CNN's Sanchez Defends Hit on McCain Over Supporter's 'Bitch' Remark

Photo of Brent Baker.
By Brent Baker | November 15, 2007 - 04:45 ET

A night after CNN host Rick Sanchez decided to try to create a scandal over John McCain's failure to rebuke a supporter who referred to Hillary Clinton as a “bitch,” Sanchez on Wednesday declared McCain “should have distanced himself” from the remark and, since he didn't, the incident was newsworthy; McCain castigated CNN for its “biased reporting” and CNN's own media critic, Howard Kurtz agreed “his campaign has a point. That little incident was pretty badly hyped by Rick Sanchez.”

ABC got into the hype too as anchor Charles Gibson introduced a story on “another bit of controversy in the presidential race” which “involves the reaction of Senator John McCain when a lady at a town meeting asked him a question that contained a derogatory reference to Hillary Clinton.”

On CNN's The Situation Room, Brian Todd informed viewers how on “Tuesday evening CNN anchor Rick Sanchez takes about six minutes at the very top of his prime time show, Out in the Open, raising questions about why Senator McCain didn't immediately chastise the woman for insulting Mrs. Clinton like that.” Later, on Out in the Open, Sanchez whined about how in criticizing CNN's news judgment, McCain is “shooting the messenger, blaming me personally and CNN for his present plight.” Sanchez laid bare his agenda as he excoriated McCain for not acting as Sanchez wanted: “His staff has put out several statements today. None of them offers an apology to women in general or to Hillary Clinton specifically.”

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Sanchez devoted two segments Wednesday night to “John McCain & the B-Word.” After looking at McCain's reaction to CNN and re-hashing what McCain did and should have done, Sanchez brought aboard left-wing radio talk show host Stephanie Miller to examine when it's okay to use the “B-word.”

Not surprisingly, MSNBC's Countdown with Keith Olbermann devoted a segment to the Monday exchange, at a South Carolina restaurant, between a woman in the audience -- who asked “how do we beat the bitch?” -- and McCain, an incident being pushed by liberal activists.

The story in the 6 PM EST hour of The Situation Room highlighted this line from an e-mail sent to supporters by the McCain campaign: “We need you to stand with John McCain against Rick Sanchez and his friends at CNN and their biased reporting.”

The Tuesday night NewsBusters posting, “CNN's Sanchez Erupts Over McCain Not Rebuking Supporter Who Called Hillary a 'Bitch,'” recounted:

Trying to create a scandal over Republican presidential candidate John McCain's failure to rebuke a woman supporter who called Hillary Clinton a “bitch,” CNN's Rick Sanchez led Tuesday night's Out in the Open with what he insisted was the “relevant and newsworthy” topic as he seriously asked: “Is John McCain done as a result of this?” He later speculated: “Is his campaign dead in the water?” Betraying the skew of those at CNN, Sanchez told guest Amy Holmes: “He could be in trouble for this from women, especially the ones that've been talking to me today in our newsroom who heard this and were offended.” Sanchez's spin matched that of left-wing bloggers, a story in Wednesday's New York Times revealed: “The clip began showing on Web sites like Salon.com, the liberal site TPM.com and others, with bloggers asking why Mr. McCain had not taken the questioner to task.”

Setting up the video, Sanchez haughtily intoned: “You're going to hear a McCain supporter. She refers to Hillary Clinton using really what is a horrible word that is used to do nothing but demean women. Well, at the time, it was a supporter who said that. It wasn't until later on, when we watched the whole tape, which is what you're about to see, that you see McCain's reaction, or lack thereof, that we decided that this is both relevant and newsworthy, and important information to this campaign.” An older woman at an event in South Carolina had asked: “How do we beat the bitch?” An appalled Sanchez complained: “He says 'that's an excellent question,' after somebody refers to Hillary Clinton as a B-word which rhymes with witch.”

CNN's follow-up story during the 6 PM EST hour of the November 14 The Situation Room:

WOLF BLITZER: Right now, John McCain's campaign is having to respond to something someone else said. It involves one woman's use of some foul language, Hillary Clinton, and criticism of CNN. Let's go to Brian Todd. He's following this story. Brian, this has ignited some controversy. Give us the background.

BRIAN TODD: It sure has, Wolf. John McCain's campaign is brushing back hard on a CNN prime time segment, accusing the network of bias. It started with an impromptu campaign stop by John McCain Monday in Hilton Head, South Carolina. A woman uses offensive language in asking how McCain can stop Senator Hillary Clinton's campaign momentum.

VIDEO ATTRIBUTED TO YOUTUBE:
UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: How do we beat the bitch?
(LAUGHTER)
SENATOR JOHN MCCAIN: May I give the translation?
(LAUGHTER)
MCCAIN: The way that-
UNIDENTIFIED MAN: Senator, I thought she was talking about my ex-wife.
MCCAIN: But that's an excellent question. You might know that there was a, there was a poll yesterday, a Rasmussen poll identified that shows me three points ahead of Senator Clinton in a head to head match up.
(APPLAUSE)
MCCAIN: I respect Senator Clinton. I respect anyone who gets the nomination of the Democrat Party.

TODD: The exchange plays out over less than a minute. Tuesday evening, CNN anchor Rick Sanchez takes about six minutes at the very top of his prime time show, Out in the Open, raising questions about why Senator McCain didn't immediately chastise the woman for insulting Mrs. Clinton like that.

RICK SANCHEZ, ON TUESDAY'S OUT IN THE OPEN: Is John McCain done as a result of this? Is this going to become a viral video?

TODD: A top official in the McCain campaign tells CNN he believes the Senator did a good job trying to diffuse the situation, that it goes without saying the woman's remark was offensive, but it's not McCain's job to come to Mrs. Clinton's defense. The McCain campaign accuses Rick Sanchez of sensationalizing the exchange in hopes of generating a news story. They used the segment as a peg for this e-mail to supporters to stand with McCain against Sanchez and to make contributions. McCain's campaign later calls for an apology. Sanchez says he has nothing to apologize for.

SANCHEZ: If someone had used this word about Laura Bush or about Senator McCain's wife or about anybody else, be they Democrat or Republican, there are many people out there who would have said that's an offensive word, and the Senator should have distanced himself not only from the statement made against Senator Clinton, but against the use of the word itself. And at no time does it seem that he does that, and that's the reason we did the story.

TODD: We asked Howard Kurtz of CNN's Reliable Sources and the Washington Post about the blow-up.

HOWARD KURTZ: It probably would have been better for John McCain to have not laughed along with the crowd and talked about that being an excellent question. [edit jump] But his campaign has a point. That little incident was pretty badly hyped by Rick Sanchez. Senator McCain did not embrace the "B" word that this woman in the audience used.

TODD: McCain has been criticized for some of his more candid public moments.

MCCAIN, APRIL 18: That old Beach Boys song, Bomb Iran? You know, bomb, bomb, bomb, anyway.

TODD: But he has also publicly shown solidarity with Hillary Clinton, visiting Iraq with her, making other appearances. And the McCain campaign says he's expressed his utmost respect for Mrs. Clinton several times on the campaign trail. We contacted Mrs. Clinton's campaign for response to the woman's remark and Senator McCain's reaction. Her spokesman had no comment. A short time ago, Mr. McCain addressed the issue at a stop in Phoenix. Listen.

MCCAIN: I did. You know, I walked into a restaurant in South Carolina. There was a number of people there. They asked questions. She made a comment. I made light of the comment, and then I said very seriously, I treated and continue to treat Senator Clinton with respect. And I've said that many times. I'm sure that's good enough for the American people, even if it's not good enough for CNN.

TODD: Senator McCain responding there once again. And the campaign has reiterated that this woman was not a supporter, stressing again that it was an impromptu campaign stop, and one of the McCain spokespeople told me that the people in the restaurant essentially turned it into a de facto town hall meeting, Wolf.

Sanchez set up a segment on the November 14 Out in the Open:

Tonight, John McCain is not apologizing, not apologizing. Last night, we showed you a clip of one of his supporters calling Hillary Clinton the B-word that rhymes with witch. You know the word well. Well, the Senator, he laughs, and then he calls it a good question. All right. So maybe he made a mistake. And most people in this situation would normally come back the next day and say, you know, I probably should have distanced myself from that comment and I shouldn't have laughed, and maybe I shouldn't allow any woman to be called such a demeaning word. Nope! Instead, today Senator McCain is e-mailing the comment with the Hillary bash to donors and asking them to send more money to his presidential campaign.

He's also, of course, shooting the messenger, blaming me personally and CNN for his present plight. Our staff has put out several statements, I should say, his staff has put out several statements today. None of them offers an apology to women in general or to Hillary Clinton specifically. No matter what you think of Hillary Clinton, and we know that she can be very polarizing, she is a U.S. Senator, the former First Lady of the United States. Should her being called that be turned into a joke by a presidential candidate? Fair question. There's a lot to get to here....

ABC got into the topic and the MRC's Brad Wilmouth corrected the closed-captioning against the video to provide this transcript of the piece on the November 14 edition of ABC's World News:

CHARLES GIBSON: Well, there is another bit of controversy in the presidential race tonight. Not so much about what a candidate said, but what he didn't say. It involves the reaction of Senator John McCain when a lady at a town meeting asked him a question that contained a derogatory reference to Hillary Clinton. ABC's Kate Snow reports.

KATE SNOW: The question came at a quick meet and greet at Trinity Restaurant in Hilton Head, South Carolina.

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: How do we beat the bitch?

SNOW: McCain chuckled.

MCCAIN: May I give the translation?

SNOW: Then said-

MCCAIN: But that's an excellent question.

SNOW: Some voters we spoke with today took issue with the question, and thought Senator McCain should at least have reprimanded the questioner for her choice of words.

UNIDENTIFIED MAN: He's running to be the leader of our country. He should have certainly used some leadership at that moment.

SNOW: And top Republican strategists agreed McCain might have handled it differently.

TUCKER ESKEW, REPUBLICAN STRATEGIST: If there's anything he could have done different, it would have been to more quickly rebuke that choice of words, and then answer the question, which is: How are we going to beat her?

SNOW: But a conservative talk radio host said the criticism was overblown.

SEAN HANNITY, TALK RADIO HOST: Do you notice, I mean, there was humor, there was laughter, there was, he didn't say it. He's not going there.

SNOW: McCain's campaign noted he did quickly pivot at the restaurant.

MCCAIN: I respect Senator Clinton.

SNOW: And today, he reiterated his respect for her, but with a veiled swipe.

MCCAIN: People come to gatherings, and they voice their opinion. I don't tell them what to say.

SNOW: But the "B" word question points to something larger: a current of anti-Clinton sentiment that is very real. We found it in Medina, Ohio.

SNOW TO THREE WOMAN: Can any of you see voting for Hillary Clinton?

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN #1: No.

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN #2: No way, no how.

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN #1: No way.

SNOW: Just don't like her?

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN #3: No. [edit jump] I'm not so sure that she is for the family.

SNOW: In that key state, 44 percent of registered voters say they have an unfavorable opinion of Senator Clinton, and nationally, Clinton remains a highly polarizing figure -- her strongest supporters intense in their support; her biggest detractors, even more intense. And the McCain campaign is trying to use all of that negativity to their advantage. In fact, today, in an e-mail to supporters, McCain's campaign manager denounced all the coverage of this questioner, but then went ahead and asked supporters for money.

—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center

Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I see CNN's answer to Ted

I see CNN's answer to Ted Baxter is at it again...How this fat, untalented blowhard had a job at MSNBC (back in the old Ashleigh Banfield days) was mysterious enough.  The fact that CNN had an opportunity to see his previous "work" and still hired him shows how dubious the judgment is at that network.  If anything, this bitch flap will help John McCain.  In truth, bitch is too kind a word to describe Her Thighness (thanks, F. Lee Levin).  McCain's campaign may be dead in the water, but it's ludicrous to suggest (as CNN's Fat Boy did) that it will die in the water because of this.  Puh-leeze.  Olberdouche's follow-up "comment" is unsurprising and unremarkable...just like Olberdouche himself.  By the way, what is it with CNN personalities hitting pedestrians with their cars?

IIRC, he got away with a hit AND RUN D.U.I.

Back when only South Florida was saddled with seeing/hearing Sanchez. (dig dig dig) Page 2 of this article has more, and the title is right, he's Teflon-Man.

And McCain's campaign's plight stems from the candidate's reflexive overspending (he has government experience!) or HE'd be the RINO the media's pushing at us instead of Rudy/Mitt. Now they're in debt, but they're STILL bloated with staff.
JMR

Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.

Yeah, and I remember "The

Yeah, and I remember "The Wisdom of" Jack Cafferty got a slap on the wrist for a hit-and-run after he clobbered a bicyclist with his car. 

McCain's campaign plight has nothing to do with this nor his relative support of the war as the media tries to push.  It has everything to do with his abandonment of conservative principles in trying to ram the Immigration Bill down our throats and in not supporting the tax cuts. 

 Betraying the skew of

 Betraying the skew of those at CNN, Sanchez told guest Amy Holmes: “He could be in trouble for this from women, especially the ones that've been talking to me today in our newsroom who heard this and were offended.

Yeah right.  They are offended at the bitch word, but have no problem with "bimbo eruptions" as well as defending a serial adulterer in the oval office, and accused rapist. These women in the newsroom must be bitches. 

}}---> Whoa there cowboy

Remember Sanchez is making this up as he goes along.  I think it's possible there are women in that newsroom who understood the exchange in its original form.

But get into a group of women and they'll answer the following the same:  All men are ___s.  Funny I didn't have to supply the first letter. 

 Plant crops - not questions

If McCain won't offer an

If McCain won't offer an apology, I'll do it for him. Hillary, I'm sorry you're a b*tch. ;) Still trying to figure out why JM needs to issue an apology to all women over what one woman called another though.

}}---> Sanchez

Remember Markos (come unto me all ye who desire the Dem nomination) Moulitsas joking about mercenaries being burned and hanged in Fallujah.  I think he said "screw them"?

OK, maybe it doesn't quite rise to the level of a private citizen using the "b" word, but I'll keep trying to find something that compares.  Little help here?

 Plant crops - not questions

How about "Grow Up!!"? (It's

How about "Grow Up!!"? (It's even clean and can be repeated with impunity.)

I said the day this was

I said the day this was first posted that they would try to water this weed into a beanstalk. These people are sooooo predictable.

Democrats are experts at forcing Republicans to "repudiate" this and "distance themselves" from that.

Did a single Democrat repudiate or distance themselves from Pete Stark's disgusting attack on President Bush? (days later doesn't count; that's not indignation, it's damage control).

What I would love to see is McCain repeat the "rebuke" statement made by Her Speakerness:

"While citizens are passionate about their views, what the woman said was inappropriate and distracted from the seriousness of the issues we have to deal with in this election."

As the father in "My Big Fat Greek Wedding" says: There you go!

Update after re-reading (LOL)

Sanchez devoted two segments of his show Wednesday night to the "controversy." What percentage of his show is that? (No surprise that Olbie picked up the baton later). He says it's relevant, dammit, and he's going to see to it that everyone else thinks so too!

“He could be in trouble for this from women, especially the ones that've been talking to me today in our newsroom who heard this and were offended.” Sanchez

Lucky Sanchez. He didn't have to go very far to find some women who were offended...in the CNN newsroom!!!

Does anyone seriously think that any of those women woud have voted for McCain under any circumstances????

I have news for Sanchez. Most women outside of the whiny liberal "victimized sisterhood" don't take it as a personal insult when someone calls another woman by that name. But then, we're not always looking for something to get offended over.

}}---> McCain as Judge Roy Bean

Nobody could deliver an apology like Paul Newman in "Life and Times of Judge Roy Bean": 

"I'm sorry. I apologize. I ask you to note that I did not call you callous-ass strumpets, fornicatresses, or low-born gutter sluts. But I did say "whores." No escaping that. And for that slip of the tongue, I apologize." 

 Plant crops - not questions

You go, Cool!!

ROFL!!!!

Rick Sanchez

Where was Rick Sanchez when Harry Reid called Bush a "loser?"  I'd rather be called a "b*tch" (if I were female) than a loser.

 Forget 911, I dial 10MM.

THE REAL STORY...

What nobody is saying is this, this story has nothing to do with McCain, he won't be the nominee. This story will be a problem for Hillary, the woman said what millions of Americans are thinking. Hillary has a long track record of being a bitch, this woman just had the nerve to ask McCain a very direct question.

BTW, I get the feeling this woman DID NOT get this question from a McCain staffer. I'm just saying...

"Some of us are wise, some of us are otherwise"  Mark Levin

BTW, I get the feeling

BTW, I get the feeling this woman DID NOT get this question from a McCain staffer. I'm just saying...danybhoy

And there you have it.

danybhoy, I think the real purpose of making a big deal of this story is to draw attention away from HRC's problem with the planting of questions in forums.

Advocacy

The media are supposed to inform. Too many of them want to command.

The common argument is that there is a difference between news and analysis, but this is neither: it's advocacy. I don't like advocacy.

  • Bill O'Reilly tries to start a crusade every other night. He doesn't just tell us what's going on; he insists that we (his viewers) go out and do something about it. For example, the other night, I watched O'Reilly demand that his guests join him on a picket line against Mark Cuban. He also wanted people to bring "support the troops' signs to the basketball games.
  • Now I despise Cuban and his bankrolling liberal movies that jeopardize soldiers, but O'Reilly was demanding that the public respond in the way he dictated. That's wrong. His viewers are not his troops, and it's demeaning to be treated as such.

Sanchez tried to start a crusade. Nobody joined. Pathetic.

}}---> KC

I caught the part about signs saying "Support the Troops", but he stopped short of picketing Mark Cuban.  He did say "be respectful"

If "Support the Troops" is synonymous with "Picket Mark Cuban", could a Liberal then say:  "I picket Mark Cuban, but not the war"? 

 Plant crops - not questions

LOL

Are all Dallas Maverick opponents supporters of the war? We can extrapolate this is many ways. Support the troops -- root for San Antonio!

And to be clear, O'Reilly isn't the only one. In fact, I'll argue that the very premise of the news business is that every story carries some degree of advocacy. I don't think they realize it consciously, but editors and producers put stories on the air that they think the public should respond to. If the news business was the mere conveying of facts, then we'd have hours of economics lectures and political science seminars. Instead, the media gives us stories that stir emotions and responses.

Sanchez gave us this story because he wanted us to respond to it. Even Wolf Blitzer gives us stories because he wants us to respond to them. Olbermann skips the details and goes right to the advocacy. But in all these cases, they want you to respond. That's why they put the story on the air in the first place.

}}---> But KC

BOR does not purport to be a newsperson.

He states emphatically he is an advocate (Who's looking out for you?).  He does not even try to hide behind a veil of "hard news"

 Plant crops - not questions

Public affairs

You're probably right about O'Reilly, but the line is hazy, and O'Reilly skirts the line. They all do.

My concern is that the media don't present themselves as fellow players in public opinion; they present themselves as referees. They want the right to control public opinion, and in return for that authority, they promise to be objective. But, as every post on this website shows, they're human beings who allow their biases to govern them. To a great extent, our society does allow the media to control public opinion, but the media cheats on their part of the deal. They're not objective. They're not even neutral.

They play an ambiguous game.

My concern is that the media

My concern is that the media don't present themselves as fellow players in public opinion; they present themselves as referees. -KC Mulville

In a recent posting by Tim Graham, he recounted Jon Stewart's interview by Rolling Stone Magazine.

Jon Stewart, the host of what he himself calls a "fake news" program had this to say regarding the media: (empahsis added)

The media should be filters, and they can only be that if they exercise editorial judgment. It infuriates me when people say, "That’s elitism." No, it’s not. That’s expertise.

Undoubtedly there are way too many in the media who agree with him, that they have the "expertise" to decide what we need to know.

 There's a difference

 There's a difference between commentators who opine on the news, like Bill O'Reilly and Rush Limbaugh, and reporters/journalists at CNN and the MSM.  CNN isn't called the "Clinton News Network" for nothing.  They are an advocacy group rather than a reporting-of-the-news organization, like they proclaim themselves to be.   I don't regularly watch CNN because of this, but when I have to (it's on where I work in the morning-can't avoid hearing it) I do a lot of head shaking- it's not news reporting at all!  Pure agenda-driven crap.  Just like coming after John McCain because of a citizen's question.  I thought his reponse was fine AND funny.   You can't win with the MSM-they are always going to shape everything into anti-Republican or anti-conservative diatribes.  Period.   

Anyone who says they support the troops but not the mission is a liar. 

Here's my 2 cents...Sen.

Here's my 2 cents...Sen. McCain was in a restaurant stop, and all kinds of people were there to meet and eat. No one could tell if those patrons were all Sen. McCain's supporter, nor are Republican supporters. The lady could be a heckler, code pink follower or a democrat- and this wasn't explored yet. Go find the woman, investigate her background and motive for saying the "b" word. I dare to get Sharpton and Jackson involve (Jackson and Sharpton will not bother because she's a female). See, all assume that she's a GOP supporter. Granted she's a McCain supporter, the Senator is not to police what people would say. How would the left/ACLU/NOW respond if Sen. McCain scolded here? Think again.

Here, we get trapped in this PC environment, so leftoids can dictate what we should say and do. If we all fall for PC, America's fall is looming. Sanchez is a propagandist and a liberal. So expect it from him.

Just telling it like it is and CNN can't handle it

Here's what a friend of mine said about the Hillary "scandal":

"Calling the ashtray chucking, lamp smashing, profane mouthed, cattle futures frud investing, money laundering,perjury committing, justice obstructing, document hiding, adultey abetting,secret service abusing, Vince Foster cover up aiding, carpetbagging, lying political phony a bitch is too mild a term."

I agree!

Hopefully...

this is the rhetorical "exception that proves the rule."

If nothing else, I've always taken considerable pride in the singular lack of coarseness and vulgarity in conservative rhetoric.  Let's leave the street language to the lexicon of the liberal/progressives where vulgarity seems to find no lack of sympathetic, pseudo-intellectual ears.

mikej, scroll up

mikej, scroll up higher in these comments, and find the one  that says "McCain as Judge Roy Bean." Sound like your friend saw the movie. LOL

Just add in socialist, and

Just add in socialist, and baby killer, and you've got it covered.

v

Sanchez is an anti-intellectual

Sanchez is a fool.  I know that's obvious, but this "controversy" is absurd.  I watched this segment last night and I couldn't believe it (silly me). Senators have called President Bush a war criminal, a liar, blah blah blah and somehow, the "B-word" (as the childish Sanchez continued to call it) is much worse.  How Sanchez even got this show is incredible.  I watch just to see if all of his flailing about will accidentally result in physical harm, either to himself or others.  Have you ever seen such animated behavior from a desk host? 

Apples and Oranges

"Senators have called President Bush a war criminal, a liar, blah blah
blah and somehow, the "B-word" (as the childish Sanchez continued to
call it) is much worse."

You are comparing apples and oranges. "Bitch" (as applied to Clinton) is a sexist slur. "Liar" (as applied to Bush) is a fact, readily verifiable from a brief Google search. "War criminal" (as applied to Bush) is a probable fact, but should not be stated as such until verified in a court of law.

 

"Jerk" (as applied to

"Jerk" (as applied to Agrarian-Decentralist) is a fact, readily verifiable by a show of hands here at NB.

Danke, Karma

Well played. 

You didn't read my comments, but merely reacted

I was commenting on the offense taken, not the language itself.  Rick Sanchez is upset about a slur (one McCain didn't use) of a politician, yet he (and other liberals) don't seem to be upset about other attacks on integrity, etc.  Also, your comment about "war criminal" only helps my point, not yours. 

Playing it both ways

Of course McCain should have distanced himself from the "bitch" comment. Instead he tried to play it both ways---expressing his "respect" for Senator Clinton while still providing red meat for the Hillary-hating base. Not exactly a profile in courage.

}}---> Profile in courage

You're right.  He should have stood up.

The author of that book, btw, must have carried it as an albatross up until his death in 1963.  Pulling the plug on those Cubans wasn't exactly our finest hour.

Plant crops - not questions

McCain shouldn't apologize

I've been a female for a few decades now (much longer than Sanchez has) and I dislike profanity as much as anyone. But I was not personally offended because that lady had the right to say that. In fact I'd be more offended if McCain apologized. 

Aren't liberals always telling us not to judge a whole group of people based on the few of them we know? so you know a few dozen women in your newsroom - and you use that to assume you know the national mood? 

I guarantee you take a nationwide survey and at least half the women in this country wouldn't care. 

card holding member of the vast right-wing conspiracy

McCain should have hit that questioner right in the mouth.

That would have generated the controversy Sanchez is looking for. And the direct action you crave, AD.  That lady looked to be a pretty healthy specimen and probably half his age.  To tamely say "I respect Senator Clinton ...." doesn't help Rick at all.  And don't worry about the Hillary hating crowd, she personally grills up porterhouses every time she waffles in the polling wind. 

"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last."  - Sir Winston Churchill

Wow, this is a bitch of a

Wow, this is a bitch of a subject! 

Get Email updates from Fred http://socialnet.imwithfred.com/email_alert_july_26.html

A-D, you are a tool. 

A-D, you are a tool.  McCain told the woman in his answer, "I respect Senator Clinton."  That is all the rebuke he needed to deliver.  That woman is entitled to her first amendment rights to think what she wishes, and to say what she wished as long as she does not advocate illegal acts.  She has the right to think that Hillary is a bitch.  She has the right to say that.  The rest of us have the right to disagree or to agree with that assessment.I don't know why that woman had such an opinion of Hillary, but it might have had to do with any and all or none of the factors mentioned in several of the posts in this thread.

On the other hand liberals have advocated the killing of President Bush and the killing of Justices of the Supreme Court.  Tell me, A-D, did you defend the President or the Supreme Court Justices?  Did you, if you heard liberals making such statements even tell them that you respected the President?  I didn't think so.  In point of fact, tool, George Bush is not a Nazi, not a war criminal, did not lie us into war, is not a dictator, is not an idiot, did not go to war for oil, etc., etc., etc.  Given your thought processes, you either need to up the voltage on your electroshock treatments, or up the dosage of your meds. 

"A communist is someone who reads Marx.  An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx."  Ronald Reagan

They are bitchin about

They are bitchin about bitch, but cant seem to come up with a way to frame or even present the Buckwheat commentary.

Why am I not surprised?

Two Observations

No one, but no one, can offend and be "offended" as easily as a liberal.

You can just hear Sanchez thinking, "I've got McCain in his 'macacca moment'. CBS, here I come...".

Bitch

 Mccain did an excellent job of not urinating in his pants when the woman in question did in fact use the dreaded B word. Now Liberals not only expect Mccain not to double over laughing but want him to be the thought and speech Police as well. The woman in question should be given a choice between being water boarded or made to read the New York Times cover to cover. Personally I had rather be water boarded.

I haven't read all of the

I haven't read all of the comments, so at the risk of repeating, I'll offer this observation:

Remember a week or so ago when some delusional pollster opined that Hillary would get votes from Republican women because they would connect with Hillary's being a woman?  Apparently the woman who referred to Hillary as a b*tch didn't get that memo.

I also have to wonder why the libmedia and the Hellary camp are upset that this woman accurately identified Hillary's character.  After all, a lady would not refer to one of her husband's operatives/advisers as a f*cking Jew b*stard, or tell personnel in Arkansas she wants the f*cking flags flying every morning, etc., etc.  That sounds like a b*tch to me. 

"A communist is someone who reads Marx.  An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx."  Ronald Reagan

what I hate about this

I hate the way Sanchez and his buddies in the media are telling women we're supposed to be offended and telling us we really want to vote for Hillary.

I thought feminism brought us past that. I thought we lived in a free society where women had the chance to think for themselves and stop being Stepford Wives. But if Hillary Clinton gets offended, we're all supposed to be psychically linked to her and be offended by proxy?

Please stop assuming whom I'll vote for or what offends me. You're not getting it right anyway. 

 

card holding member of the vast right-wing conspiracy

candance, the annoying

candance, the annoying thing is that we don't even know that HRC was offended. It is Rick Sanchez and his buddies who are acting offended, on her behalf, and on behalf of all women.

Self-righteous prigs.

and the woman who asked it?

What about her feelings? Apparently she's ticked off at Hillary, and as noted above, didn't get the memo Hillary had her vote. Is her opinion worthless? Is she less of a woman? Maybe she asked that question as a backlash because she resented being told how to vote.

Forcing us to vote for a woman defeats the purpose of women's suffrage and it shows us what the left really thinks of us - just like blacks, Jews, Christians, and union workers, they've put all women into their own little voting bloc. Nice to know liberals see our minds and not our boobs.

And now any woman who goes against the grain is being rude. What a crock. Looks like we're back to pre-Revolution America: some opinions are worth more than others. 

 

card holding member of the vast right-wing conspiracy

And they got rid of Paula

And they got rid of Paula Zahn for this amateur.  I think Ricky is just trying to get noticed (have you seen his ratings lately).  That and trying to get the negative press off of CNNs candidate, Queen Hillary.  Look for Wolfe to bow at the Clinton altar tonight at the debate.