Bridge Collapse Provides Cafferty with Fresh Angle to Stigmatize Iraq War

Photo of Brent Baker.

CNN's Jack Cafferty on Thursday afternoon managed to use the Minneapolis bridge collapse tragedy to take another shot at the Iraq war as he pointed out how the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have cost $600 billion and featured an e-mailer who complained spending on infrastructure is “a drop in the bucket compared to $450 billion wasted in Iraq.”

[UPDATE, 8:35pm EDT: Cafferty's question during the 7pm EDT hour of The Situation Room: “In light of the Minnesota bridge collapse, how could the U.S. better spend the $2 billion a week that we're pouring into Iraq here at home?” Cafferty later decided to feature an e-mail response from Steven in Hawaii who sarcastically suggested: “Just identify all of America's infrastructure as Taliban, or Islamic extremists or gay marriage proponents and presto all the money in the federal budget will be thrown at it to 'attack' the problem!”]

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Cafferty outlined the 7pm EDT hour “Cafferty File” question:

“The total outlay for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, so far, over $600 billion. Think for a minute about what we could do with that money here at home, not only to improve our own infrastructure, but for other domestic needs that go wanting. Here's the question: In light of the Minnesota bridge collapse, how could the U.S. better spend the $2 billion a week that we're pouring into Iraq here at home?”

Presumably, he meant "how could the U.S. better spend at home the $2 billion a week that we're pouring into Iraq?"

At the end of the 4pm EDT hour of The Situation Room, Wolf Blitzer interviewed Senators Chris Dodd and Chuck Hagel, who pointed out it's difficult to find the “hundreds of billions of dollars” needed to repair infrastructure. Blitzer then went to Cafferty for the e-mail replies to his “Cafferty File” question of the hour, but Cafferty first interjected: “I think the number of dollars that we have spent on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan is right at $600 billion.”

Cafferty's question: “In light of the fact that proper maintenance of our roads and bridges has been neglected for years, how do we get our government to do the right thing?” Amongst the answers Cafferty chose to highlight: A woman who described $200 billion, apparently the amount spent in some time period on infrastructure, as “a drop in the bucket compared to $450 billion wasted in Iraq” -- Cafferty suggested “I think it's actually more than that” -- and a man who proposed that “the solution is simple. Revive Roosevelt's National Recovery Act. Begin putting people to work rebuilding our country.”

Cafferty at 4:59pm EDT with the replies to his August 2 question for the 4pm hour:

I'm not a mathematician, but I think the number of dollars that we have spent on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan is right at $600 billion. The question, in light of the fact that proper maintenance of our roads and bridges has been neglected for years is: How do we get our government to do the right thing? Now, there's something to get your arms around.

Nina writes: "Jack, we haven't invested in infrastructure in this country since Lyndon Johnson's time, actually. Then, it was guns and butter. Now it's just guns, no butter. The butter seen as fat is our bridges, roads, and rails."

Karen in Indiana: "Bush and our Congress fiddle, while our infrastructure fails us. $200 billion, a drop in the bucket, compared to $450 billion wasted in Iraq" -- I think it's actually more than that -- "some of it on their infrastructure. Vote for anybody, except the ones currently in office."

James in Tennessee: "In the early '90s, I sat on the Highway Users Federation board. One of our missions was to get the feds to release funds slated for the maintenance of the federal highway and bridge system. I retired before anything positive happened in that respect. And I have been out of the loop ever since. You might look into how much unreleased funding is presently available and what it's being used for, if it's not being used for the purposes intended."

Stan in Hays, Kansas: "Congress is spending billions each month to rebuild infrastructure in Iraq. Can't they find a few bucks for the folks in Minnesota and the rest of this country that's falling apart?

Jim in California: "The solution is simple. Revive Roosevelt's National Recovery Act, begin putting people to work rebuilding our country. So many of the infrastructure elements in this country were developed in the '30s and '40s under Roosevelt, and then left to rot in front of our smoke-filled eyes. The country is 80 years behind the curve."

And Jeanne writes my favorite letter: "On this question and almost every question you have asked in the longest while, there is but one answer. Vote out and each and every elected official each and every election year. You need to run this e-mail daily on your show until we start thinking about it. If we would do that, the officials in government would begin to listen to us."

Jeanne, I think you might be on to something.

—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Budget priorities

It's important to maintain our infrastructure so Islamofascists will have an easier time getting their car bombs to their targets.

Defense is a constitutionally mandated function of government, and yet that's the part of the budget the libs consider expendable.  If they're so worried about bridges, there are lots of other non-essentials they could cut.

When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.

Yes, how many bridges might

Yes, how many bridges might we have lost had we not taken a stand in the war on terror?

Another question: Does that $600 billion include expenses we would've had anyway, had there not been a war? Soldiers get paid in war just the same as they do in peace.

*****

"Some people have a way with words. Other people, er, I don't know. Not have way, I guess

The leftists have to milk

The leftists have to milk this for all it's worth...

Politics started getting inserted in this bridge collapse at about 9:30 PM MT where I live with Trace Gallager(sp) on Fox and some local talking head out of Minnesota....blaming Pawlenty and the 'R' s...while they were still trying to rescue people....

It was disgusting....I was yelling at the television screen.

Unbelievable.

Despicable ...

Jack Cafferty can go to hell...along with the rest of them.

That is my rant...I am so disgusted with the msm.

The deterioration of our

The deterioration of our infrastructure, and all areas are declining, is related to increase in transfer payments.

In Korea this week. They laugh at our movement to weak socialism (or socialism that weakens)

Ignore the MSM and you will be informed

 

When structures collapsed

When structures collapsed earlier, who and what war did they blame? 

 

The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.

- Arabian Proverb

...anybody who has an 'R'

...anybody who has an 'R' behind their name if they have any kind of power at all Chris...

...SIGH....

BT,Yeah, sigh. But what

BT,

Yeah, sigh. But what war? I wasn't aware that all construction in this country has come to a halt to pay for this war, were you? I blame the governments, both state and local for spending the money on the "look at us we're a big city" glamor projects like rail systems, etc. All the while letting the existing road systems go to hell...

 

The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.

- Arabian Proverb

Maybe...just a

Maybe...just a thought...before we fund a bridge to nowhere, we should fix te bridges to somewhere...

Have They No Shame?

Have they no shame? They've proven they do not. Not a single ounce. They openly admit "success in Iraq would be a problem for us (Democrats)". Harry Reid exclaimed with a smile words to the effect that for every X number of American soldiers that die "we pick up another House seat". We all knew when this happened last night every (D) in the country was busy writing two press releases. One saying, if it was a terrorist attack: "we protect Iraqis 7,000 miles away but don't give a damn about protecting our own people here at home" and the other, if it was structural failure: "Bush wastes $2 billion dollars a day in Iraq that just one of those days would have paid to replace five of these death trap bridges that blanket our country". Guess what? We were right. Boy, that really took a rocket scientist to predict!

I further predict there will be somewhere between zero and two voters nationwide who bother to look up the hard facts and figures of the bottomless money pit called the highway transportation fund. Eisenhower got things off to a good start in the 50's then the vultures swooped in. Billions (actually, trillions when you add up all of the 47 years since 1960) mostly went into an abyss. The money bought votes. Period. Over 90% of the money went to boondoggles (think "bridge to nowhere", "casinos in New Orleans" and on and on).

Just like the "War On Poverty", if you add up ALL of the money spent and being spent on what Johnson started with great fanfare, over $300,000 could have been handed to every man, woman and child in our country who claimed to be living even near the poverty line. Invested, poverty would today be a thing of the history books in our country. Yes, we'd still have a class of people who live off a check but at least it would be a private check and they'd be a participant in an "ownership society" instead of "helpless victims" certain politicians can't get enough of. The highway and transportation money has been there in great excess to provide us an adequate and safe highway system. But the proper spending of it has been a "death by a thousand cuts" (think "the Big Dig" in Boston). Now, those very people who wasted our money to secure and hold their seats in congress will shamelessly blame George Bush and the Iraqi War for this tragedy. Just as they did in New Orleans where money for proper levies HAD been given to Louisiana but almost all of it was spent on casinos and other tourist attractions as it passed through the pockets of an untold number of crooked politicians and their financial supporters. Think "$90,000 of cash in a freezer". No more than a few will ever pay for their crimes. Even they absolve themselves in their minds of what amounts to indirect murder. If you have no shame, you have no conscious. I go further and say you also have no soul.

Better that they make their argument even more plain and simple to the voters. Let them proclaim, "By pulling out of Iraqi YOU can HAVE the money (if you vote for me) because camels don't need roads!" Our new masters will thank you (uh, then kill us all)".

It never ends does it. I

It never ends does it. I recall after the mining disaster in Pensylvania Marky Mark Shields on News Hour said that this was the fault of Tom DeLay and his deregulation etc.

Any chance for them to scream "we need bigger government!" or "End the war in Iraq!" they'll grab it like a brass ring.

I'm sure they'll work socialized medicine into it somehow.

 

-cs™

 

"The great enemy of the truth is very often not the
lie -- deliberate, contrived and dishonest -- but the myth --
persistent, persuasive and unrealistic."

 "It never ends does

 "It never ends does it."

Nope. We've got to admit, these idiots do have a lot of energy...

 

The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.

- Arabian Proverb

This is just completely

This is just completely insane! I am speachless on this.

All the thoughts I have on this are not appropriate for this forum.

"Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana!" Groucho

Mothman my ass, that bridge

Mothman my ass, that bridge fell because of George Bush and the war in Iraq. Sure, it was 40 years ago, but what does that have to do with anything?

I also blame Halliburton. If they were a bridge building company instead of an oil services company, they could have fixed this bridge. Therefore, it is their fault because they aren't in the bridge business. 

On Halliburton

Actually, Brown & Root, now KBR (and a division of Halliburton) DID build at least one bridge I know of...the Loop 610 bridge over the Houston Ship Channel. 

So, in a roundabout way, they DO build bridges....

:-)

Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.

}}}----> KBR

KBR's (Halliburton) hit the bigtime with the $20 Million Mansfield Dam, which created Austin's Lake Travis.  Mansfield Dam Project was a present from LBJ, blessed by FDR in 1937.  The deal ensured Johnson unlimited campaign funds throughout his political life.

Well, there you go.

Well, there you go. Halliburton supplied them with faulty plans probably, because if they built one bridge, then that makes them responsible for every bridge ever built. They did this knowing that in 40 years they would need a distraction from their war for oil.

Oh, before I forget...

Scooter Libby!

}}---> kbr

Their war for oil began in earnest as LBJ awarded the spoils of the JFK assassination to B&R (this was before Kellogg) for infrastructure in Vietnam. 

By any other name, for good or bad, Halliburton has been there to do the big jobs in time of war.

Jack the Knife Cafferty

I sent Cafferty 2 comments on this segment, neither of which he chose to air, although he has aired dozens of my comments in the past.

First comment:Hey Jack, quit complaining about the bridge disaster, it has made great theater for you and your network. I particularly enjoyed watching CNN interrupt initial coverage of the disaster with several commercials. It made me want to rush out and buy some Phillips tablets for my diarrhea and come home to lie on my Stainmaster carpet to watch when your coverage continued.

Second comment: Jack it is nice to see you almost smiling again. I knew you would find a way to somehow lay the blame for the bridge collapse on the Bush administration and the war. Just curious, do you have any idea what the cost of a small nuclear device, or even dirty bomb being detonated in downtown Manhattan, or a small airplane spraying 10 pounds of anthrax over Long Beach and the L.A. port area would be? You go ahead and lay childish partisan blame for a bridge falling down, but let the grownups protect us from the real threats. 

Jack Cafferty Q & A

Q: What is the difference between Mr. Potter from the movie "It's a Wonderful Life", and Jack Cafferty from Real Life?

A: One is an Angry, Balding, Demented, Ignorant Old Man, and the other is just Mr. Potter from the movie "It's a Wonderful Life"

On the Saturday before

What a nice isolationist argument.

There WAS a time when we did pour lots of money into our own infrastructure, and refused to acknowledge that the Outside World even existed.  That worked great right up until 6 December 1941...

Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.

}}}----> After the War

After the war, Ike decided an American Autobahn was needed to enhance Interstate Commerce and allow for swift response if attacked.

No good deed goes unpunished.

I'm not even going to

I'm not even going to comment more than this next sentence on cafferty. He is a worthless POS, who knowingly spreads lies and slanders people, and will pass away an angry, bitter nothing.

Now, on to the crux of the matter. Isn't it funny, how every natural disaster is Bush's fault? No matter how much money is allocated for infrastructure repair ($50+ Billion last budget I believe), it's Bush's responsibility to ensure every bridge gets repaired, road, etc. Never mind the people responsible in each state, to ensure those things occur.

If these people who want to blame Bush for everything, and rely that much on the federal govt, then they need to forfeit every cent they earn to me, and I will make sure they never get injured. How sad and pathetic is it, that these miserable little people have absolutely no self responsibility?

They need someone to feed them meals, burp them, and wipe their dirty bottoms for them, since they cannot do for themselves. I am sick and tired of liberals constantly blaming Bush for their runny noses (who need a govt handout to wipe that snotty nose, no less), and take no personal responsibility. Cradle to the grave nanny state... "Waaaaaaaaaa! someone died, Bush lied! Waaaaaaaaa! I can't do anything for myself Waaaaaaaaaaaaa! It's all Bush's fault.

Give me a damn break! I wish there was a way to visually identify these loathesome burdens to our way of life, so that I can never defend these people again! They got 20 yrs of freedom under me while I served, now I am retired, and I'm not going to defend them again!

Go to Canada if the US is that bad!

Now where's the Tylenol®?

 

Yes! Have some.

Bridges

The bottom line folks is anything bad that happens, including having lettuce make people sick or children not having medical care is President Bush's fault. Why can't we conservatives just admit this? (sarcasm off)

You know you are going to have a bad day when you have a visitor that says: 

I'm from the government and I'm here to help you.

Thump!

It was just a matter of time before the other shoe dropped.  How sad these people are, how sad.

Wow

"It takes two people to lie Marge"

"One to lie and one to listen...."

 

Here is a good point, I have friends that live in Minnesota and they confirmed what I have thought, Minnesota is one of the highest taxed states in the Union. Hmmmmmm, where did all that money go?

Into the Al Franken For

Into the Al Franken For Senator campaign coffers?