ABC Hits Hillary from Left, Advances MoveOn's Agenda

Photo of Brent Baker.

Citing how “members of the anti-war group MoveOn.Org named Iran, not Iraq, as their top issue,” and without once applying a liberal or left wing label, ABC's Word News on Monday night skewered Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton from the left for voting for a resolution other candidates claim could allow President Bush to launch a war against Iran. Anchor Charles Gibson explained how “Clinton recently voted for an amendment in the Senate that would designate Iran's Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist organization. Other Senators running for President...are criticizing her vote, saying the amendment she supported could give the President authority to start a war against Iran.”

Reporter Kate Snow centered her story around how “Senator Clinton has been taking a lot of heat for that Iran vote, starting at the last debate.” Viewers heard saw video of Clinton being confronted at an Iowa event, and Mike Gravel charge “I'm ashamed of you,” before Snow maintained “it's the kind of vote that angers the Democratic faithful.” Snow concluded by benignly describing MoveOn as simply an “anti-war” group: “Tough talk on Iran is perceived by some Iowans as all too similar to the tough talk from Democrats in the run-up to the Iraq War. And, Charlie, last week, members of the anti-war group MoveOn.Org named Iran, not Iraq, as their top issue.” So, MoveOn speaks and ABC News jumps?

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

The MRC's Brad Wilmouth corrected the closed-captioning against the video to provide this transcript of the October 8 story on ABC's World News:

CHARLES GIBSON: Next on this broadcast, we turn to presidential politics. Senator Hillary Clinton recently voted for an amendment in the Senate that would designate Iran's Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist organization. Other Senators running for President -- Biden and Dodd -- voted against it, or, in the case of Senator Obama, missed the vote. But now they are criticizing her vote, saying the amendment she supported could give the President authority to start a war against Iran. ABC's Kate Snow covers Hillary Clinton's campaign for us, and is here tonight. Kate?

KATE SNOW, AT ANCHOR DESK: Charlie, this vote on Iran had a lot to do with standing her ground and looking tough against Iran in a general election, say if she were running against Rudy Giuliani. Problem is we're not there yet. She still has to win the nomination of her own party.

SNOW'S TAPED PIECE: In Iowa Sunday, registered Democrat Randall Rolph asked Hillary Clinton about her vote to designate Iran's Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist organization. In her answer, Clinton strongly hinted Rolph's question was planted by another campaign.

EXCHANGE AT EVENT:
HILLARY CLINTON: Because what wasn't in what you read to me that somebody obviously sent to you is that-

RANDALL ROLPH, Iowa Democrat: No, ma'am. I take exception, this is my own research. I have no-

CLINTON: Well, then, let me finish. Let me finish telling you-

ROLPH: These are my words. No one sent that. I am offended that you would suggest that.

CLINTON: Well, then, I apologize. It's just that I've been asked the very same question in three other places. So let me apologize.
END OF EXCHANGE

ROLPH, TO ABC NEWS: And I felt that she was telling me not only to shut up, but that I was stupid.

SNOW: Senator Clinton has been taking a lot of heat for that Iran vote, starting at the last debate.

MIKE GRAVEL, DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: And I'm ashamed of you and Hillary for voting for it.

JOHN EDWARDS: I have no intention of giving George Bush the authority to take the first step on a road to war with Iran.

SNOW: It's the kind of vote that angers the Democratic faithful.

MARK HALPERIN, ABC NEWS POLITICAL ANALYST: Sometimes Hillary Clinton votes in ways that will free her up in a general election, but they can come back to bite her as she tries to win this Democratic nomination.

SNOW: And today, Barack Obama piled on.

BARACK OBAMA: Her willingness, I think, to once again extend to the President the benefit of the doubt, I think, indicates that she hasn't fully learned some of the lessons that we saw back in 2002.

SNOW: Clinton's campaign says the criticism is unwarranted -- the measure in no way authorizes the President to go to war. In fact, Obama voted for a similar bill this past spring.

CLINTON, ON SUNDAY: Let me add that I also was the first person to go to the floor of the Senate back in February of this year and said very clearly that President Bush did not have any authority whatsoever to launch an attack on Iran.

SNOW, BACK LIVE: But there may be more questions as she travels through Iowa on a bus tour. Tough talk on Iran is perceived by some Iowans as all too similar to the tough talk from Democrats in the run-up to the Iraq War. And, Charlie, last week, members of the anti-war group MoveOn.Org named Iran, not Iraq, as their top issue.

—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Moveon speaks and all the

Moveon speaks and all the leftists networks jump.

Nothing new, just going to get more prevalent the closer we get to the election IMO.

Backfire is a nice word.

Yup

ABC lapdog of the left.Charlie sit ..sit.Charlie roll over.Good Charlie. 

So Obama didn't vote on

So Obama didn't vote on this bill. Well, how conveeeenient.

This missed vote was an absolute political manuever by his campaign. That way, he can slam Hillary for her vote, and not have to explain for his vote.

Well, you know what? If he can't stomach making decisions on these kind of votes that actually mean something, what does that say about his character in making these kinds of decisions when he HAS to as president?

Absolutely Right!

Obama obviously doesn't want to make tough decisions. Obama says he wouldn't vote for what he perceives to be an 'authorization for war with Iran', but he'll sure as hell vote to cut off the funds for the troops who'll have to fight the war.

 

Yeah, too bad

Yeah, too bad he didn't abstain from that vote. His lack of a vote would have been better off for our troups than his nay vote.

He can just do a "Clinton".

He can just do a "Clinton". Didn't one of Clinton's staffers say they kept trying to get authorization for bombing at one point, and they couldn't get him to the phone???

I agree

I feel that all of them (representing both parties) should be made to continue performing the jobs they were elected to do while campaigning anyway.
And avoiding voting on controversial subjects is cowardly.

Make no mistake about it..

Make no mistake about it.. if the presidential election was just about the Democrats who are currently running, implying that if none of the Republicans were running, we'd see the true color of this media push the agenda it really wants to push. There would be an all out coordinated and focused attack on Hillary, Richardson, and Biden, and the battle would be on between Edwards, Kucinich, Gavel and Obama.

CLINTON: Well, then, I

CLINTON: Well, then, I apologize. It's just that I've been asked the
very same question in three other places.

Is there any way to check and see if she has actually been asked about that Iran vote in three other places? Are there transcripts of townhall meetings etc.? Was it maybe in a debate?

Because if she was asked the same question in 3 other situations before this one, I t'm pretty sure it would have been in the news somewhere, and I haven't seen or heard anything about that.

motherbelt

Very astute observation. There's definitely more to this story.

By the way, I think Hillary herself is a "plant", a Marxist/Leninist plant, that is.

 

Charlie "the protester" & Kate Snow-job.

I wonder what these two mindless wonders are going to say when Akhmedinadinnerjacket attempts an attack on an Israeli City, possibly with a WMD of some kind. Maybe even a nuke. (Publicly, I mean. Privately they will be overjoyed, as will most all of their ilk.)

Will they then still suggest that the West sit on its hands and do absolutely nothing, which is the usual course of action supported by these people?

That is, if the Israelis haven't by then turned Iran into Lake Ben-hur, in which case, their opinions will be worth even less than they are now.


When I'm president, privatization is off the table because it's not the answer to anything.
-Hillary Rodham, September 3, 2007 AARP Legislative Conference.

Don't Tase Me Bro!

anyone else remember something like this happening before?

HILLARY CLINTON: Because what wasn't in what you read to me that somebody obviously sent to you is that-

Weren't Kerry's people convinced that the guy asking him a question he didn't like was a Repub implant and had him forcibly removed, when in fact he was very much a liberal minded individual who didn't tow the same line as Mr. Kerry? Or is my memory on that completely wrong?

We are already at war with Iran

We are already warring with Iran, or at least, they are warring with us, in at a minimum providing equipment and training that are killing our people. Last I heard, those are acts of war. The question is whether or not we take overt, direct military action against that government. These people are killing our servicemembers, and then Dinnerjacket comes to our shores and wants to visit one of our most sacred places to ''honor'' our fallen??? The world is a hugely more dangerous place these days even compared to the height of the Cold War. The Soviets were evil, but in today's world, it's the crazies type governments that are going to prove the most destructive, unless they are put down one by one, one way or another, like the rabid dogs they are.

"Start a War with Iran..."

I'm sorry, but didn't Mahmoud Bahoombajamba already state 'Death to America'? Hello? Who started what? I can't wait until that country is a crater.

The American Revolution Continued