Top Seattle Times Editor Admits Majority of Newsroom Votes 'Blue,' Driven by 'Activism'

Photo of Brent Baker.
By Brent Baker | August 16, 2007 - 05:40 ET

Seattle Times Executive Editor Dave Boardman, who in a Tuesday e-mail to his staff had scolded them for cheering Karl Rove's resignation (Ken Shepherd's NewsBusters item), wrote a follow-up e-mail on Wednesday in which he conceded the political display matched the “blue” perspective of the majority in his newsroom where, like most of journalism, reporters are driven by “activism.” Boardman acknowledged:

“If we wore our politics on our sleeves in here, I have no doubt that in this and in most other mainstream newsrooms in America, the majority of those sleeves would be of the same color: blue. Survey after survey over the years have demonstrated that most of the people who go into this business tend to vote Democratic, at least in national elections. That is not particularly surprising, given how people make career decisions and that social service and activism is a primary driver for many journalists.”

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

It's reassuring to learn that Boardman chided his staff for the outburst, but as he admitted it accurately reflected the political perspective of most journalists.

Romenesko on Wednesday night posted in full the second e-mail Boardman sent to his newsroom staff. An excerpt from the August 15 memo following up on reaction to his Tuesday e-mail in which he had said of the cheering: “That sort of expression is simply not appropriate for a newsroom.”

My Raves admonition on politically based cheering in the newsroom has ignited the predictable flame-throwing in the blogosphere, particularly from the portside. Allow me to riff a bit further on that, and on my reasoning....

The postings nearly everywhere speak not to the fundamental issues around newsroom decorum, but instead spring from one's place on the spectrum of Bush/Rove "Bad" or Bush/Rove "Good."

I ask you all to leave your personal politics at the front door for one simple reason: A good newsroom is a sacred and magical place in which we can and should test every assumption, challenge each other's thinking, ask the fundamental questions those in power hope we will overlook.

If we wore our politics on our sleeves in here, I have no doubt that in this and in most other mainstream newsrooms in America, the majority of those sleeves would be of the same color: blue. Survey after survey over the years have demonstrated that most of the people who go into this business tend to vote Democratic, at least in national elections. That is not particularly surprising, given how people make career decisions and that social service and activism is a primary driver for many journalists.

But if we allowed our news meetings to evolve into a liberal latte klatch, I have no doubt that a pathological case of group-think would soon set in....

It's not about "balance," which is a false construct. It isn't even about "objectivity," which is a laudable but probably unattainable goal. It is about independent thinking and sound, facts-based journalism -- the difference between what we do and the myopic screed that is passed off as "advocacy" journalism these days....

Seattle Times Company's bio of Boardman, sans a picture of him.

My Thursday MRC CyberAlert article about the cheering and Boardman's reactions.

—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center

Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

}}---> The getalong gang

You could get the same result if you polled for Union Members among members of the Press.

It is ignorant (naive denotes lack of knowledge) to believe they would vote any differently than their representation dictates.

That is the source of the "activism".

We do not enjoy a free press.

~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~

Democrats are made, not

Democrats are made, not born!

Because it happens in newsrooms not hospitals.

"I'm interested in the fact that the less secure a man is, the more likely he is to have extreme prejudice." Clint Eastwood

}}---> Close, rob

Democrats are "scored" not schooled.

The old FFFF in sophomoric lingo.  Afterwards they behave much the same as a battered spouse. 

Al and Jesse won't admit it, but they know it.

~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~

lol What's the good word

lol

What's the good word today?

"I'm interested in the fact that the less secure a man is, the more likely he is to have extreme prejudice." Clint Eastwood

}}---> the good word

Dominica Davis FOX Weather caster.

I can't help it. She's just the best Weather person ever.  I remember she was saying something about. . . uh. . .  weather.

~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~

lol, better than say Ann or

lol, better than say Ann or the t-shirt girl?

"I'm interested in the fact that the less secure a man is, the more likely he is to have extreme prejudice." Clint Eastwood

}}---> I'm smitten

You just have to witness her delivery of the weather is all I can say.  Please don't tell Ann or T shirt girl.

~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~

* Shhhhh

What happens on NB stays on NB!

"I'm interested in the fact that the less secure a man is, the more likely he is to have extreme prejudice." Clint Eastwood

"But if we allowed our news

"But if we allowed our news meetings to evolve into a liberal latte klatch, I have no doubt that a pathological case of group-think would soon set in...." Well, we would'nt want that to happen.

Nortonalec

}}---> Rush Limbaugh! I love it

Rush is, at this moment, talking about Battered Liberal Disorder.  I like to think he caught my post a couple of boxes up.

He's also referencing Blue States.

Coincidence?

~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~

CA

I never thought of it that way, but you are right. For all practical purposes, we do not have a free press.

}}---> Thank you poco

It's that 800 lb. gorilla that can't be addressed because he understands English and has very good hearing.  He also has lots of suckup monkeys who seek protection in exchange for favor.

Perhaps a better visual would be Jabba the Hut and Salacious Crumb.

~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~

Brent, The only thing the

Brent,

The only thing the high concentration of left leaning individuals in the Mainstream Media indicates is that right leaning individuals don't pursue careers in journalism.

If you want to end liberal bias convince more conservatives to become journalists.  Seems pretty simple to me.

 

Only partially correct

Ending ANY bias in media is NOT about the numbers.

It IS about PERSONAL INTEGRITY.

Eliminating bias requires one to recognize their personal bias in the first place, and to admit that not everyone else thinks the same way they do (despite their personal passion for group-causes). 

It requires that after recognizing one's own bias, a "journalist" be very careful to make factual presentations, and to exclude statements and innuendo that convey one's own values, choices, and prejudices. It requires restraint - for example, from tainting the facts with one's personal and subtle slant.

When EACH person takes personal responsibility seriously, THAT's when liberal bias will be "ended".

 

JohnM, I agree

JohnM,

I agree whole-heartedly.  The problem I think you run into in journalism with a person who strongly leans one way or another is that their beliefs become like common sense to them.

For instance, for many liberals it's just common sense that Global Warming exists and for conservatives it's common sense that it doesn't.  I think it's tough to overcome a bias when it's becomes ingrained as an obvious reality.

 

"their beliefs become like

"their beliefs become like common sense to them."

Yes! and that's where they have the responsibility to NOT assume that everyone else should be thinking the same way they do - they should be questioning and probing BEYOND what they believe!

"I think it's tough to overcome a bias when it's becomes ingrained as an obvious reality."

YES! And it's the responsibility of the true professional journalist to FIRST challenge themselves about what their own view of reality is! They could ask themselves "What if they're right and I'm not?" and then go out and uncover the facts.

If it's necessary (and appropriate) to report about someone's opinion, they should be explicit and say "It's so-and-so's belief/opinion that..." and then counter-balance it with similar material from ALL opposing points of view.

As I write, I realize that being a true journalist takes a lot of effort. Throwing around one's opinion is easy, and sloppy. (I'm doing it now.)

But I'm not a journalist.  What does that say about people who claim to be journalists today?

 

Concervative Journalists

"The only thing the high concentration of left leaning individuals in
the Mainstream Media indicates is that right leaning individuals don't
pursue careers in journalism."

This assumes that conservatives would be hired by the liberal managers at the papers or TV stations. As in most universities these days this is probably not the case. They fail the liberal litmus test.

Faulkner, It's illegal to

Faulkner,

It's illegal to not hire someone based on their political leanings.

Furthermore, it's illegal to ask someone about their political beliefs during the hiring process, so their beliefs would have nothing to do with whether they got hired or not.

Sorry but there is no liberal litmus test.  If there was, I'm sure we would have seen some major Employment Practices Liability lawsuits from those conservatives that failed the litmus test.

No Liberal Litmus Test?

Leon:

   It might be illegal but it happens all the time.  There have been books written about the same problem in academia.  You don't have to not hire someone specifically because of their politics.  You can always find another reason to justify it.  Also, the journalism schools in most universities are so heavily slanted toward the left that it's hard for non left wing students to graduate.   Same is true in many other journalism oriented liberal arts disciplines, such as English and History.  There's defintely a litmus test, just not an overtly stated one.  Do you really think a conservative would be hired at the NYT or Newsweek or Time?  I don't.  Of if they were they wouldn't last past the first few Bush Adminstration/Iraq War/Tax Cut supporting articles they tried to write.

It's illegal to not hire someone based on their political leanin

Wrong Moose breath.

Candidates (as one example) hire people all the time based upon their "political leanings". So does the President btw!

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

Yeah, but heaven help him

Yeah, but heaven help him if he tries to fire them.... 

Without recognizing the ordinances of Heaven, it is impossible to be a superior man. - Confucious

EEOC

No doubt, and where is the EEOC in that controversy? Nowhere to be found. It seems the President can fire (if he wants to) someone for being a back stabbin, liberal moonbat who can't follow orders.

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

What do they call it when

What do they call it when they alter a photo to show what isn't there, or hide what is?

The legality didn't seem to slow them down on this.

Conservatives don't get into social service?

I take offense at the insinuation that liberals are more involved in social service and activism. Just because we don't chain ourselves to tress, or throw paint on people, or burn their cars, does not mean we are not socially conscious or active. What it means is we are law abiding.

* You are correct sir!

I believe the label "conservative" explains the difference.

"I'm interested in the fact that the less secure a man is, the more likely he is to have extreme prejudice." Clint Eastwood

Bias Deniers Beware

Rush Limbaugh said exactly this almost 20 years ago!  The MSM soffed at him then, but now the truth is finally coming out, and they won't be able to fake objectivity much longer!

One more thing

One more reason that liberals hate Christians. I saw a survey about a year ago showing that 73% of Evangelicals said that they were registered Republicans and 14% Independents. Additionally, 93% of them said that they had been voting Republican over at least the last 10 years.

Think that the dems, liberals and MSM (all one and the same) don't know that?

Right! 

Imagine this!

...given how people make career decisions and that social service and activism is a primary driver for many journalists.

And, here I thought a journalist's motivations are an unmitigated desire to report the whole and accurate truth about whatever the subject is. Dummy me!

If you are about social service and activism, then why would you go into journalism?

Just my $0.02