He was an African- American guy with a white mother, white grandparents, grew up in Hawaii, went to Indonesia looking for himself. And he found himself, if you read his autobiography, in this church where he became a Christian. So in that sense, that association is somewhat relevant. But I have to say that to make your judgments about how to cast a vote for President based upon the statements of this pastor seems to be a bridge too far. 















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Wasn't it his own big mouth that caused his problem?
May 21, 2008 - 22:01 ET by MearlineTHAT and choosing NOT to put his hand over his heart for the national anthem. Seems to me that his problems are of his own making. Luckily for us.
he didn't put his hand over
May 22, 2008 - 09:31 ET by pbanks7he didn't put his hand over his heart during the singing of the National Anthem, which became a practice that originated under the times of Ronald Reagan, where you put your hand over your heart when you're singing the Star-Spangled Banner.
What country did SHE come from? I've been putting my hand over my heart since before President Reagan was Governor Reagan. She's just another empty-headed talking mouth, spewing opinion and excuses as fact.
MSM - shaping all the perceptions you need to believe.
"which became a practice
May 22, 2008 - 11:00 ET by WhoIsJohnGalt"which became a practice that originated under the times of Ronald Reagan,"
Even if that were true (it's not, I've been doing it for as far back as I can remember, and I'm punching fifty in the mouth), so what? Reagan left office twenty years ago when BO was mid twenties! Is she suggesting that BO had so much prior experience NOT putting his hand over his heart prior to Reagan that he just can't break the habit?!?!
Or was it just another gratuitous potshot at Reagan?
LATEST: FLA. KLINTONOIDS SUE, I LIKE
May 22, 2008 - 14:28 ET by reelman46FLA. KLINTONOIDS SUE: ANOTHER SUIT TO LOVE
Hear the latest today?
Three Fla. Klintonoids have filed suit against the DNC…it takes the
Democrat party to sue itself because they refuse to count all the
votes… they cannot run a sane primary but millions think they can run
the USA…gotta laugh, they have a primary system where there are no
rules and the voters can be overturned by the ’super delegates”…
imagine ignoring the 4th and 8th most populated states…and always
remember the Klintons have no moral-ethical borders sooo Mr. Fantasy
had better not brag too soon…it ain’t over till its over…as Yankee
catcher Yogi Berra used to say… whooopee, now we have a legal court
mess…and no Republicans to blame, I like.
Doug Schexnayder, Ph.D. (theconservativecrawfish)
...and his tacit approval
May 22, 2008 - 11:04 ET by WhoIsJohnGaltof the good Rebum Wright's venom directed at this country.
...and his wife's "mean country" comments.
...and his condescension of middle America (clinging to guns and bibles)
...and his contempt for capitalism
etc., etc.
What a nonsensical
May 22, 2008 - 11:50 ET by docbstatement..I was raised in the South and we Never were taught to put our hand over our heart for the national anthem---only the pledge of allegience. This is an excuse for questionable prejudice... It might behoove many to Google, Doug Coe and the Family or Jerry Falwell, or Pat Robertson...
Maybe just ponder why you would want a president elected totally by the low information, rural community and not a cross section of the voting public????
This has little to do with Douglas and more to do with fear of the strong woman not supporting your candidate.
Too much attention on Wright? Hah!
May 21, 2008 - 22:04 ET by jefflebowskiWho has even heard from David Duke in the last 20 years? But every time that the MSM wants to put the "racist" moniker on someone...David Duke is usually mentioned.
At first I wondered why
May 21, 2008 - 22:29 ET by gopsteveAt first I wondered why Obama would want to lose such a valuable supporter in the msm...then I realized her replacement at CNN will way more than likely be an all out, ardent supporter of Obama as well.
Exactly
May 22, 2008 - 09:37 ET by KC MulvilleIt's not as if losing Douglass would silence the only MSM voice in his favor.
On the other hand, we're not far from the point where the Obama campaign drops the pretense. Would anyone really be surprised if Obama's supporters in the media simply stayed where they were, and just openly endorsed Obama? I mean, sure, they've always kept up the pretense that they were disinterested journalists, but nobody really buys that, do they? This website documents, every day, dozens of instances where the liberal media favors liberal Democrats. We all know reality. The polls all show that the public knows the liberal media fraud.
My point is that the MSM is obviously supporting Obama anyway. Would it be such a big step, then, to simply make it official? My prediction is that they'll push the envelope on this by letting some reporter or columnist do it, and then give him (or her) fawning portrayals as a "new journalist." Then they'll see if the public buys it, and if so, they'll proceed to the next steps. They're already calling Jon Stewart the new journalism, so we're not far from it now.
Would it be such a big
May 22, 2008 - 15:24 ET by motherbeltWould it be such a big step, then, to simply make it official?
Why not? Newpapers endorse candidates all the time. So why pretend?
At least then they are up front about it.
Not gonna happen!
May 22, 2008 - 18:12 ET by CTMarxists, Communists and Liberal Democratics believe the end justifies the means and they would rather lie when the truth would serve them.
You'd question the veracity of a CNN Reliable Source?
May 21, 2008 - 22:39 ET by CTLinda Douglass is in for a real treat trying to keep up with her candidate's position of the minute as the new Obama-rama senior strategist.
You're right about his changing positions
May 21, 2008 - 23:25 ET by zachlindYou’re right about Linda Douglass trying to keep up with Mr. Obama and his changing positions. Not only would she have to demonstrate her ability to master a new type of mental gymnastics but also she would have to spend some time in the gym working on her stamina. Given the current state of her looks I would say she is getting a little long in the tooth. She might ought to sit this one out.
I guess this news means
May 21, 2008 - 22:47 ET by bigtimerI guess this news means Linda and her husband aren't having any more cozy dinners with the Clintons like the did when they were the power couple...hey at least she quit her job as a so-called journalist and admits what she is now...a strategist.
The rest of the leftist msm might want to take notice and follow in her footsteps.... maybe somewhere we could get some honest non-biased reporting if they did.
"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill
empty minds
May 22, 2008 - 01:29 ET by jaywlQuite often I see remarks like this "-- fill the vacuum in people's minds who don't know enough about him." It comes from journalists, usually. My impression is they really believe, first , that if someone doesn't support Obama it is because they don't know enough about him. Of course the second belief is that it is their duty as Americans to explain his positions, attest to and display his character, and contrast his remarkable qualities to those lacking in opponets. By going on Obama's staff, Linda douglas just made her work legal.
Linda and Obama
May 22, 2008 - 07:34 ET by NKurucThese people in the MSM are quite frankly delusional. They've bought into the tripe that comes from the mouth of the "great messiah". This guy is not a saviour....he does provide great press, and presents a nice image. Make him president for 365 days per year, and you'll get a younger version of Jimmmmmmmmy Carter. This is rapidly turning into a joke......a very cruel joke on the American people. In the end we will all pay if we elect this empty suit (and of course his arrogant wife comes with the package). Please note, emphasis on "empty". Think about it...who have the Democrats put up in the last three elections. Gore, Kerry, and now Obama. What an absolute disgrace!
If Obama wins the nomination
May 22, 2008 - 12:20 ET by ahusserThen the theme of the Democratic Party for the election will be:
IF YOU DON'T VOTE FOR OBAMA YOU ARE A RACIST!!
It is going to be very hard to campaign against, characterize, or criticize the Obamaman without the race card being thrown. It is going to be a humdinger of a victimfest. The silver lining is that this self-destructive strategy the dems are sure to use is probably going to backfire and there may be a serious backlash.
“Republican candidates
May 22, 2008 - 10:12 ET by mattm“Republican candidates have routinely associated themselves with white pastors who have made similarly incendiary statements.”
Oh yeah? What incendiary statements? Do you have the soundbites or the quotes? Or are you equating preaching against sin and immorality with "God Damn AmeriKKKa"?
Sorry, Mz. Douglass, there is no equivalence.
Ball in Kurtz' Court
May 22, 2008 - 10:47 ET by CaringwhiteguyI can hardly wait to hear how Howie massages Douglass' move. I never thought his panels were objective(maybe Kurtz did). But "Reliable"???? Will Kurtz feign ignorance as to exactly what Douglass was up to? How can he? He's supposed to be one of the most connected guys in DC. Or maybe he'll cut Linda some slack. "Perhaps she had an overnight conversion". Then again, maybe he won't address it at all.
compromised
May 22, 2008 - 10:52 ET by the mad pole“I hate to keep being in the position of defending Barack Obama...”
Yeah, since the contortions require grabbing ankles.
Facts of life
May 22, 2008 - 11:53 ET by cvgbuckeyeLike it or not, and some people will not, here is THE TRUTH:
1. Every time a "white guilt trip liberal" makes a statement about the gross racism of white people in the U S., they are setting race relations back years and are converting more white people to a feeling of race resentment.
2. Every time a black person makes a statement about the gross racism of white people in the U S., they are setting race relations back years and are converting more white people to a feeling of race resentment.
3. Every time the MSM makes a statement about the gross racism of white people in the U S., they are setting race relations back years and are converting more white people to a feeling of race resentment.
4. If there is any evidence of racism on the part of a group of people in this country, it is certainly not on the part of white people.
5. There are some black people who just don't like or want white people around them. There are some white people who just don't like or want black people around them. That's just the way it is. You can't legislate brotherly love or intimidate it into existence. You can only attempt to teach it.
6. I am fed up to my eyeballs with being accused of racism because I am a "White, Conservative Christian" and I WILL respond in kind to any further accusations as EVERYONE should. QUIT CRYING AND TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR YOUR OWN STATION IN LIFE.
Another Pin for J.M.
May 22, 2008 - 11:31 ET by DocLinda,
John McCain lost his flag pin in Vietnam. He was busy in Hanoi & U.S. & ARVN forces couldn't find it. We (Vietnam Era Veterans) will try to get him another. Hope this helps with your view of his patriotism.
Here we go again...another
May 22, 2008 - 11:47 ET by marpelHere we go again...another assault on the intelligence of the American people...
The Difference
May 22, 2008 - 13:30 ET by PTBACFThe difference between white pastors and Wright is simple. White pastors disagree with a particular group such as gays. White Pastors also talk to gays and help them to change by finding salvation in Christ.
Wright disagreed with America as a whole and told God to send it to Hell.
How can you not notice a difference between helping someone and sending a country to hell?
Linda Douglass is irrelevant in all of this...
May 22, 2008 - 14:03 ET by ThalpyLinda Douglass is irrelevant in all of this except to provide a good example of where the msm stands today. That they would feel compelled to take a stand on news issues is the disgusting part. It isn't about Wright, Fallwell, Robertson, Duke, or Malcolm X: it's about them and us. Whites are the Devil, Blacks are the long--suffering Oppressed.
Without the racist whites there could be no Black Liberation Theology; without Blacks there would be no Democrat party.
You Won't Har This in the MSM!
May 22, 2008 - 15:40 ET by ChasvsMay 22 (Bloomberg) -- Billionaire investor Carl Icahn said Barack Obama would be a ``terrible'' U.S. president whose election would bring higher interest rates and a loss of international confidence in the dollar.
``I don't normally get involved in politics, but this time I am,'' Icahn told an investors conference in New York last night. ``I don't think Obama really understands economics.''
The Illinois senator is the front-runner for the Democratic presidential nomination. Obama has 1,962 delegates, according to an Associated Press tally, putting him 64 delegates shy of the 2,026 needed to clinch the nomination.
``I personally think he would be a terrible president,'' Icahn, 72, said. Obama would probably go on a ``huge spending spree'' that ``the country can't afford right now.''
Coupled with the higher tax rates that the Illinois senator has already endorsed, ``you would have a loss of confidence in the dollar,'' leading to accelerating inflation and ``much higher interest rates,'' Icahn said. His comments, and remarks by other presenters at the conference, were embargoed by the organizers until this morning.
Even worse, Icahn said, would be a Democratic president with a veto-proof supermajority of 60 Democrats elected to the Senate.
``It would be devastating,'' he said. ``Then you couldn't stop runaway legislation.''
Earlier this year, Icahn donated the maximum $2,300 to the presidential campaign of Republican Rudy Giuliani, according to the Washington-based Center for Responsive Politics. Giuliani has dropped out of the race. He has also given to Democrats, including New Hampshire Senate candidate Jeanne Shaheen.
Obama does have support in the investment community. Among those who have donated to his campaign are billionaires Kenneth C. Griffin of Citadel Investment Group in Chicago, and George Soros of Soros Fund Management, according to the center.
To contact the reporter on this story: Michael McKee in New York at mmckee@bloomberg.net