Whoopi Goldberg Decries Fact-Challenged Bloggers, But Spreads Misinformation Herself on ABC's The View
Appearing as a guest on Saturday’s Huckabee show on FNC, Whoopi Goldberg - co-host of ABC’s The View - complained that bloggers disseminate inaccurate information about her without the need to "fact check," and that "they poop on you and they walk away." Goldberg: "But a blogger can say endless stuff. They don't have to fact check. ... And then that is picked up and made into some other story on another station, and it becomes the truth. See, I think fact outweighs assumption. So if you have facts in your hands, then you can talk, then you can have a conversation... People just, they poop on you and they walk away."
After asserting that she has said "not one thing" on ABC’s The View that she regrets saying, Goldberg soon added, "And I've gotten flack for what I felt was fact as opposed to someone's speculation."
But Goldberg has her own history of helping spread misinformation on The View. Last May, she and other co-hosts repeated the distorted claims of a left-wing organization in Texas which alleged that conservatives on the Texas State Board of Education were trying to downplay or eliminate references to slavery in its grade school history curriculum. On the Monday, May 17 show, Behar misinformed viewers with sarcasm: "Remember that thing called the 'slave trade'? Remember that? Okay, it turns out, what you learned was all wrong. Because it wasn't some evil buying and selling of human beings. It was simply called 'Atlantic triangular trade.' That's what they want to call it now. It's called revisionism. People do it about the Holocaust, and now Texas wants to do it about our country."
Moments later, Goldberg chimed in, "I’m sorry. Slavery was slavery. You can’t recall it." Instead of reading out the actual wording from the curriculum plan, panel members seemed only to refer to third-party accounts of the proposed changes.
And in April, the panel on the View helped feed the misinformed hysteria over Arizona’s effort to enforce federal immigration laws as some of her co-hosts assumed the new state law would require racial profiling and targeting of Hispanics, failing to convey that Arizona law enforcement would only check immigration documents of suspects who have been detained for some other reason. Goldberg acted more as moderator on this occasion and was not as outspoken as other co-hosts in making assertions about the new law, but she did not challenge the claims of her co-hosts and seemed to assume they were accurate. Goldberg, from the April 26 The View:
There are only some people who get stopped, okay? They're generally brown. Because there's a lot of people from Italy, from Denmark, from Ireland, England, Africa, who have been here on visas that expired ages ago. If we're going to do something, let's start at the beginning and really do it. Let's get the folks who are not supposed to be here to go back around to the back of the line and start again. If you want to be here, come in and do it the right way. If you're going to stop one, then stop everybody.
Below is a transcript of the relevant portion of the Saturday, November 20, Huckabee show on FNC:
MIKE HUCKABEE: You talk in the book about something near and dear to my heart, and it’s about bloggers and the fact that people can be anonymous and cruel and vicious. You call them cowards.
WHOOPI GOLDBERG: I call them cowards and assassins, you know, because you don't know where the hit is coming from. See, on the View, and I'm sure on your show as well, if I say something, you know I said it. If you hear me say it, you know I said it. If I don't apologize the next day, you know I meant it. But a blogger can say endless stuff. They don't have to fact check.
HUCKABEE: Yeah.
GOLDBERG: They don't have to find out if they are even current in their information. They don't have to do any of that. And then that is picked up and made into some other story on another station, and it becomes the truth. See, I think fact outweighs assumption. So if you have facts in your hands, then you can talk, then you can have a conversation and say I hated what you did, blah, blah, blah. And I want to know who’s saying it so I can say, well, I think you're wrong here, you missed this. But you can't do that. People just, they poop on you and they walk away.
HUCKABEE: Well, I think it's the equivalent of really word smith terrorism where people can anonymously hurt other people-
GOLDBERG: Yes.
HUCKABEE: -they take no responsibility-
GOLDBERG: No.
HUCKABEE: -for it, and yet the damage can sometimes be absolutely irreversible.
GOLDBERG: Yes.
HUCKABEE: You're on television five days a week. You deal with a lot of controversial topics. Is there any one thing that you have said on television about somebody or an issue that you wished you hadn't have said?
GOLDBERG: Not one thing.
HUCKABEE: Not one thing.
GOLDBERG: No.
HUCKABEE: How nice that must be.
GOLDBERG: Well, you know what, I stand behind my beliefs.
HUCKABEE: You've never had that moment where it came out of your mouth and you said, "That ain’t going over real well."
GOLDBERG: Well, a lot of things I’ve said haven’t gone over real well.
HUCKABEE: But you didn’t mind.
GOLDBERG: Well, you know what? They were my opinion...
[GOLDBERG RECOUNTS TRYING TO PUT MICHAEL VICK’S DOG FIGHTING INTO PERSPECTIVE AND THE RESULTING COMPLAINTS]
So they really gave me a hard time on that. And, you know, I got a little bit of flack for getting up and walking away from Mr. O'Reilly. That was all right, too. And I've gotten flack for what I felt was fact as opposed to someone's speculation.
- Brad Wilmouth's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
Just imagine if the entire
Submitted by dirtydan64 on Sun, 11/21/2010 - 10:27am.
Left blogesphere used her thought process and felt they can do no wrong.......... Wait they do so in that respect she's nothing special !!! However if Whoppi wanted to separate herself from the rest should would take a few cues from The right One who opposes most of what she says & Think's !!
Well, you know what? They
Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Sun, 11/21/2010 - 10:31am.
Well, you know what? They were my opinion..And Whoopie doesn't think anyone else can have an opinion? And the Huck interview just shows why we don't want old Huck as President.
Apparently Whoopi is all in
Submitted by motherbelt on Sun, 11/21/2010 - 10:31am.
Apparently Whoopi is all in favor of "facts"....unless she's talking about herself.
Other people lie. Whoopi has "beliefs" and an "opinion."
What Whoopie has is a walnut
Submitted by 26CX on Sun, 11/21/2010 - 10:35am.
What Whoopie has is a walnut for a brain.
Here's a fact
Submitted by ricklail on Sun, 11/21/2010 - 10:40am.
Whoopi was a 2 bit whore on welfare. I've seen that in the blogshere and it is a fact.
Correct me if I am wrong, but . . . .
Submitted by DontFeedTheTrolls on Sun, 11/21/2010 - 10:46am.
I thought she was a heroin junkie.
Here it is from Ebony magazine
Submitted by 26CX on Sun, 11/21/2010 - 10:54am.
The Whoopi Goldberg story
You are right on that.
Submitted by ricklail on Sun, 11/21/2010 - 11:43am.
You are right on that. Remember Polanki's not a rapist rapist. She is just Jimma Kotter stupid. I can't stand to watch her for more than 3 seconds. That is usually the time it takes to turn the channel when I see her.
Yes, I heard her gas on
Submitted by StarAZ on Sun, 11/21/2010 - 12:30pm.
If there is any teeny-tiny, besmidgen of a small chance these pat-downs and iffy x-rays might catch a terrorist in action, we should all suck it up. Thanks for kicking away my rights, Miss Whoopi.
Beware the Dreadlocks of Stupidity
Submitted by locomotivebreath1901 on Sun, 11/21/2010 - 10:39am.
So, when Goldberg says bloggers "poop on you", is she talking about "poop on you - poop on you" (which apparently is not very serious), or is she talking about a serious case of "poop. on. you.?"
And should anyone with the moniker of "whoopi" be taken seriously about anything?
I'm so confused.
My Name is Whoopi and I am a Comedian...Seriously!
Submitted by gruyere cheese on Sun, 11/21/2010 - 11:05am.
Ms. Goldberg says: But a blogger can say endless stuff. They don't have to fact check.
It is a make believe world for Whoopie Goldberg ...not her real name, and we are suppose to take anything she says seriously?
Give me a break!
Just another Communist Stalinist...
Submitted by ArrowSmith on Sun, 11/21/2010 - 11:23am.
HER opinions are dandy, but ours are criminal...
To Whoopi
Submitted by BigAlSouth on Sun, 11/21/2010 - 11:24am.
To Whoopi:
I poop on you . . .
Did Huckabuck challenge her
Submitted by ricklail on Sun, 11/21/2010 - 11:37am.
Did Huckabuck challenge her in any way about the lies? He was touting this on Fox and Friends Saturday. I had to turn it because he was making me sick the way he described her. She is a left wing stooge as far as I am concerned who gets her marching orders from Babs and Behar. I really think they planned on walking out on o'Reilly. It was not spontaneous.
Why was Whoopie so upset? It
Submitted by ant on Sun, 11/21/2010 - 12:00pm.
Why was Whoopie so upset? It was just slavery, it wasn't slavery-slavery. Not like present day slavery like occurs in the Mid-east or the sex slave illegals that owe thousands of dollars to coyotes. How's that open-borders thing working out for them?
Sums it Up
Submitted by Jimbo on Sun, 11/21/2010 - 12:11pm.
She exemplified the liberal mentality when she and Baehar walked off the set of the View because they disagreed with Bill O’Reilly’s point of view. Liberals will preach their point of view until your ears bleed, but the moment someone comes along with an opposing point of view that the liberal in turn cannot intelligently counter, they should obscenities and walk away. It sums up the entire liberal mentality for me.
" liberal in turn cannot intelligently counter"
Submitted by hbnolikeee on Sun, 11/21/2010 - 12:26pm.
liberal and intelligent don't work in the same sentence (in facts liberals prefer not to work in general). this is an oxymoron.
I sure hope
Submitted by ripper58 on Sun, 11/21/2010 - 12:41pm.
Huckleberry doesn't run for POTUS in 12, he's such a wimp
I had a sex dream last night
Submitted by liberalsarefunny on Sun, 11/21/2010 - 1:52pm.
I had a sex dream last night about Whoopi Goldberg and Rachel Maddow. Do I have a problem?
It's possible that you are
Submitted by ant on Sun, 11/21/2010 - 6:45pm.
It's possible that you are either Joy Behar or Ted Danson. I must disclose, however, that I am not a licensed psychologist.
jw---
Submitted by matthewdean on Sun, 11/21/2010 - 10:49pm.
It depends.
If Rachel makes you hot, 's ok.
If, on the other hand, Whoopi does, and you ain't Ted Danson, you are beyond help.
MD
Now I had a sex dream with
Submitted by liberalsarefunny on Mon, 11/22/2010 - 3:43pm.
Now I had a sex dream with Ted Danson. Thanks a lot...
jw---
Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 11/23/2010 - 1:50am.
Shake it off.
Take a lap.
Think Rachel.
You'll be all right.
MD
So, it's okay to offer up an
Submitted by Chris Norman on Sun, 11/21/2010 - 8:55pm.
So, it's okay to offer up an opinion that isn't "fact-checked" as long as it's liberal and on television but not if it's conservative and on a blog. Got it.
Whoopi
Submitted by batcat on Sun, 11/21/2010 - 9:57pm.
Whoopi, those bloggers learned it from you. You've never let facts get in the way of your moronic
opinions.