At President Bush's Thursday morning press conference, an Associated Press reporter pressed Bush about raising the gas tax to pay for bridge repairs, an ABC News correspondent described Bush's refusal to hike taxes, while paying for the Iraq war, as in conflict with doing “justice” for “government needs” for bridges and housing and, afterward, CBS's Katie Couric rued how Bush “seemed to dismiss the notion of raising the federal gas tax.” CBS reporter Jim Axelrod observed that Bush sees his “strong record as a tax cutter” as part of his legacy and “so even with something as pressing the imagery of the bridges and the infrastructure needs, he can’t be seen as calling for a tax increase, even to address that.”
In the first question at the 10:30am EDT session, the AP's Terry Hunt cited how House “Transportation Committee members are recommending an increase in federal gasoline taxes to pay for repairs. Would you be willing to go along with an increase in gasoline taxes of five cents a gallon or more?” Later, Ann Compton of ABC News reminded Bush it's “been clear you don't want to raise taxes. Can you do justice to the kind of programs the government needs for bridges, for housing, and also continue to spend as much as you do on the war in Iraq?” As for news reports that Bush wishes to cut corporate taxes, Mark Smith of Associated Press radio turned sarcastic: “Do you believe America's corporations are not making enough money these days?”
The MRC's Rich Noyes checked the White House transcript against the video for these questions, at the August 9 press conference, which conveyed liberal talking points:
# Terry Hunt, Associated Press: "Mr. President, former Chairman of the House Transportation Committee, Republican Don Young, says there are about 500 bridges around the country like the one that collapsed in Minneapolis last week. And Young and other Transportation Committee members are recommending an increase in federal gasoline taxes to pay for repairs. Would you be willing to go along with an increase in gasoline taxes of five cents a gallon or more?"
# Jim Axelrod, CBS News: "Mr. President, I was talking with a journalist about an hour ago in Baghdad who says to be a cynic in Iraq is to be naive at this point, that there is discernable progress, undeniable progress on the battlefield, but there is just as discernable and undeniable lack of progress on political reconciliation. Given the premise of the surge is to give the Iraqi government breathing space to gets its business done, given that they're not getting their business done, are the American people entitled to hear from you more than, 'I've told Prime Minister Maliki he's got to do better?'"
# Peter Baker, Washington Post: "Thank you, sir. A two-part question. The New Yorker reports that the Red Cross has found the interrogation program in the CIA detention facilities used interrogation techniques that were tantamount to torture. I'm wondering if you have read that report and what your reaction to it is? And the second part of the question is, more than a year ago you said that you wanted to close the detention facility at Guantanamo, and a year later nothing has actually happened in that regard. Your Vice President, Attorney General and Homeland Security Secretary are reported to be resisting such a move. I wonder if you could tell us who's really in charge on this issue, are you doing anything about it, do you expect Guantanamo to be open or closed when you leave office?"
# Mark Smith, Associated Press Radio: "Mr. President, are you considering a plan to cut corporate taxes? Do you believe America's corporations are not making enough money these days?"
# Ann Compton, ABC News: "You've been clear about saying that you will veto overspending by Congress when they come back next month to do appropriations bills. You've also been clear you don't want to raise taxes. Can you do justice to the kind of programs the government needs for bridges, for housing, and also continue to spend as much as you do on the war in Iraq?"
# David Greene, National Public Radio: "Mr. President, I wanted to ask you about accountability. You're a big believer in it, you've talked about it with regard to the public schools. But given the performance of Iraqi leaders, given your decision to commute the sentence of Lewis Libby, you've also stood by the Attorney General recently -- there have been a lot of questions about your commitment to accountability. And I'm wondering if you could give the American people some clear examples of how you've held people accountable during your presidency?....If I could follow -- sorry. Given the decision to commute the sentence of Libby and given the performance of Iraqi leaders, is it fair for people to ask questions about your commitment to accountability?"
The MRC's Justin McCarthy took down this post-press conference exchange between CBS News anchor Katie Couric and White House correspondent Jim Axelrod:
COURIC: Let’s go to Jim Axelrod who is in the White House briefing room. Jim I’m surprised the President wasn’t really pushed more on infrastructure questions, and he seemed to dismiss the notion of raising the federal gas tax to pay for some, what, quarter of the American bridges that are in desperate need of repair. Do you think the pressure will continue on him to do something about setting his spending priorities, or, or, setting different priorities when it comes to federal spending?AXELROD: I don’t think there’s any question about that. Congress will continue to push for it. But the President was very clear, sort of underscoring a philosophical underpinning of his, which is that you don’t need to raise taxes, you just need to be more careful about how you are spending money, especially when it comes to those infrastructure, transportation related expenditures. He was saying, “look, a lot of money gets appropriated for transportation in this country. It’s up to Congress if they want to spend it different, for instance, in pursuit of infrastructure needs. It’s up to Congress to spend it more efficiently and better.” But he was clear that he doesn’t, he doesn’t support any sort of gas tax related tax increase.
COURIC: And, and Jim, his comments were really pointed in terms of really accusing committee members of, of, of financing and funding pet projects first and foremost, and than really caring about the nation’s infrastructure as a whole as a secondary issue.
AXELROD: I think as the President gets further and further along in his presidency and begins to think more of legacies issues, one of the things that is most closely associated with the President, obviously is the strong record as a tax cutter. He is tied to this in terms of history, and so even with something as pressing the imagery of the bridges and the infrastructure needs, he can’t be seen as calling for a tax increase, even to address that. So it becomes a question of how you’re going to justify getting the money spent there, but not doing so by calling for a tax increase.
—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center





# Terry Hunt, Associated Press: "Mr. President, former Chairman of the House Transportation Committee, Republican Don Young, says there are about 500 bridges around the country like the one that collapsed in Minneapolis last week. And Young and other Transportation Committee members are recommending an increase in federal gasoline taxes to pay for repairs. Would you be willing to go along with an increase in gasoline taxes of five cents a gallon or more?"
# David Greene, National Public Radio: "Mr. President, I wanted to ask you about accountability. You're a big believer in it, you've talked about it with regard to the public schools. But given the performance of Iraqi leaders, given your decision to commute the sentence of Lewis Libby, you've also stood by the Attorney General recently -- there have been a lot of questions about your commitment to accountability. And I'm wondering if you could give the American people some clear examples of how you've held people accountable during your presidency?....If I could follow -- sorry. Given the decision to commute the sentence of Libby and given the performance of Iraqi leaders, is it fair for people to ask questions about your commitment to accountability?"
COURIC: And, and Jim, his comments were really pointed in terms of really accusing committee members of, of, of financing and funding pet projects first and foremost, and than really caring about the nation’s infrastructure as a whole as a secondary issue.














Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Oh no, not again!
August 10, 2007 - 01:22 ET by Dave RUh-oh, I sense another "read my lips" moment approaching.
I hope GWB has the intestinal fortitude to resist this lunacy, something his daddy was, sadly, unable to do. As a result, we got a Clinton in the White House. Problem is, GWB hasn't actually impressed me with his ability to resist his more liberal tendencies.
Let's all hope history doesn't repeat itself.
He talked about spending priorities
August 10, 2007 - 04:15 ET by sarcasmoHe talked about spending priorities, in the President's defense. If it had been me, I'd have shoved a knife in Ted Stevens' back and mentioned how the budget behind a single "Bridge to Nowhere" would suffice to inspect/repair dozens of bridges to somewhere, but I guess Mr. Bush is either too-polite or Stevens is still too-scary despite the recent mess.
JMR
Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.
Too polite
August 10, 2007 - 06:56 ET by Six String SpiffI like Bush as a friend, but his lack of political testicular fortitude is/has been been frustrating to say the least. I don't know how many times he could have told some of these lib democrax to get bent with the Constituion in his hand. He bows to almost every demand they have. Rediculous.
The American Revolution Continued
}}---> Bush Press Conf
August 10, 2007 - 04:30 ET by Cool ArrowThe President held strong in this morning's fight with the Democrat Press. If anything, he slapped them around with their own preconceptions.
The Alberto Gonzales moment was priceless. Coulda' hearda' pindrop.
The Alberto Gonzales
August 10, 2007 - 05:38 ET by motherbeltThe Alberto Gonzales moment was priceless. Coulda' hearda' pindrop. - Cool Arrow
Missed it...what happened?
journalists?
August 10, 2007 - 05:15 ET by DontFeedTheTrollsThese are the same 'journalists' who say Americans can't earn a living wage and they now want the government to take even more of our money in taxes. The same 'journalists' who scream that record profits at Exxon Mobil are obscene, while the thrice record profits in taxes made by the government on Exxon Mobil's products just isn't enough.
Are they friggin' schizophrenic??
D
Keep the ILLEGALS out, join NumbersUSA to send free faxes to your reps.
At the question "Would you
August 10, 2007 - 05:37 ET by motherbeltAt the question "Would you be willing to go along with an increase in gasoline taxes of five cents a gallon or more?" I wish the President had replied with how much of our $3 a gallon is taxes now.
If our government had been more reponsible with our taxes over the years, and used the gas tax money for its intended purpose, bridges would have been getting repaired all along. What makes Mr. Hunt think the increased gas tax he's proposing would actually be used to repair roads and bridges if it hasn't been up till now?
Well said. I wish the
August 10, 2007 - 09:21 ET by Reality CheckWell said. I wish the President had simply said, "I think that if we need more highway revenue, we should do what we've always done to raise federal tax receipts, and that's to cut taxes. If Congress puts a tax cut bill on my desk tomorrow, I'll sign it."
That would be hilarious.
Reality Check
Sigh
August 10, 2007 - 05:59 ET by FedUpWithPCIt almost seemed gleeful, the loaded questions being tossed at the president. I think, perhaps, that these reporters ought to be glad I wasn't at the podium that day, because there would have been a chair or two tossed around. I mean, good lord, that stupid bridge didn't collapse because of a lack of bloody funding, it collapsed because the obscenely large surplus the state DID have (2 billion, I believe it was) ended up being misappropriated into other things. Whether it's a five-cent tax or a fifty dollar tax, simply tossing money at the state and saying "fix that bridge" won't do a damned thing to help anyone. It's not Bush's job to act as a watchman on each and every little piece of state infrastructure- it's up to the states themselves to budget for and enact the maintenance of these things.
"Damnit Terry, I'm a President, not a Bridge Inspector!"
Media Lobbyists?
August 10, 2007 - 06:21 ET by Sergeant ROCKHmm... I thought journalists were to "ask" questions, not campaign or lobby for tax increases?
This is a question???
August 10, 2007 - 06:37 ET by motherbeltMark Smith, Associated Press Radio: "Mr. President, are you considering
a plan to cut corporate taxes? Do you believe America's corporations
are not making enough money these days?" (emphasis mine)
This is a legitimate question????? To quote Edgar Allen Poe, I am "sick, sick unto death" of these "journalists" whose sole purpose in attending a press conference is to make a little speech disguised as some sort of question, and then brag about how they got in a "zinger."
Do you believe America's
August 10, 2007 - 07:20 ET by rimskyDo you believe America's corporations
are not making enough money these days?"
As if it's the President's job to set profit limits or some such nonsense. The scary thing is, Hillary will try to do exactly that if she gets elected to the Whitehouse. Idiots, all of 'em. They really think they are asking legitimate questions!
When was the press assigned---
August 10, 2007 - 07:15 ET by misterbillWhen was the press assigned---to function as the Congress???? Pushing the President on the tax issue is not their job. They should ask him why he does not agree with it and report that info to the public. How f***ing dare they?????
MSM - The 4th Branch
August 10, 2007 - 07:19 ET by Sergeant ROCKThey are the fourth branch of government - ask one of them.
Amazing Ignorance!
August 10, 2007 - 07:47 ET by rbchaffeAmazing how the same reporters trying to get everyone worried about rising gasoline prices (while remaining mostly quiet when the price goes down again) are also pushing for rising the tax on gasoline.
Also amazing how ignorant they are (or in denial, or simply in collusion with the Democratics) about how, having lowered the tax rates, President Bush has caused tax receipts to actually increase to record levels.
Cannot one, even just one, MSM "journalist" out there ask about congressional spending priorities (i.e. fiscal responsibility) instead of pushing for higher taxes after every disaster?
Politically Driven
August 10, 2007 - 08:00 ET by Sergeant ROCKThey are the propaganda arm of the DNC. The only time you may hear or see a hint of criticism of a democRAT is when they deviate from the leftist agenda.
The fact of the matter is,
August 10, 2007 - 07:52 ET by InfomanOhioThe fact of the matter is, the average corporate tax rate in the rest of the world is about 27 percent. Here in the U.S., it is about 40 percent. It's no wonder we're losing businesses to third world countries. These liberal "journalists" want to turn America into a ghost town.
The truth may be ugly, but it is still the truth.
They're just gonna hafta wait fer new higher Taxes..
August 10, 2007 - 08:18 ET by JayTeeI'm sure that when the Congress gets back in session, or what passes for Congressional representatives of the People, the Media will get what they clamor for.....Higher Taxes. Another Bush Veto, unless the populace rises and shuts down the switchboard like they did on Immigration.
The MSM in Baltimore, the day after the Bridge collasped, went out and found the oldest Bridge they could find, and put a Fat lady talking about how the Bridge was in such bad shape and was going to fall...she was a non Engineering type, and the Bridge could have held maybe 4 Cars end to end...with maybe a 10 ft drop if it ever collasped.
It was quite unbelievable....but given two more days of coverage, they managed to sneak in a short video picture of a BIG Bridge, while discussing the little Bridge......hoping of course, another little 'ole lady would be scared into believing crapola.........
MSM's hard at work, pushing another Agenda.....and no Construction Engineer has yet to show their face in the Video's or be interviewed.....
What good is a Free Press, if it is a False Press ? David Foote GoE
Couric brings up a good point
August 10, 2007 - 08:31 ET by westonbCOURIC: And, and Jim, his comments were really pointed in terms of really accusing committee members of, of, of financing and funding pet projects first and foremost, and than really caring about the nation’s infrastructure as a whole as a secondary issue.
And he completely dodges the question:
AXELROD: I think as the President gets further and further along in his presidency and begins to think more of legacies issues, one of the things that is most closely associated with the President, obviously is the strong record as a tax cutter. He is tied to this in terms of history, and so even with something as pressing the imagery of the bridges and the infrastructure needs, he can’t be seen as calling for a tax increase, even to address that. So it becomes a question of how you’re going to justify getting the money spent there, but not doing so by calling for a tax increase.
That is exactly what has been going on in Congress. They'll attach a million dollars here and there for these pointless projects to any bill on the floor. But yet its still Bush's fault for spending too much money on the war. Right...
"Government's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives."-Ronald Reagan
Liberals/Democrats make me
August 10, 2007 - 09:12 ET by ErgoDyneLiberals/Democrats make me feel like the smartest person in the world.
I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it.
Rather than raise taxes,
August 10, 2007 - 09:14 ET by Mean Gene Dr. LoveRather than raise taxes, how about live within the current budget (or shrink the budget)? That would mean taking away the pork.
I wonder how many of these reporters operate with their personal expenditures. If they find a leak in their roof or their septic tank ruptures and they don't have enough money in their budget, do they go rob a bank to pay for repairs? Or do they shuffle their finances around by taking money out of savings or away from other not so important things to fund the project?
It just makes me wonder.
"Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa! There's still plenty of meat on that bone. Now you take this home, throw it in a pot, add some broth, a potato, baby you've got a stew goin'!" --Carl Weathers
The MSM never does any
August 10, 2007 - 09:41 ET by umpeteThe MSM never does any homework....they consider asking "tax-raising" questions to be informative, rather than looking at how much tax revenue does the fed take in from gas tax on a mothly basis; how much the state of minnesota takes in from its gas tax, etc.....
the ironic part of it all is, if americans reduced their gas consumption by, let's say 10 percent, the biggest losers would be the state and the fed, who would lose their "cash cows."
I've yet to see (or hear) what minnesota takes in from gas tax revenues, and I'm not confident it will reported, either
As of 2005, Minnesota's gas
August 10, 2007 - 10:00 ET by Mean Gene Dr. LoveAs of 2005, Minnesota's gas taxes (combined Federal and State) were 40.4 cents per gallon.
"Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa! There's still plenty of meat on that bone. Now you take this home, throw it in a pot, add some broth, a potato, baby you've got a stew goin'!" --
Trade ya....
August 10, 2007 - 10:14 ET by RJTrade ya...
"Connecticut motorists pay about 60.4 cents per gallon in gas taxes, effectively a sales tax of about 20 percent, the second highest gas tax burden in the country, behind only California.
Further, the great bulk of Connecticut's gas-related taxes is no longer even being devoted to covering the costs of the state's transportation system, the traditional rationale for gas taxes. That is because more than half the revenue of the gross receipts tax is going into the general fund and other funds." (Stamford Times 6/10/07)
Just found this site that
August 10, 2007 - 10:09 ET by Mean Gene Dr. LoveJust found this site that says MN is taking 22 cents a gallon.
"Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa! There's still plenty of meat on that bone. Now you take this home, throw it in a pot, add some broth, a potato, baby you've got a stew goin'!" --
Nice find, Mean
August 10, 2007 - 10:13 ET by BlondeNice find, Mean Gene.
Those poor people in California....although here in Florida we're not far behind.
Question of the day
August 10, 2007 - 09:50 ET by coffee260Here's the question that grabbed by attention. Not for the reasons you might think.
That's a stunning suggestion. Not because of the allegation that Pat Tillman was murdered, but because you have a reporter in the White House press corp who obviously has a suspicion or at the very least colleagues that have raised the possibility. It goes to the mindset of these liberal reporters. They see the plausible in the implausible and the implausible in the plausible.
If their was credible evidence to suggest Pat Tillman was murdered I assure you it wouldn't be much of a secret.
Raise taxes? I have the
August 10, 2007 - 11:13 ET by bassndudeRaise taxes? I have the perfect tax. For every story published by the MSM, tax that reporter a filing tax of say, .10cents. Tax the ones that want a tax increase.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
better idea for increased taxes
August 10, 2007 - 11:22 ET by LionKingI have a better idea...for anyone who wants to increase taxes, pretend that they have been increased and send in a check to the government right now. Lead by example.
If these idiots are so eager
August 10, 2007 - 13:34 ET by fitzfongIf these idiots are so eager to raise taxes, why don't they just go into the IRS and the state and surrender some of their ill-gotten gains? Reducing taxes leads to increases in the treasury, not raising taxes. Why don't they call for decreases in spending? They're simply not interested in the facts, just in promoting a bankrupt agenda.