Blitzer Joins MSNBC in Distorting Limbaugh, Advancing Far-left Smear

Photo of Brent Baker.

CNN's Wolf Blitzer on Monday night matched MSNBC in distorting the target of Rush Limbaugh's “phony soldiers” comment as the 7pm EDT hour of The Situation Room devoted a full story to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's attack on Limbaugh based on a Friday hit job on Limbaugh by the far-left Media Matters. “It's an angry new shot in the dispute over the war in Iraq,” Blitzer asserted before reporting that Limbaugh had charged “that some veterans who are criticizing the war are, in his words, quote, 'phony soldiers.'" In fact, on his show Friday and Monday, Limbaugh made clear he was referring to those who claimed to be soldiers, but never served, a point mentioned by reporter Dana Bash, but only after Blitzer framed the story by adopting as fact the spin of the left wing attack group.

Bash offered a favorable take on Reid's reasoning: “Harry Reid combined a biting attack on Limbaugh with a demand for an apology for what Democrats call an insulting rant against soldiers who joined Democrats in opposing the war.” Though Bash noted that “Limbaugh insists he was only talking about one anti-war soldier, Jesse MacBeth recently convicted of falsely claiming to have served in Iraq,” she proceeded to highlight how “Limbaugh's comments are burning up the liberal blogosphere. Watchdog group Media Matters, among the first to blast Limbaugh, says it doesn't buy his explanation.” She next vaunted how “this new escalation of the Iraq debate has Democrats looking to turn the tables after the controversy of MoveOn.org's attack on the commanding General in Iraq.” A strategy that will only work if the media play along. Bash did air a bit of Limbaugh's response to Reid: Laughter, followed by “he's got to be a nut!”

UPDATED with video (2:30): Real (4.3 MB) or Windows Media (5 MB), plus MP3 audio (900 KB)

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Frankly, I'm disappointed in Blitzer who is usually a better journalist who, if he really felt Reid's rant was newsworthy, could have at least set up the story by giving equal weight to Limbaugh's explanation for the intent of the “phony soldiers” remark as to the derisive spin pushed by political enemies of Limbaugh.

This wasn't the first time Blitzer's program showcased an effort to silence Limbaugh. The June 3, 2004 MRC CyberAlert, “CNN’s Blitzer Showcases Demand Armed Forces Radio Drop Limbaugh,” reported on Blitzer's late afternoon show, then called Wolf Blitzer Reports:

CNN on Wednesday [June 2, 2004] elevated the calls, by a few left-wingers, to have the American Forces Radio and Television Service (AFRTS) remove from its radio side its one hour a day of Rush Limbaugh, into a full-fledged “controversy” worthy of a full story on the 5pm EDT Wolf Blitzer Reports program. “Rush Limbaugh. Why critics say American troops in Iraq are a captive audience,” Blitzer plugged the upcoming segment. Blitzer described as a “sort of interesting kind of story” the demand the government censor Limbaugh for “comparing the prisoner abuse scandal to what he suggested was fraternity hazing.”

CNN reporter Tom Foreman acknowledged “it’s a bit of tempest in a teapot,” but that didn’t inhibit CNN from devoting three-an-a-half minutes to it just past 5:30pm EDT. Foreman maintained that “this controversy over Rush Limbaugh's role in Iraq has been simmering for weeks and now it seems to be coming to a boil.”

More like its been “simmering” amongst a very small group of liberal activists.

So what did Foreman cite as justification for making it a story on Wednesday: “The folks in charge of the military radio service responded today to an angry Senator.” That Senator was liberal Democrat Tom Harkin of Iowa....

My Friday NewsBusters posting, “Show After Show, MSNBC Smears Limbaugh with 'Phony Soldiers' Distortion,” recounted:

All day Friday, even after Rush Limbaugh corrected the misinformation, MSNBC promoted a story fed to them by the far-left Media Matters about how Rush Limbaugh had called military personnel who served in Iraq and oppose the war “phony soldiers.” Limbaugh opened his noon EDT radio show on Friday by explaining how he was referring not to any real soldier but a phony one, notably Jesse MacBeth, who became a hero to the left when he recounted how his Army unit murdered innocent Iraqis. In fact, he hadn't even completed basic training.

Nonetheless, MSNBC headlined a 4pm EDT segment “'PHONY SOLDIERS' INSULT; Rush Limbaugh: U.S. Troops Who Oppose Iraq War are 'Phony.'” Anchor Tamron Hall asserted: “Conservative radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh never served in the armed forces, so when he made the following comments about Iraq War veterans who return home to oppose the war, it set off a firestorm of outrage.” Hall ran a clip of Limbaugh saying it is Democrats who need to apologize for insulting the troops, but failed to relay Limbaugh's explanation of who he said was “phony.” Pairing it with MoveOn's “General Betray Us” ad, retired Colonel Jack Jacobs called it “stupid talk” and suggested those in the military “would like people who don't know what they're talking about to just shut up.”

At the top of the next hour, Chris Matthews teased Hardball: “Radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh says veterans who support withdrawing the troops are 'phony soldiers.' Those are his words.” A guest charged Limbaugh “didn't go to Vietnam because he had a bump on his butt. So, I mean, this guy's a draft-dodger.” Then at 8pm EDT, with “Limbaugh Bashes Vets for Withdrawal” on screen, and briefly “...Phony Soldiers...” over video of Limbaugh, Keith Olbermann teased Countdown: “Comedian Rush Limbaugh tries to back out of his quote: Servicemen protesting the war are quote, 'phony soldiers.'”

Now, back to CNN and a transcript of the story which ran at about 7:28pm EDT during the third hour of the October 1 The Situation Room on CNN:

WOLF BLITZER: Tonight, a top Democrat is coming out guns blazing against conservative radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh. It's an angry new shot in the dispute over the war in Iraq and Limbaugh's charge that some veterans who are criticizing the war are, in his words, quote, “phony soldiers.” Our congressional correspondent, Dana Bash, is watching all of this unfold. Dana, the Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid, he took this straight to the Senate floor today.

DANA BASH: He sure did and Senator Harry Reid is part of this controversy now that Rush Limbaugh calls a Democratic campaign to smear him. But Senator Reid made clear today that he was using this controversy to, in his words, to make clear that “neither party holds a patent on patriotism.” The Senate Majority Leader took the floor and took, aim not across the aisle or at the President, but at a conservative radio host.

SENATOR HARRY REID ON THE SENATE FLOOR: Rush Limbaugh took it upon himself to attack the courage and character of those fighting and dying for him and for all of us. Rush Limbaugh got himself a deferment from serving when he was a young man.

BASH: Harry Reid combined a biting attack on Limbaugh with a demand for an apology for what Democrats call an insulting rant against soldiers who joined Democrats in opposing the war. Limbaugh spoke with a caller last week.

[CALLER TO LIMBAUGH's SEPT 27 SHOW: They never talk to real soldiers. They like to pull these soldiers that come up out of the blue and spout to the media-
LIMBAUGH: The phony soldiers.
CALLER: The phony soldiers. If you talk to a real soldier, they're proud to serve.]

BASH: Limbaugh insists he was only talking about one anti-war soldier, Jesse MacBeth recently convicted of falsely claiming to have served in Iraq. But Limbaugh's comments are burning up the liberal blogosphere. Watchdog group Media Matters, among the first to blast Limbaugh, says it doesn't buy his explanation. And this new escalation of the Iraq debate has Democrats looking to turn the tables after the controversy of MoveOn.org's attack on the commanding General in Iraq.

REID ON THE SENATE FLOOR: If we take the Republicans' side at their word that last week's wote on another controversial statement related to the war was truly without patriotism, not politics, the I have no doubt that they will stand with us against Limbaugh's comments.

BASH: Limbaugh's response?

LIMBAUGH, ON HIS RADIO SHOW MONDAY: [laughing] He's got to be a nut! This is, this is, I cannot believe that they are actually going this far with this. [Text of Limbaugh's challenge to Reid]

BASH: Now Limbaugh accused Democrats of engaging in McCarthyism and he even alluded to a quote used against Senator Joseph McCarthy himself as Limbaugh said, “have you no decency left, have you no shame whatsoever?” Now a spokesman for Senator Reid responded in kind with a quote from Edward R. Murrow. Wolf, that quote, “we must not confuse dissent with disloyalty.” Wolf.

BLITZER: I guess this battle's going to continue for some time, Dana. Thanks very much.

—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

This is News to anyone??

Wolf interviewed Bill Maher not so long ago.... The really pathetic thing is that anyone who's paying attention knows this story is crap...But that's what these pricks count on...Don't interview Rush...Don't let the viewers hear the whole thing, don't give any background about what Rush was talking about...just pass on the lie...

And here's our crack Capitol Hill reporter Dana Bash, just fresh off her assignment of throwing up her lunch...

Jesus....

Now, this might sting just a little bit.....

that's what these PRICKS

that's what these PRICKS count on:)

People need to realize

People need to realize these neoPRAVDA media outlets are the same ones who insist on demanding and publicly publishing classified national security programs being used to keep up with the terrorists, and demand to know every little thing our military is doing in war/battle and with enemy detainees/prisoners, refuse to believe the scientific conclusions of 9-11 and seem to believe George Bush knew about 9-11 way back when he was still in short-pants ... But they just can't seem to read the Limbaugh transcript in full, or listen to the taped audio.

 

However, what is WORSE than neoPRAVDA doing this is that elected officials in congress have either neglected or refused to also investigate the facts in full ... or HAVE and are deliberately and sinisterly ignoring them in the face of the American people as proven by their congressional malpractice on the floor yesterday.

BASH: Limbaugh's

BASH: Limbaugh's response?

LIMBAUGH,
ON HIS RADIO SHOW MONDAY: [laughing] He's got to be a nut! This is,
this is, I cannot believe that they are actually going this far with
this.

As if that was all.

What Blitzer and Bash didn't report was Limbaugh's challenge to Harry Reid to face him with his accusation.

What I want to do now is demand that Harry Reid come on this program
and confront me like a man. Live, unedited, come on this show and let's
go at it.... [ ]
...Senator Reid, it is time for you to stop hiding behind the speech-and-debate clause and your Senate immunity.

You want to come on this program and call me unpatriotic, come on this
program and call me unpatriotic. You want to call me a liar, you want
to tell me that I did not say what I said, you come on this program and
you tell me to my face that I said what I did not say. Stop hiding
behind your special protections as a senator and spewing the talking
points of an embarrassing, partisan hack media group called Media
Matters for America.

Because Reid made an issue of the fact that Limbaugh had never been in the military, he added this:


Hillary Clinton didn't serve in the military, by the way, Senator
Reid. She just voted against General Petraeus. Barack Obama did not
serve in the military, Senator Reid, and he didn't even show up to vote
in support of Petraeus. John Edwards didn't serve, and after voting to
send our troops to war, he has undermined them ever since.

Anyone think Dingy Harry will take up the challenge?

 

why should he? Dickless has

why should he? Dickless has accomplished his pussy democrat mission...

That warm feeling between your legs, Senator Reid,

Is you peeing your lacey panties after listening to Rush and having your appointees surfing the web this afternoon.  For the days that follow, may I recommend Depends?

Their fact checkers must

Their fact checkers must have interned at TNR

where's the conservative response?

 

i'm sick of the lethargy of conservatives/republicans ... nary a peep from any mainstream conservatives.  am i missing something?  i swear, it's like witnessing a boxing match in which one fighter not only refuses to punch back, but does nothing to even block the flurry of punches coming his way. 

there is no consequence for the petraeus bash ... no repercussions from some of obama's stupid/ignorant comments ... and probably no backdraft for murtha calling Marines "murderers".  meanwhile, imus gets canned for some inane comments and now rush and o'reilly ... this is ridiculous

 

 

y-y-you mean.........

There are Republicans in the house and senate?  Really?  I wasn't aware.

Sometimes it does not seem

Sometimes it does not seem that way, does it? :-(

Unfortuantely, it's true, but ...

Maybe, just maybe, they'd win an election if they actually stood up and actually fought for what they believed. The democrats have one big, gaping wound that no one wants to pour salt into ... they are ALL TALK and NO ACTION. i swear, it doesn't take a CEO of a fortune 500 company to smell a huge, steaming pile of BS from an all-talk no action employee. i think republicans/conservatives should go on an all out blitz to do nothing but prove that those elected in november are nothing but empty suits and skirts. the US is in the middle of a war and democrat leadership in congress is more concerned with radio personalities, steroids, bathroom stalls and science fiction (global warming). when a quivering, shrinky-dink like harry reid can run his mouth incessently without even the slightest opposition ... we're in trouble.

if this trend continues ... be prepared for hearing the clinton "cackle" every night for 4 years ... when only one team is in the race, there can be no doubt as to who the winner will be.

 

 

 

Not even in the Game

Not only do they not throw any punches -- they don't even put on the trunks and the gloves. They have turned into a total bunch of wusses -- with apologies to all wusses!!

I'm no big defender of Rush or O'Reilly, but...

I don't think it's fair to lump the 2 of them in with Anus.
JMR

Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.

Watch very carefully

This is an experiment in reality. For most news stories, we hear what the mainstream liberal media tells us, and we're often forced to take their word for it, because we weren't there ourselves. They have us at a disadvantage, because we have no way to dispute them. But this case is different. We know about the reality of these events independently of the reporters – and we now have firsthand evidence that reality isn’t what liberal reporters say it is. I didn't hear O'Reilly's original interview, but I happened to be listening to Rush during his “outrageous” segment. I thought nothing of it, and knew immediately what he was referring to. And it was wholly different from what they’re reporting.

  • It's also important to note that this comment came during a long-running conversation. In a conversation, you can trust that your listener remembers what you had previously said, and to factor that into what you’re saying at any moment. In a conversation, you don't explain everything from scratch, and make every point over and over again. That's the difference between a conversation (like Rush and O'Reilly were having) and a stray comment here or there.
  • The mainstream media knew the difference between a conversation and a stray comment, but now they’re shamelessly exploiting that distinction to damage someone’s reputation. They cherry-picked a comment to make it look bad, and ignored the rest of the conversation.
  • In all of these cases, the liberal media is encouraging this unfair distortion. Either they’re too stupid to realize the difference between a stray comment, or they’re too biased to pass up a chance to distort something harmless.
  • Why the sudden batch of examples? Obviously, because they’re embarrassed about the Petraeus ad, and how it made them look bad, so now they’re going to do anything to convince people that ‘everyone does it’ or ‘the other guys do it too.’

Now, consider one more thing. If they’re so willing to distort stories that we know about … imagine how much they distort the stories we’re out of position to dispute?  

Of course they did...

The mainstream media knew the difference between a conversation and a stray comment...

They proved it when they gave B. Hussein Obama a pass when he seemed to say that ethnic cleansing was a good thing; we all know what he meant to say, so we're not going to go overboard on what actually fell out of his mouth.

As usual they want to have it both ways: they want to report what Obama meant to say, as well as what they wish Rush had actually said (but didn't).

There's probably something Freudian in what they think they heard Rush say - I think the psychological term for it is projecting...

~~~

If you don't stand behind our troops, feel free to stand in front of them!

And Kerry

Remember this: Kerry, on 10/30: "You know education, if you make the most of it, you study hard, you do your homework, and you make an effort to be smart, you can do well. And if you don't you get stuck in Iraq."? And a Kerry adviser said that Kerry was referring to the general intellectual abilities of Pres. Bush and not U.S. troops. The quotation, the adviser admits, came out slightly "mangled."

I don't recall Blitzer hammering Kerry over this.

___________________________________ 

If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber

Lies. Distortions. Deception. All in a day's work.

Excellent analysis, KC Mulville. And yes, this case is different, but the pattern has become all too clear. I think we are witnessing the death throes of the Old Liberal Media, who are now naked in the streets for all to see, and twitching nervously from self-inflicted wounds. Still, some of their followers are true believers; true believers of the lies they are fed, and who, with a cult-like fervor, willingly drink the poison they are offered. The blind leading the blind to their political death.

Pathetic, yet necessary.

And the Democrats prove once again

that they are incapable of making an argument strictly on the merits (whatever they perceive those merits to be...) but have to resort to personal attacks to boot. Senator Harkin had this to say:

Well, I don’t know. Maybe he was just high on his drugs again. I don’t know whether he was or not. If so, he ought to let us know. But that shouldn’t be an excuse.

No class. All A$$

who need merits when you

who need merits when you OWN THE SYCHOPHANTIC MEDIA?

but unlike the brain-dead blue states, fly-over country knows the smell of sh*t:)

Mars Attacks

My view is term limits are now necessary.  The only thing I can think about right now is the line:  "We have two out of three branches of government still functioning, and that ain't bad".  The 110th Congress is an embarassment to the entire world. 

I've been in the term limit camp for a long time, Mark

But what shall we do about it, old bean?

Old men, old shoes, young boys and nothing more

I am reminded of General Patton saying he knew an army was whipped when he saw the condition of it...........and maybe people should be looking at it this way.

Right now, besides the attack on O'Reilly and Limbaugh in absolute lies in something that liberals all know they will be exposed in will have them loose audience and seats in Congress, there is an "outing" going on against 4 major Republicans terming them "sodomites".
The whispering is intended to out them and be picked up like the Minnesota outing of Larry Craig in this continuous effort of scorched earth which is coming from the Hillary Clinton and Al Gore campaigns funded by George Soros, backed by the liberals in the CIA intel spying and the silence of the facts in the media.

All of this is designed to destroy 2 main elements of support to the GOP in the Christians and the Patriots. Some inclination is formulating that that strange Ron Paul is in this race to pull off the entire libertarian Buchanan brigades who Buchanan is trying to keep behind Tom Tancredo.
All of this means the deliberate destruction of the Republican party enough that 49% negative Hillary Clinton can win or people will still vote for Al Gore.

For the liberals and cartel to be going to these extremes of outright lies and the destruction of citizen's lives to gain the advantage means they are beyond desperate, but that they are loosing.

This is a desperate and deliberate campaign. Personally I do not trust James Dobson in this either as his backing of Harriet Miers in her homosexual stance and other strange postions, who Dobson is now calling for a further fragment of the GOP in "their own Christian candidate".
It all very much an operation from within and without to first silence Conservatives like George Allen and Tom DeLay, then silence Conservative radio and then to pick off the remaining leaders.

This has got to be the most despicable undertaking since the brutalizing of Mrs. Andrew Jackson.

Wolf Blitzer is slime and this Soros funded cartel backed DNCommunist attack is the garbage Hitler, Himler and the boys of Lenin and Stalin pulled.
They are going for broke and it will break the United States of America.

 

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

I forgot about that

Someone on this site (not me) said that if they allowed the liberal media to succeed with the 'macaca' strategy, that will open the floodgates, and they'll be using it all the time.

Whoever said that ... sure got it right.

How stupid does Sen.Reid think Americans are?

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has knowingly taken a lie to the floor of the U.S. Senate in order to denigrate a private citizen's free public speech.  Sen. Reid has disgraced himself and the U.S. Senate.

Rush Limbaugh insults Harry Reid all day.

Maybe Harry Reid is less likely to believe Limbaugh's explanation due to this.

Harry Reid is an undefendable LIAR and a COWARD.

Harry Reid maybe a complete Horse's Arse, but there can be no doubt he knew full well he was promoting a lie to his colleagues and the American people on the floor of the Senate.

Insults and direct knowledge of his motives

That is undefenseable talk

Reid is attacking Rush for

Reid is attacking Rush for a verifiably proven wrong interpretation by Media Matters, but he has not a peep to say about Murtha who called the troops cold blooded killers or others who compared them to PolPot.

Your sense of scale lacks a bit to say the least.

 

Maybe it was a memory lapse?

Remember poor Harry forgot about the land he sold.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8KMJ8I00&show_article=1

Maybe he forgot to listen to the tape or forgot parts of it.Or could be a matter of building a bridge between Media Matters and Rush's version.Harry is good at bridges.

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-earmarks13nov13,0,6626376,full.story?coll=la-home-headlines

Now you are attacking without hearing his side of the story

Harry Reid got money for roads for his state; how dare he. Also how dare he make a complicated land deal without your direct approval

Yes it was complicated alright

"Senate ethics rules require lawmakers to disclose on their annual ethics report all transactions involving investment properties—regardless of profit or loss—and to report any ownership stake in companies." 

"Despite the sale, Reid continued to report on his public ethics reports that he personally owned the land until it was sold again in His disclosure forms to Congress do not mention an interest in Patrick Lane or the company's role in the 2004 sale."

"Reid called funding for construction of a bridge over the Colorado River, among other projects, "incredibly good news for Nevada" in a news release after passage of the 2005 transportation bill. He didn't mention, though, that just across the river in Arizona, he owns 160 acres of land several miles from proposed bridge sites and that the bridge could add value to his real estate investment."

Your right how dare he.

HellO???

And now for Dan Barker's stinging, fact filled retort....

'cricket......cricket.....cricket'...

Nice job you toilet bug...

Now, this might sting just a little bit.....

Off the meds?Or just a

Off the meds?Or just a fixation with bugs?

Don't confuse a statement of fact with an insult.

The facts are clear Harry Reid had to know the lie to his speech.  The insult is to the American people for thinking we are stupid enough to believe his lie.

Yes, CT

Yes, CT and we must block their efforts to reinstate the Fairness Doctrine.

Harry Reid is fast becoming THE story..

I'm embarassed for the State of Nevada......to have a man such as Harry Reid representing them in the Senate. 

Is there no other Patriot in the entire state of Nevada that can represent Nevada  ?      

Bill O'riely took aim at Mr. Reid, simply by playing Reid's comment before the Senate on this subject. 

Harry "War is Lost" Reid is questioning Rush Limbaugh's patriotism ? ?   What Planet is Reid on....?   The man needs to get a grip......and hopefully the Great Americans in Nevada will see fit to elect a true American representative as a Reid replacement, and send Mr. Reid to De-tox, Psychiatric care, or whatever that particular Squirrel of a man needs to get his head screwed on straight.

Harry, we are NOT that STUPID !!! but you seem to qualify.

What good is a Free Press, if it is a False Press ?   David Foote  GoE

Smear Campaigns

Has anyone noticed that these past few months have seen a serious uptick in media attacks on conservatives? Not just political conservatives who have always been under attack, but "all" conservatives & it appears anything to do with conservative!

Has anyone noticed there are currently attempts to get legislation passed that will seriously diminish America's ability to act on her own, or to defend herself, or to keep outsiders out of our everyday business? Like the Law of the Sea Treaty. This globalist inspired document could mean the United Nations or appointed entity, could actually tell the US Navy, they cannot traverse certain waters. It also means the UN decides who gets what finds are made under the seas. The UN decides how bounty is to be distributed according to "their" formula. Wanna bet America would always get the short end of any stick?

Serious money is behind these media smear efforts, these legalize illegal aliens efforts, these internationalize American laws & policies efforts. Guess who has sunk perhaps even up to hundreds of millions of dollars into such efforts over these past eight to ten years, perhaps longer. But one who also does NOT participate in any interviews with any other than allies. He makes no policy, yet policies written these past few years match exactly what he stands for & what his funded organizations & followers stand for.

McCain Feingold has made it possible for a wealthy outsider to directly influence, even control, the activities of political functions in America. And some with intent to destroy this nation to remake it into the utopian socialist paradise they "tell the populace to think" can exist, have used their money to disproportionately affect our entire political, monetary, & foreign policy process! Add the perhaps bought & paid for cooperation of the old mainstream media, & what you have here folks could be called an attempted "coup!" Of course, it will be "they alone" who will decide all for all of us since "they alone" are the most qualified to do so for the poor, unsophisticated, poorly educated, mere citizen.

So long as the left is screaming, we are neglecting policy decisions. So long as we are neglecting policy decisions or legislation, we allow it to be passed onto the next congressional session. Guess who plans to buy enough of that next election to make sure those making decisions will be sympathetic to his point of view?

It sounds like a pathetic conspiracy theory. Yet when one adds up "all" of the possible motives, all of the desired results they seek, all of the hatred they spew, all of the anti-America attitude they espouse, is it really paranoid to mention it just could be a real attempt to end this constitutional republic, from within, by powerful special interests backed by super moneyed individuals or more accurately, a super moneyed individual?

Think George Soros. Then think, MoveON.org, Media Matters, ACLU, Democrat party, United Nations, Human Rights Watch, ANSWER, International Answer, Tides Foundation, & numerous other leftist activist groups who all depend on funds from this person &/or his allies or his allied organizations.

Now, how much is paranoid & how much is real?

McCain-Feingold permitted outside actors, international actors, and extremely wealthy actors, to "BUY" into our process more deeply than ever before in our history.

Perhaps the media that still cares should investigate the reach of and the intentions of, the extreme money that is so influencing our political process?!

Because we all know investors expect a return on their investment. The more they invest, the bigger the return they expect. What return will George Soros & his allies expect?

The only special interest group that should matter, the people, have been led down a path and at the end is the tyranny of a despotic socialist movement waiting to shove its booted foot on our necks!

The media has told everyone all along that conservatives are the fascists. Yet when one reads unrevised history, and listens to those who fought against it in a world war, it was the NAZI's who were really the, National SOCIALISTS!

They too told the people the government would care for them. All the people need do is, give them the power!

This country is in a fog........

I agree that the vast majority of citizens either can't see the forest, for the trees or are so ambivalent about how to correct the situation that now permeates this government, that a need for a rational, or irrational action, depending on your viewpoint, is necessary.

I don't advocate, nor endorse an upheaval in our democracy, but a "Star Chamber" type of overview might well be contimplated by some who are so inclined.  Look it up.

 

RepublicanTs

Most all the comments I am reading on this blog have the same message running thru them:  The Republicans either can't or won't fight back.

I am bewildered as to what has happened to our party and their balless approach to defend themselves from unwarranted attacks by the Dems and the far left MSM.  Except for the young lions like Jeff Flake and a few other like minded newcomers, there seems to be none that want to snap out of the coma that has infected them since the second year of  Bush's first term.  

I can only assume that his lack of action to rarely, if ever, fight back against a uncooperative opposition party, but instead play patty-cake with them, just to get along has spread throughout the entire Republican party.  He tried schmoozing with the likes of Kennedy, he and his old man cozied up to Bill Clinton, while BJ Bill was stabbing them in the back, and his reluctance to ever veto a bill showed him as a patsy.  An easy mark, that the Democrats knew they could mold like putty in their hands. Even when the Dems stepped way over the line and Bush did show some minor indignation, when the dust settled back down he was right back in their hands being manipilated once again.  There are so many examples of his unwillingness to make a stand and fight back, but too many to list.

Consequently, that attitude permeated the rest of the Republicans and resulted in many conservative voters ousting them from their jobs.  They just couldn't believe that the frustrations felt by their constituents would result in their demise.  Guess what, they were wrong!  They were wrong then and they continue to be stupidly wrong now.  If they don't wake up from their self imposed coma immediately, they will be in the minority for at least the next 8 years. 

Folks are begging for a change of attitude from their leaders, but are just not seeing it.  As a result, they are either going to stay home next November or even jump ship, disregarding the consequence of electing the lying witch.  Lord help us if that happens. 

Folks are begging for an

Folks are begging for an audit. How are taxes spent/wasted. Who are living high off the hog?