Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 20, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Benghazi Fiasco
  • Gosnell Trial
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Brad Wilmouth's blog
  • BREAKING: WashPost Reports Obama DOJ Also Spied on James Rosen of Fox News
  • Crowley to Obama Advisor: 'Why Didn't the President Just Say, Yeah, Benghazi Was a Terrorist Attack?'
  • CBS's Sharyl Attkisson Says Team Obama 'Perfected' Delaying Info Release And Has 'Quit Talking to Me Altogether'
  • Fareed Zakaria Howler: 'Obama’s World View is Rooted in American Exceptionalism'
  • Video: Brent Bozell Cautions Media Will Quickly Revert to Defending Obama, Attacking GOP Over Scandals
  • Bozell Column: 'Progress' Gets Canceled
  • CNN's Banfield: 'Take Me Off the Ledge' and Tell Me IRS Audits Weren't Political
  • NBC's Williams Ready to Move On: 'It's Tough to Know the Staying Power of Any Given Scandal'

CBS Highlights Public Opposition to Gun Control

By Brad Wilmouth | October 28, 2011 | 08:44

A  A

On Friday's The Early Show, CBS correspondent Whit Johnson filed a report highlighting a recent Gallup poll finding a majority of Americans opposing new gun control laws at the highest rate ever recorded. After beginning the piece by highlighting a woman who just recently decided to become a gun owner for the first time in her life, Johnson detailed some of the poll's findings:

According to a new Gallup poll, 47 percent of Americans report having a gun on their property, up from 41 percent a year ago, the highest number Gallup has recorded since 1993. The poll also found that 53 percent of Americans oppose a ban on assault rifles and semi-automatic guns, the first time more have opposed than supported a ban.

The CBS correspondent noted that Democrats like President Obama have been reluctant to push new gun laws, and took a moment to note complaints from gun control advocates. After a clip of Colin Goddard, a member of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, complaining that there are not enough gun laws, Johnson undermined him by noting the substantial drop in "gun-related homicides" that has coincided with increasing gun ownership:


WHIT JOHNSON: But the number of firearm-related homicides in the U.S. has dropped dramatically, from more than 18,000 in 1993, to fewer than 9,000 in 2010 - numbers the NRA is quick to point out.

CHRIS COX, NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION: Those rates are the lowest record in 43 years while gun ownership is at all-time high. It really destroys the arguments from the gun control community that more guns means more crime.


But the CBS correspondent ended his piece on an odd note as he seemed to wonder if new gun owners like the woman featured earlier would end up somehow undermining the positive crime statistics, and noted that the assault weapon ban likely will not be renewed.. Johnson:

Still, it remains to be seen how new gun owners like Katie Barbour will shape the debate going forward. The 10-year assault weapons ban signed by President Clinton expired in 2004. Polls like this one only reinforce the growing sense of reluctance among Democrats to once again take the issue on.

Below is a complete transcript of the report from the Friday, October 28, The Early Show on CBS:

CHRIS WRAGGE: But first here this morning, some news this morning about gun control that may surprise you. According to a new poll, most Americans are now against it. It's a sign that we're more comfortable with guns than ever, and correspondent Whit Johnson is in Washington with more for us on that. Whit, good morning.

WHIT JOHNSON: Chris, good morning to you. Well, it's difficult to monitor gun ownership in this country, but this new Gallup poll indicates that more and more people have guns in their homes, and that America's attitude towards gun control may be shifting. Katie Barbour is firing a gun for just the second time

KATIE BARBOUR, GUN OWNER: I was, never was around guns my whole entire life, and-

JOHNSON: Keeping an open mind, Katie went to this shooting range in Virginia with her boyfriend two weeks ago, and now they're handgun owners.

BARBOUR: I don't really think I'm comfortable with carrying a handgun around 24/7 strapped to my side yet, but, you know, I do, I do feel comfortable in a place like this.

JOHNSON: According to a new Gallup poll, 47 percent of Americans report having a gun on their property, up from 41 percent a year ago, the highest number Gallup has recorded since 1993. The poll also found that 53 percent of Americans oppose a ban on assault rifles and semi-automatic guns, the first time more have opposed than supported a ban. Even after Congresswoman Gabby Giffords was seriously wounded this year in an Arizona shooting rampage, the cries for tougher gun laws have quieted on Capitol Hill. President Obama has said little about the subject publicly, frustrating gun violence prevention advocates like Colin Goddard.

COLIN GODDARD, BRADY CAMPAIGN TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: That morning changed my whole perspective on this country, my community.

JOHNSON: Goddard was shot four times during the 2007 Virginia Tech massacre. He says the words "gun control" have become a political tabboo, and a distraction from much needed reforms.

GODDARD: Took me nearly losing my life to realize that, you know, we don't register guns, we don't license gun owners, we don't even do background checks on everybody.

JOHNSON: But the number of firearm-related homicides in the U.S. has dropped dramatically, from more than 18,000 in 1993, to fewer than 9,000 in 2010 - numbers the NRA is quick to point out.

CHRIS COX, NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION: Those rates are the lowest record in 43 years while gun ownership is at all-time high. It really destroys the arguments from the gun control community that more guns means more crime.

JOHNSON: Still, it remains to be seen how new gun owners like Katie Barbour will shape the debate going forward. The 10-year assault weapons ban signed  by President Clinton expired in 2004. Polls like this one only reinforce the growing sense of reluctance among Democrats to once again take the issue on.
 

  • Chris Wragge
  • Whit Johnson
  • Brad Wilmouth's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

libs hate guns

Submitted by ohio granny on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 9:25am.

Liberals hate private ownership of guns. As long as the private citizen has guns, liberals will never be able to take over like the communist's and nazi's. And that is why they hate guns. Anyone with any intelligence understands that when it is illegal for the private citizenry to own guns, only the criminals will have guns.

Liberals and gun control advocates guaranteed that we would have mass bloodshed on the streets every time in every state when concealed carry was being debated. And guess what has happened? nothing close to that. Crime has fallen overall. Imagine, liberals being wrong again, and again.

  • Login to post comments

I recognize the need for

Submitted by Rupert Cadell on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 9:38am.

I recognize the need for citizens to own guns, at least in certain parts of the country, but I also look at them the same way I look at weatherproofing my house in late fall or putting on snow tires. Yes, they MIGHT serve a useful purpose in an improbable scenario, but what's to like about them beyond (potential) utilitarianism? Sorry, but if liberals "hate" guns, then I claim in turn that far too many gun-owners fetishize them.

Before the flame-based replies begin, I grew up shooting defenseless animals a few times a year on trips to rural Maine and now own a double-action revolver. (It sits in a drawer. I haven't seen it in years. Maybe I should make sure it's still there) But I would not join the NRA if my life depended on it. I despise that organization.

 

  • Login to post comments

No flaming, Rupert..

Submitted by NC Cop on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 9:43am.

I personally just disagree with you. I own several handguns and 4 rifles. Why? I like to target shoot and I compete in competitions with them. Most people who own guns are the same way. If you don't want to own a gun, then that's fine, nobody is going to make you. However, why affect someone else's right to own a gun(s) if they want to?

You may despise the NRA, but isn't in interesting that you despise an organization that fights for your right to keep that dobule-action revolver. May I ask why you despise them?

Shooting defenseless animals?! You know all of those animals will be waiting for you in the afterlife??? Just kidding!! It's a joke I make with all of my buddies who hunt.

  • Login to post comments

Hi NC, I know that since I

Submitted by Rupert Cadell on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 9:50am.

Hi NC,

I know that since I own a gun, I SHOULD target shoot a few times a year, but I just never do and have no real inclination. Nor would I say anyone should not be allowed to do so (though I am very much in favor of heavy restrictions, waiting periods, etc. on firearm purchases). I'm just saying I don't understand the mindset that looks at guns as aesthetic, revered objects.

My hatred for the NRA is convoluted and probably not entirely fair, and if I start talking about one of my specific reasons, I guarantee you this thread will be derailed by bickering, so I'll bite my tongue and reiterate that my dislike goes back to childhood and is probably not 100% logical.

Hunting, yeah. I do not get it. Even as an 12-year-old, there was always something that seemed wrong about marching though the lovely snowy woods to use a high-tech machine with high-tech optical enhancement in order to shoot a deer with X number of points just to eat venison stew and brag about the kill for the next decade.

 

  • Login to post comments

"I'm just saying I don't

Submitted by NC Cop on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 9:57am.

"I'm just saying I don't understand the mindset that looks at guns as aesthetic, revered objects."

I don't necessarily agree that people worship them or anything like that, but when people start passing heavy restrictions on firearms, you're messing with the Constitution and some people are very protective of that.

If the government started passing heavy restrictions on free speech or religion, you can imagine the response. Firearms are just as important to people. It's no secret that Democrats are pro gun control so whenever they pass a gun control measure it seems like just another stepping stone to complete gun control, which is a very bad thing. We have tons of gun laws on the books, more gun laws is not the answer.

  • Login to post comments

This is a pretty well-worn

Submitted by Rupert Cadell on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 10:02am.

This is a pretty well-worn analogy, but I see no reasonable complaint against making the process of gun ownership at least as regulated as the process of obtaining a driver's license. I agree that passing more gun laws than most states have now would not be a good solution (or any solution at all) but I find the opposite-extreme viewpoint on gun ownership to be far more troubling.

Time for me to log out and begin the workday. Thanks NC Cop, you are pleasant to talk to. Have a nice weekend.

 

  • Login to post comments

Have a good one!!! Talk to

Submitted by NC Cop on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 10:04am.

Have a good one!!! Talk to you later!

  • Login to post comments

good norning Rupert

Submitted by cocodrie on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 10:09am.

The main problem with your "reasonable requirements and regulations" is the authority a government entity to refuse the required permit or license. Guns are legal in NY and DC but try to get a permit. Most gun crimes are committed by repeat offenders that have been released for some reason or other.

 

Jesus Loves You so much He died for you

  • Login to post comments

gun reverence

Submitted by Agnostic on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 10:05am.

Please don't confuse respect for reverence.  The people that taught me to shoot when I was young and then again in the military had a deep respect for guns and what guns could do in the wrong hands.  There respect for potential danger of guns drove them to be ritualistic in their handling and even in their speaking about guns.  However, it was not reverence.

In your case, the fact that your gun has not been cleaned and cared for would be a sign to enthusiast that you don't respect the potential dangers and threats associated in having a gun that is not properly cared for and in safe condition.  I don't have a gun though I've been exposed all my life because I know my lifestyle does not provide me with the correct circumstances to safely own a gun. 

There are some that have a reverence for the perceived power that a gun may give them but these are the people that are generally not associated with guns on a constant basis and only see the 'potential glory' (never understood that way of thinking) in the associated power of a gun.  Most people that deal with guns consistently regard them as dangerous tools that require respect and care to function usefully and safely.

. . Socialist = Modern Liberal = Parasitoid
  • Login to post comments

I'm against further restrictions

Submitted by Tugboat Phil on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 10:07am.

because if YOUR daughter works a swing shift and has to cross several hundred yards of dark parking lot each night, I want her to have the choice of easily purchasing and deploying a small device that will equalize her against a 250 lb attacker. Would the gun work every time? Maybe not, but the 250 lb man beating, raping and then strangling her with her own pantyhose and tossing her into a ditch is probable EVERY time when she is not given the choice to arm herself.

I love my daughter so much that I bought her a 5 shot, .357 magnum revolver for Christmas a few years ago. Does she worship it? No, but she did name it Bradley. When she's planning a trip somewhere I can easily ask her in any company if "Bradley" will be accompanying her.

As to myself, I put my carry pistol on my belt just like some people do a phone holster. I know that my time to leave this earth could come with a disease or a car wreck. But if given a chance, it will not be on my knees begging some disaffected yout' to spare my family and me. So far, I've had the presence of my sidearm thwart one potential situation without every having to draw it. That's good enough for me.

President Obama is a Muslim (from his own lips), Kenyan (read it from his publicist) a homosexual (read it on a news magazine cover) and a Socialist (I'm alive and can see it for myself)
  • Login to post comments

I suppose the NRA serves a useful purpose in helping

Submitted by virginia republican on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 11:03am.

protect our Second Amendment rights. However, even though I own a firearm, I will never donate a penny to that organization because of their habit of sometimes endorsing liberal Democrat candidates for reelection because of the lip service support that candidate may have given to the right to own guns. Endorsement despite the fact that candidate belongs to a political party which wants to abolish or severely restrict that right. Such an endorsement happened in my congressional district, though thankfully the libtard congressman lost.

  • Login to post comments

Weak

Submitted by Unsane on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 11:38pm.

Yeah, make the ownership of guns a sexual thing. 

Hardly, in my case.  I've always wanted to own a gun, because, well...I like guns.  Some people like...well, you name it, we all have our own hobbies.  We ALL have at least ONE thing which turns us into geeks.  And that's fine.  And if that happens to be firearms for some people...so what? 

I'm not a serious, die-hard gun aficionado like some others.  However, I own two handguns now.  In one case, I bought the handgun for practice in the name of my duties (not a cop, BTW).  The other was bought specifically because it can in fact be easily carried concealed. 

I view gun ownership as...well, guns are always something I wanted to own, anyway, but other than that, they are a necessary evil.  I wish the world was inhabited by nothing but angels, but fact of the matter is that as long as there are plenty of nuts out there, and plenty of a**holes out there who will either threaten my life or property for trivial, stupid reasons.  I need to deal with them for the cops are not there to help me.  The cops only provide deterrence and investigation after the fact, but are not there to protect me or anything else.  (I wish PDs would stop putting those idiotic slogans on their cars like "To serve and protect" and other crap like that - if they put anything else on their vehicles other than "Police", it needs to be "Here to deter".  but I digress.)

I enjoy shooting at the range, but it is also good to know that no matter what the world's a**holes may do to me - flip me off on the highway, behave in a hostile, childish, immature manner towards me in public - they can do that to their idiotic heart's content.  There IS a line they can never cross.  And that's okay if they don't know where that line is - I know where it is.  That's why I carry a gun in the truck and have one at my side where I can legally conceal carry in this state. 

In a perfect world I would be more than happy to not own guns for the basis of self-defense.  But I deal with the world of reality, not with the world as I want it to be.  The world is far from perfect and my guns are needed to do a bit more than be be tools I use to knock down inanimate targets at the range. 

"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)

  • Login to post comments

The Left has never seen this issue in the proper way.

Submitted by Thalpy on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 11:01am.

Sadly, our side doesn't see things in the proper way either. If we don't remove most of the weak excuses we claim as representatives for our side, guns won't be necessary. The RINOs continue to cave on so many issues by continuing to extend the line in the sand on free speech and states' rights. It's past time for Republican leadership to confront Obama's extra-constitutional nonsense. They are weak and lack the skill to do what is necessary.

  • Login to post comments

fearing doomsday

Submitted by MidAmerica on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 10:17am.

The rise in gun ownership is an indication that the people are losing faith in the government.  But the disturbing element is it's not the ability of law enforcement that the citizens are questioning but the ability of the national government to protect, defend and represent the people of this country.  In other words the citizens are buying guns for possible defense in case of societal breakdown.  No amount of police can protect in that scenario.

  • Login to post comments

Unfortunately, many people are under the impression that

Submitted by virginia republican on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 10:53am.

it is the duty of the local police to "protect" you. Not true. That would be the responsibility of a body guard you might hire. The police have the basic responsibility to enforce the law, i.e. investigate crimes and apprehend the folks who commit those crimes. If someone breaks into your home, the odds of the police getting there soon enough to stop him before he does you bodily harm are slim to none. The odds of a 1911 in your nightstand stopping him are much better.

  • Login to post comments

Yes.

Submitted by Thalpy on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 11:18am.

Police action is reactive. Unless citizens share beliefs and have tolerance, police simply aren't ever there in time. We have to remember that old quote by some wise person, " when seconds count, the police are just minutes away."

  • Login to post comments

It sits in a drawer...

Submitted by Mr_Priest on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 10:30am.

It seems like people, (yes this is a generality) who seldom use or practice using their guns (tucked away in a drawer) always seem to be the ones who end up accidently shooting other people. I was cleaning my gun and bang…. etc. I forgot I had it in there until my nephew found it… etc. There’s much more to being a responsible gun owner than just owning a gun. Firearms education including everyone who may come in contact with your weapon should be a priority. It’s also a great way to spend an afternoon of family together time. But that aside, the bottom line is, you have protection for the rare, rare event you should need it.

"The trouble with quotes on the internet is you never know if they are genuine" —Abraham Lincoln

  • Login to post comments

Korean wisdom:

Submitted by Unsane on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 12:42am.

"The law is far, the fist is near."

"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • WashPost vs. WashPost on IRS probe (Ed Morrissey)
  • Media too prone to fall sway to Obama's referrent power (Salena Zito)
  • Five reasons to keep government out of Internet governance (Eli Dourado)
  • Is asking about what you pray for inappropriate for IRS? IRS commish not sure (Say Anything)
  • Another fed court invalidates Obama's NRLB recess appointments (Politico)
  • Former SecState Hillary Clinton's record leaves much to be desired (Kondracke)
  • Sen. Boxer is lying about impact of budget cuts on Benghazi security (WashPost)
  • Left-wing actor Cusack attacks Obama, Holder over AP scandal (Twitchy)
  • Dopey Chicago gun laws prevent museum from displaying unloaded WW2 relic (Fox News)
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
David Limbaugh's picture
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh Column: Partisan Obama Culture Spawned a More Abusive IRS
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: An Honest Examination of Race
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

ObamaCare's a Real Pain in the Neck
more cartoons
  • Morning Joe Meteorologist: Tornado Averted 'By The Grace of Whatever'
  • Bowling for Dollars....to Pay for Baby Deaths
  • Romney: ‘I’m Not a Fan of the President’
  • Krauthammer on IRS Testimony: ‘You've Got to be a Knave or a Fool to Say That and an Idiot to Believe It’
  • Media: Obama Down But Not Out
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use