Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

February 13, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS
Home » Blogs » Brad Wilmouth's blog
  • Washington Post’s Ignatius Hails Obama’s Nimble Contraception Policy; Will Zings Bishops: ‘It Serves Them Right’
  • Entire Chris Matthews Panel Says New JFK Sex Revelations Are Totally Irrelevant
  • Santorum Nomination ‘Completely Terrifies’ Economist Magazine’s Economics Editor
  • Evan Thomas and Chris Matthews: Jackie and Serial Adulterer JFK Had a 'Good' and 'Full' Marriage
  • Bozell Column: Another Fleeting Failure for NBC
  • Martin Bashir Implies GOP Too Racist to Have Marco Rubio as VP Candidate
  • Barbara Walters, Shameless Hypocrite: Hits Kennedy Mistress for Greed, Tells Her She Should Have Stayed Quiet
  • NY Times Writers Rush to Obama's Defense Like It's Their Job

Olbermann on Letterman: Tea Parties Are Like 'Homogenized Milk,' But Some 'Valid' Points

By Brad Wilmouth | February 19, 2010 | 09:23

Change font size:  A |  A

Appearing as a guest on Thursday’s Late Show with David Letterman on CBS, MSNBC host Keith Olbermann contnued to indict the racial makeup of Tea Party event partipants as evidence of an "unfortunate undertone" of racism as he compared the movement's members to "homogenized milk." He also asserted that "there’s nobody from any kind of minority group" at the events, in spite of a CBS News/New York Times poll which suggests that five percent of Tea Party activists are minorities.

Olbermann: "I did notice if you look carefully at the videotapes of the events, or you watch the events, it does look like a really large family reunion. Everybody looks exactly the same."

After host Letterman suggested the word "homogenous" to describe the movement, Olbermann continued: 

Homogenized milk would be a sort of an analogy to it. It just looks an awful, if you’re in a crowd of, you know, several thousand people, and they all look exactly like you and there’s nobody from any kind of minority group with you, you’ve got to start wondering why that is. Is it really statistically possible it’s a coincidence?

But, in contrast to his regular take on Tea Partiers which he espouses on his Countdown show, he suggested that these activists are "rightly angry" about some things and that some of their points are "absolutely valid," though he seemed to think some are motivated by "stalemates in Washington," rather than opposition to liberal policies. Olbermann: "But they want some change, and there are some points that they make that are absolutely valid, but I’m wondering if there’s a little bit of undertone to it that’s unfortunate."

Below is a transcript of the relevant portion of the Thursday, February 18, Late Show with David Letterman on CBS:

DAVID LETTERMAN: Let’s talk about, I’m sort of fascinated by the Tea Party. I don’t know what that means. I know that it’s, is it a splinter group of the Republican party? Is it a whole new entity? What exactly is it?

KEITH OLBERMANN: I don’t think they know what it is yet. What I’ve been able to see, however, so far, is it’s a lot of people who are, to some degree, rightly angry about sort of stalemates in Washington and very upset about what they perceive is happening to society. Whether it’s, whether it’s what they think it’s about or it’s about something else, remains to be seen. I did notice if you look carefully at the videotapes of the events, or you watch the events, it does look like a really large family reunion. Everybody looks exactly the same.

LETTERMAN, LAUGHING: I’m not sure what that means, but I’ll take your word for it.

OLBERMANN: Well, there are very few people-

LETTERMAN: Homogenous group?

OLBERMANN: "Homogenous" is a good word. Homogenized milk would be a sort of an analogy to it. It just looks an awful, if you’re in a crowd of, you know, several thousand people, and they all look exactly like you and there’s nobody from any kind of minority group with you, you’ve got to start wondering why that is. Is it really statistically possible it’s a coincidence? And that’s the issue with them. But they want some change, and there are some points that they make that are absolutely valid, but I’m wondering if there’s a little bit of undertone to it that’s unfortunate.

Share this
  • David Letterman
  • Keith Olbermann
  • Brad Wilmouth's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Donate to NewsBusters

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB

 

 

 

  • Colo. Democrat intern fired after "glitter bombing" Romney (AP)
  • Chuck Colson, cardinal, and rabbi oppose HHS mandate (WSJ)
  • Idea of the Democrats better than the reality (Wisc. State Journal)
  • The cynical and self-contradictory Gospel of Obama (Krauthammer)
  • Video: Protesters at CPAC admit they're being paid to protest (Daily Caller)
  • Does the drug 'ella' cause abortions? (Weekly Standard)
  • Does income inequality cause global warming? (Power Line)

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Recent comments

  • Lied out his ace? Those are the words of a Bush hater.
    12 min 17 sec ago
  • Jerry Frey.....You are correct that President George W. Bush
    23 min 14 sec ago
  • UpN, SPOILER lololo , if that guy did that here instant 10 years
    48 min 9 sec ago
  • Pay no attention to Rachel Maddow? As far as I know...
    49 min 14 sec ago
  • Resist we much!
    1 hour 30 min ago
More >

Try a Sweater Vest, Mitt
more cartoons
  • Sarah Palin Totally Rocks Conservative Conference
  • Breitbart Warns MSNBC: 'We’re Watching You to Play the Race Card'
  • Weekend General and Sports Open Thread
  • Mitt Romney's Full Address to CPAC
  • Daily Kos Week in Review: Confusing Ground for Religious Haters
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Editorial Associate
Aubrey Vaughan

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.