Sore Loser: With No Clarence Thomas Interview, NBC Features Anita Hill

Photo of Brent Baker.
  • Bookmark and Share

CBS's 60 Minutes got the first interview with Clarence Thomas on the occasion of the release of his memoir and ABC's Good Morning America is in line for the morning show exclusive interview with him to air multiple days this week, thus leaving NBC News out of the mix. So, the losing network decided to resurrect Anita Hill. Anchor Lester Holt teased Sunday's NBC Nightly News: “Her story. Justice Clarence Thomas speaks out, and tonight so does the woman who nearly derailed his confirmation. My exclusive interview with Anita Hill.” Though Hill's charges against Thomas look pretty tame through the later revelations of Bill Clinton's actions with women, Holt depicted them as “charges of crude sexual advances” and “shocking allegations.” Also, without any mention of the left-wing activists with whom Hill colluded, Holt sympathetically described her as “a reluctant witness.”

Hill declared of Thomas: “I don't think he's been a particularly convincing justice.” Holt concluded by forwarding her political agenda: “Anita Hill believes at the time of the Senate hearings, she was judged against the backdrop of both black and female stereotypes. And as a direct result, she has become an outspoken advocate of issues of gender and racial equality.”

In contrast, previewing her GMA interviews with Thomas, on Sunday's World News Jan Crawford Greenburg characterized Thomas as the one “maligned” in the hearings:

The first Monday of October is always kind of a momentous day, but it's going to be overshadowed by these memoirs that really trace the course of a fascinating life of one of the most complex, divisive figures in modern life going through his bitter 1991 confirmation hearings. We sat down with him for nearly seven hours over the course of four days. Incredible, revealing, powerful interviews of a really maligned and misunderstood justice.

To his credit, Holt did at least introduce his piece on Hill by relaying Thomas's less than glowing assessment of Hill as a “left winger” and a “mediocre employee.”

The MRC's Brad Wilmouth corrected the closed-captioning against the video to provide this transcript of the September 30 NBC Nightly News story:

LESTER HOLT: The man known as the quietest justice on the Supreme Court is now speaking out. Clarence Thomas has a new book coming out tomorrow, My Grandfather's Son. In it, it's clear he has not forgotten his bruising confirmation battle and the charges of crude sexual advances leveled by his former employee Anita Hill. As we reported here last night, Thomas describes Hill in his book as a "left winger" and a "mediocre employee." He writes "she was touchy and apt to overreact."

Tonight, her story. Anita Hill was a reluctant witness 16 years ago. Her shocking allegations gave Thomas' confirmation hearings the confrontational tone of a trial. After Thomas was confirmed to the court, Hill returned to private life as a law professor. I spoke with her recently about the Thomas memoir and the hearings that transfixed the nation.

ANITA HILL: I was portrayed as crazy. I was portrayed as someone with an axe to grind. I was portrayed as someone who was in love with Clarence Thomas.

HOLT: Today Hill is a professor of social policy, law and women's studies at Brandeis University just outside Boston.

HOLT TO HILL: Are you still recognized on the streets?

HILL: Yes, I'm recognized on the streets, in funny ways, in funny places where I wouldn't have expected.

HOLT: She says she has never fully put the episode behind her.

HOLT TO HILL: Clarence Thomas has an autobiography coming out soon. Are you bracing yourself for that?

HILL: He has made clear that he thought that the confirmation hearing really was an attempt by politicians, really, to crucify him or the high-tech lynching of Clarence Thomas. So I can't imagine that there will be new things coming out in this biography, autobiography, that I have not heard or that he hasn't even himself said before.

HOLT: Hill says she hasn't had any personal contact with Thomas since the hearings. And her professional assessment of him is carefully measured.

HOLT TO HILL: What kind of justice do you think he's been?

HILL: I don't pretend to be objective about Clarence Thomas as a justice, and I would be dishonest if I said I am objective. But from my reading of the cases, I don't think he's been a particularly convincing justice.

HOLT: As she moves forward, Hill is also looking back. She received over 20,000 letters in the months after the hearing, letters she now wants to revisit.

HILL: I'm going to go back and look at what those letters say about where we were as a society then and hopefully what they say about how we can move forward.

HOLT: And looking back, Anita Hill believes at the time of the Senate hearings, she was judged against the backdrop of both black and female stereotypes. And as a direct result, she has become an outspoken advocate of issues of gender and racial equality.

—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I wish he'd pressed her

On the "not convincing" allegation. Justice Thomas' dissent in Raisch may have been a minority opinion, but it sure convinced me that he's the only one up there with a halfway-consistent clue about Federalism, which is NOT designed to be a policy of political convenience...
JMR

Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.

Where is Paula Jones?

Clinton has a book out, and he's doing all the interviews. I wonder if NBC fely compelled to interview Paula Jones (or Kathleen Willey, or Gennifer Flowers, or ...) for a "counterpoint," as they did here with Anita Hill.

Good point, KC. My thought

Good point, KC. My thought was that the thinking is "heaven forbid this conservative justice have a successful book without us dirtying him up a little." They need to make sure that people who were too young back then to pay attention, "get the message" now. For liberals, a conservative's "defining moment" is always his darkest hour. But because he's an ultra-liberal, for the "Lion of the Senate", Chappaquiddick was an insignificant blip (not worthy of a mention) in a stellar life and career.

So, losers want to interview

So, losers want to interview a liar? Well, I guess the bottom of the barrel sticks together at least!

Anita Hill's Book Was Insignificant

Anita Hill wrote a book called Speaking Truth to Power back when those "I BELIEVE YOU ANITA" bumper stickers were all the rage among Dem drivers. Within the book's pages, however, she refused to expand on her allegations of misconduct by Justice Thomas, instead simply quoting her Senate testimony. If my memory serves me well, the book didn't do that well, but she did.

Hill is like a female Jimmy Carter -- (s)he'll be a hero(ine) of the left forever even though (s)he hasn't done anything significant.

P.S. -- Interesting that someone who supposedly was traumatized about being sexually harassed would wear a miniskirt on a nationally-televised interview. Nawwww, she doesn't wanna be noticed...

"Well, I've got nothing against the press...they wouldn't print it if it wasn't true..." -- Joe Jackson, "Sunday Papers"

(During the Anita Hill

(During the Anita Hill hearings)

SENATOR JOSEPH BIDEN (to Anita Hill who was under oath):  Are you planning on writing a book?

HILL (chuckling):  No.

Forget 911, I dial 9MM.

In the continuous game

of one-up-manship, CBS will have commentary by Robert Bork, who will put this whole episode in perspective.

"On Halloween .... the parents send their kids out looking like me. Last
year... one kid tried to rip my face off! Now its different...when I answer the
door the kids hand me candy."

-Rodney Dangerfield

If that happens...

I'd hope to see interviews of Kozinski & Posner, since both of these judges were passed-up for the likes of that Whitehouse-dwelling intellectual giant, Harriet Myers...
JMR

Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.

Oops

I forgot the /s tag - didn't think it was needed! With a name like yours, you should have known ;-)

"When a man steals your wife, there is no better revenge than to let him keep
her."

-Sacha Guitry

Actually

I think your interview is seriously a good idea IF the network that does it is honest enough to say that more than just the left were opposed to Judge Bork's nomination, for a variety of reasons which included some honest ones (CATO archives for more). Our disagreement doesn't mean he should not be heard, after all, if he has something to say.

And I'll admit, I'm a big fan of Judge Alex Kozinski, even if I don't agree with him 100% of the time, he's by far Reagan's finest judicial appointment in my book. And while I don't "know" Posner quite as well, his intellect continually amazes me, again even when I disagree.
JMR

Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.

KC That was my thought as

KC

That was my thought as well.

Clinton’s new book “Giving”.. what??

Clinton

–VS-

Juanita Broderick (AR)- rape 


Eileen Wellstone (Oxford) - rape


Elizabeth Ward Gracen - rape - quid pro quo, post incident
intimidation Regina Hopper Blakely - "forced himself on her, biting,
bruising her"


Kathleen Willey (WH) - sexual assault, intimidations,
threats


Sandra Allen James (DC) - sexual assault 
22 Year Old 1972
(Yale) - sexual assault 


Kathy Bradshaw (AK) - sexual assault


Cristy Zercher - unwelcomed sexual advance, intimidations 


Paula Jones (AR) - unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure,
bordering on sexual assault


Carolyn Moffet -unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure,
bordering on sexual assault
1974 student at University of Arkansas - unwelcomed
physical contact
1978-1980 - seven complaints per Arkansas state troopers


Monica Lewinsky - quid pro quo, post incident character
assault 


Gennifer Flowers - quid pro quo, post incident character
assault 


Dolly Kyle Browning - post incident character assault 


Sally Perdue - post incident threats


Betty Dalton - rebuffed his advances, married to one of his
supporters


I THINK I SEE WHAT HE IS GIVING..

 

Kennedy has a book coming out "America Back on
Track". He should know all abut keeping things on track, just ask Mary Jo
Kopechne, and his 1968 Oldsmobile.

 

Funny how they NEVER get the hard questions. WE ALWAYS
DO.   

These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc.
Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day

You know, I've always

You know, I've always referred to that book by the title you're implying. It just seems more natural.

Quo usque tandem abutere, Catilina, patientia nostra? Quam diu etiam furor iste tuus nos eludet?

Let this be a reminder.

When the left wants to destroy you, they will find a way.

Thomas was against abortion. This made radical feminazis seething mad. They had to derail Thomas' nomination. They fabricated false accusations. The media ran with them. Hill lied, she became famous.

With the big election coming, the left will destroy as many of their enemy as they can. It will get dirty.

NBC and Anita Hill ... Two

NBC and Anita Hill ... Two prime examples of really crappy sloppy seconds.

Lester Holt alleges: 

Lester Holt alleges:  "Anita Hill was a reluctant witness 16 years ago." 

That allegation is FALSE.  Anita Hill was not "a reluctant witness".  Anita Hill was a very willing accuser, who very voluntarily offered up her unsubstantiated and thoroughly discredited claims.  However, Hill very much wanted to avoid any challenge to her allegations and any cross examination of her credibility, and thus Hill insisted that she be allowed to make her allegations ANONYMOUSLY in the hope that such anonymous and unsubstantiated allegations would force Thomas to surrender his nomination to the Supreme Court without the need for Hill to face any cross examination of Hill and her allegations.

I'm hitting and running

I'm hitting and running this morning/afternoon, so I am not certain these links have been provided. so here they are ...

60 Minutes Interview w/ Justice Thomas from last night:

Pt. 1:

http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/i_video/main500251.shtml?id=3312822n

Pt 2:

http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/i_video/main500251.shtml?id=3312824n

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.