In the self-incriminating quote of the night, an unidentified white man, in a Tuesday night CBS Evening News story on Barack Obama, insisted “I don't want to sound prejudiced or anything,” but then proceeded to declare: “I don't want to vote for a colored man to be our President.” The soundbite aired during a piece from Dean Reynolds on Obama's racial identity and how it gives some blacks “pause” because “he is not the descendant of African slaves, but is the son of a white mother and a Kenyan father.” Reynolds, reporting from Portsmouth, New Hampshire, concluded by observing that “of course, there are whites who will never vote for Obama because he is black.” The unidentified man, standing in what looked like a store, then asserted in a soundbite:
I don't want to sound prejudiced or anything, but for one I'm not gonna, I don't want to vote for a colored man to be our President.
The CBSNews.com online version of the Reynolds story identified the man only as “one South Carolina voter.”
The man certainly, and very unfortunately, confirmed the media's prejudices about conservative white men.
Editor at Large
Comments Policy
"The man certainly, and
November 27, 2007 - 21:13 ET by Jerry"The man certainly, and very unfortunately, confirmed the media's prejudices about conservative white men..."
Why do you assume he was a conservative? When the party is not identified in association to a negative portrayal, 99.99% of the time it is a Democrat.
When asked if he went to war with Iraq to derail the impeachment vote: “I don’t think any serious person would believe that any President would do such a thing." - President Clinton (Dec 1998).
I agree, a conservative
November 28, 2007 - 09:19 ET by general companyI agree, a conservative would not even consider Obama. I also think they would know better then to spout off with this type of nonsense, libs say stupid crap all of the time. If the media did not ID him as a conservative, isnt it safe to say he is a Dem?
"Always do right. This will gratify some people, and astonish the rest". Mark Twain
Add to that, Republicans
November 28, 2007 - 09:34 ET by Hero SquadAdd to that, Republicans right now can't vote for Obama unless they switch parties.
With a plethora of reasons why a conservative would not consider voting for a liberal-to-the-core Democrat, skin color would never even come into play.
Meanwhile, a liberal Democrat should support most, if not all, of what Obama stands for, leaving only one factor that would cause said Democrat to vote otherwise.
*****
"The empty wagon makes the most noise." - Derrick Mason
This unidentified guy is
November 28, 2007 - 12:31 ET by mattmThis unidentified guy is obviously a Jim Crow Democrat.
Bingo. If this guy had
November 28, 2007 - 10:42 ET by CortillaenBingo. If this guy had been a registered Republican, they would have been trumpeting his party all over the piece. The fact that they neglected to mention it can only mean one thing: He's one of their own.
www.rhjunior.com Great comics with a hefty dose of Christian and anti-nutjob goodness.
"With your mind as high as Mt. Fuji you can see all things clearly. And you can see all the forces that shape events; not just the things near to you." -Miyamoto Musashi
Brent, it's called political
November 27, 2007 - 21:17 ET by dscottBrent, it's called political black ops from the bag of dirty tricks, and this season seems to have an inordinate amount of this activity. It started successfully with George Allen over the Macca flap and then moved on to Foley over the gay issue. That the MSM is participating openly in such an unethical pandering to the race card means the Dems and MSM are particularly worried about the outcome of the primaries and general election.
The MSM has chosen Obama over Hillary, so now begins the process of race baiting in order to put everyone on the defensive to help Obama level the playing field so to speak by instantly implying that if you are white and don't vote for Obama you are a racist. If Obama loses, all the Dems and MSM will caterwaul and mewl that America is racist and more steps need to be taken.
Liberals know they can't win if the election is about what they really are (Socialism, socialized medicine, welfare or high taxation), that's why they are hiding behind the "Progressive" rebranding.
Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. dscott's corollary: The line between malice and stupidity is called depraved indifference.
Too True
November 27, 2007 - 21:39 ET by red_dragon311If Obama loses, all the Dems and MSM will caterwaul and mewl that America is racist and more steps need to be taken.
Liberals know they can't win if the election is about what they really are (Socialism, socialized medicine, welfare or high taxation), that's why they are hiding behind the "Progressive" rebranding
right on and if hillary is the dem and she doesn't win it will be americcans are sexist ...
You forgot...
November 27, 2007 - 22:45 ET by m4ster chiefYou wrote:
"Liberals know they can't win if the election is about what they really are (Socialism, socialized medicine, welfare or high taxation), that's why they are hiding behind the "Progressive" rebranding."
You forgot to list "unrestrained sodomy, unrestricted porn for anyone old enough to have developed eyelids, and the Liberal Holocaust (unregulated abortion.")
Hey, I'm a liberal white
November 27, 2007 - 21:17 ET by mbx175Hey, I'm a liberal white guy and I don't want a black guy as President either.
mbx
November 27, 2007 - 21:44 ET bydoesn't that depend on which black guy (or gal)?
GoHunter08
Manufactured news.
November 27, 2007 - 21:21 ET by c5thenI guess that Reynolds couldn't get a New Hampshire resident to say what they wanted, so they had to go to good old SC and find a John Edwards supporter.
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Fred08.com
Prejudice
November 27, 2007 - 21:38 ET by Lame CherryThere is not a human alive who is not prejudiced in every form from sight, sound, scent, touch due to our relationship with our parents and later transends to emotional psychopathies.
One either votes for their parents or votes against their parents. In that democrats vote for people who make excuses for them and GOP'ers vote for people who learned to disdain failure.
Someone not wanting to vote for a black because they are black deals with a prejudice of only liking what they visualized growing up.............and in turn any reporter in the MSM who makes things like this an issue is due to the fact growing up they grew to be racists.
Reporters, producers and anchors on the media are such interesting tadpoles swimming about tasting race, oggling sex, vomitting religion, touching perversion and simply hearing only those things being spoken which gives them cover to practice their prejudice by making an issue of the other people.
A very interesting genesis of the Democrat party of 1850 showed they were heathens, anti American and bigots. They still are today in the liberals pulling the same watch the white rabbit game.
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
All I know is give me these
November 27, 2007 - 21:47 ET by USA4freedomAll I know is give me these things as a President..
Not in any particular order..
#1: Tax cutting
#2: spending cutting
#3: pro gun
#4: pro life
#5: no ear marks
#6: build fence
#7: clamp down on companies using illegal help
#8: fair or flat tax
#9: strong defense
#10: drill for oil
# 11: build more refineries
#12: cut foreign aid to countries that criticize us for 5years
# 13: make election day April 16th.
#14: win the war.
#15 keep your dam hands to yourself.
That SOB could be purple with white and green stripes with adam Mohawk and a bone in his nose, and he still will get my vote!
Just give us what we want in a President.
(I only wish some one would..)
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc. Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day
Do you actually believe the
November 27, 2007 - 22:18 ET by balboaDo you actually believe the stuff you post on here, or is it just an exercise in bizarre postulating dressed up as in-depth analysis?
Sorry Bal, I will try to
November 27, 2007 - 23:07 ET by USA4freedomSorry Bal,
I will try to check with you next time, to get your OK..
Brent stated: The man certainly, and very unfortunately,confirmed the media's prejudices about conservative white men.
I’m white, and conservative and will vote for whom evercomes closest to what I would like to see in a candidate. No matter what coloror gender.
Is that a little more un-der-stand-able for you??
I don’t want to sound toooo bizarre post-ish.
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc. Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day
I was responding to
November 27, 2007 - 23:10 ET by balboaI was responding to Lamecherry, not you.
Sorry, I saw it under my
November 27, 2007 - 23:13 ET by USA4freedomSorry, I saw it under my post.
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc. Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day
I think I need to smoke
November 27, 2007 - 23:14 ET by USA4freedomI think I need to smoke something to understand his info..
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc. Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day
USA4F
November 27, 2007 - 23:21 ET by MrShyLame C is not a debator/engager/breeze-shooter either.
He simply reads each blog, writes his prose in his unique style, and then waits for the next blog.
"MY end justifies THAT mean." - Shakespeare (not really)
MrS
November 27, 2007 - 23:25 ET bykind of an anti-bot?
BOT-G
I guess so.. What ever pops
November 27, 2007 - 23:27 ET by USA4freedomI guess so..What ever pops your corn.
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc. Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day
the microwave what's the
November 27, 2007 - 23:29 ET bythe microwave
what's the frequncy Kenneth?
GoHunter08
Anything I see from Dean Reynolds
November 28, 2007 - 09:31 ET by TaserCatAnything I see from Dean Reynolds I take with a grain of salt. They guy tilts left so far, he might fall over.
Are you saying he veers so
November 28, 2007 - 09:37 ET by Hero SquadAre you saying he veers so far left that he's facing oncoming traffic?
*****
"The empty wagon makes the most noise." - Derrick Mason
Great post fromUSA4freedom
November 27, 2007 - 22:24 ET by WR JonasGreat list and I can only add one thing ,defund and defect from the UN.
A question for our MSM enemies. Is Oprahs support for Obama a racist act since her natural liberal tendency would be to support the female candidate?
yes, she sold out her
November 27, 2007 - 22:39 ET by red_dragon311yes, she sold out her sisters for her sista's
I read that Oprah actually
November 27, 2007 - 23:07 ET by motherbeltI read that Oprah actually said she was going to tell women: you don't have to vote for Hillary just because she's a woman; you can vote for what you need ....
(Whatever that is, I guess she thinks Obama's got it.)
Actually, if he had been a
November 27, 2007 - 22:41 ET by robert108Actually, if he had been a conservative, he would have said he would never vote for a Dem. So, he was a Dem, who said he wouldn't vote for the "colored" Dem candidate. Not too hard to figure out.
There are many legitimate
November 27, 2007 - 23:13 ET by mostlymoderateThere are many legitimate reasons a person might admit to not voting for a black president. One could be the fact that blacks represent a minority of the population and that a black president might spend too much time working for black causes instead of "American" causes (causes that effect EVERYONE).
It's not Obama's fault. The black community is confused with the agenda's of people like Sharpton, Jackson, Rapper's, etc. Now I KNOW that most black people do not subscribe to any of the above; however, that is what the media PORTRAYS. Therefore, I can understand a white person being weary of voting for a black person.
Actually, Michelle Obama
November 28, 2007 - 00:54 ET by RESTLESS 1Actually, Michelle Obama thinks Blacks won't vote for him because he is black as well. I wonder if this means that Blacks are racist against Blacks too? ;>)
Black's ARE racist against
November 28, 2007 - 02:05 ET by mostlymoderateBlack's ARE racist against one-another. Why do you think they are always calling each other N1$$er??
SOD...that's my ex B-I-L
November 27, 2007 - 23:45 ET by BlondeKidding, of course.
But this story is a riot...
And doesn't bode to well for her Royal Clinton, oh excuse me, Hillary Clintonette....off with their heads!
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
Look Ma!
November 28, 2007 - 00:30 ET by Parker1227I found me a genuiiine racist! I told you ALL them southerners were a bunch of bigoted rednecks, jus' like in that Burt Reynolds movie Deliverance (squeeeeal like a pig!).
The only institutionalized racism remaining in this country is in crackpot Leftist Humanities departments (found in most colleges) where to be White, European, and male is to be born guilty. If you are a southerner or a capitalist on top of this then you are evil incarnate.
And where do most reporters come from? Bigoted Leftist Humanities departments, of course.
Hey! Maybe this is the
November 28, 2007 - 00:30 ET by MidAmericaHey! Maybe this is the "Some say" person the media is always quoting.
I am white man that lives
November 28, 2007 - 01:06 ET by jdhawkI am white man that lives in the South and I am not voting for the "Magic Negro" either. However, I could care less what color the man is. I do care about what he stands for.
Besides what I have written below, B. Hussein Obama has little political experience. He is a first term Senator. He has no national experience beyond this term. And, given that he is running for president, he hasn't had the time to learn that job, yet.
On the following issues is how I am judging the candidates, defeatocrats or Republicans (I state where I stand on each issue):
1. What do they propose that we do about Iraq and Afghanistan wars and the WOT? Support finishing the job we started in both countries and root out and destroy islamofascism whever it may be found.
2. What is their position on immigration in the United States? Secure our borders and enforce existing law. This will ensure that illegals do not continue to enter our country and will force the ones that are here to move back where they came from.
3. Will they make permanent the tax cuts of 2001 and 2003 and abolish death taxes and the AMT? Tax cuts ought to be permanent and we should abolish death taxes and the AMT.
4. Would they federally fund embryonic stem cell research? No, an alternative has already been found.
5. Do they favor or oppose legalized abortion in the United States? No, except where the mother's life is in danger. It is murder.
6. Do they favor or oppose the concept of universal health care in America? No. And, we should move the existing government health care programs to private enterprise where possible.
7. Do they favor the concept of privatization of Social Security? Yes, immediately.
8. Do they favor or oppose giving the president a "line-item" veto? Yes.
9. Do they support assistance for the production of ethanol and/or biofuel as an alternative to oil? No, it is inefficient and drives up the cost of this commodity, corn, for all other uses.
10. Do they favor or oppose a constitutional ammendment defining marriage as between one man and one woman? Yes.
11. Do they favor or oppose the use of the death penalty for certain crimes? Favor.
There is not one of the above items that B. Hussein Obama and I see eye to eye on. And, for that matter, none of the other dimocrats do either.
You see the same thing with
November 28, 2007 - 02:01 ET by wiwfYou see the same thing with people that won't vote for Romney because he's Mormon.
The Rocky Mountain Collegian: Illustrating Idiocy
yeap, I won't vote for
November 28, 2007 - 08:34 ET by dscottyeap, I won't vote for Romney, but it has nothing to do with his "professed" religion. Romney is as Morman as he is Pro-Life or conservative, he's none of the above! This guy is a genuine as a $3 bill.
Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. dscott's corollary: The line between malice and stupidity is called depraved indifference.
jdhawk, the sad part is not
November 28, 2007 - 08:53 ET by USA4freedomjdhawk,the sad part is not too many of "our guys" have a good history of these issues. I don't want to hold my nose again. I think that Duncan Hunter would be the best pick but.. no traction.Fred seems to be sleep walking..Huck. looks like Democrat lite.. from what I read.Mitt/ Gul. I can't trustMc Cain/ Finegold.
Can I have a "none of the above" pick..
We don't need anymore RINO's
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc. Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day
Those are all important and
November 28, 2007 - 08:53 ET by JerThose are all important and relevant issues on which to base a decision, and provide a clear rationale for your support of a Republican candidate.
But why refer to Obama variously as the "Magic Negro" and B. Hussein Obama?
Jer
Barack Hussein Obama
November 28, 2007 - 09:19 ET by candanceThat's his real name. No lie. His father was an African Muslim who married a white atheist. He spent his childhood attending a Muslim school in Indonesia then returned to the states when he was ten.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama
card holding member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
I wonder how many people
November 28, 2007 - 02:26 ET by well99I wonder how many people they had to ask to get that comment?
"Colored Man"
November 28, 2007 - 02:37 ET by zeestephenCan we see the video out takes on this news report? How come the "colored man" guy doesn't have a name? If we Google his name will we find a registered Democrat? Shame on him if this is really true. Shame on us if we let CBS dump this story into the political marketplace without more scrutiny.
BTW - can someone explain to me why a man with a black father and a white mother is called "black?" If Obama had a white father and a black mother would he be "white?"
Zee, because it is worth
November 28, 2007 - 06:47 ET by Jcon96Zee, because it is worth more in political capital to be seen as black. Kind of like it was morth more to Looneywood and Halley Berry to be seen as black for the purpose of her Oscar.
Obama
November 28, 2007 - 08:25 ET by fosstenActually, Obama didn't get to decide his color, according to him. He said in an interview that he was called "black", so that is what he is. Rush made a good point though, if you don't like it, renounce it!
Forget 911, I dial 10MM.
Bashing whitie
November 28, 2007 - 10:36 ET by FranksamA recent story in the Denver Rocky Mountain News about a Denver City Gov't "sensitivity" training film portrayed only one insensitive employee. Guess what, it was a white boy, cracking jokes about burrito eaters and such.
As a lifelong white boy, I agree with several of the comments above re race. I'd vote for just about any color or sex of human if he or she represented my interests. Barack does not.
UPDATE: Maybe this should be an additional comment. I'm not that smart.
Well..... I'm not very sophisticated in the way these comments post, but as of today, and after I mentioned the diversity training video in Denver earlier, I read the News, and the training video has been pulled. After one guy complained about the video, numerous other employees of Denver who had been subjected to the show came forward to complain as well.
At least this time, the PC crowd backed off, and the News reported without any particular bias.
Who uses the term "colored" anymore?
November 28, 2007 - 08:21 ET by Britcom-
Well, for starters...
November 28, 2007 - 08:23 ET by sarcasmoThe NAACP. And in the ever-changing cycle of political correctness where "black" is no-longer PC, we hear "people of color," which might be close.
JMR
Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.
Sarc
November 28, 2007 - 08:26 ET by fosstenIsn't that supposed to be the NAALCP?
Sorry, couldn't resist.
Forget 911, I dial 10MM.
What I don't get is...
November 28, 2007 - 08:33 ET by sarcasmoWhat was so-wrong with "black." Sure it's inaccurate just like white, but if they wanted accuracy they could have gone for 'dark brown' and 'light brown.' The terminology-change seems to me to be designed (by those who make all of their money off of racial conflict) to incite racial conflict where otherwise there would be none. It's very hard to explain the shift from "black" to "people of color" in any other way. I still just say "black."
Racism is a problem of the heart, and such issues aren't where government (which has no heart) shines. You can't legislate morality. It's a minority-view, but I think any racial progress in my lifetime has been despite, not because-of, big government. I'm blessed to work in a company that has none of that BS, and I know I'm blessed -- which is also a blessing -- even though I sometimes take it for granted. Our black employees are there because they're excellent employees. Period. I'm lucky to work with them.
JMR
Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.
South Carolina
November 28, 2007 - 08:41 ET by candanceI'm really getting tired of the lefties in the media portraying the south in the worst possible light.
A few months back it was Whoopi Goldberg saying Michael Vick didn't know any better because he was from the deep south - as if everyone in the south tortures animals.
Then it was De Palma showing his murderous Marines with a Confederate flag in their quarters.
Now it's this news report (about voters in New Hampshire) going 800 miles away to find a racist in the south. At least this time they got a guy with a real southern accent, though.
Such elitist thinking. Any time they need to justify or explain something, they say it happens down south and immediately all their liberal viewers accept it. If that sound bite had come from Minnesota, would people be more skeptical?
card holding member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
The part I like is the fact
November 28, 2007 - 09:00 ET by USA4freedomThe part I like is the fact that no one remembersany….history. It was theDemocrats….. standing…in.. the.. doorways of the southern schools. Some how this great lie goes onforever. Repeat after me.. TheRepublicans are racist. Are you going to believe the Democrats or your lying eyes. Black Democrats under Clinton, (after receiving some 90% of the black vote) Ron Brown.. and….? Black Republicans under Bush,(after receiving only some where around 10% of the black vote) Secretary of State Colin Powell and national security adviser Condoleezza Rice, to General Services Administrationdirector Steve Perry and Kay James, head of the Office of Personnel Management. All this and the people we put up as judges, running for state and national office, example: Clarence Thomas Steel, Blackwell and Swann. On the other hand in the Democraticside of the debate you get: McCall (ran for Mayor of NYC) and thelate Maynard Jackson (DNC Chairman hopeful) all tossed under the busfor…drum roll please.. white guys..
Look, can’t we get past the race card. The Democrats have this weird idea that theRepublicans want blacks not to get ahead. You being poor or uneducated does not make me richer or smarter. It will give us.. higher taxes to help support the poor. Watching blacks in poverty does not put one dime in my.. pocket, but it will take dollars out of my wallet for: welfare, food stamps, etc. More proof that Liberal ideas do not work.
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc. Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day
might i suggest a CBS manufactured lie again
November 28, 2007 - 08:59 ET by lunaticcringeradioi'm from the southern region there, and i'm near this guys age, but i've never heard anyone in my demographic there calls black people colored. it's an outdated term that younger folks don't use, but blacks(as i use) are offended by "colored" even though it's not officially on the list of words white people can't use yet, so i think CBS has this guy staged to interview and use "colored" knowing it would offend black folks and sell their story that i think is manufactured.
just like the dan rather cbs fake papers story, this is a fake story.
lunaticcringeradio
ps i can think of a couple of blacks folks i'd vote for president before any liberal. just get the job done i don't care what color or sex you are.
Offended by "Colored"
November 28, 2007 - 09:05 ET by ThisnThatSo how do they feel about NAACP -- National Association for the Advancement of Colored People?
___________________________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber
exactly
November 28, 2007 - 09:23 ET by candanceThis fits into what I said above - no one will think twice about this because he's from South Carolina. But I guarantee if someone sniffed around this, they'd find out it was pre-planned.
card holding member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
Oh man, this is going to be
November 28, 2007 - 08:59 ET by dscottOh man, this is going to be a very dirty campaign this election cycle, even Pravda is reporting on it. LOL http://english.pravda.ru/world/americas/23-11-2007/101539-hillary_clinton-0
Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. dscott's corollary: The line between malice and stupidity is called depraved indifference.
Oh those racist in the
November 28, 2007 - 09:08 ET by USA4freedomOh those racist in the south.. so that is the only places where blacks had a problem??
Canyou say race riots?
Springfield,Ill? 1908
http://www.lib.niu.edu/ipo/1996/iht329622.html
Chicago?1919
http://www.lib.niu.edu/ipo/1997/ihy970454.html
Tulsa?1919
http://www.montgomerycollege.edu/Departments/hpolscrv/VdeLaOliva.html
Washington,DC? 1919
http://www.geocities.com/Hayesportfolio/Red_Summer.htm
Chester,Pa. 1918
Philadelphia,Pa. 1918
Nashville,TN. 1918
Knoxville,TN. 1919
Elaine,NE. 1919
Detroit,MI. 1942
Detroit,MI. 1943
Detroit,MI. 1967
Watts,LA, CA. 1967
LosAngeles, Ca. 1992
Is that the same America that has the state of Massachusetts one of the great bastions of liberalism Boston.
Now lets say you are in Boston in 1974..
http://encarta.msn.com/encnet/refpages/RefMedia.aspx?refid=461543499&artrefid=761557136&sec=-1&pn=1
Ibet that just screws up that “only the south is racist” theory.
Canyou say KKK around Boston??
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,913476,00.html
Today the Boston Public Schools are 86% African American and Hispanic. According tothe 2000 census, Boston's white population is 54.48%, whereas Boston's black and Hispanic populations together total 39.77%
So there you have it. There is racism where ever you go. Even in the NorthEast.........
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc. Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day
To quote my favorite
November 28, 2007 - 11:04 ET by robert108To quote my favorite comedian, Lenny Bruce: "If you want to see real prejudice, speak in a Southern accent." Enough said.
Not to be nitpicking
November 28, 2007 - 16:54 ET by well99"Ibet that just screws up that “only the south is racist” theory.
Canyou say KKK around Boston??
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,913476,00.html
Today the Boston Public Schools are 86% African American and Hispanic. According tothe 2000 census, Boston's white population is 54.48%, whereas Boston's black and Hispanic populations together total 39.77% "
That was "South Boston" .J/K...maybe
Another Clinton plant
November 28, 2007 - 11:03 ET by JimboThe first thing I thought when I read this is that this guy is another Clinton plant. She is declining in the polls becasue (in part) people are starting to wake up to the fact that she may be unelectable on the national election. So she is putting out this type of stuff to show Obama has the same problem.
Out of the question?? Anyone??
Leon says "By the way, I'm not afraid of fat people, I'm repulsed"
Truth Monger Says - "Both are religions [Christianity & Islam], yes - with the same percentage of terrorists."
Dems think all conservative republicans are racsits
November 28, 2007 - 12:47 ET by exLibWhat's in play here is the Liberal view of ALL conservatives (see Tom Brokaw thread for more on that).
Liberals think all Americans are racist, homophobes, women haters, etc....
Remember 2004? Kerry was nominated because of his "military" experience. They thought that because Kerry served in the military that gave the Dems the edge over the "supposed" dodger Bush. Flawed thinking of course.
Now in 07, Dems are seeing that Maybe Hill is NOT elected because in a general election conservatives won't vote for a women.
Worse is Barrack and the fact that he couldn't possibly win a general election since only Libs "like" colored people, I mean people of color.
I agree this guy is fake. The implication is that he is a Conservative- Republican. No one who leans left will even consider that this guy is a Dem. The reason he is unlableled is so they don't have to lie.
The thing is, like Kerry in 04, dems will eventually nominate whomever they think will win an election, in otherwords whom they think the most number of Republicans/independents will vote for.
"The reason he is
November 28, 2007 - 16:57 ET by well99"The reason he is unlableled is so they don't have to lie."
Never stopped them before.It is funny that they didnt have his party or political leanings.