Remembering Charlton Heston, who died Saturday night in his Beverly Hills home at age 84, the ABC and CBS anchors on Sunday night tarnished the actor's political activity on behalf of conservative causes, particularly his leadership of the NRA, as “controversial” and “polarizing.” Dan Harris, anchor of ABC's World News, asserted: “As President of the National Rifle Association, he became one of the most-polarizing figures in American politics.” CBS Evening News anchor Russ Mitchell declared: “Once the quintessential big screen hero, in his later years he drew as much attention for his controversial politics.”
Those pro-gun rights views were certainly “controversial” to network journalists who disagreed with him and so hit him repeatedly from the left on the issue in 1998 and 2001 morning show interviews, especially Katie Couric.
For instance, check out how Couric pressed him on the June 8, 1998 Today show:
COURIC: Speaking of gun safety and children, Mr. Heston, as you well know, and in fact as everyone in this country knows, there has been a spate of school shootings recently that have been quite disturbing to all Americans. Given the fact that these seem to be happening with greater frequency has it caused you to rethink your philosophy about children and guns and the accessibility of guns for children?...
COURIC: Getting back to kids and guns, if you will indulge me for a moment. You cannot think of any other position the NRA could take in terms of trying to decrease the number of school shootings? You feel like this is not your bailiwick, this is not your problem?
HESTON: Not at all. As I told you the NRA spends more money, more time-
COURIC, cutting him off: Other than education.
HESTON: Well, what would you suppose? What would you suggest?
COURIC: I don’t know, perhaps greater restrictions.
Those quotes, with a video/audio clip (Windows Media video, Real video or MP3 audio), are in the MRC's 2006 “Meet the Real Katie Couric: CBS's New Star Adores Liberals, Scolds Conservatives — And Thinks America Should Be More Like France.”
For more from Heston's interviews that morning, check the MRC's June 9, 1998 CyberAlert:
Congratulations, Mr. Heston, on your election as President of the NRA. Now, embrace liberal gun control laws and we’ll praise you. If you don’t, we’ll disparage you. So, it seemed, the networks decided. Monday morning Heston made the rounds of the three morning shows and on each was hit from the left on the irrationality of his opposition to gun control....
Three years later Heston returned to the Today show and tried to promote the DVD release of Bur Hur, but Couric was a lot more interested in pushing further gun control, as recounted in the Wednesday, March 14, 2001 CyberAlert:
Charlton Heston agreed to an appearance on NBC’s Today to plug the release on DVD of Ben Hur, but after just a little bit of time on that Katie Couric pounded away at the NRA President on gun control, pressing him with stats and arguments from Handgun Control, Inc.
MRC analyst Geoffrey Dickens took down her arguments in the form of questions on the March 13 show:
-- "Obviously because of your role in the National Rifle Association I want to get a couple of quick comments if I could Mr. Heston from you on this recent shooting. Particularly at, in Santana High School outside of San Diego. When you heard about that, I mean what was your reaction?"-- "Some people, some people though feel it, it may be about maladjusted kids. But it is about guns as well and, and how easy it is to get guns in this country. Do you think-"
-- "Well, you know, this, this boy Andy Williams' father did have guns in the home. What do you think about some kind of smart technology that would make it more difficult for children to use guns?"
-- "Well, what, I mean is that something you could support as an advocate of the National Rifle Association?"
-- "And do you think gun manufacturers will be more receptive than they have been already? Some are making a move in that direction?"
-- "Handgun Control cites a statistic that our firearms deaths of children under the age of 15 is twelve times that of 25 other industrial nations combined. Is it all about maladjusted kids, if, if those, those numbers are so stunning are there that many more maladjusted kids in this country than there are in 25 industrial nations combined?"
-- "Do you think that, that, that guns are to blame at all in any way shape or form for the increase in violence in this country?"
-- "Do you find that you have, that you have a more receptive audience for that philosophy with, with the Bush administration?"
-- "This is gonna be my last question. Do you, do you feel more comfortable with George W. Bush in the White House? Do you think you have a more receptive administration?"
-- "Alright Charlton Heston. Again, congratulations on the DVD release of Ben Hur."
Nice afterthought.
A portion of the obituary story on the April 6 World News on ABC:
DAN HARRIS: As President of the National Rifle Association, he became one of the most-polarizing figures in American politics.
PETER JENNINGS, IN 2002 INTERVIEW: When stand up at the NRA convention and you hold the rifle in your hand and you make that extraordinary gesture. It's not wholly dissimilar from the gesture you made in The Ten Commandments.
HESTON TO JENNINGS: That's true. They call it acting. I know when I stand and I say “from my cold, dead hands,” I know that I'm not really doing that. I'm acting.
HARRIS: His acting career started on the stage, just after World War II, struggling to build a career in plays, on televison and in B-movies. When he finally hit the big time, he used his acting to fuel his activism. At first, for the Left campaigning for civil rights, even marching with Martin Luther King. By the 90s, his politics had become decidedly conservative.
HESTON, ARCHIVE VIDEO: Mr. Clinton, sir. America doesn't trust you with our 21-year-old daughters and we sure Lord don't trust you with our guns.
Mr. Heston was a judge for the MRC's “The Best Notable Quotables of 1993: The Sixth Annual Awards for the Year’s Worst Reporting.”
—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center





COURIC: Getting back to kids and guns, if you will indulge me for a moment. You cannot think of any other position the NRA could take in terms of trying to decrease the number of school shootings? You feel like this is not your bailiwick, this is not your problem?
PETER JENNINGS, IN 2002 INTERVIEW: When stand up at the NRA convention and you hold the rifle in your hand and you make that extraordinary gesture. It's not wholly dissimilar from the gesture you made in The Ten Commandments.
HARRIS: His acting career started on the stage, just after World War II, struggling to build a career in plays, on televison and in B-movies. When he finally hit the big time, he used his acting to fuel his activism. At first, for the Left campaigning for civil rights, even marching with Martin Luther King. By the 90s, his politics had become decidedly conservative. 














Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Funny how the very people
April 7, 2008 - 10:26 ET by mattmFunny how the very people who claim sole ownership of open-mindedness are so adamant in their disagreement over certain issues. One would think that an open-minded person would be able to acknowledge the validity of a point even if they disagree with it.
Maybe they're not really open-minded after all....hmmmmm...
Right on
April 7, 2008 - 10:54 ET by iveseenitallRight on, mattm. Since when does standing up for the Constitution of the United States make you a "polarizing figure"? The "liberal" language implies some evil in the man. Disgusting!
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
BTW, In case people didn't know, Peter Jennings was a high school dropout from Canada who "lectured" the American people for 30 years. Sad.
There are clearly two Charlton Hestons....
April 7, 2008 - 10:51 ET by Army BratThe one the left perceivess and, of course, the real Mr. Heston.
Polarizing whilst serving as my President in the NRA? Hardly. He brought millions of Americans together on an issue that is at the heart of freedom in America. His staunch defense of our collective right to bear arms to defend our homes and families from those that would do us harm.
Happy Trails...
Gun control IS
April 7, 2008 - 10:54 ET by balboaGun control IS controversial and polarizing, so it follows that Heston's activism would lead him to be characterized as such.
Constitution
April 7, 2008 - 11:01 ET by iveseenitallThe Constitution is what has been made "controversial" and "polarizing" by the "liberals" in America. Anyone who supports The Constitution as it reads has been made "controversial" by the lefties in black robes and many others who want government control of individuals' lives. Sad.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
That's solid narrow focus.
April 7, 2008 - 11:03 ET by balboaThat's solid narrow focus. Good work.
Narrow?
April 7, 2008 - 11:13 ET by iveseenitallWhat are you, a guru? Typical "liberal" reponse. Interpret the "law" according to how you "feel" at the time. The last time I looked, "justice" from the bench was supposed to be blind and judges were supposed to follow the law as it is written. The bench is no place for "broadmindedness" or personal interpretation.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
I'm not interpreting any
April 7, 2008 - 11:27 ET by balboaI'm not interpreting any laws. I'm recognizing the nature of the gun issue.
Gun issue
April 7, 2008 - 12:02 ET by iveseenitallThe "nature" of the gun "issue" is tied to a discussion about how one interprets the law. The gun "issue" is whether or not American citizens should enjoy their rights under The Constitution of the United States. "Liberals" want to limit these rights and have therefore caused "controversy" where there should be none at all. The Constitution should not be open to the personal prejudices of biased individuals or groups. Charlton Heston is not a "polarizing " figure, except in the minds of those who want to interpret the Constitution any way they feel like doing it. If the "liberals" want to change the Constitution, there are ways to do it. But they won't even try, because they know they will lose. In the meantime, they call a man who wants to uphold the law "polarizing". Ridiculous.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
BTW, when do we see Algore's nutty words characterized as "polarizing" or Michelle Obama's hatred, or Micheal Moore's crapola lies...? We've had decades of "polarization" from the so-called "liberals", but it is rarely characterized as such by the MSM.
But there's more to it just
April 7, 2008 - 12:52 ET by balboaBut there's more to it just than "liberals causing controversy." There are shooting massacres that raise controversy. There are illegal handgun murders. You're trying to making it only "a liberal thing" and it's just not.
Not to butt into your
April 7, 2008 - 14:30 ET by Gary P JacksonNot to butt into your conversation. But guns are not really the issue. A gun is an inanimate object. No "gun" has ever hurt anyone. No, it takes PEOPLE to hurt other people.
Just last week we heard about a group of kids, third graders I believe. These kids had a plan to hurt or kill their teacher. They had this deal very well thought out, with each assigned a "job" to do, including subduing, attacking, and clean up afterwards. These kids are evil! The weapon? A knife. Do we ban knives? No.
The problem is lack of fear of punishment. We have made it really easy for folks to commit horrid crimes, and get off with little more than a slap on the wrist, or get away totally on some technicality. Heck, even when we are tough on a criminal, and prescribe capitol punishment, the criminal has as good of a chance of dying of old age before the sentence is carried out!
Most people are good people, and would never commit any crime. Part of that is due to strong character, and part of it is due to fear of being caught. For most people that is enough. Whether it's speeding, or robbery, or worse, fear of getting caught is enough to deter most people. But there is a significant element that don't have that fear, for what ever reason.
That's the problem. Not guns. If every gun in the world would magically disappear, the bad people would find a way to commit the exact same crimes. Punish the bad people.
I understand what you're
April 7, 2008 - 15:21 ET by balboaI understand what you're saying, but you don't often hear about someone who went on a killing spree with a knife. No one's illegally selling knives out of the trunk of their car.
Bal, The greenriver killer,
April 7, 2008 - 15:46 ET by bassndudeBal, The greenriver killer, Ted Bundy, Kevin Underwood...the list goes on and on. Really, to make a statement like not hearing of knife killers very ofter, is, at best, ignorant. At worst, it is an attempt to foster the lie. It is untrue. There are more knife killings and attempted killings than there are with guns.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
Killing spree a la
April 7, 2008 - 15:54 ET by balboaKilling spree a la Columbine, Va Tech, Northern Illinois, various post offices, etc.
So, your saying all the
April 7, 2008 - 16:22 ET by bassndudeSo, your saying all the others dont count? Very liberal view you have bal. But using your view, how many lives would be saved if every law abiding, God fearing citizen was required to carry a loaded firearm, everywhere they went? Do you think Columbine, Va tech and Illinois would have turned out different?
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
I didn't say anything about
April 7, 2008 - 18:00 ET by balboaI didn't say anything about the others "not counting," whatever that means. Sheesh...
When the MSM remembers liberals..
April 7, 2008 - 11:52 ET by Gary HallWhen the MSM remembers liberals..
I was trying to think of another recent death of a Hollywood icon - well, author Kurt Vonnegut came to mind. I pulled up a few quick articles in the MSM on his passing, from CNN, BBC, NYT and Time. Then I searched for the words, polarizing, liberal, political, and controversial. What a surprise - not a single hit. On the other hand, the word "Bush" appears. Shocking.
This paragraph from a CNN piece:
You see, from the media's point of view - that was not a polarizing, a liberal, a controversial nor a political stance. The MSM is just all too happy to pass along the view; after all, they agree.
A little more non-controversial and non-political Vonnegut:
Vonnegut was an ignorant
April 7, 2008 - 12:02 ET by NL207Vonnegut was an ignorant fool if he believed Adolf Hitler was elected Chancellor. Hitler received a plurality of the vote in 1933, but insufficient to be elected. von Hindenburg, the German President, had two choices: appoint Hitler Chancellor or hold a run-off election. Hindenburg chose the former option and the rest is history.
If Vonnegut was wrong about this, it only stands to reason he was wrong about Bush as well.
NL207
April 7, 2008 - 12:10 ET by Gary HallWell, I can assure you. The lable "ignorant fool" most likely did not show up in any of the MSM obits in describing Vonnegut. (;~> gh
Nets Remember Charlton
April 7, 2008 - 12:13 ET by Jack BauerThat's so weird, you know!
Because I remember Peter Jennings in particular, and the "nets" in general as being even more polarizing and controversial too.
The local media here in LA
April 7, 2008 - 12:51 ET by rbosqueThe local media here in LA called him "contraversial" because he was against abortion. So now in this world we live in, the left finds it contraversial to save the life of a baby? To ensure a perfectly healthy fetus does not come to full-term? This is an example of "up is down", "black is white"...
Right
April 7, 2008 - 16:09 ET by iveseenitallRight on, rbosque. The world is upside down. Right is wrong in so many cases today. Unfortunately, this doesn't bode well for the future.
P.S. I'm watching Cavuto right now. There's a guy on who has written a book about how to be an "A-hole" and get rich doing it. He's on t.v. pushing the garbage while good, serious authors can't get within a hundred yards of a t.v. show. A famous baseball manager once said, "Nice guys finish last". Maybe it's true. Sad.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"