Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive little Johnny in crying wolf...........

Nope it wasn't George who cried wolf, not Dick nor Paul........Saddam had the WMD's and Russia in 3 ways helped them flush them which I detailed here.

Now of course the MSM who are lap dogs of Rockefeller and Rothschild and protected Bill Clinton in his little bribery with Saddam..........and of course the press never researched Saddam's bribes to all their bosses which Marc Rich funnelled.

So now we enter into Iran. Nobody wants to believe in public what Bush is saying, especially since the Europeans and the MSM all know Russia dumped Saddam's WMD's in various nefarious locations to poison the planet, empower Syria and terrorists and give Putin one more nuke to threaten the world with.........

But the public upon being lied to just doesn't believe pesky old Iran is a booger man............because that little report came out that Iran stopped Uranium production..........oh but they didn't say why they stopped WAS BECAUSE GEORGE BOMBED THE BAJESUS OUT OF SADDAM AND TOOK OVER IRAQ.

Gee about the same time ole Khadaffi.........yeah the PC boys called Muie Ghadaffi now but I prefer the K...........gave up his Uranium.

So there we have it CBS, you lied, now the people don't know what to believe besides wacko Ron Paul, wacko Jeff Rense, wacko Steve Quayle, wacko Democrats, wacko Alex Jones and wacko George Soros.............so the Persian Islamocommunists continue on their unholy way making bombs.........yes children they are making the bomb in addition to the several they bought from the Soviet Union.

This is why France threatened under Chirac to nuke Iran out of the blue.........and why all those Europeans are scared a Shahab 3 tipped with atomic weapons will soon fall upon their little socialist enclaves.

The Europeans testicles and ovaries are in the fire. They sold all these goodies, looked the other way when Mother Putin was selling bombs and looked the other way when Kim and the Chicoms helped perfect the Ahmadinejad bomb squad.

Iran has nukes. The problem is how does the world destroy the Iranian leadership, terrorists, bombs and military parts and leave the Persians a government to chug along with so the whole world doesn't spiral into a tit for tat nuclear war.

China will implode without Iranian oil.

Games on you lying liberals.........you made the mess covering up the lies........now you got nukes in Iranian terrorists and New York is the target.

Check mate

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

The media is simply latching onto the easiest story line, but it’s the shallowest of story lines. The media either doesn’t understand or agree with the demand for nations to be transparent about their weapons. They’re hailing the NIE report as proof that Bush was wrong, but that’s an embarrassingly shortsighted and partisan charge. Instead, the NIE proves the value of transparency, and the need to stand behind it as a demand.

• Under the surrender agreement to the first Gulf War, Iraq had an obligation to prove that they were not developing weapons. Iraq had an obligation to be transparent. As we know, Iraq preferred to play games instead of comply. Saddam was too proud to accept transparency. Saddam was a very rich man, had a history of sponsoring terrorism, and had been blowing off the demands for many years. Other states in the region had the same profile, but Saddam was the biggest and the richest.

• Then 9/11 happened. Another rich sponsor of terrorism (Osama bin Laden) had used his wealth to attack the United States. The US went after bin Laden, but it also became clear that Saddam was a bin Laden waiting to happen. More than ever, it was crucial that either Saddam accept transparency, or the US would feel compelled to attack. Saddam refused transparency, so he was invaded and overthrown.

• We now know how other states responded. Libya surrendered their development outright. Iran appears to have suspended it. To be blunt, the invasion of Iraq showed them that we were serious, and they took us seriously.

• By any historical standard, that was an effective policy, and the net result was fewer nuclear weapons and fewer WMDs. The strategy of the Iraq invasion turned out to be correct. Unfortunately, the errors and mistakes in the execution of the strategy are another matter. The strategy itself was correct.

The American policy is simple. You must be transparent about your weapons. If not, we'll assume you’re developing them. If you refuse to comply with inspections, we must assume you’re hiding something. After 9/11, we're not going to look the other way. If you hide anything, we’re going to keep up the pressure until you either accept transparency, or face the consequences.

That’s an effective strategy. We need to keep it.

"They’re hailing the NIE report as proof that Bush was wrong, but that’s an embarrassingly shortsighted and partisan charge."

And ironic as well, considering his policy towards Iran was formed by earlier NIEs that said Iran was indeed pursuing a nuclear weapons program. Seems the standards these days is if you don't know what intelligence reports from 2 years into the future will say, you're either wrong or, if you're Bush, a liar.

Anyway, Merry Christmas, Iran, for you have just been given a gift, as you will now be able to develop a nuclear program with little or no oversight from the world community.