ABC Relays Claims Obama & Dems Will ‘Protect’ GOP from ‘Less Than Responsible’ Budget Cuts
On the February 12 World News Saturday, ABC correspondent David Kerley highlighted claims by Bob Greenstein of the left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy that the Democratic-controlled Senate and President Obama would block Tea Party-backed cuts from this year’s federal budget, thus protecting Republicans from their "less than responsible actions."
After Kerley began his piece by recounting that Tea Party Republicans in the House had pressured House Speaker John Boehner to support a plan cutting $100 billion in planned spending from the current fiscal year's budget, calling the cuts "broad and very deep," the ABC correspondent included a clip of Greenstein asserting that "they’re bigger than people think" without informing viewers of the liberal lean of his organization.
After a second clip of Greenstein in which the former Carter administration member contended that Republicans are "protected from the consequences of their own, I think, less than responsible actions here," Kerley continued: "Protected from the consequences, he says, because the Democratic Senate and the President will not go along."
The ABC correspondent then concluded his report by uncritically passing on President Obama’s plans to supposedly "freeze federal spending." Kerley: "Then the President gave us a little more indication today about what he plans in his budget. He wants to spend more on education and new economy jobs and pay for that with cuts of his own - which he says, David, will freeze federal spending for the next five years."
Below is a complete transcript of Kerley’s report from the February 12 World News Saturday on ABC:
DAVID MUIR: At that same conference (CPAC), conservatives proud of the muscle they’re flexing against members of their own party, forcing Republicans on the Hill to come up with all of those promised cuts in spending: $100 billion worth. Here’s David Kerley tonight.
REP. MICHELE BACHMANN IN CPAC SPEECH: Stop, enough, we’re not going to go down this road anymore.
DAVID KERLEY: Conservative Republicans meeting in Washington are celebrating tonight. While most of the nation concentrated on Egypt, Tea Party Republicans were forcing House leadership to blink.
DEAN CLANCY, FREEDOMWORKS: 100 billion means 100 billion, and we insist on it, and we’re getting it.
KERLEY: Freshman Republicans - more than 80 of them - said no to their leader’s first offer to cut $35 billion for the rest of the year. The Speaker bent to their will, changing his tune, tripling the proposal.
JOHN BOEHNER, SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE: We’re going to cut more than $100 billion in discretionary spending on this year’s account.
KERLEY: So a campaign promise to cut $100 billion would be jammed into the last seven months of the budget year. The cuts would be broad and very deep.
BOB GREENSTEIN, CENTER ON BUDGET AND POLICY: Contrary to the view they’re smaller than people think, they’re bigger than people think.
KERLEY: Money for the EPA, clean water, food safety, the weather service, and funds for states and cities would be cut.
GREENSTEIN: It’s as though they’re checking a box: We said 100 billion, here’s 100 billion, and they’re protected from the consequences of their own, I think, less than responsible actions here.
KERLEY: Protected from the consequences, he says, because the Democratic Senate and the President will not go along. Then the President gave us a little more indication today about what he plans in his budget. He wants to spend more on education and new economy jobs and pay for that with cuts of his own - which he says, David, will freeze federal spending for the next five years.
- Brad Wilmouth's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
Yeah, a freeze in spending
Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Sun, 02/13/2011 - 2:12am.
Only after the baseline for spending has been increased under this administration, does the 0 offer up a freeze. Screw that. CUT CUT CUT!!!!
(No subject)
Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Sun, 02/13/2011 - 2:14am.
Damn, first post and I flub it up by falling in love with the "enter" key.
"Less than responsible"?
Submitted by Phryj1 on Sun, 02/13/2011 - 2:15am.
I'd say it was "less than responsible" to spend that much money in the first place. Once again, the left demonstrates a selective -and frankly, completely nonsensical- concept of fiscal responsibility. They never, ever complain about too much spending or too high of a tax burden, but they all become devoted acolytes of [their particular bizarro world idea of] being financially responsible when it comes to cutting spending.
Progressives seem to be completely averse to facts and logic. Apparently, reality has a conservative bias.
duhbama (at cabinet meeting
Submitted by jdhawk on Sun, 02/13/2011 - 3:46am.
duhbama (at cabinet meeting regarding Egypt): "Look, we need to do something about this Egypt thing. If our own citizens realize they can just toss out their leader for being a worthless idiot, then I could be next!
cabinet members (mumbling): "Hmmm, yes . . . I see what you mean. . . .
Yeah............when you are
Submitted by killa37 on Sun, 02/13/2011 - 3:59am.
Yeah............when you are engaged in 'less than responsible' over-spending and borrowing and taxing and regulating and printing and going deeper and deeper into debt, it's VERY important that you curtail 'less than responsibe' spending cuts!!!!
Delusional morons..........................
Spendaholics Must Be Stopped
Submitted by Boil It Down on Sun, 02/13/2011 - 5:55am.
Kerley, Greenstein and the rest of 'spendaholics' need to get it out of their head that "paying for new spending with budget cuts" is NOT a cut. Anyone that would believe that is a complete idiot. That is some more of the insane 'beltway economics' that brought us to the crisis we now face.
The irresponsible bureaucrats that have been spending like drunken college kids with their first credit card have no business lecturing anyone on responsible 'cuts'. ABC was irresponsible for this lopsided report as well.
As far as liberals are
Submitted by motherbelt on Sun, 02/13/2011 - 8:35am.
As far as liberals are concerned, ALL spending cuts are "irresponsible."
Everything is crucial; there is NOTHING that can be reduced.
So the democrats are the responsible adults...
Submitted by Red Jeep on Sun, 02/13/2011 - 9:24am.
...and the Republicans are the immature kids. Is that the whole point of this piece?
Typical MSM templates:
1. Democrats, adults; Republicans, children
2. Democrats good: Republicans, bad
3. Democrats love the poor: Republicans want to take food away from the poor.
4. Democrats, the party for Civil Rights; Republicans against Civil Rights.
5. Democrats elected Lincoln; Republicans owned the slaves in the south.
6. Democrats want safe abortions; Republicans will force women to use back alley abotionists.
7. Democrats love immigrants; Republicans hate immigrants.
Repeat over and over and over.
Protection from dems? No thanks!
Submitted by jon_torlin on Sun, 02/13/2011 - 10:41am.
The Dems' form of protection is like using a condom with its tip missing.
-Jon
Cutting the USA feds by 80%
Submitted by jkwtrading on Sun, 02/13/2011 - 2:59pm.
Cutting the USA feds by 80% is reasonable..cut cut cut until they are just a blip on our memories.
I want kids to ask hey dad what was the federal governemnt spening really like because I see none today.
When I was a kid we could say that.. what is govenrment spending. what is a nanny state, who the hell wants one of them..
I want everyone to expereince the USA when there was no nanny.
During the 60's a famous commercial emerged called RAID.. RAID steps in bugs step out..I look now for the American people to view liberals as bugs and dose them with RAID. big splahes of Raid..
Yes the democraps will
Submitted by eaglewingz08 on Sun, 02/13/2011 - 5:48pm.
Yes the democraps will protect the republicans from cutting spending, the same way they protected republicans from being included in the porkulus, and in cap n tax, and in obamacare.
The dems' view is either you agree to tax and spend the country to ruin, or it's the highway.