Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

May 25, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Anti-religious Bias in the Media
  • Same-sex Marriage
  • 2012 Presidential Race
Home » Blogs » Brad Wilmouth's blog
  • On and On It Goes: Networks Cover 'Predator Priests' As They Stay Silent on Catholic Liberty Lawsuits
  • NBC's Williams Touts L.A. Banning Plastic Bags As Effort to Keep Them 'Out of the Natural World'
  • Bozell, Carlson Note Media's Silence on Obama Supporter's Bribe to Hush Rev. Wright
  • Very Annoyed Matthews Rips ‘Horse’s Ass Right-Wingers’ Who Cite ‘Thrill Up My Leg,’ Calls C-SPAN Host a ‘Jackass’
  • CNN Asks Tony Perkins 'Why Do Homosexuals Bother You So Much?'
  • Reuters's Freeland: 'Anorexic' Americans Think Tax Bite Too Heavy When In Fact It's Dangerously Thin
  • Soledad O'Brien Spins Romney's Words on Bain, Suggests He's Dodging the Questions
  • MSNBC Host, Guest Worry About Propriety of Discussing Sexism in Islamic Cultures

ABC’s Harris: Climate Scientists ‘Embattled’ by ‘Controversial’ Skeptics ‘Despite Compelling Evidence’ of Global Warming

By Brad Wilmouth | December 28, 2010 | 15:20

Change font size:  A |  A

On the Wednesday, December 22, Nightline on ABC, inspired by recent extreme weather, correspondent Dan Harris filed a report on global warming in which he gave attention to the views of a proponent of global warming theory, while giving a lesser amount of attention to two skeptics, one of whom he labeled "controversial."

Harris related that, "despite all that compelling evidence" of global warming, climate scientists "feel more embattled than ever," taking heat from "politicians on the right." He even went so far as to highlight examples of reported harassment of climate scientists, including anti-Semitic insults.

Harris also concluded his report passing on a warning from scientists that there will be more "extremely deadly weather" in the future "if the world doesn’t act very quickly":

Corbyn is now predicting a mini ice age in the coming years. However, the vast, vast majority of climate scientists disagree and say, if you like this year’s extreme and extremely deadly weather, you’ll likely get much more if the world doesn’t act very quickly.

After beginning the report with a look at weather forecaster Piers Corbyn - calling his methods "unorthodox" because he uses magnetic fields to predict weather - Harris moved to global warming theory proponent Professor Michael Oppenheimer of Princeton University:

That’s Princeton scientist Michael Oppenheimer, who says climate change is like loading the dice or tilting a pinball machine, making it more likely that we'll have heat waves, intense rainstorms and higher sea levels. It’s not a pretty picture.

The ABC correspondent passed on complaints by climate scientists that they "feel more embattled than ever," taking heat from "politicians on the right":

It might feel cold outside of your house tonight, but 2010 may well turn out to be the hottest year on record. And, in fact, the last decade was definitely the hottest on record. Despite all that compelling evidence, climate scientists say they now feel more embattled than ever. And some of their biggest opponents, they say, are politicians on the right.

Harris tried to embarrass global warming skeptics by including clips of two public figures - incoming House Speaker John Boehner and Republican Congressman John Shimkus - who expressed doubts that were either flawed or not based on scientific reasoning, before sympathetically returning to Oppenheimer to make his case, even highlighting examples of reported harassment toward global warming theory proponents. Harris:

Meanwhile, the FBI tells us it has seen a spike in threatening e-mails to climate scientists, and a white supremacist Web site recently ran pictures of scientists with the word "Jew" next to them. Michael Oppenheimer says he’s sure this interview will result in angry e-mails.

After a clip of Oppenheimer complaining about a "disinformation campaign" funded by industry, Harris got to global warming skeptic Dr. Fred Singer, whom the ABC correspondent called "controversial," only giving a couple of brief soundbites for the University of Virginia professor emeritus to say that global warming theory proponents are "wrong." Introducing Singer, Harris related:

Their foe, they say, is a well-funded campaign to confuse. Led by people like Dr Fred Singer, a controversial scientific skeptic with whom I conducted this combative interview several years ago, which was heavily criticized by many in the skeptics community.

After noting that Corbyn is also a global warming skeptic, Harris got to his conclusion which dismissed doubters and passed on the call for action, presumably meaning more government regulatoins. Harris:

Corbyn is now predicting a mini ice age in the coming years. However, the vast, vast majority of climate scientists disagree and say, if you like this year's extreme and extremely deadly weather, you'll likely get much more if the world doesn't act very quickly.

Below is a complete transcript of the report from the Wednesday, December 22, Nightline on ABC:

CYNTHIA MCFADDEN: Good evening, I’m Cynthia McFadden. We begin tonight with the weather. Winter so far has brought the kind of storms that interrupt and even endanger lives, with days of rain and flooding in the Southwest, record snowfall in the North, and conditions harsh enough overseas to shut major transportation hubs. This, after a summer of even more dangerous waves of heat and water. Tonight, Dan Harris talks with a forecaster who saw it all coming, and who has less than promising news for what’s coming next.

DAN HARRIS: It’s hard not to be impressed when you see entire houses being swept away by flood waters in the West. Part of the same storm that, tonight, is creating road closures, evacuations and widespread fear of mudslides. Meanwhile, tonight, the madness continues over in Europe, where the snow and freezing temperatures that paralyze major cities is only now starting to relent. There is one person who is happy about all of this, though.

PIERS CORBYN, WEATHER FORECASTER: I’m extremely pleased that it’s very cold and it’s very cold in Europe as well.

HARRIS: This rather odd-looking man is Pierce Corbin, who actually predicted this nasty weather, which the British government failed to do.

CORBYN: We predicted that this winter in Britain and Europe would be the coldest for 100 years.

HARRIS: Corbyn’s methods are, to say the least, unorthodox. He forecasts based on the magnetic connection between the sun and the earth. Although many people say his correct forecasts are just a fluke, he remains supremely confident, and now says the weather will only get worse - and very soon.

CORBYN: In the coming period between Christmas and the New Year, as I said, we are expecting blizzards in Europe and the eastern parts of England. We’re expecting blizzards in the Northeast USA.

HARRIS: Maybe Corbin’s right, maybe he's not. Either way, we are certainly coming to the end of a year of crazy and often lethal weather, most notably that unprecedented heat wave over in Russia and that huge and lethal episode of flooding in Pakistan. And, of course, every time we have a year like this, people always ask the same question. This has been a, by any stretch, pretty crazy year in terms of weather. Is there anything in what you’ve seen this year that makes you think that we’re seeing climate change at work?

PROF. MICHAEL OPPENHEIMER, PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: You can never attribute the cause of individual weather events to a long-term trend like the global warming trend brought about by the buildup of the greenhouse gases. What you can say is that certain types of weather are made more likely by the buildup of the greenhouse gases.

HARRIS: That’s Princeton scientist Michael Oppenheimer, who says climate change is like loading the dice or tilting a pinball machine, making it more likely that we'll have heat waves, intense rainstorms and higher sea levels. It’s not a pretty picture.

OPPENHEIMER: Over the long-term, it’s not. And if we don’t act to stem the emissions of the gases, eventually, it gets disastrous because Earth simply just keeps warming.

HARRIS: It might feel cold outside of your house tonight, but 2010 may well turn out to be the hottest year on record. And, in fact, the last decade was definitely the hottest on record. Despite all that compelling evidence, climate scientists say they now feel more embattled than ever. And some of their biggest opponents, they say, are politicians on the right. In one congressional hearing, John Shimkus from Illinois quoted the Bible, arguing God promised the earth would stay safe for mankind.

REP. JOHN SHIMKUS (R-IL): I believe that’s the infallible word of God, and that’s the way it’s gonna be for his creation.

HARRIS: And here’s what our incoming Speaker John Boehner told George Stephanopoulos:

JOHN BOEHNER, SPEAKER-DESIGNATE: George, the idea that carbon dioxide is a carcinogen that is harmful to our environment is almost comical.

HARRIS: What is your reaction?

OPPENHEIMER: Well, first of all, no one is asserting that carbon dioxide is a carcinogen. The assertion is that it should be classified as an air pollutant. A warmer world is not a good world for people. This is nonsense, it’s politically motivated and completely detached from the scientific reality.

HARRIS: Meanwhile, the FBI tells us it has seen a spike in threatening e-mails to climate scientists, and a white supremacist Web site recently ran pictures of scientists with the word "Jew" next to them. Michael Oppenheimer says he’s sure this interview will result in angry e-mails.

OPPENHEIMER: I recently, just last week, spoke at a meeting and I read out some of my e-mails, and people in the audience were astonished. Some people have gotten death threats. I haven’t.

HARRIS: What types of things have people called you?

OPPENHEIMER: I’d rather, you can’t use the more amusing ones on family television, even in this late hour.

HARRIS: Now climate scientists, including Professor Oppenheimer are fighting back, forming rapid response teams to counter what they describe as a vast disinformation campaign.

OPPENHEIMER: There’s no question that going back almost 20 years that certain segments of industry got together and started funding disinformation campaigns, just like the tobacco industry did with smoking, in order to create doubt in the public’s mind that the science was firm enough on global warming to actually act on it. But this is a device we’ve seen before.

HARRIS: And it worked for a little while.

OPPENHEIMER: And it did work. It delayed action. We see the same thing here.

HARRIS: Their foe, they say, is a well-funded campaign to confuse. Led by people like Dr Fred Singer, a controversial scientific skeptic with whom I conducted this combative interview several years ago, which was heavily criticized by many in the skeptics community.

HARRIS: There are so many scientists who disagree with what you’re saying, the IPCC, NASA, NOAA, the National Academy of Sciences, American Association for the Advancement of Science, the America Geophysical Union, the American Meteorological Society. We’re talking about scientists-

PROF. EMERITUS FRED SINGER, UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: What can I say?

HARRIS: -all over the globe.

SINGER: What can I say? They're wrong.

HARRIS: We should say that Piers Corbyn, that guy who claimed to have predicted Europe’s current weather woes, he, too, is a climate skeptic.

CORBYN: I know there are certain people in the global warming cult, and that’s what it is, it’s a religious cult. They believe that everything that happens is caused by global warming. Look, this is sheer madness.

HARRIS: Corbyn is now predicting a mini ice age in the coming years. However, the vast, vast majority of climate scientists disagree and say, if you like this year’s extreme and extremely deadly weather, you’ll likely get much more if the world doesn’t act very quickly. For Nightline this is Dan Harris in New York.

Share this
  • Global Warming
  • Weather
  • Dan Harris
  • Fred Singer
  • Michael Oppenheimer
  • Piers Corbyn
  • ABC
  • Nightline
  • Brad Wilmouth's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Donate to NewsBusters

Comments

Bet On It...

Submitted by neighb on Tue, 12/28/2010 - 3:36pm.

Take away ANY CHANCE of the redistribution of money from so-called "rich" nations to the ones that are broke, and immediately cancel ALL ridiculous grants to so-called "scientists" who need the cash and you'll quickly see that the Global Warming Hoax is just that.

neighb
  • Login to post comments

Source of all Global Warming is FOUND

Submitted by tombaker on Tue, 12/28/2010 - 3:53pm.

The star, called the Sun, is the source of all Global Warming.  Any analysis of Cimate without looking at Solar Cycles is from idiots.   The variations of orbit do contribute also.

The emmisions from a tailpipe of a new car in the USA are so clean its rediculous.   A dog has as large of a carbon footprint as a SUV.   Get rid of your dog, if you are Global Warming believer.

Why do you think they call it Climate Change now.....because Global warming theory has been scientifically destroyed.....and the data coming in each year removes it more and more.

Theory

Create Test

Gather Data

Anaylize Data

Conclusion.

New Hypothisis

 

The data does not support the hypothesis, and the scientists are refusing to create a new Hypothesis.

  • Login to post comments

Climate change is a scam

Submitted by Cyborg 0427 on Thu, 12/30/2010 - 8:51am.

Right, global warming is and has been caused by our own sun. The polar caps on Mars are receeding at a much faster rate than our own and the moons of Jupter which have been frozen in ice are now melthing.  I do not believe that climate change is caused in any way by carbon emmisions. I can remember when smog over large cities was much worse than they are now because the source of smog has been delt with, namely cars. This is just another scam by the left to tax us into submission for the NWO.

 

The new government slogan: If it's not broken, break it.

You can lead a liberal to logic but you can't make them think.
  • Login to post comments

And from Cancun, this...$$$

Submitted by Rackie on Tue, 12/28/2010 - 3:57pm.

"That the Cancun summit was never a climate conference at all has become increasingly obvious.

Even before it began, IPCC Working Group III co-chair Ottmar Edenhofer said, COP-16 is actually “one of the largest economic conferences since the Second World War…

One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy.”

In fact, it has “almost nothing to do with the environmental policy.” Its real purpose “is redistributing the world’s wealth and natural resources.”  

 

From icecapus.com

  • Login to post comments

Oh they're gonna play the race card..I mean the anti-semite card

Submitted by krendler on Tue, 12/28/2010 - 4:09pm.

Oh they're gonna play the race card..uhh...I mean the anti-semite card now.

In lieu of solid, compelling science, they're simply going characterize the skeptics as anti-semitic.

Here we go again, folks.

Shades of "I distinctly heard the word N***** coming from that Tea Party mob."

  • Login to post comments

Reporter with an agenda

Submitted by dbo on Tue, 12/28/2010 - 4:13pm.

"Led by people like Dr Fred Singer, a controversial scientific skeptic with whom I conducted this combative interview several years ago, which was heavily criticized by many in the skeptics community."
  That wasn't an interview. That was a total smear job.
  • Login to post comments

Ya know, when you really think about it, the far-lefties...

Submitted by Dave. on Tue, 12/28/2010 - 4:12pm.

...really no-longer need to press this hideos "Climate Change" scam in order to steal what is left of America's wealth and redistribute same so it eventually finds its way into the Swiss bank accounts of Third World potentates/aspiring dictators the world over, thus plunging the planet into a New Dark Age of a Marxist/statist hell-hole.

Obama is doing that for them, and has already surpassed anything they could ever hope to do, as most people with an IQ above freezer temperature now clearly recognize AGW as the scam it is.

-Dave

 

A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves - Edward R. Murrow
  • Login to post comments

What temperature scale?

Submitted by TheHistorian on Tue, 12/28/2010 - 4:25pm.

Freezer temperature is pretty high on the temperature scale.  On the Kelvin Scale, even liquid N2 which is lower than most freezers, is 77K, which is WAY above Al Gore's scientific IQ, so "above freezer temperature" is really a compliment?
 

“Liberals tend to put the onus of your success on society and conservatives on you and your family.”

Dennis Prager

  • Login to post comments

Ok now, in all

Submitted by bassndude on Tue, 12/28/2010 - 4:40pm.

Ok now, in all seriousness...is there some sort of prerequisit that you have to be a moron to report on "Global Warming"? ...or sorry..."Climate" change....? Really..

 

Save a SeAL, club a liberal/troll!!

  • Login to post comments

It is NOT snowing...

Submitted by Britpop on Tue, 12/28/2010 - 4:55pm.

http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/snowfalls-are-now-just-a-thing-of-the-past-724017.html

  • Login to post comments

It's been a ball, watching

Submitted by danbo on Tue, 12/28/2010 - 5:04pm.

It's been a ball, watching the warmers decompensate. They so deserve it.

The warmers have CO2. They've ignored that big ball of light in the sky, They've ignored the oceans. Just to name two variables. We knew the cycles would change. Now we have a quiet sun. The oceans have shifted into their cool cycle. And volcanos have been adding a cooling effect.  A triple wammy.

The people who gave us the term "Deniers", and called for Nuremberg like trials of skeptics are whinning.

I think I'll stick my ice trays in the oven, to make some ice. And have a scotch and water to toast these "Scientist".

 

 

 

"You lie!"  Rep. Joe Wilson R-(SC)

  • Login to post comments

Let's push back hard on the

Submitted by Van Halen on Tue, 12/28/2010 - 5:17pm.

Let's push back hard on the Left starting Jan 5 when the new Congress sits.

Demand:

repeal of Obamacare

massive tax cuts

massive spending cuts

troops/wall/drones/cameras to the Mexican border

defund PBS, FCC and anything to do with climate change

  • Login to post comments

yeah, but..

Submitted by wizardjr on Tue, 12/28/2010 - 8:32pm.

personally I'd settle for demanding the truth

  • Login to post comments

It's a canard to pull the harrassment card now!

Submitted by neutron on Tue, 12/28/2010 - 5:36pm.

For the last decade, skeptics have been subject to intense harassment: loss of careers, denial of tenure, unethical rejection of papers by the closed ring "Hockey Team" reviewers and editors, as well as documented death threats against outspoken skeptics.

It's the lefties and the greenies that have very publically shouted from web sites and print media that they will hunt down and kill those who oppose them. One quote is "We know where you live." If you look into the archive at Watts Up With That you will find the information.

AGW skeptics have never encouraged, let alone espoused any harassment of anyone in the global warming alarmist camp, or any other camp.

BTW, Piers Corbyn's method is "unorthodox" to these pseudo-science global warming folks because Piers uses real and uncooked data combined with actual astrophysics to predict the impact of changes in solar radiance, magnetic flux, and solar particles on the earth and its atmosphere.

Piers has an 85% accuracy rate on his predictions. Okay, it's not perfect, but it's much better than the UK Meteorology Office's 0% (zero percent) accuracy rate that is a proponent of AGW and uses AGW models to predict climate and weather.

The "Hockey Team" (global warming alarmists) were forced to admit that the Midaevil Warm Period and the Maunder Minimum really did happen (destroying the Hockey Stick graph that the IPCC reports and AGW theory were based on).

Jones of the Climate Research Unit (CRU) (the super-duper head scientist of the AGW effort) admitted a year ago that there has been NO SIGNIFICANT WARMING for over a decade, despite rising CO2 levels. (Hide the decline!) That's because if you study CO2 and temperature data as far back as we have it from ice cores, temperature rises preceed CO2 rises, and temperature falls preceed CO2 falls. CO2 does not drive temperature; temperature drives CO2.

And BTW, I am a scientist. I attained the rank of Technical Fellow about a decade ago.

  • Login to post comments

According to a report I heard

Submitted by ricklail on Tue, 12/28/2010 - 5:38pm.

According to a report I heard on the NC News Network December is shaping up to be the coldest December on record for NC. The first half of the month set a record so now they are waiting on the data for the second half.

A well regulated militia being necessary to a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
  • Login to post comments

I see how that works

Submitted by CobraMan on Tue, 12/28/2010 - 6:36pm.

So, it's the skeptics who are controversial, and not the global warming theories themselves. So, how's that absolutism working our for you guys?

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court

Or Anwar al-Awlaki.

  • Login to post comments

Sweden - Coldest December in 110 years

Submitted by Rackie on Tue, 12/28/2010 - 7:53pm.

http://www.thelocal.se/31072/20101226/mostread

  • Login to post comments

This just in from the White

Submitted by DWoSD on Tue, 12/28/2010 - 8:02pm.

This just in from the White House;

Scientist have now proven beyond all exclusive doubt that ANY WEATHER that occurs anywhere in the world is a result of Global Warming.  The science is closed on this and those who would disagree with this conclusion will be classified as "Certified Deniers".  Those officially labeled as such will be routinely ridiculed and mocked by the Main Stream Media, this White House and Al Gore.

Also, Global Weather Disruption will be the new term we will insist everone uses.  Failure to accept this term will also result in ridicule and mocking. 

So in review, all weather patterns and temperture fluctuations up or down, represent dangerous reactions to man made CO2 emissions and if we do not ruin capitalism immediately, we are all doomed. 

President B. Obama

Leader and All Knowing Ruler of the Former USA

  • Login to post comments

show me this evidence

Submitted by wizardjr on Tue, 12/28/2010 - 8:29pm.

not the cooked books, not the cherry picked data, not some rigged computer model, not NASA faked data (did you know it's 500 degrees Fahrenheit in central Wisconsin?)

WHERE THE HELL ARE THE REPORTERS??!!?? We used to have people that got facts, then they checked the facts, then they reported them, then they watched for any changes or updates and reported that. Now we have 'journalists' and news mumblers. Crap.

  • Login to post comments

 The last good investigative

Submitted by the struggler on Tue, 12/28/2010 - 8:46pm.

 The last good investigative reporter I know of was the dude that followed The Incredible Hulk around from town to town.

  • Login to post comments

Lefty journal hacks have a variety of words and phrases to

Submitted by Rush Fan on Wed, 12/29/2010 - 5:18am.

describe the 'compelling evidence’ of the existence of Global Warming. My local newspaper wrote an editorial on the dire effects of Global Warming, and they described the evidence of Global Warming as 'an almost certain fact'.  I wrote back to the editors that using the phrase 'almost certain fact' was as ridiculous and made as much sense as using the phrase almost pregnant.  I concluded with the popular saying: Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not their own facts.”

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

  • Is liberalism dead? (Roger L. Simon)
  • The media's next move on same-sex marriage (Get Religion)
  • Senate Dems pay women staffers less than male staffers (Washington Free Beacon)
  • Left targeting Chief Justice Roberts in attempt to save ObamaCare (IBD)
  • Walker's chance of defeating Wisc. recall looking great (Ace of Spades)
  • Ex-prez Bill Clinton poses for pic with porn stars (Fox Nation)
  • Protests against conservative group ALEC draw pitiful numbers (YouTube)

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB
Scott Rasmussen
Rasmussen Column: 'Austerity' Talk Is Just Political Cover for More Government Spending
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter Williams Column: Should Black People Tolerate This?
Cal Thomas's picture
Cal Thomas
Cal Thomas Column: The Media's Religion Deficit
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: IRS Gives Billions in Tax Refunds to Illegals
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Michelle Malkin Column: How the Gay-Marriage Mafia Slimed Manny Pacquiao
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Recent comments

  • Stupid, too.
    31 sec ago
  • Caj-
    10 min 21 sec ago
  • Maybe when it gets to civil disobedience
    13 min 23 sec ago
  • Well, the media was completely fair
    14 min 59 sec ago
  • U.S.S.A.
    22 min 3 sec ago
More >

More Like Farcebook
more cartoons
  • Piers Morgan Whacks 'Little Wretch' Who Says He Taught Phone-Hacking
  • GOP Rep. Saying Obama 'Not An American' Labeled 'Treasonous' by Ed Schultz
  • NYT's Maureen Dowd Whines on 'Women's Lower Caste' in the Catholic Church
  • Open Thread: How About That Arab Spring?
  • PBS for Obama: USA Today Puts Gushy 'Essay by Ken Burns' on Front Page
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.