On Friday's Hardball, MSNBC's Chris Matthews tried to explain away his “criminality” allegation against the Bush administration, hailed as his “hero” a CBS News correspondent who touted Jesse Jackson as “a sort of conscience of the country” and, in showing pictures from the Thursday night party celebrating Hardball's 10th anniversary, illustrated how he was surrounded by liberals.
Comments from Matthews on his show suggested that his charge against the Bush administration -- “they've finally been caught in their criminality” -- which the Washington Examiner quoted him as saying at the party, was merely a reference to Scooter Libby. But he failed to specifically clarify, correct or deny the quote. He argued “that in one case,” Bush administration “efforts to silence critics, and to cover up those efforts, got a senior Cheney aide caught up in criminality, indeed, in a conviction for perjury and obstruction of justice.” Matthews, playing the martyr to obviously unsuccessful supposed attempts to silence him, then trumpeted “my hero Eric Sevareid,” who “once noted we cannot always be right on the facts, though we must try to be; we cannot always be fair, but we must try to be. But we must always be independent.” If only Matthews really lived up to that “independent” promise.
Back in July of 1988, during CBS News coverage of the Democratic National Convention, Sevareid, sitting in the booth with Dan Rather, praised Jesse Jackson: "He has become here, a kind of new, he's acquired a new status. He's almost like Hubert Humphrey was, a sort of conscience of the country." (Screen shot is from the MRC's video archive from July 20, 1988.)
Throughout Friday's Hardball, as the show went into commercial breaks, viewers were treated to pictures of Matthews at the anniversary party with various guests. Of ten people in the photos credited to Marty Katz, not counting his wife Kathleen Matthews who until recently was an anchor for DC's ABC affiliate, only one, Pat Buchanan, could be readily identified as a conservative. Those seen smiling and laughing with Matthews included five Democratic Senators or Congressman, but not one from the Republican side of the aisle:
-- Congressman Charlie Gonzalez, Democrat of Texas
-- Senator John Kerry
-- NBC News reporter Andrea Mitchell and her husband Alan Greenspan
-- Senator Ted Kennedy and Congressman Patrick Kennedy
-- NBC's Tim Russert
-- Margaret Carlson of Bloomberg News and formerly with Time magazine
-- Pat Buchanan
-- Congressman Ed Markey, Andrea Mitchell and Alan Greenspan
In the Washington Examiner's “Yeas & Nays” column item posted Thursday night, Jeff Dufour and Patrick Gavin reported:
....In front of an audience that included such notables as Alan Greenspan, Rep. Patrick Kennedy and Sen. Ted Kennedy, Matthews began his remarks by declaring that he wanted to "make some news" and he certainly didn't disappoint. After praising the drafters of the First Amendment for allowing him to make a living, he outlined what he said was the fundamental difference between the Bush and Clinton administrations.
The Clinton camp, he said, never put pressure on his bosses to silence him.
“Not so this crowd,” he added, explaining that Bush White House officials -- especially those from Vice President Cheney's office -- called MSNBC brass to complain about the content of his show and attempted to influence its editorial content. "They will not silence me!" Matthews declared.
"They've finally been caught in their criminality," Matthews continued, although he did not specify the exact criminal behavior to which he referred. He then drew an obvious Bush-Nixon parallel by saying, “Spiro Agnew was not an American hero."
Matthews left the throng of Washington A-listers with a parting shot at Cheney: “God help us if we had Cheney during the Cuban missile crisis. We’d all be under a parking lot.”...
Seemingly addressing these quotes, on the October 5 Hardball Matthews delivered this brief commentary:
Last night we had a great celebration here in Washington of ten years of Hardball. We celebrate the wonders of the First Amendment and our freedom of the press which Americans of all political stripes treasure. Anyway, I told the crowd that it hasn't always been easy these past ten years, that politicians don't like to be criticized, that in one case their efforts to silence critics, and to cover up those efforts, got a senior Cheney aide caught up in criminality, indeed, in a conviction for perjury and obstruction of justice.As my hero Eric Sevareid once noted, we cannot always be right on the facts, though we must try to be; we cannot always be fair, but we must try to be. But we must always be independent.
—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center





-- Congressman Charlie Gonzalez, Democrat of Texas
....In front of an audience that included such notables as Alan Greenspan, Rep. Patrick Kennedy and Sen. Ted Kennedy, Matthews began his remarks by declaring that he wanted to "make some news" and he certainly didn't disappoint. After praising the drafters of the First Amendment for allowing him to make a living, he outlined what he said was the fundamental difference between the Bush and Clinton administrations.










Editor at Large

Comments Policy
}}---> Severeid wannabe
October 6, 2007 - 04:55 ET by Cool Arrow“we cannot always be right on the facts, though we must try to be"
Unless Severeid's mounted on a Rotisserie, he must be rubbed raw on the walls of his casket.
Chris doesn't try to be right. Take a fresh look at his hilarious book review with Jon Stewart. I counted five flowery references to the Clintons.
~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~
Ewwwwwww
October 6, 2007 - 06:44 ET by old cro"Unless Severeid's mounted on a Rotisserie, he must be rubbed raw on the walls of his casket."
You leave a vivid and hilarious image in my minds eye with that one. I have never heard it put quite so "elegantly"!
The people I put in jail have more honor than the top administration in this organization.
- Bob Hoffman, B.A.T.F. agent, "60 Minutes", January of 1993
?
October 6, 2007 - 07:23 ET by old croThe quote above was maybe meant for the Bush I administration, when I saw the date I instantly thought it meant the Clinton admin.
I could be wrong - mea culpa
Or....reading it more he may not even be talking about anyone's administration. Oh well........
Correctness vs. fairness
October 6, 2007 - 06:52 ET by motherbeltAs my hero Eric Sevareid once noted, we cannot always be right on the
facts, though we must try to be; we cannot always be fair, but we must
try to be. But we must always be independent. -Chris Matthews
What does that mean, "we cannot always be fair."? I hate to disagree with a dead man, but why not? Of course one can always be fair; and should be.
And Mr. Matthews, being "independent" doesn't mean one is entitled to one's own set of "facts."
motherbelt
October 6, 2007 - 10:01 ET by botgYou can take Chris at his word here. No doubt 'independent' means free to pursue his own biased agenda. Indeed we disagree with him.
Support our Troops
Matthews has lost it.
October 6, 2007 - 08:52 ET by Pasco ConservativeBelieve me when I say he is paranoid and delusional. The man is a mental case taken seriously by all the politicos. Check out his spittle drenched rants against the Republicans.
Any man who is under 30, and is not a liberal, has not heart; and any
man who is over 30, and is not a conservative, has no brains.
-Unknown
He's a hero...in his little
October 6, 2007 - 09:02 ET by VT Con ManHe's a hero...in his little circle of nutjobs. The "Media" treat him like a rocket scientist, while anyone with any sense can see just what a complete schlubb he really is.
Who else even cares what this panty waste does or says?
Well, we have seen the Duke Lacrosse criminal allegations
October 6, 2007 - 08:59 ET by JayTeeWell, we have seen/heard the Duke Lacrosse criminal allegations go unsubstantiated, un proved, and yet broadcast for days as "Fact" by the MSM.....
We, the people, have been alerted to the Baloney coming from the MSM. Pastrami may be substituted for Baloney, but we can recognize the switch.
Un-documented ..Un-substantiated...accusations "have finally been Caught" via the Duke LaCross case...which is still ongoing, but not in the Liberal direction.
Mr. Matthedd is going to get another ratings "bump" he won't like.
What good is a Free Press, if it is a False Press ? David Foote GoE
Feathered Friends
October 6, 2007 - 09:03 ET by Sergeant ROCKBirds of a feather do flock together!
Indoctrinate-U
Our Education. Their Politics.
At The End Of The Day He Is Still Last
October 6, 2007 - 09:21 ET by PamHis ratings are embarrassing, and the party was pathetic. The party was thrown to bolster ratings, but at the end of the day, Chris is still last...
in spite of newsbusters
October 6, 2007 - 10:11 ET by BacchusAnd, he's in last place in spite of NewsBuster staff watching him. NB bolsters his ratings. Without NB, wouldn't he be like a tree falling in a forest, not making a sound?
I believe ... that Matthews is lost, and his ratings are not accomplishing anything, as is shown by the extreme apathy for Hardball this week.
Bacchus
October 6, 2007 - 10:20 ET by botgthis is a bit off topic but your "tree falling in the forest" made me think of it's first corollary; "If logic is presented to a liberal does it exist?"
Support our Troops
Ah, but I'm sure he would
October 6, 2007 - 10:37 ET by motherbeltAh, but I'm sure he would say it's not about ratings, it's about "integrity."
Riiiiight.
...that in one case their
October 6, 2007 - 10:48 ET by SMGalbraith...that in one case their efforts to silence critics,
That case was Scooter Libby calling Russert (not Matthews) to complain about Matthews slinging around the "neocon" label. Reportedly, he (Libby) believed it was indicative of anti-Jewish sentiment on Matthews' part.
That's unfair on Libby's part.
But does that equate to an attempt to "silence critics"? One phone call (to Russert not Matthews) complaining about the word usage equates to "their efforts" to silence critics?
Please, some martyr for press freedom.
(BTW, remember the other smear by Matthews where he stated that "Cheney wants to just kill everybody"? I really would like to know the source of this anger towards Cheney; he's had it for more than 20 years. It's bizarre)
SMG
That case was Scooter Libby
October 6, 2007 - 10:56 ET by motherbeltThat case was Scooter Libby calling Russert to complain about Matthews
slinging around the "neocon" label. Reportedly, he (Libby) believed it
was indicative of anti-Jewish sentiment on Matthews' part. -SMG
Libby may have had a point. Although one can argue intentions in a specific case, with a specific person, in some circles, "neocon" is considered a code word for "Jews."
So Libby doesn't know whether Matthews is just using the word in the conservative, neoconservative, paleoconservative sense, or as a euphemism.
Libby doesn't know whether
October 6, 2007 - 11:06 ET by SMGalbraithLibby doesn't know whether Matthews is just using the word in the conservative, neoconservative, paleoconservative sense, or as a euphemism.
I agree that the use of the word for some people in some instances may be (and is) indicative of anti-semitism. We both know that there are people on the Left who just throw the term around without the slightest understanding of what it means. It's simply, for them, a pejorative.
But if "Libby doesn't know" how Matthews was using the word, it's unfair and irresponsible (for a public official particularly) to accuse Matthews of bigotry.
If indeed that is what he told Russert.
There is no evidence elsewhere (other statements, et cetera) that Matthews has expressed anything that can be remotely considered anti-semitic.
SMG
Matthews=MSNBC=Russert
October 6, 2007 - 10:39 ET by buddycMatthews=MSNBC=Russert
The only difference between Russert and Matthews is that Russert is slightly more reserved. Also Russert's family though a son probably receives more money from liberals. His college age son got a nice contract with democrat campaign consultants.
Matthews and Russert are
October 6, 2007 - 11:48 ET by nythatesusaMatthews and Russert are just big, sweaty Tammany hogs, not objective newsmen. The biggest problem with the debate is not that a liberal is moderating, but that the GOP candidates (probably) will act as if he is impartial. This gives Media Center Leftists the veneer of objectivity with viewers only casually interested in politics. James Carville and/or Paul Begala would be better moderators, because we know where they stand(in Leftyville), and journalistic credibility is not going to those who don't deserve it.
Fairness Doctrine for Academia, Fairness Commission for Hollywood.
Valerie Phlameout
October 6, 2007 - 12:09 ET by Jerry MackChriss spent months ranting and raving that Bush, Cheney and Rove should be impeached, jailed or burned at the stake for outing Valerie Phlameout. But once the truth was revealed he said it was too complicated an issue to go into. This is his idea of being fair and objective.
Complicated?
October 6, 2007 - 15:47 ET by Sergeant ROCKYes, it's always 'complicated' for a liberal to undo their lies when they have served, or continue to serve, their purpose.
Indoctrinate-U
Our Education. Their Politics.
Liberal reunion
October 6, 2007 - 15:41 ET by lhbarnesThat many libs in one place at the same time. Talk about an "animal house!"
A big leftist lying party
October 6, 2007 - 17:43 ET by bigtimerA big leftist lying party for ten years of lying BS.
What a guy...along with all his ilk.
Btw...Is Greenspan alive in the picture? (I heard something about propping some sun-glasses on him form someone named McCain...too funny)