Less than three weeks after the CBS Evening News used the indictments of Bernard Kerik to relay how “people” say he's “a poster child as to why Giuliani shouldn't be President,” Katie Couric pounced on a revelation not considered newsworthy by ABC and NBC as she teased Wednesday's newscast, “A potential political embarrassment for Rudy Giuliani: Questions about how he billed New York City taxpayers for his security. Was he trying to hide something?” ABC and NBC ran full stories on Bill Clinton's inaccurate claim that he “opposed Iraq from the beginning,” a remark CBS limited to a brief item from Couric following the Giuliani story.
Reporter Byron Pitts asserted “the Giuliani campaign is once again fending off new questions about an old affair,” explaining that “according to the Web site Politico.com, in 2000, as Giuliani was beginning his not-so-secret extramarital relationship with Judith Nathan, the woman who eventually became his third wife, he billed obscure city agencies thousands of dollars in expenses for his police security detail in the Hamptons off Long Island where Nathan was living.”
[UPDATE, 10pm EST Nov. 29: On Thursday night, November 29, both ABC's World News and the NBC Nightly News aired stories on this subject, with denials from Giuliani about any impropriety. The CBS Evening News also ran a follow up with Giuliani denouncing the attack as “a political hit job.”]
My November 9 NewsBusters posting, “CBS on Kerik: 'Poster Child as to Why Giuliani Shouldn't Be President,'” recounted:
The CBS Evening News, which has aired only one full story on the scandal surrounding Hillary Clinton's fugitive donor Norman Hsu, on Friday night ran its second full story on the impact on Rudy Giuliani of Bernard Kerik's indictments as Byron Pitts told Kerik that “people” say you're “a poster child as to why Giuliani shouldn't be President.” Back on August 31, in the newscast's only full story on Hsu, fill-in anchor Harry Smith didn't even mention Hillary Clinton's name in his introduction, but on Friday Katie Couric put Giuliani front and center: “Kerik isn't the only one who could face trouble. It's also bad news for his friend and mentor, Republican presidential hopeful Rudy Giuliani.”
In the Hsu story, CBS reporter Sandra Hughes didn't warn about any negative impact on the Hillary Clinton campaign or speculate about what Hillary Clinton knew about Hsu's criminal past or suspect bundling. But in the Giuliani piece, Pitts predicted: "Kerik's legal problems could mean political problems for Giuliani and the inevitable questions of the presidential candidate: What did he know and when did he know it?" In an exchange with Kerik, Pitts proposed: "There are people who say that you, forgive me, are a poster child as to why Giuliani shouldn't be President, because of your own troubles."...
The MRC's Brad Wilmouth corrected the closed-captioning against the video for the November 28 CBS Evening News story:
KATIE COURIC: Now to the presidential campaign and new problems tonight for Rudy Giuliani. Some potentially embarrassing questions came up today that date back to his days as mayor of New York. Byron Pitts is covering the Giuliani campaign.
BYRON PITTS: On a night when they would rather fine tune answers for tonight's GOP debate, the Giuliani campaign is once again fending off new questions about an old affair. According to the Web site Politico.com, in 2000, as Giuliani was beginning his not-so-secret extramarital relationship with Judith Nathan, the woman who eventually became his third wife, he billed obscure
city agencies thousands of dollars in expenses for his police security detail in the Hamptons off Long Island where Nathan was living. For example, in one instance, $34,000 worth of travel expenses were placed in the budget for the New York City Loft Board.
MIKE ALLEN, POLITICO.COM: These were records that the city controller had tried to get in the past, but the mayor's offices said they couldn't be released because of security.
PITTS: Giuliani's campaign had this response, calling the story a non-issue: Quote, "This is common practice. The NYPD is responsible for providing security for the mayor of New York around the clock." But the question isn't about his security detail, it's about how the expenses were billed.
PROF. LARRY SABATO, UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: It's coming out at the worst possible time for Giuliani, just as voters in Iowa and New Hampshire are beginning to make up their minds finally. It reinforces his biggest problem, which is that, not just his liberal positions on social issues, but also the fact that he's had a very messy private life.
PITTS: And messy is always unwelcome for a campaign that would rather stay on message. Byron Pitts, CBS News, New York.
—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center



The CBS Evening News, which has aired only one full story on the scandal surrounding Hillary Clinton's fugitive donor Norman Hsu, on Friday night ran its second full story on the impact on Rudy Giuliani of Bernard Kerik's indictments as Byron Pitts told Kerik that “people” say you're “a poster child as to why Giuliani shouldn't be President.” Back on August 31, in the newscast's only full story on Hsu, fill-in anchor Harry Smith didn't even mention Hillary Clinton's name in his introduction, but on Friday Katie Couric put Giuliani front and center: “Kerik isn't the only one who could face trouble. It's also bad news for his friend and mentor, Republican presidential hopeful Rudy Giuliani.”
KATIE COURIC: Now to the presidential campaign and new problems tonight for Rudy Giuliani. Some potentially embarrassing questions came up today that date back to his days as mayor of New York. Byron Pitts is covering the Giuliani campaign.
city agencies thousands of dollars in expenses for his police security detail in the Hamptons off Long Island where Nathan was living. For example, in one instance, $34,000 worth of travel expenses were placed in the budget for the New York City Loft Board.












Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Typical leftie double
November 28, 2007 - 21:57 ET by robert108Typical leftie double standard. Sandy Berger walks free.
How slimy!
November 28, 2007 - 22:04 ET by Tim GrahamI'm an Anybody But Giuliani voter. But this story is so remarkably biased when you consider that CBS was hardly eager in 1992 to explore how Clinton used government resources were exploited for his "messy" private life, like getting Gennifer Flowers a state job to keep her happy and quiet.
I agree, Tim, especially
November 28, 2007 - 23:00 ET by motherbeltI agree, Tim, especially since right now this is just a "potential" embarrassment. Well Couric seems determined to develop its potential.
I particularly dislike the tactic of using a question to get a suspicion out there: "Was he trying to hide something?" Of course, the implication is that yes, he was.
And in addition to your example, the MSM seem particularly disinterested in what happened to Norman Hsu's money, and whether the Clinton campaign really returned all of it. I read somewhere that it had not all been returned yet, and that some of it had actually been given to charity (if true, is that ethical?).
The MSM neither knows nor shows any interest in it. Yet they will sit like a hen on the Giuliani story hoping it will hatch into something.
I'm the same kind of voter...
November 29, 2007 - 07:23 ET by sarcasmoBut at least when Rudy was questioned about the same thing in the debate, there was conveniently no mention by Anderson Vanderbilt that the motivation was likely his extramarital dalliances. I don't care about bias in 1992 in this case -- we all know the media is and was biased, and it's not 1992 anymore in any case.
I care about not-repeating Oval Office BJ-history, despite the substantial good comedy factor. I've done enough jokes about Presidents & interns to last me the rest of my life just with Slick, and not-covering Clinton scandals due to bias is no excuse not to cover this scandal (or Kerrick's established mob-links, which Rudy knew-about before he suggested his equally-sexually-untrustworthy buddy to President Bush) to the fullest extent possible to educate voters so that mistakes of the past aren't repeated.
JMR
Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.
Rudy on Pootie
November 29, 2007 - 07:35 ET by Cool ArrowThis whole fiasco may be old news, but I think it might have the same eyes rolling effect on others it had on me. Just not willing to put up with much more "got some on the taxpayers' dime" news.
There's only a few candidates clean enough at this point to look remotely electable.
Rudy's not
November 29, 2007 - 07:37 ET by sarcasmoOne of 'em, especially after last night...And on his propensity for sexual dalliances, even Fox's substantial pro-Rudy bias won't save him.
JMR
PS Nice desperation in the editor's picks, but the Ron Paul supporter chose Nov. 5th because of "V for Vendetta," a comic book.
Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.
Oh My
November 29, 2007 - 08:52 ET by allanfSo let's see. Is Hillary's secret service detail billed to the US Government when she goes on vacation?
Katie --- you'll have to do better. You embarass yourself.
Did I hear 'Lincoln
November 28, 2007 - 23:33 ET by kgDid I hear 'Lincoln bedroom' on the tax payer's dime?
Did I hear how much pardons are costing?
Did I hear how much money the MSM has invested in Hillary's '08 run?
Did I hear about what's new with Hsu?
-
November 29, 2007 - 23:14 ET by dahliatraversAnd you can add: looting the White House and Air Force One as they left.
Yep! Rudy was getting far
November 29, 2007 - 00:07 ET by Sonny LykosYep! Rudy was getting far too much traction in the polls. Time to attack him. Get the list of what we got on him and lets start publicizing one of them, but save some for later, incase he regains a high poll standing again. Then we'll hit him again, maybe even with two at a time.
I"m looking forward to about a month (short time masses memory you know) before the actual elections for the MSM to really zap any popular Republican. Ditto for any Senator or House Rep. that's up for reelection.
We haven't seen anything
November 29, 2007 - 09:34 ET by msh1973We haven't seen anything yet (according to Rush). The msm and the Democrats have an ax to grind and they will stop at nothing to destroy any Republican running for President. That is just my humble opinion.
Howdy msh... I feel your
November 29, 2007 - 23:54 ET by bigtimerHowdy msh...
I feel your humble opinion is El Correcto....same as El Rushbo's...
LOL...
Gotta' run for a bit...watching the Cowboy's/Packers game...been a good one so far.