MSNBC was so excited about a Thursday New York Times story with a derogatory look at Republican presidential nominee John McCain’s supposed relationship with a female lobbyist eight years ago, that the network broke into the 7 PM EST re-run of Hardball to read from the Web-posting of the article which Keith Olbermann described as “extraordinary.”
Olbermann insisted the alleged efforts of staffers to “protect” McCain sound “eerily similar” to Clinton-Lewinsky. Later in his 45 minutes of “Breaking News” coverage, Olbermann proposed: “If this doesn’t sound like deja vu all over again, I don’t know what does.”
CNN avoided such extended coverage as its 8 PM EST CNN Election Center stuck to other campaign news, though Anderson Cooper led at 10 PM EST with McCain’s denials about any romance with a lobbyist: “Tonight the McCain campaign is slamming a potentially incendiary story and the New York Times for writing it. Does the timing of the story add up to a hit job? Is the subject, ethics and rumored infidelity, fair game?”
FNC’s Hannity & Colmes began with an exclusive with attorney Bob Bennett, retained by McCain, who denounced the New York Times story as “a smear job.”
At about 7:45 PM EST, Olbermann broke in on MSNBC to announce “Breaking News,” specifically:
We interrupt Hardball to tell you that the New York Times is reporting on its Web site tonight that top advisors to Senator John McCain have, quote, “intervened to protect the candidate from himself,” unquote, to keep a 40-year-old Washington lobbyist named Vicki Iseman away from Senator McCain because, in the words of the Times correspondents, they became quote “convinced the relationship had become romantic.” The Times says both Ms. Iseman and Senator McCain deny there is any kind of romantic relationship.
What exactly the relationship is between the 71-year-old McCain and 40-year-old lobbyist who’s representative of several firms whose business has come before the Senate is unclear at this point, but the Times has broken in onto its Web site with this extraordinary story that reeks of so many in American history the day after Senator McCain won the Wisconsin primary....
Though McCain and Vicki Iseman denied any romantic involvement and the article centered on events eight years ago, over the next 45 minutes Olbermann discussed the story with NBC News reporter Kelly O’Donnell, Newsweek reporter Richard Wolffe, Newsweek’s Jonathan Alter, Pat Buchanan and NBC News political director Chuck Todd. Then, a bit past 8:30 PM EST, Olbermann picked up with his regular Countdown show. But at 9 PM EST, Dan Abrams returned to McCain as his lead item.
Just after 8 PM EST, Olbermann ruminated with Wolffe:
OLBERMANN: The phrase here, “protect the candidate from himself.” “Intervene.” This sounds, this sounds eerily familiar. We harkened back to the efforts from members of President Clinton's staff to try to keep Monica Lewinsky away from him ten years ago or more. Those are eerily similar uses of the language, are they not?
WOLFFE: Yes they are...
The AP reported Wednesday night:
Republican presidential hopeful John McCain issued a statement Wednesday night saying he "will not allow a smear campaign" to distract from his campaign as published reports questioned his relationship with a lobbyist...
An excerpt from the top of “For McCain, Self-Confidence on Ethics Poses Its Own Risk,” the New York Times story by Jim Rutenberg, Marilyn W. Thompson, David D. Kirkpatrick and Stephen Labaton:
WASHINGTON — Early in Senator John McCain’s first run for the White House eight years ago, waves of anxiety swept through his small circle of advisers.A female lobbyist had been turning up with him at fund-raisers, visiting his offices and accompanying him on a client’s corporate jet. Convinced the relationship had become romantic, some of his top advisers intervened to protect the candidate from himself — instructing staff members to block the woman’s access, privately warning her away and repeatedly confronting him, several people involved in the campaign said on the condition of anonymity.
When news organizations reported that Mr. McCain had written letters to government regulators on behalf of the lobbyist’s client, the former campaign associates said, some aides feared for a time that attention would fall on her involvement.
Mr. McCain, 71, and the lobbyist, Vicki Iseman, 40, both say they never had a romantic relationship. But to his advisers, even the appearance of a close bond with a lobbyist whose clients often had business before the Senate committee Mr. McCain led threatened the story of redemption and rectitude that defined his political identity....
—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center





We interrupt Hardball to tell you that the New York Times is reporting on its Web site tonight that top advisors to Senator John McCain have, quote, “intervened to protect the candidate from himself,” unquote, to keep a 40-year-old Washington lobbyist named Vicki Iseman away from Senator McCain because, in the words of the Times correspondents, they became quote “convinced the relationship had become romantic.” The Times says both Ms. Iseman and Senator McCain deny there is any kind of romantic relationship.
OLBERMANN: The phrase here, “protect the candidate from himself.” “Intervene.” This sounds, this sounds eerily familiar. We harkened back to the efforts from members of President Clinton's staff to try to keep Monica Lewinsky away from him ten years ago or more. Those are eerily similar uses of the language, are they not?
















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
I know all of us expected
Thu, 02/21/2008 - 03:33 ET by Gary P JacksonI know all of us expected this, but they sure have started early!
Can someone more astute answer this for me: What would stop delegates to the Republican convention from switching their vote to, say, Huckabee or even Mitt Romney?
I would love to see McCain come out with both barrels blazing, and the F Us flying. But I fear he reserves that for fellow Republicans.
Gary
Thu, 02/21/2008 - 03:46 ET by Cool ArrowThey don't need no stinking proof.
This is a hit piece by the NYT at the behest of the Clinton machine devised to force the story on Obama out into the MSM arena.
Problem is the Clintons can't afford to be linked to the Obama story, so they're laying the groundwork for it to look like McCain raises the issue.
Pretty smart politics.
♣ a seal
And to think the Times has
Thu, 02/21/2008 - 04:41 ET by kgAnd to think the Times has the gaul to say McCain pressed them to not run it. I would press them not to run it. There is NO proof. Anyone should press them not to run with it, especially the Times editors. There is not even enough substance there to speculate.
But Hillary presses them to run it to take the spotlight off herself and her losses. She cannot afford any more damage and needs a sacriface, a distraction, a sleigh of hand.
Obama needs the distraction too so they ease up on his wife's statements as well as his own lack of experience and substance.
We can't have the Democrats look bad, now can we?
So, MSNBC has now tossed the other bathroom sink at McCain
Thu, 02/21/2008 - 03:54 ET by R D HelmSo, who is going to toss the first toilet his way?
If this is any indication of the MSM "laying off" McCain until just prior to the general election, as some here have strived to convince me they will do, I shudder to think what they have waiting in reserve when "crunch time" rolls around.
McCain isn't even the official party nominee as yet, and the Republican National Convention is still over six months away.
At this rate, they are going to run out of plumbing fixtures before the convention even happens.
I think Sen. McCain is in for a really long six months.
Proud member of the "Rough Republican Attack Machine."
We're ALL in for a Long Eight Months
Thu, 02/21/2008 - 04:33 ET by HeikiAnd an even longer 62 months after that if Barack ''Messiah'' Obama wins the general election. This scene is so surreal, I'm starting to see Lame Cherry's ''Black Helicopters'' with Al Gore Rappeling onto the front lawn of the White House on Jan 20, 2009.
God help us all if that man (Obama) wins in November.
Well no surprise there
Thu, 02/21/2008 - 05:06 ET by well99NYT makes up stuff all the time.I dont like McCains politics but this is a cheap shot.Where is the proof.I think it is time for a investigation on NYT for fraud,trying to influence the election, and libel.
Breaking News ?
Thu, 02/21/2008 - 05:07 ET by old croThis story warrants a newsbreak in to regular programming? Give me a break!
Most of the article was about "The Keating Five", although no mention
whatever of the other "four". To refresh your memories, here is a
list of the others:
Alan Cranston
Dennis DeConcini
John Glenn
Don Riegle
I will play my new favorite game with you, and let you
guess the political persuasions of the other senators involved.
Oooh, Oooh
Thu, 02/21/2008 - 06:32 ET by TeeDeeI know! Pick me! Pick me!
It figures K.O. would be excited to tell his one or two actual listeners about this!
Bob Bennett did a great job on Hannity and Colmes of letting the air out of this so-called scandal written in that so-called newspaper.
"It isn't that liberals are ignorant, it's just that they know so much that isn't so" - Ronald Reagan
does Hillary know?
Thu, 02/21/2008 - 14:10 ET by mom_roxCould you possibly be referring to the same Senator John Glenn (D-OH) who recently endorsed Hillary Clinton for president?
A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.
- George Bernard Shaw, 1944
...
Thu, 02/21/2008 - 05:13 ET by Jack Bauer....
I wonder.....
Thu, 02/21/2008 - 07:49 ET by NavyBuckeyeHow would the author of this article or KO would like it if some one came and said they feel either one of these two are having and affair with an intern at MSNBC or the NYT? I mean it would be so easy:
Mr. Smith, who was recently KO's assistant but is now just the assistants adivsor, came forward and said he feels that KO is having an affair with Sally the intern. He saw them both enter an office together and leave about 3 minutes later with smiles on thier faces. Then later that day he noticed them talking(with intermittent laughter) in a secluded corner of the office at MSNBC headquarters. Although KO and Sally the intern deny the charges, we feel this is enough proof to call him and adulterer.
FNC could run this as breaking news during the six o'clock broadcast and run it for at least three hours. They can call co-workers and ex-girlfriends to say how he is always oogling women and talking to them.
I bet KO would not like this at all, but yet it is the same thing this times reporter and KO just did themselves.
“Were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers or newspapers without government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter” - Thomas Jefferson
"Eerily similar to Lewinsky
Thu, 02/21/2008 - 08:04 ET by motherbelt"Eerily similar to Lewinsky scandal"?????
Oh please.
Is there any indication that McCain was engaging in "Clinton/Lewinsky" behavior in his office?????
There are NO similarities, period!
Olbermann and the MSM are trying to make this into "Deja vu all over again."
Oh, and Keith, try to be original....that's been done to death.
I agree...
Thu, 02/21/2008 - 08:05 ET by NavyBuckeyeThe next step in this is looking for the smoking cigar.....
The MSM will be digging through this womans trash looking for a stained dress, but will only find mud.
“Were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers or newspapers without government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter” - Thomas Jefferson
McCain scandal a story, Lewinsky not?
Thu, 02/21/2008 - 09:09 ET by nkviking75How much squealing did the press do about the whole Clinton/Lewinsky scandal when it was going on? They tried to tell us that was a non-story, a scurrilous attack, and a special prosecutor (Ken Starr) obsessed with sex. If the MSM would stick to its principles (a term used extremely loosely here), they'd sweep this McCain scandal, true or not, under the rug.
Don't hold your breath.
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.
No similarities: McCain's lady is actually cute
Thu, 02/21/2008 - 08:13 ET by ArchConservativeWhat does it matter anyways? I thought sex was a private matter and that it shouldn't be anyone's business. Oh wait, that's right, that's only if you perjure yourself, suborn perjury, or abuse the priveledge of the Peoples' House.
You support the troops by supporting the mission! If you don't support the mission, have the guts to say you don't support the troops.
This is actually a cartoon
Thu, 02/21/2008 - 09:04 ET by Free ThinkerThis is actually a cartoon of the media bias that Newsbusters points out everyday. I read the article and it is without any substance. As far as hit pieces go the NYT should be embarrassed. One really has to wonder if an editor even looked at the article. Olbermann's reaction to it is even more bizarre. What a fool.
This could be the Times
Thu, 02/21/2008 - 13:41 ET by Hunter12This could be the Times carrying the water for Obama. If you read Karl Rove's piece that was linked in the open thread, he talks about McCain's accusations against Obama not divorcing himself from lobbyists. The Times rushes a story about McCain and a lobbyist into print. I don't believe in coincidence as it relates to the MSM. Now, when McCain tries to bring up the issue of BHO and his lobbyist connections, he's got the spectre of this story hanging in the background. I still think TBS will be running 24 hours of "The Manchurian Candidate" the day before the election.
"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last." - Sir Winston Churchill
Let's see during the
Thu, 02/21/2008 - 16:00 ET by mlongLet's see during the Clinton affair KO would call in sick when he worked at FOX so he wouldn't report about it..that's how he earn the name "Bathtub Boy"...but now he can't wait to jump on this bogus McCain story.....another victory for the new "Murrow".
"I want my Mommy!!!!"
Hillary Clinton'08