PBS and NY Times In House Watchdogs Bark at 'Soft' Wright Coverage

Photo of Brent Baker.

“Mainstream media coverage of the Reverend Jeremiah Wright has drawn a round of barking from some of their own in-house watchdogs,” FNC's Brit Hume noted in his Monday night “Grapevine” segment. Hume started by highlighting how PBS ombudsman Michael Getler criticized the soft approach of Bill Moyers in his interview with Wright: “Inflammatory, and inaccurate, statements that Moyers himself laid out at the top of the program went largely unchallenged” and “there were not enough questions asked and some that were asked came across as too reserved and too soft.

Hume next turned to New York Times public editor Clark Hoyt's disappointment in the paper for putting a review of Wright's performance in appearances ahead of checking what Wright contended against the reality, scolding his employer: “It was a performance strangely lacking in energy at a potential turning point in the election.”

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Hume's lead item in his Monday, May 5 “Grapevine” segment on Special Report wit Brit Hume:

Mainstream media coverage of the Reverend Jeremiah Wright has drawn a round of barking from some of their own in-house watchdogs. The Bill Moyers interview of Reverend Wright on PBS drew heavy criticism from viewers and network ombudsman Michael Getler wrote, quote: "Inflammatory, and inaccurate, statements that Moyers himself laid out at the top of the program went largely unchallenged...There were not enough questions asked and some that were asked came across as too reserved and [too] soft…This came across to me,” he said, “more as a conversation among theologians than it did as a truly probing interview with a truly controversial person who had said some truly inflammatory things."

New York Times public editor Clark Hoyt also was critical of his paper which he said angered some readers by putting a review of Wright's recent appearances on its front page before ever reporting what the reverend actually said in a news story. Hoyt wrote, quote: "It was a performance strangely lacking in energy at a potential turning point in the election."

Getler's May 1 posting: “Too Much Reverence for the Reverend?

Hoyt's May 4 column: “The Preacher’s New Pulpit

—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

"It was a performance

"It was a performance strangely lacking in energy..."

Knowing the NYT as we do, what was so "strange" about it? I'd say it was about par for the NYT course. The NYT public editor must be in denial about the nature of the newspaper he works for...

SO what changed?

PBS will not bring a conservative on line, to balance out Bill Moyers and the NY Times is what it is.  So, what changed?  Nothing.  The Liberal Media must believe it can get Obama through the complete election cycle without vetting him, how moronic is that.  

Is it more important to elect the best person to the presidency or to elect a black person to the presidency?  It seems that the liberals only thought about elections is what it shows about them.  This is their way of showing the black community that they can really put a black man in power, something they've not been good at for years. Well, if it's Barack, it could set black politicians back a few decades.  

Democrats: Stuck on Stupid since 2000.

The NYT had opinion on the

The NYT had opinion on the front page?

Naaah....can't be.

You're mistaken. It was just "news analysis."

Speaking of softball

Speaking of softball interviews, Hume ought to include in his "Grapevine" segment the interviewers Bill O'Reilly and Chris Wallaces.  Their performances were, ". . . strangely lacking in energy at a potential turning point in the election."

 

Brent, if you write any more about Wright...

...I have some information in my own meager blog's most recent entry that might be of help.  Wright's own statements, combined with facts provided by his own church's website, illustrate just what sort of "church" he's led.   Characterizing Wright as "inflammatory" is an understatement.  For your perusal:

www.thebrattonreport.com

And by all means, if you're not Brent, you're welcome to read and comment, too.

--Mike