Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 24, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Brad Wilmouth's blog
  • Chris Matthews Trashes 'Morning Joe' for Being 'Open to All People's Points of View'
  • Thursday Morning: Fox Gives 15 Minutes to Latest IRS Scandal Details; NBC and ABC Ignore
  • On Taxpayer-subsidized PBS, Liberal Reporters Lament Benghazi Won't Go Away
  • No Mention of IRS Scandal on NBC's 'Today,' But Plenty of Time for Obama Prom Photo
  • MSNBC’s Chris Hayes Hypes ‘LGBT Injustice’ During Interview With 18-year Old Woman Charged With Sex With Minor
  • Lisa Myers: 'For a Year the IRS Essentially Knowingly Lied to Congress and No One Came Forward'
  • Network Evening Shows Don’t Name Islam in London Terror Attack
  • MSNBC’s Finney On IRS Scandal: ‘Why Didn't Romney Make More Of A Big Deal Of It?’

CNN’s Kurtz Defends Olbermann & MSNBC from Comparisons to Glenn Beck

By Brad Wilmouth | April 12, 2011 | 08:30

A  A

 In spite of former MSNBC host Keith Olbermann’s history of using distortion and even misinformation to attack conservatives, and his infamously recurring conspiracy theory that the Bush administration made terrorism-related announcements to distract from politically embarrassing news, CNN host Howard Kurtz on Sunday’s Reliable Sources defended Olbermann’s Countdown show and MSNBC generally when right-leaning guest Amy Holmes of America’s Morning News pointed out the excesses of left-wing MSNBC anchors during a discussion of FNC host Glenn Beck’s upcoming departure from the network.

Kurtz: "Now, I don't put Keith Olbermann in the same category as Beck at all. His MSNBC show, agree with it, disagree with it, was a very well-researched program."

He later added: "I've got to push back on this, though. You say that some of the people at MSNBC, just as bad. Now, they may be as opinionated, they may be as strident, they may occasionally be irresponsible. But they are not trafficking conspiracy theories, they're not making things up."

During the segment which also included liberal talk radio host Bill Press and the more centrist David Zurawik of the Baltimore Sun, Holmes raised MSNBC’s history:

If you were to compare Glenn Beck to many of the folks on MSNBC, Ed Schultz, he certainly is activist, he has a message, one that he believes needs to get out there into the public conversation. Lawrence O'Donnell declares himself to be a socialist. Well, a lot of people would say moving America to a social democracy is far more dangerous than going after some low-level functionary at the White House.

She later added:

But you could string together sound bite after sound bite from MSNBC of their primetime lineup. Ed Schultz, you have "Worst Person in the World" when Keith Olbermann was on. You have, as I said, Lawrence O'Donnell declaring himself to be a socialist, which he has every right to do, but it is extreme.

Kurtz soon responded:

Let me pick up on Amy's point about MSNBC. Now, I don't put Keith Olbermann in the same category as Beck at all. His MSNBC show, agree with it, disagree with it, was a very well-researched program. But he also became increasingly opinionated, he also clashed with his bosses, and he also left.

Zurawik incredulously shot back:

Howie, he was the guy who said, right after the episode I cited in October, he did the same thing Beck did. He said give me all the dirt you have on, and on Roger Ailes, too. I mean, it was so personal. This is not what you're doing on cable television.

After Holmes noted that Alveda King, niece of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., had taken part in Becks’s "Restoring Honor" rally, Kurtz again defended MSNBC:

I've got to push back on this, though. You say that some of the people at MSNBC, just as bad. Now, they may be as opinionated, they may be as strident, they may occasionally be irresponsible. But they are not trafficking conspiracy theories, they're not making things up.

Below is a complete transcript of the segment from the Sunday, April 10, Reliable Sources on CNN:

   HOWARD KURTZ: The ratings were simply remarkable. Nobody draws 2.5, 3 million people on cable news at 5 in the afternoon, but Glenn Beck did. Yes, his numbers were down 40 percent, and, yes, more than 400 advertisers had fled, but the reason he and Roger Ailes’ network are getting a divorce has to do with the question of independence. Beck’s brand was threatening to overshadow Fox, much to the consternation of the journalists there. And Beck increasingly wanted to build his own brand without interference. Here’s how he gave viewers the news.

[GLENN BECK]

KURTZ: So what are the lessons of this television breakup? Joining us now, Amy Holmes, co-host of the radio show America’s Morning News; David Zurawik, TV and media critic for the Baltimore Sun; and Bill Press, host of radio’s nationally syndicated Bill Press Show. David Zurawik, did Glenn Beck, standing at that blackboard every day, spinning those conspiracy theories, did he do himself in?

DAVID ZURAWIK, THE BALTIMORE SUN: Oh, I think he absolutely did himself in. And I’ll tell you what, in a way, it’s interesting to see the marketplace function. You can have that audience and yet not have advertisers, in the way. But here’s how he did himself in, Howie. He went too far with - remember back in October of 2009, when he went on the Van after, he went after-

KURTZ: Van Jones.

ZURAWIK: Van Jones?

KURTZ: White House official.

ZURAWIK: When he started saying send me everything you have on members of the Obama White House, and then Keith Olbermann said send me everything you have on Beck, that was a toxic climate for talk radio, for talk television.

KURTZ: The beginning of the end maybe.

ZURAWIK: Yeah, and that was too much.

KURTZ: Let me ask Amy Holmes, Beck had this huge audience, very successful. In my view, he became radioactive at times. Did he go too far? What do you, how do you attribute his demise?

AMY HOLMES, AMERICA'S MORNING NEWS: Well, I saw that there was certainly the conspiracy side of the Glenn Beck Show, but there was also the tutorial side. I mean, Glenn Beck was a person who was putting on scholars and researchers from conservative think tanks, not the media-accepted Brookings Institution. But I think that Glenn Beck was a force of nature, and oftentimes, forces of nature are feared, they have to be explained. He attracted all of his attention. And all of these viewers, I would have to surmise, I don’t know this, but him not being able to keep that show is in part because he wasn’t following orders from Roger Ailes.

KURTZ: Well, clearly, there was tension from the two sides. And a hurricane is also a force of nature, but eventually it goes out to sea. Bill Press, you said on this program just a few months ago, Glenn Beck was a ticking time bomb. What made him explode?

BILL PRESS, TALK RADIO HOST: Couple of things. First, I got to say, the first lesson I learned in television, it doesn’t matter how big, I saw it in L.A. when I started, it doesn’t matter how big you are, how popular you are, your days can be numbered. I mean, you can go and nobody will miss you. And I think that’s what happened to Glenn Beck. But what made him explode, I think, is building on what some of the other stuff, I think he had this messianic complex. I really think he started to take himself too seriously. He thought he had a God-given mission. He talked, you know, he became very televangelistic. He talked about this mission. He talked about-

KURTZ: Some people like that. PRESS: Well, I think it’s okay from Rick Warren. I think it’s okay from Pat Robertson. I don’t think you want it, Roger Ailes didn’t want it at 5:00.

HOLMES: But, I mean, if you were to compare Glenn Beck to many of the folks on MSNBC, Ed Schultz, he certainly is activist, he has a message, one that he believes needs to get out there into the public conversation. Lawrence O’Donnell declares himself to be a socialist. Well, a lot of people would say moving America to a social democracy is far more dangerous than going after some low-level functionary at the White House.

PRESS: There’s nothing wrong with having an opinion, but, you know, Howie used the word "incendiary," or "toxic," whatever you want to call it, or "radioactive." When you say that the Japan earthquake was God punishing the people of Japan, or the democratic uprisings in Egypt, or some conspiracy between American liberals and Islamic fundamentalists-

ZURAWIK: What Bill is saying is really, he’s back to a, he’s back to, really, Father Coughlin and that brand of extreme right-wing radio talk.

KURTZ: Since we’re all citing examples, let me play you a few of his greatest hits for the audience, and we’ll pick it up on the other side.

[GLENN BECK]

KURTZ: David Zurawik, let me pick up the metaphor here. Get your seatbelts strapped on. There’s little question that he was forced out. Why do you think Fox pulled the plug at this point?

ZURAWIK: Well, you know, Fox has this tension. You know, they’re really pushing the Bret Baier image hard and saying we are a news, and they behaved really well on the midterm election night. But there’s this tension between that vision of who they are and what Glenn Beck did. And for all of the good things they tried to do as a journalistic, presenting themselves as a journalistic institution, he shredded it with that kind of talk every day at 5:00. Howie, that really is crazy, apocalyptic, extreme right-wing radio talk. It has no place on television. And we’ve never had that before. That’s the scary thing about it.

KURTZ: -but obviously some people tuned in. Now, you might say the liberal media targeted Beck. The liberal advocacy group Media Matters certainly had a campaign against him, but Roger Ailes told me some months ago that he asked Beck in a friendly way to tone things down.

HOLMES: Sure, and you know what, Roger Ailes is the boss. And, generally, you’re supposed to do what the boss says. And if you don’t, then you don’t get to keep your show. But you could string together sound bite after sound bite from MSNBC of their primetime-

PRESS: Nothing like that, nothing like that, that’s-

HOLMES: -lineup. Ed Schultz, you have "Worst Person in the World" when Keith Olbermann was on. You have, as I said, Lawrence O’Donnell declaring himself to be a socialist, which he has every right to do, but it is extreme.

PRESS: There’s nothing to compare to that. But look, let’s face it, I come back, look at Bill O’Reilly, okay? Only Glenn Beck could make Bill O’Reilly look like a statesman. Bill O’Reilly knows, Rush Limbaugh knows, 25 years, they know there are some limits. Beck is such a megalomaniac that he thought he could say anything, and he thought he didn’t need Fox. Well, we’ll find out.

KURTZ: Let me pick up on Amy’s point about MSNBC. Now, I don’t put Keith Olbermann in the same category as Beck at all. His MSNBC show, agree with it, disagree with it, was a very well-researched program. But he also became increasingly opinionated, he also clashed with his bosses, and he also left.

ZURAWIK: Howie, he was the guy who said, right after the episode I cited in October, he did the same thing Beck did. He said give me all the dirt you have on, and on Roger Ailes, too. I mean, it was so personal. This is not what you’re doing on cable television. Now, let me say this in the middle of these two because it’s true. And this is like, which carcinogen do you want in your water? Which one in the public? Look, Olbermann, all of the others on MSNBC, O’Donnell, they are just as bad in one way. But in another way, Beck was worse. Here’s how Beck was worse. Beck understood the fault lines in our sort of history and moral consciousness. And he went with the Nazi stuff. And when he tried to appropriate the moral authority of Martin Luther King with that rally, he went right at things that are important to groups like African-Americans and Jews, and he would offend you in your face and not care. Olbermann didn’t do that. I’ll say that for Olbermann.

HOLMES: He had Alveda King at his rally standing by his side, who agrees with his message and is the niece of Martin Luther King.

KURTZ: Here’s Beck talking about, and he apologized for this, how liberal Judaism, excuse me, reform Judaism was like radical Islam. I’ve got to push back on this, though. You say that some of the people at MSNBC, just as bad. Now, they may be as opinionated, they may be as strident, they may occasionally be irresponsible. But they are not trafficking conspiracy theories, they’re not making things up.

ZURAWIK: No, Howie, I’m saying they didn’t go there. That’s the difference. They didn’t go where he did in the case of Jewish identity.

PRESS: They’re not calling people Nazis. They don’t go in this anti-Semitic rant that he did about George Soros. They don’t call the President of the United States a racist.

ZURAWIK: That’s exactly what I said.

PRESS: Let me tell you something, wait a minute, there are strong opinions on MSNBC, and they’re paid to give their strong opinions, but they don’t go over the line the way Glenn Beck did with all of the stuff that Howie just said.

HOLMES: -conspiracy theories about Fox News being some sort of, you know, blight on American political discourse, you hear that on MSNBC all the time. And unlike MSNBC, Fox was not presenting Glenn Beck as a journalist. They did not have him moderating political debates as MSNBC. MSNBC has far more of a tension between their opinion and their journalism than Fox does.

PRESS: Wait. I just want to make it clear, okay? Roger Ailes fired Glenn Beck. You can’t blame MSNBC. You can’t blame Media Matters. You can’t blame Bill Press. We clashed as well. Roger Ailes knew he was toxic for that network. And you know what else? I’m telling you, I’ll bet you that the other hosts went to Roger Ailes and said you’ve got to get this loon off this air, he’s making us all look bad.

KURTZ: -before I ask my last question to Zurawik, I will tell you that a lot of journalists at Fox News feared that Beck was becoming the face of the network. And a lot of the executives felt he was an unguided missiles. And at the same time, Beck didn’t actually work at Fox. In other words, he only showed up to do the show. He had his own production which is going to continue. He’s got his syndicated radio show. He gives speeches. He’s got a Web site called the Blaze, which sets me up for this question: How much more influence will he continue to have without that Fox platform? I mean, he’s still got quite a following.

ZURAWIK: Howie, he will have influence. There’s no doubt about it. And he has all this source of revenue, and probably the Fox money wasn’t that important. But when you go to radio, and also, his Web site was useful to people on the left for a while with the NPR thing. But he’s going to be marginalized, in a way.

HOLMES: I disagree with that.

ZURAWIK: He will, because it’s a difference of being on television, and we have a history, we have a history of right-wing extremist radio talk.

KURTZ: You disagree because?

HOLMES: Because of Rush Limbaugh. Let’s look at Rush Limbaugh and his influence. It is profound on American politics and American discourse. Radio as a medium, as you know, Bill Press, that it’s very intimate, you’re talking directly to your listener in a way oftentimes on TV that you’re not.

PRESS: He needs Fox more than Fox needs him.

KURTZ: All right, got to get a break.   

  • Amy Holmes
  • CNN
  • Fox News Channel
  • Glenn Beck
  • Reliable Sources
  • Brad Wilmouth's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

Olbermann's program full of

Submitted by kg on Tue, 04/12/2011 - 8:40am.

Olbermann's program full of facts? That is the most ridiculous statement I have ever heard. It appears Kurtz gets his facts from Media Matters and DailyKos as did Olbermann.

In comparison Beck gets his facts right from the source's mouths and actions.

 

"DumbAssity of Dope"

  • Login to post comments

Yeah....

Submitted by Blonde on Tue, 04/12/2011 - 9:30am.

BOR, dressed up as a Nazi, doing der Fuhrer salute. Very factual. NOT.

Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)

  • Login to post comments

Finish the story, Brad

Submitted by HockeyKid on Tue, 04/12/2011 - 8:46am.

Pull out some archives of examples when Olbie and Special Ed just pull stuff out of their posterior orifices. I love it when libs set themselves up like this.

"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me

  • Login to post comments

What?

Submitted by Red Jeep on Tue, 04/12/2011 - 8:56am.

"HOWARD KURTZ: The ratings were simply remarkable. Nobody draws 2.5, 3 million people on cable news at 5 in the afternoon, but Glenn Beck did. Yes, his numbers were down 40 percent..."

This is a recurring theme of Beck's critics that he lost a lot of audience. I don't see where the numbers prove that. He constantly had 2 to 3 million viewers at 5:00 running about equal with Hannity's 9:00 number of viewers.

If he lost 40% of his viewers and then only had 2 or 3 million viewers left, then he was a monstrously huge hit at 5:00 that the MSM ignored!

"... and, yes, more than 400 advertisers had fled..." ?!?! List them. Common Lib talking point, that is excepted as conventional wisdom.

".. but the reason he and Roger Ailes’ network are getting a divorce has to do with the question of independence. Beck’s brand was threatening to overshadow Fox.." Huh? How was he doing that?

Howie is just making it up as he floats along.

  • Login to post comments

400?

Submitted by UpNorth on Tue, 04/12/2011 - 9:58am.

Didn't one of our resident trolls get almost orgasmic over "Glum Bleek" losing 300 advertisers? When challenged, he couldn't come up with a list, either.

This "losing advertisers" is just another example of the Big Lie.  Repeat it often enough, and the non-thinking progressives believe it. 

To re-elect Obama would be like the Titanic backing up and hitting the iceberg again.
  • Login to post comments

Ah yes, so right you are

Submitted by Blonde on Tue, 04/12/2011 - 10:22am.

.....the new departed j. fwankie. Nasty little piece of liberal work.

The incessant lies of the left....Blather, Rinse, Repeat. Blather, Rinse, Repeat. They think if they do this long enough, anyone would believe it. Too bad, conservatives are fact based beings.

Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)

  • Login to post comments

"fact based beings" Yep.

Submitted by amyshulk on Tue, 04/12/2011 - 10:28am.

"fact based beings" Yep. That's what scares the msm - more people are waking up and realizing they need to grow up and start living in the real world, not the fantasy the left presents as fact!

The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
Ronald Reagan
  • Login to post comments

Let's do the math!

Submitted by Red Jeep on Tue, 04/12/2011 - 11:04am.

Beck has been on FOX since Jan 2009, 2 1/3 years. So to lose 400 advertisers his show would have to lose on average. 3 1/3 advertisers a week.

If true Beck broke all sorts of records for advertiser and viewer loss, but still had the most viewed cable show at 5:00 PM.........

  • Login to post comments

I'm surprised j. frank hasn't

Submitted by Beukeboom on Tue, 04/12/2011 - 11:06am.

I'm surprised j. frank hasn't tried to sneak back in under another new ident.

  • Login to post comments

Kurtz' expertise

Submitted by kiwikit on Tue, 04/12/2011 - 11:18am.

seems clearly not knowing MSNBC. I wonder how many hours he even watched it since he obviously has no
idea (though he pretends to be knowledgeable) what was said there. Kurtz is a phony fraud.

  • Login to post comments

kiwikit.......Howard Kurtz knows MSNBC as well as you or I.

Submitted by Rush Fan on Wed, 04/13/2011 - 12:15am.

Perhaps even better. That fact or his expertise is irrelevant. More importantly, Kurtz is hosting a show on CNN because he is a liberal, with a slanted liberal agenda. Do you really believe that if he was a conservative or even leaned to the right, CNN would have him host a show?

  • Login to post comments

That 40% that keeps getting

Submitted by Roger the Shrubber on Tue, 04/12/2011 - 1:20pm.

That 40% that keeps getting tossed out is a comparison between Beck's ratings in early 2011 versus early 2010, when the health care debate was in full swing. Think 2 million today versus 2.8 million a year ago. Yes, that is a decline.
Back in early 2009, his rating were very simliar to where they are today, give or take 100,000 here and there.

Beck's ratings are down overall, and I think it's because of his classroom atmosphere, where many people do not want to feel like they are sitting in a classroom while eating dinner. That demographic drop cannot be dismissed as false.

On the other hand, no Fox News show could get even 1 million viewers at the time slot before Beck came along, so that pokes big holes into the "Beck's ratings lost Fox so much money!" argument.

Since Howie Kurtz is such a fixture on MSNBC, it's not a suprise he'd be carrying their water.

  • Login to post comments

Beck will be fine

Submitted by Tomorama on Tue, 04/12/2011 - 8:57am.

I also believe this president and many in his administration are racist.

I base it on their uh, uh, uh, uh actions and what they allow and who they defend.

I was no fan of Beck, but was he or is he any more delusional than Sarge or Niles Crane at 08:00 pm?

Don't think so.

His two specials on Black Conservatives in America were the best shows I have seen any of these people do.

The whole audience for QA were all black and conservative, it was eye opening to say the least.

Sarge did a show on the boo hoo hooing of the "Black agenda".

Big difference in substance and "agenda".

If you make poverty easy, you will have more of it. Benjamin Franklin
  • Login to post comments

MSNBC has advocated conspiracy theories all along

Submitted by Galvanic on Tue, 04/12/2011 - 9:01am.

One of the favorites is the "outing" of Valerie Plame. Olbermann and Maddow consistently presented the conspiracy theory that it was Dick Cheney and Karl Rove who gave her name and identity to Novak, even though Armitage confessed to the grand jury and Nowak confirmed.

To this day, MSNBC maintains that Cheney and Rove outed her for revenge.

  • Login to post comments

This is the typical liberal attack method

Submitted by c5then on Tue, 04/12/2011 - 9:01am.

Lie, make up stuff and then attack your opponent for lying and making stuff up.

Notice the attacks on Donald Trump are now ratcheting up. No one is refuting his questions as to where Obama was born. All they are doing is attacking him personally and denegrating the question itself. This is their tactic whan they have to data to back up their argument.

I don't care whether you agree with trump or not, isn't it rather stupid to put all this effort into trying to belittle him when a simple $10 document would end the discussion?

John McCain had to produce his birth certificate and go through a court hearing in a Federal court becasue his appearance on several State's ballots was challenged because he was born on a U.S. military base in Panama.

Obama has spent well over $1 million dollars of his own money to prevent his birth certificate or any of his records from becoming public. The MSM seemingly don't care about that. That's not news, but Charlie Sheen's babling is...Hmmmmmm..

 

Madison and Jefferson and Franklin built a Republic - Roberts killed it! 

  • Login to post comments

I tuned out Trump almost as

Submitted by amyshulk on Tue, 04/12/2011 - 10:33am.

I tuned out Trump almost as fast as I did Sheen, and I didn't disagree with Trump's argument! It just got old, fast. This issue is still an issue because they WANT it to be, so they can tar & feather the R over it. I understand getting at the root, but since the playing field the gov't sets up is the root {GE paying no tax, etc} it's hard for me to get incensed over distractions. Do I think Pres. Obama is legit? No clue. Too late now though, next!!!

The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
Ronald Reagan
  • Login to post comments

Kurtz s a Useful Idiot for the Left

Submitted by scottyusmc on Tue, 04/12/2011 - 9:10am.

Kurtz and Press are both useful idiots for the left....

  • Login to post comments

Careful Howie, this type of

Submitted by Captain Repus on Tue, 04/12/2011 - 9:22am.

Careful Howie, this type of kindergarten journalism is what got you canned from the Washington Compost. Your new gig at Mother Goose or whatever outfit you now work for might get buyers remorse if you spew liberal lies that are so easily proven false.

Did you know Doug has Mesothelioma? We'll deal with the government. You have enough to worry about.
  • Login to post comments

Whatever shred of credibility Howie the Hack had left

Submitted by SickofLibs on Tue, 04/12/2011 - 9:30am.

just blew right out the window.

Countdown was a "very well-researched program"? LOL, not even Olby's (ex) co-workers would make such an absurd statement.

Olby was nailed numerous times for ripping-n-reading from DKos LIVE WHILE ON AIR.

  • Login to post comments

Hey Brad, take a breath.

Submitted by WhoIsJohnGalt on Tue, 04/12/2011 - 9:38am.

That first sentence/paragraph was a tad long and complicated. It covered the who-what-when-where-how-why pretty well, but required several readings to digest.

I'm just sayin'...

  • Login to post comments

liberals

Submitted by Huapakechi on Tue, 04/12/2011 - 9:47am.

They're either doing the screaming monkey massed attack with bared fangs and flung feces or they ar doing the effete collegiate snob method of attack. If Beck were incorrect in his facts he would be facing fifty years of liable trials, which he is not..... Is there any wonder why liberals fear and loathe him more than just about any other person in broadcasting?

  • Login to post comments

Lie of 2011 Candidate

Submitted by Beukeboom on Tue, 04/12/2011 - 10:11am.

Kurtz: "Now, I don't put Keith Olbermann in the same category as Beck at all. His MSNBC show, agree with it, disagree with it, was a very well-researched program."

This needs to be saved for the year-end dumb-ass comment of the year vote.

  • Login to post comments

That Got Me Too

Submitted by Boil It Down on Tue, 04/12/2011 - 10:24am.

For Kurtz to call Olbermann "very-well researched" may be one of the dumbest things I've ever known him to say. I question whether he ever watched Olbermann.

  • Login to post comments

It had to be "well researched"....

Submitted by almostacowboy on Tue, 04/12/2011 - 11:07am.

...in order to avoid any appearance of cognoscence.

  • Login to post comments

Rip n Read Olbermann....

Submitted by adamsmith on Tue, 04/12/2011 - 5:06pm.

People didn't refer to Olbermann as Rip n Read for nothing. There were countless times he'd announce "facts" that were just unsubstantiated BS he took word for word from Bluffington Post, Media Matters and the DailyKos. He was a Kos contributor. If he was that great he wouldn't have been fired for what? Four times? Olbermann and Maddow were out and out Obamalinsky footsoldiers. Why else would they be summoned before the Messiah to the Mosque House when Fox was making the Empty Suit look really bad with his Commie Czars and all.....These Socialist Statists have repeated the lies so much, THEY believe it.

A little off topic, but look at Lawrence O'Donnell the next time you want to laugh at him with the sound off. His insanity comes shining through. Those creepy WIDELY spaced eyes make him look like that Creature in the movie "Splice"(on cable lately). And the forehead, that thing could make an excellent chopper landing zone. No, really, just look at his features. Makes you wonder if he's a Socialist Alien. It's not really human.

  • Login to post comments

Beck lies?

Submitted by Radical1979 on Tue, 04/12/2011 - 1:44pm.

As much as they say Beck lies, I never see his arguments refuted. Just "he lies" over and over again, without identifying what is a lie. The Van Jones thing? All true.

I think Beck was overshadowing some of the big egos of Fox and that's why he's being cut loose.

Proud member of the 53%!
  • Login to post comments

Radical, Beck is not really

Submitted by bassndude on Tue, 04/12/2011 - 4:00pm.

Radical, Beck is not really what you call "cut loose" from FOX. It is more like an independent contractor, or photographer who signs a contract with a major contractor to do special jobs for him, and him alone. Beck has signed another contract with FOX. He is to do specials for them through out the next few years. So he still has a deal with FOX.

 

Save a SeAL, club a liberal/troll!!

  • Login to post comments

Daily KOS is a research

Submitted by LAM SON 719 on Tue, 04/12/2011 - 3:48pm.

Daily KOS is a research group?

Non, je ne regrette rien. "You aren't angry because I might be a racist, you're angry because you know I'm right".
  • Login to post comments

No mention by Kurtz of Olbermann's (and MSNBC's) most glaring...

Submitted by krendler on Tue, 04/12/2011 - 5:41pm.

And no mention by Kurtz of Olbermann's most glaring shortcoming: His complete ban on ANY and ALL voices of dissent from his program? One big circle jerk, night after night. But according to Howie, "well-researched." Laughable. Olbermann's show was one of the most disgraceful and dishonest programs to ever fill the airwaves.

  • Login to post comments

give it up!

Submitted by michiganruth on Tue, 04/12/2011 - 6:39pm.

I wish people would stop saying Glenn Beck is anti-Semitic. I heard his Islam/reform rabbi comment, and I thought it was funny--and spot on.

as a Jew myself, I would like to give Glenn a pass courtesy of the entire SENSIBLE Jewish community--those of us who don't have our heads completely up our liberal posteriors--and declare that he is not an anti-Semite! far from it. Beck is a Righteous Gentile and a good friend of Israel's.

  • Login to post comments

michiganruth.....You are certainly sensible. Sadly, you

Submitted by Rush Fan on Tue, 04/12/2011 - 11:46pm.

represented only only about 12% of the Jewish vote in the last election. That's right, Barack Obama received approximately 78% of the Jewish vote in the last election. I came across two good articles on why Jews are so liberal that you might be interested in reading. Norman Podhoretz wrote an article in the Wall Street Journal titled Why are Jews Liberal? In addition to the 78% who voted for Obama in the last election, Podhoretz cites another astounding statistic: "Since 1928, the average Jewish vote for the Democrat in presidential elections has been an amazing 75%—far higher than that of any other ethno-religious group."

Talk Radio host and columnist Dennis Prager also wrote about liberal Jews in a column titled Explaining Jews, part V: Why are Jews liberal?

Now that President Obama has revealed himself to be an unreliable friend of Israel (as well as the United States), perhaps more Jews will vote Republican. I hope so.

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Deputy kills PBS NewsHour staffer (Washington Examiner)
  • Oklahoma disaster was tragic, but larger ones have occurred (USA Today)
  • Mainstream Media Scream: Today’s Savannah Guthrie questions GOP ‘overreach’ (Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner)
  • Desperate Carney complains asking about scandals like asking about birth certificate (RCP)
  • Look at NYT's partisan-hack rewrite of the IRS hearing (Draw and STRIKE!)
  • Study: Christians who tithe have better finances than those who don't (TGC)
  • The media are willing accomplices to Obama (PolitiChicks)
  • FBI has suspects in mind in Benghazi; Obama prefers to try them in court (AP)
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Ann Coulter Column: When Did We Vote to Become Mexico?
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • Dennis Miller: 'Nixonian' Obama Will Need Teleprompter to Say 'I Am Not a Crook'
  • Leno: Obama Knows Nothing Because They Moved ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ to the White House
  • IRS Charged With Unfair Scrutiny of Pro-Life Groups' Prayer Events, Protest Signs
  • Ex-AccuWeather's Bastardi Slams 'Ambulance Chasing' by Global Warming Theory Activists
  • Goldberg: Scandal Reporting Needs to Focus on Hard News, Not Political Spin
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use