ABC Conveys Worries Obama-Clinton Battle Will Hurt Party in Fall

Photo of Brent Baker.
  • Bookmark and Share

The broadcast networks rarely highlight poll numbers other than their own, but on Wednesday night ABC's World News pegged a story to a Gallup survey which confirmed the ongoing Democratic presidential battle will harm the party's chances in November. With “HURTING THE PARTY?” on screen beneath pictures of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, anchor Charles Gibson warned:

Many Democrats have been worried that the protracted fight, between Senators Clinton and Obama, might start alienating voters and hurt the party's chances against John McCain in the fall. Well, now there is evidence that may, indeed, be the case.

Reporter Jake Tapper outlined the evidence:

The notion that the current tough tone could hurt the party against Republican Senator John McCain is a real concern among top Democrats. A new poll indicates that 28 percent of Clinton supporters say they would vote for McCain over Obama should she not get the nomination. 19 percent of Obama supporters say they'd go for McCain over Clinton.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

NBC Nightly News delivered a similar number Wednesday evening, but didn't have a story revolve around it. Reciting findings from a new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll, Tim Russert noted how in the past two weeks Clinton's positive number is down 8 points while Obama's has fallen by two points and 20 percent of both Obama and Clinton supporters “say they would be open to voting for John McCain in the general election, an indication of how bitter this fight has gotten.”

The Wednesday, March 26 story on ABC's World News:

CHARLES GIBSON: Presidential politics, next. Many Democrats have been worried that the protracted fight, between Senators Clinton and Obama, might start alienating voters and hurt the party's chances against John McCain in the fall. Well, now there is evidence that may, indeed, be the case. ABC's Jake Tapper is in Washington tonight.

JAKE TAPPER: Back from a brief vacation, Barack Obama in North Carolina this afternoon, reflected wearily on how he's been running for President since February 2007.

BARACK OBAMA: Since that time, babies have been born and are walking and talking.

TAPPER: It feels long to many Democrats because of how nasty the campaign has become, which Obama tried to address in his remarks today about Hillary Clinton.

OBAMA: Senator Clinton's a smart person. And she's a capable person. And I, I want to make sure that the tone of this campaign remains -- creates the situation where Democrats are going to win in November.

TAPPER: The notion that the current tough tone could hurt the party against Republican Senator John McCain is a real concern among top Democrats. A new poll indicates that 28 percent of Clinton supporters say they would vote for McCain over Obama should she not get the nomination. 19 percent of Obama supporters say they'd go for McCain over Clinton. Those numbers could improve. Still, Democratic officials, such as Tennessee Governor Phil Bredesen are concerned.

GOVERNOR PHIL BREDESEN: The nastiness is only going to get worse. What these candidates are going to have to do over the summer is persuade super-delegates that the other person is not capable of being President. And you turn around at the end of August, and suddenly that person we have to explain why they should be President.

TAD DEVINE, DEMOCRATIC STRATEGIST: When they attack each other, when they do so particularly in battleground states, these arguments are heard by voters. And they may be remembered by them later on.

TAPPER: Campaigning for his wife in Parkersburg, West Virginia today, Bill Clinton disagreed. Politics is a contact sport, he said. That's what America is about.

BILL CLINTON: If a politician doesn't want to get beat up, he shouldn't run for office. Let's just saddle up and have an argument. What's the matter with that?

TAPPER: Since it's likely that neither Obama nor Clinton can win the nomination without the support of the party insiders called super-delegates, Charlie, Governor Bredesen has proposed that all the super-delegates convene in June after the last Democratic primary, agree upon a nominee, and then allow for the rest of the summer for the party to begin healing before the convention in August. Charlie?

—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The Summer of Hate?

"...then allow for the rest of the summer for the party to begin healing..."

The wrong-reverend Wright seems like a logical dem choice to lead a dem healing service.

Oh...This

Oh...This on-going soap-opera gets better and better...

Pass the pop-corn ...open a cold one.

I love it when all the leftist msm are so very worried.

I saw these poll numbers about an hour or two ago...McCain has to be grinnin' from ear to ear...like I've mentioned at this rate so far he will win by default...no conservatives needed...thank you very much.

ROFL! 

BILL CLINTON: If a politician doesn't want to get beat up, he shouldn't run for office. Let's just saddle up and have an argument. What's the matter with that?

Ah...words of such wisdom coming from Bill.

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

BILL CLINTON: If a

BILL CLINTON: If a politician doesn't want to get beat up, he
shouldn't run for office. Let's just saddle up and have an argument.
What's the matter with that?

That's only until he has to start taking it instead of dishing it out. Then it becomes "the politics of personal destruction."

It's been almost exactly 4

It's been almost exactly 4 weeks ago since I started floating the idea that Democrats would put McCain in the White House. Here's a case whereby I wish I was wrong.

"Abstain from McCain"

ABC Conveys Worries

ABC Conveys Worries Obama-Clinton Battle Will Hurt Party in Fall

 They had better. Didnt we all know that any of the Repub candidates would expose either of these knuckleheads. Except maybe McCain? No need to worried now ; ]

"Always do right. This will gratify some people, and astonish

the rest". Mark Twain

   What are the chances

   What are the chances we'll see hillary out actively campaigning for obama?  or vice-versa.  If the dem loser sits the election out the candidate is toast.  Will bill clinton endorse the man who denied his wife the nomination?  Will barack, the black male candidate, accept not getting the nomination and now go on to work for the white woman?  wow... this campaign is a gift that keeps on giving.

If they did the exact same

If they did the exact same story about the Republican party (if they were in this situation), you'd be belly-aching that they never portray the Democratic party as being headed for trouble.

you'd be belly-aching

you'd be belly-aching

Who? Exactly are you referring to? Grouping us as one, is,,,,,,,, ridiculous?

 

"Always do right. This will gratify some people, and astonish the rest". Mark Twain

Newsbusters.  

Newsbusters.

 

No segregation here bud

Term would be, "We'd be belly-aching" Then.

 

"Always do right. This will gratify some people, and astonish the rest". Mark Twain

bellyaching

bal, consistantly as a lib, has a glass that is ALWAYS half empty.  Must be miserable getting up in the morning...selah.

OK...I didn't know we were

OK...I didn't know we were delving into the non-sensical.

Well boa...we're not going

Well boa...we're not going to have to worry about that at the moment now are we?

Btw...do you remember the Buchanan/Dole race I think it was..they wouldn't let Buchanan in somewhere in San Diego if memory serves me right, he made his speech/platform elsewhere in the area...the msm made a huge deal out of it...with glee. 

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

Bal- this whole primary has

Bal- this whole primary has become a soap opera.  Usually the dems have a boring election season and then nominate a flawed candidate, which the Republicans promptly beat up and then win the election.  But this time the dems decided to do it differently.  They have narrowed it down to two flawed candidates who are beating each other up thereby denying the Republicans the honor of doing it themselves. 

Usually?

Usually?

»→ Well, Bal

It is kinda funny that Obama looks like th Black equivalent of Lester Maddox, and Hillary Clinton is telling everyone who will listen that it's perfectly logical to steal an nomination.

♣ a seal

Cool Arrow, funny...

...seeing that I grew up in Atlanta when 'ole Lester Maddox was governor.  Your metaphor is is LOL funny and right on.

Cool

"It is kinda funny that Obama looks like th Black equivalent of Lester Maddox" 

RACIST !!!!!

:p 

 

* * * SOCKS THE CAT '08 * * *
For REAL Change

Which may be good news, because...

As conservatives like Limbaugh & various others have admitted, Republicans chose a RINO who is unlikely to want said honor. John McCain would probably choose Hillary as his VP, if he thought he could somehow get away with it politically.
JMR

A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.

According to who ? you?

John McCain would probably choose Hillary as his VP

 

According to who? you? Better then RP

 

"Always do right. This will gratify some people, and astonish the rest". Mark Twain

Yep, according to me -- DUH!

And it's telling that you seem to think Hillary would be better than a fiscally conservative Constitutionalist...
JMR

A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.

telling indead

fiscally conservative Constitutionalist...

Hmm,, I had another term for him.

 

"Always do right. This will gratify some people, and astonish the rest". Mark Twain

Yawn...

"Big spender," right? Since he obviously wanted to expand the federal government SO much...Good thing we went with 'wisdom' on security (see esp. question #3) instead.
JMR

A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.

  That's for sure. 

  That's for sure.  McCain would not go negative against a fellow Senator. 

 Well let me clarify, he wouldn't go negative against a democrat Senator.

sarc... Billy Boy would

sarc...

Billy Boy would be all for that if the situation had her on top and McCain as VP...he just couldn't give enough praises (slight exaggeration) for McCain the other day...and it has been vice versa with the Clintoon team in the past lately.

Wonders never cease to amaze me....you gotta' laugh in this life.

I just love the fact that the leftist msm is all a twitter...little nervous Nellie's now aren't they?

Great fun to behold. 

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

I'm just worried the Libertarians may do something sensible...

Because it's entirely possible they could nominate a well known name like former congressman Bob Barr. It's a bit less likely IMO, but they also might nominate my old friend, Dr. Mary Ruwart. If they choose either of these nice folks, it will be interesting to watch the antilibertarian-biased media try to ignore the LP again...
JMR

A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.

Barr was one of my favorite

Barr was one of my favorite congress-critters, he did an excellent job on the House Committee to Impeach Clinton to-boot, of course the msm detested his very being..he was on a lot of msm shows back then......didn't he along with Dick Armey join the ACLU to counter the leftists there?

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

I think it was healthy for the ACLU

To take him aboard. IMO it was unhealthy for individual rights for the ACLU to become a synonym for "lefty Democrats" for the same reasons it was unhealthy for the NRA to do the same thing with Republicans. When individual rights -- whether speech or self-defense -- become partisan issues, control freaks win and the rest of us slowly lose.
JMR

A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.

sarc, I agree. I think McCain would choose HRC as VP.

Hell, he may as well, as they aren't all that far apart politically.

I hears McCain's speech today. It might as well have been delivered by Hillary herself. 

Theme for Election '08: I want my mommy!

Why this doesn't matter and may be dangerous

First of all women (black or white) are going to vote for Hillary no matter what happens if she is nominated and blacks are going to vote for Obama no matter what happens if he is nominated. Keeping Hillary in this race is very dangerous and a bad idea. All this will blow over once the nomination is settled and there are more women in this country then blacks so you better hope Obama is nominated.

Unless McCain picks someone like Romney as his VP he is going to alienate conservatives because these "cross-over" voters will never materialize. There are more conservatives in the country then liberals so we do not need them to vote for us, we just need a candidate to vote for. There are far to many months until November and if someone as ridiculous as McCain can recover from the amnesty debacle don't bet on what Hillary or Obama cannot recover from.

The Anti 'Man-Made' Global Warming Resource

One loser.

Jug Ears or Thunder Thighs one is going to lose so McCain is automatically in. Anyone believe that since the democrats are habitual liars about everything? Never trust a skunk with rabies (aka democrats). 

 

 

Old, Retired and glad of it.

"Jug Ears or Thunder

"Jug Ears or Thunder Thighs"

Whoever could you be talking about? ;>)

OPERATION CHAOS INDEED...

Democrats accusing each other of racism, sexism, and every other"ism" once reserved for Republicans? The drive-by-media who have always denied any liberal bias, now in desperation, are forced to display said  bias by openly lamenting, and cautioning Democrats that if they continue on their current path, they will  most definitely HURT THE PARTY?

The so-called conservative brain-thrust being conned by Democrats into adopting their failed big-tent philosophy, and thus, nominating the weakest Republican candidate for the general?

It seems like God have decided "enough is enough", and declared a pox on all their houses.

Soon

...there will be locust swarms....  ;-)

Get your program here

Can't wait until it comes down to the super-delegates, and they start really feeling the heat. Just get a load of this bunch (Kwame & Byrd included).

Barker,

.....praise be, I perused this superdelegate list and noted that my state of Ga. has the "noteworthy" Jimma Cartah there. I think he needs to just keep that hammer in his hands and keep building those houses for Habitat for Humanity.  Just have someone keep an eye on his "handiwork".  Those whacky dems...

Charles Gibson's party

Of course. it's Charles Gibson's party that he's worried about. The moment the democrats pick their candidate, Charles Gibson and the rest of the media will turn their fangs on to John McCain.

 

Of course the media always

Of course the media always worry about the Democratic Party being in trouble. It disrupts the "natural order" of things.

In 1994, after the Republican rout of the Congress, they immediately started brainstorming, discussing on panel shows, writing articles offering advice, and generally worrying about what the Dems had to do to get power back. Anyone remember them doing the same for Republicans in '06? Yeah, right. Then, the talk was all about cleaning house.

They are brazen in their support, and they don't even care any more that it shows. Their ratings are going in the tank, and even that doesn't bother them. They don't care to look at the reason why.

As for "hurting the party".....excuse me, but SO WHAT? Are HRC and Obama running for the position of Head Supporter of the Democratic Party or to lead the country? If the both want to be President, why the hell should either one of them give up for the sake of "the Party"????

If I were either one of them I'd be saying "Hell, no, I ain't quitting! I'm not trying to get a Democrat elected, I'm trying to get ME elected. It's the people who want to run the machine who worry about "the Party" uber alles.

Worry about fixing "the Party" later. 

A new poll indicates that

A new poll indicates that 28 percent of Clinton supporters say they would vote for McCain over Obama should she not get the nomination.

Anyone with an explanation of why this would be so?  Why would a Clinton supporter not hold their nose and vote for Obama in the general election if he got the nomination?  Huge question folks.

 Lord Sidious / Darth Vader 2008  Long Live the Empire!  Come to the Dark Side, it is your Destiny.

»→ Good question dscott

Since, according to some posters here, Obama has come out of his most recent crisis unscathed.  According to a WSJ poll, of course.

♣ a seal

"Anyone with an explanation

"Anyone with an explanation of why this would be so? Why would a
Clinton supporter not hold their nose and vote for Obama in the general
election if he got the nomination? Huge question folks."

Maybe the same reason Fred Thompson supporters will not hold their nose and vote for McCain?

Well Shawn, being a

Well Shawn, being a conservative I understand the difference between McCain and Thompson, and maybe this is a good analogy for you but I don't understand what it is that makes Obama more left than Clinton. Please educate me.  Lord Sidious / Darth Vader 2008  Long Live the Empire!  Come to the Dark Side, it is your Destiny.

Actually dscott,

Actually dscott, I don't find it at all surprising.  Of the two candidates, Hillary has the support of most of the more centrist Democrats.  Since they believe Obama is too far to the left, McCain, in light of his more moderate historical political stances, is considered an acceptable alternative to Hillary, and preferable to Obama.

Jer

Excellent, someone who

Excellent, someone who would be in the know.  So according to you there is a group of people within the Dem party that feels Obama is too far left?  How so?  Pardon my confusion, but I don't see a substantive difference between the two on the issues, but then I'm looking at this through a conservative world view.  Maybe you can high light for me what you believe are the substantive differences that make Obama too far left for a Clinton supporter to stomach. 

 Lord Sidious / Darth Vader 2008  Long Live the Empire!  Come to the Dark Side, it is your Destiny.

dscott...As you may know, I

dscott...As you may know, I consider myself a centrist Democrat.  That said, what follows are not necessarily my views, but I believe they may represent the thinking of a majority of centrist Dems.

1.  Centrist and moderate Democrats have had an affinity for McCain for some time, and have viewed him as somewhat of a maverick Republican who has often bucked the prevailing orthodoxy of the more conservative wing of the party.

2.   Many have embraced the notion that Obama is too much of a neophyte in international affairs, and may preside over a foreign policy which is too accomodative

3.  According to some Congressional rating services, Obama has had the most liberal voting record in the Senate

4.  That despite Obama's assertions of unity, co-operation, and consensus politics, he may prove to generate even more political divisiveness than that which already exists

6.  Regardless of  enormous personal hostility toward he and Hillary, Bill Clinton did, for the most part, govern from the center.  Moderate Democrats believe Hillary would continue with that practice, but if she is not the nominee, McCain is more likely to do so than Obama.

7.  A number of Jewish liberal Democrats may question the depth and intensity of Obama's commitment to Israel

Those are just some quick thoughts.  I have to run, but we can revisit this later if you wish.

Jer

Hmmm, trying to digest

Hmmm, trying to digest this.

#3 - How is Obama more liberal?  Would an example be his solution to health care being mandatory participation where Clinton would be voluntary?

#4 - Are saying Obama would be more likely to play upon the racial and sex divides by insisting on reparations or something like that?

#7 - That one I understand, he certainly seemed to have allied himself with people who were anti-Jewish.

 Lord Sidious / Darth Vader 2008  Long Live the Empire!  Come to the Dark Side, it is your Destiny.

I was just about to say that

I was just about to say that isn't Obama's minister very anti-semitic and he seems to have a lovefest with the man that hates Jews, Farrakhan.

dscott... How is Obama

dscott...

How is Obama more liberal?

I was at least implicitly suggesting that it might be more a perception as opposed to reality.  But then, I don't think such perception is baseless.  His "liberal" voting record has been noted more than once here at NB.  His "no preconditions" statement regarding conferences and negotiations with adversaries--I would submit--must be construed as a more "liberal" position.  And his more widespread support from the netroot leftish-progressives would also be a factor in assessing his place on the ideological spectrum.  Does that help?

Jer

So, his liberal

So, his liberal credentials, if you will, are based on the acceptance of the various liberal groups who support him.  In this case, being widely supported by the Netroots gives him an ultra liberal seal of approval?  Since he is supported by the Black community, he has their seal of approval.  Then by logical extension, any group within the liberal universe who supports Obama does so because he reasonates with their thinking or their agenda. 

Please excuse my plodding here because I am trying to understand your value system from my frame of reference.  Not an easy thing to do.

What other groups support Obama (Netroots, Blacks and youth)?  versus Clinton (women and party bosses).  How does Obama and Clinton reasonate with Gays?

 Lord Sidious / Darth Vader 2008  Long Live the Empire!  Come to the Dark Side, it is your Destiny.

dscott...I'm not saying

dscott...I'm not saying that one's ideological credentials are exclusively defined by his or her supportive "groups"...but it is a helpful metric.

I think you have correctly identified and differentiated the various factions who primarily support either Obama or Hillary.  There are others...labor probably tilts heavily toward Clinton, for example.  Of course, there are going to be exceptions to some degree within these groups.

Regarding my personal value system, I have made numerous references to it over the course of my 9-10 months here.  Please feel free to ask any question in that regard which may help you better understand it.

Jer

And on Nov. 5, we can hold

And on Nov. 5, we can hold one big pity party.