On Friday’s Hannity show on FNC, host Sean Hannity challenged former NBC anchor Tom Brokaw to speak out in response to Janeane Garofalo’s recent tirade on MSNBC host Keith Olbermann’s Countdown show on Thursday, a screed which seemed to have Olbermann’s approval as he appeared to agree with her accusations of racism against Tax Day Tea Party participants.
During a discussion with FNC’s Kimberly Guilfoyle and conservative columnist S.E. Cupp, Hannity addressed Brokaw as he introduced the clip: "I want to address this specifically to Tom Brokaw. Tom Brokaw, are you proud of this?"
Then played a portion of Garofalo’s comments:
JANEANE GAROFALO CLIP #1: You know, there is for more interesting than seeing a bunch of racists become confused and angry at a speech they're not quite certain what he's saying. It sounds right to them, and then it doesn't make sense, which – let's be very honest about what this is about. It's not about bashing Democrats, it's not about taxes. They have no idea what the Boston Tea Party was about.
KEITH OLBERMANN: That's right.
GAROFALO: They don't know their history at all. This is about hating a black man in the White House. This is racism straight up. That is nothing but a bunch of teabagging red necks.
GAROFALO CLIP #2: -but these people, all white, for the most part, unless there's some people with Stockholm Syndrome.
After some discussion, Hannity addressed Brokaw again: "Tom Brokaw, are you proud of the brand that you built all these years? Are you proud that that is on NBC News?"
Below is a transcript of the relevant portion of the Friday, April 17, Hannity show on FNC:
SEAN HANNITY: All right, now I think, we had on Hannity and Colmes and throughout the years and on my radio show I had often had Tim Russert on, on a regular basis. I thought Tim Russert was a journalist's journalist, and I think he's missed, and think he was one of the best that was ever been in the business. And I want to play, this is NBC, ladies and gentlemen, and these are comments that were made on NBC News, their news network last night, and I want to address this specifically to Tom Brokaw. Tom Brokaw, are you proud of this?
JANEANE GAROFALO CLIP #1: You know, there is for more interesting than seeing a bunch of racists become confused and angry at a speech they're not quite certain what he's saying. It sounds right to them, and then it doesn't make sense, which – let's be very honest about what this is about. It's not about bashing Democrats, it's not about taxes. They have no idea what the Boston Tea Party was about.
KEITH OLBERMANN: That's right.
GAROFALO: They don't know their history at all. This is about hating a black man in the White House. This is racism straight up. That is nothing but a bunch of teabagging red necks.
GAROFALO CLIP #2: -but these people, all white, for the most part, unless there's some people with Stockholm Syndrome.
HANNITY: If you’re an African-American, and by the way, can you believe this?
CUPP: Unbelievable.
KIMBERLY GUILFOYLE: It's disgusting, foul, and offensive. And hello, Janeane, we need to hear your apology. I think she needs to issue a public apology.
S.E. CUPP, CONSERVATIVE COLUMNIST: Well, I wouldn't hold your breath. She's, I mean, this is nothing new for her, and you know, I can only speak from experience, I went to the New York City tea party where I spoke ... we had three black people speak on behalf of this movement. You know, I don't think anyone really takes Janeane Garofalo that seriously.
GUILFOYLE: Why does she get away with it, though, Sean? You know, this is what's so offensive. And he's sitting there acknowledging and agreeing with it. This is, that’s NBC News?
HANNITY: I don't think Tom Brokaw – I think he tried for most of his career – I think he probably slants a little more left than me, okay, but I'm out there, and we have responsible passionate debate every single night, but I wonder, Tom Brokaw, are you proud of the brand that you built all these years? Are you proud that that is on NBC News? And I’m thinking-
GUILFOYLE: I don't think he is, to be perfectly honest, because that is so outrageous what she had to say and calling these people – hard-working Americans who pay their taxes, racist and-
HANNITY: African-Americans that are conservative or have a different point of view, or if they're protesting, to insult them-
GUILFOYLE: She said people are upset because there's a black man in the White House.
HANNITY: Stockholm Syndrome?
GUILFOYLE: Awful. Horrendous.
CUPP: Not to mention, MSNBC's Rachael Maddow in another really dignified moment in cable news, called us all tea baggers. I mean, really gross. I wouldn't even want my mother to hear that.
—Brad Wilmouth is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
I heard this
April 20, 2009 - 17:03 ET by bigtimerI heard this Friday...
Hannity may as well be reaching for the moon...heck Brokaw and NBC agree.
I wonder at times how blind Hannity is...I like Hannity in many many ways, but sometimes he and BOR are really clueless.
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
bt, ding X 1000! Brokaw
April 20, 2009 - 17:18 ET by Chris Normanbt,
ding X 1000! Brokaw would just say that he doesn't hold Olbermann responsible for Garafalo's words (all the while admiring her inside for spewing that bile and wishing he could summon up the nerve to say it too). Hannity must've been in his "eagle scout" mode.
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
Yep Chris...that is exactly
April 20, 2009 - 17:23 ET by bigtimerYep Chris...that is exactly how he and others would handle it.
I've watched Brokaw the majority of my life...what is sickening is he is now living here in Montana and he has done some filthy things politically to candidates running here using the airwaves...he has ties to a lot of other leftists that have moved here also that I have posted about over time here...they do not come anymore left than Brokaw...he can fool some of them some of the time...but he ain't fooling me.
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
bt,Yeah, there's nothing
April 20, 2009 - 17:35 ET by Chris Normanbt,
Yeah, there's nothing like a liberal urban elite "cowboy" comin' out west to teach us hicks about what's right, huh? It reminds me of Robert Redford playing cowboy. Here in New Mexico, we've got Val Kilmer fixing to run for governor. Quick - guess what party? Although, ol' Val's gonna have some trouble running as a heart throb - he has just about doubled in size - and I don't mean his popularity either - he must be eating a lot of green chile stew....
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
OMG...Is he really? He ain't
April 20, 2009 - 17:40 ET by bigtimerOMG...Is he really?
He ain't my huckleberry anymore!
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
Kids Say the Darndest Things ...
April 20, 2009 - 17:36 ET by allanfMSNBC and Olbermann just give voice to the things NBCer's wish they could get away with saying.
allanf...yep, you put it
April 20, 2009 - 18:10 ET by bigtimerallanf...yep, you put it in a nutshell.
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
Saw this on friday's
April 20, 2009 - 17:16 ET by BlazerSaw this on friday's program. Hannity threw down the challenge and I guess we know Brokaw's answer since he hasn't given it.
Not saying Brokaw's proud about the choice of word's being used mind you, but I'll bet he's very proud at how far left NBC has slid to the left,..... hell, he helped get em' there.
"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "
- Ben Kenobi on Liberals, and the MSM.
" The Cake is a lie."
I heard this on Friday.
April 20, 2009 - 17:55 ET by balboaI heard this on Friday. Hannity is trying very hard to bait Brokaw. He said this on his radio show, too. Maybe if he says it some more, and then some more, and then some more, Brokaw will...continue not to acknowledge it.
well balboa
April 20, 2009 - 18:06 ET by candanceI actually agree with you on this. Some lefties try to blame the news reporters on Fox for an opinion Glenn Beck or Ann Coulter gave just because they appear on the same airwaves. And we get annoyed at lefties for doing that.
Usually I don't listen to Sean, but just by chance I caught that part of his radio show in my car. He kept invoking Tim Russert's name like some whipping post, which I thought was a little crass. I doubt Russert would have criticized NBC for something that appeared on KO's show, and I very much doubt he would appreciate being used to attack Tom Brokaw.
Yet another reason for me to stop listening to Sean.
To me, it's just blustering
April 20, 2009 - 18:16 ET by balboaTo me, it's just blustering grandstanding by Hannity.
But what IF someone were to
April 21, 2009 - 08:36 ET by BDBut what IF someone were to approach Brokaw or whomever on the street and asked them the question?
"Do you think Garafalo is correct that conservatives have a brain disorder?"
If I were approached on the street I could answer, why not Brokaw?
If someone were to approach
April 21, 2009 - 10:58 ET by balboaIf someone were to approach Brokaw and ask that, I'm sure he could answer. But should he?
→ Brokaw baiting
April 20, 2009 - 18:16 ET by Cool ArrowI think there's the connection of Gregory and Brokaw lending legitimacy to Matthews and Olbermann by appearing on their shows.
The coziness ended when O'Reilly called Gregory and Brokaw out on their clownish escapades.
To the best of my knowledge, Bro9kaw is still an MSNBC buffoon.
LYDSEXICS UNTIE!
I disagree cool
April 20, 2009 - 18:25 ET by candanceIf Megyn Kelly appears on BOR to discuss a legal matter, is she no longer credible as a news reporter? If BOR then invites Ann Coulter and she says something snarky, should we accept the premise that Megyn Kelly is proud of Ann Coulter?
→ I disagree Candance
April 20, 2009 - 18:29 ET by Cool ArrowIf Megyn Kelly appears on O'Reilly, I thoroughly expect she will disagree with him openly and vehemently if she thinks he's wrong. I've seen it, and I'll bet, so have you.
When Brokaw and Gregory appeared with Olby & Chrissy, I saw no objection whatsoever from them to the two buffoons.
LYDSEXICS UNTIE!
Well what were they talking
April 20, 2009 - 18:31 ET by balboaWell what were they talking about? Should Brokaw have objected to something when he was on?
Where is the balance?
April 21, 2009 - 08:51 ET by general companyThe problem with this knucklehead is she(Garofalo)said this nonsense without anyone confronting her. If anyone would had said this on Fox regardless of who was the butt of it, it would had been challenged.
If a network leaves these remarks floating in the air, that means to me anyway, they agree with them. And I do think mslsd does agree with them
My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
Not On Faux News
April 21, 2009 - 08:59 ET by williams411Yeah, I don't seem to recall the last time faux news at a liberal guest on any of their shows. Seems to me that they don't like dissent. Is faux news afraid of being challenged by a liberal?
"Dictionaries have a liberal bias" - Bernie Goldberg
Trix are for kids, fox is for fools
"Faux News" - what a genius - not!
April 21, 2009 - 09:05 ET by DontFeedTheTrollsWow, "Faux News". Did your little brain come up with that by itself or did you have a group session with someone else with half a brain. Yes, Fox News is loaded with liberal commentators. Watch it some time and you will see. Oh, wait, you don't think for yourself.
D
Keep the ILLEGALS out, join NumbersUSA to send free faxes to your reps.
So you have missed regulars
April 21, 2009 - 09:05 ET by BDSo you have missed regulars Juan Williams, Mark Lamont Hill of Temple University, and Medea Benjamin of Code Pink, etc?
Like all other liberals who never watch Fox News yet call it "Faux News", it is just your loss.
And another 50m target down.
Ms Pink...
April 21, 2009 - 16:40 ET by Rob De WittAh, the proper spelling of that should be "Media Benjamin."
ME-dia. MEEEE-dia. Look at ME (dia).
ahem
April 21, 2009 - 09:38 ET by candanceOne
Two
Three
Four
Five
Either you always flap your gums having no idea about the topic at hand, or you are intentially being dishonest. This is such an obvious point that it has to be one or the other.
Well done, but sadly he will
April 21, 2009 - 09:41 ET by BDWell done, but sadly he will not care about truth.
Fox will have more liberals
April 21, 2009 - 12:48 ET by general companyon today then Oberdude has had in the-----how long has that show been on. Willy, your clueless
My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
different issue
April 20, 2009 - 18:37 ET by candanceIf Brokaw personally agrees with KO that's one thing. But that's not the point Hannity made here. Hannity specifically said that Garafalo was embarrassing the entire NBC brand.
Do you think Glenn Beck influences all of Fox News?
Good point. Should someone
April 20, 2009 - 18:39 ET by balboaGood point. Should someone ask Hannity if he's going to stand by and let Beck blubber all over the place?
→ Yes, bal
April 20, 2009 - 18:53 ET by Cool ArrowIf Hannity disagrees with Beck, he should voice his concern. O'Reilly doesn't agree with Beck on the depth of government's intentions against Americans. He says so. Isn't that to be expected?
To me, it seems like there should be disagreement. I'm not Jewish. Should I keep quiet about Skinheads because I'm not on their list of targets?
How is it that disagreement is such a foreign concept?
LYDSEXICS UNTIE!
Disagreement doesn't demand
April 20, 2009 - 18:59 ET by balboaDisagreement doesn't demand comment.
→ You're right
April 20, 2009 - 19:04 ET by Cool ArrowWhat's the saying?
All that's necessary for evil to prevail is that good men do nothing?
Something like that. You're right. Comment is voluntary. But silence can be a telling statement also. Silence is acquiescence.
You win that one.
LYDSEXICS UNTIE!
disagreement
April 20, 2009 - 19:07 ET by candanceIn a way I agree and in a way I don't. Of course we should all voice disagreement with neoNazis and the like.
But I don't think we should all be shoving microphones in Brit Hume's face demanding him to separate himself from every conservative pundit that appears on Fox, else he has no neutral credibility. That's tedious.
→ I'm missing it
April 20, 2009 - 19:20 ET by Cool ArrowOlbermann doesn't have a problem slapping at Hume when he gets a chance.
I think Hume has even been a "worser" person in the world recently.
Heck yeah, Hannity can call out Brokaw on this.
And O'Reilly can call out GE over Olbermann. I've got no problem with it.
If NBC ethics are representative of Brokaw's ethics, I'm OK with it. If those ethics are not one and the same, Brokaw should say something.
LYDSEXICS UNTIE!
This is a little silly,
April 20, 2009 - 19:12 ET by balboaThis is a little silly, though. You're asking everyone anywhere to voice their opposition to anything and everything?
Yes, bal
April 20, 2009 - 19:26 ET by Cool ArrowYou're right, of course.
Calling a bunch of Americans racist because they disagree with a push for complete government control is something we all should keep quiet about.
I don't think Brokaw owes anybody anything as long as he doesn't mind having Hannity's invitation hanging out there.
Something tells me Brokaw has not been given liberty to speak.
LYDSEXICS UNTIE!
Why would Brokaw care, in
April 20, 2009 - 19:50 ET by balboaWhy would Brokaw care, in any way, that Hannity is trying to bait him?
→ He shouldn't
April 20, 2009 - 19:58 ET by Cool ArrowBut we saw eight years of Cheny/Halliburton nonsense. Cheney didn't owe an explanation, and I don't think he gave one.
Though smaller in scope, Brokaw has every right to allow us to believe what we will of him.
You're right. He shouldn't care. I don't demand that he care.
LYDSEXICS UNTIE!
???
April 20, 2009 - 19:03 ET by candanceNow reporters have to go around apologizing for what pundits say on their network? That makes no sense.
→ No
April 20, 2009 - 19:11 ET by Cool ArrowBut the same News organization that promotes Brokaw gives an unobstructed mike to Garafalo.
He has no problem with it? I understand.
He probably wouldn't have a problem with a standup comedy on the Michael Byrd murder on his Network.
How do I know this? He has demonstrated the behavior with his silence on Garafolo.
I've got no problem rationalizing Brokaw's silence because he's stood by for years watching his Network sell him out.
LYDSEXICS UNTIE!
→ No specifics
April 20, 2009 - 18:46 ET by Cool ArrowI don't have the specifics.
I can lump Brokaw in with Olbermann and Matthews by what he does not report more often than what he does.
Did you catch Brokaw and Gregory's extensive coverage of the Tea Parties?
Wasn't that amazing? Oh? Nonexistent? Not important?
Face it. Brokaw and Gregory, if they had scruples, would display a lot more honesty in presenting what they see as important.
And if you don't see Megyn Kelly disagreeing with O'reilly at least once a week, we're watching different shows.
LYDSEXICS UNTIE!
→ I think he does
April 20, 2009 - 18:56 ET by Cool ArrowOlbermann and Chris influence NBC news. I'd be silly to suggest Beck doesn't influence FOX News.
It's a very detached viewer that hasn't seen a significant shift to the right from FOX since the election.
I'm OK with the shift. And given the organized effort of the MSM to present a totally left-wing view, I don't have a problem with it.
LYDSEXICS UNTIE!
Liberal Media Should Come Out
April 20, 2009 - 19:35 ET by ghblogThe MSM have not really been too obvious about being elitist and in the tank for Democrats. The recent handling of the tea parties is just another example.
You may read more of my thoughts at:
http://www.framingthedialogue.com/archives/cooper-should-make-a-360-and-come-out-of-the-closet/
→ It was a compliment
April 20, 2009 - 19:36 ET by Cool ArrowOf sorts, it was a compliment to Brokaw.
Hannity was appealing to what was once Brokaw's calling in life.
It's the "Devil and Daniel Webster" redux. Appeal to a time when the guy's head was on straight.
LYDSEXICS UNTIE!
Ayers and Wright
April 20, 2009 - 19:45 ET by williams411Oh my god!!! praise jesus, it's a miracle!!! Hannity didn't mention william ayers or reverend during that whole discussion...Is sean feeling ok?
Trix are for kids, fox is for fools
Oops
April 20, 2009 - 19:47 ET by williams411"...didn't mention william ayers or reverend wright..."
Amazing
April 20, 2009 - 19:49 ET by ArtisteI just don't think I can tolerate 4 years of listening to wacky liberals scream racism every time someone disagrees with this lackluster president. It's appalling.
I Can't Tolerate
April 20, 2009 - 19:56 ET by williams411I just don't think I can tolerate 8 yrs of faux news telling its viewers that obama is a "socialist marxist communist fascist muslim nazi america hater that wants to take over the world".
Trix are for kids, fox is for fools
I just don't think I can
April 20, 2009 - 20:02 ET by BlazerI just don't think I can tolerate 8 yrs of faux news telling its
viewers that obama is a "socialist marxist communist fascist
muslim nazi america hater that wants to take over the world".
Hey, you know that neat little thing with all the button's they give when you buy a t.v. ? Yea, that's called a remote control.
"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "
- Ben Kenobi on Liberals, and the MSM.
" The Cake is a lie."
Take Your Own Advice
April 20, 2009 - 20:16 ET by williams411If you think msnbc and keith olbermann are so evil then just ignore em'. Just stick with faux news and pretend you're watching an actual news channel.
Trix are for kids, fox is for fools
What a stupid comment
April 20, 2009 - 20:35 ET by general companyThat remark suggst your a fool for being HERE. I think you dropped your other brain cell.
My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
Just like a liberal. He
April 20, 2009 - 20:26 ET by CT PatriotJust like a liberal. He answers you with saying something about how you should behave when you tell him how he should behave.
Example: You: Be quiet.
Him: No, YOU be quiet.
And these liberals think they have the market cornered on intelligence and intellect? Whatever. You limp-wristed eggheads may have the brains, but we patriots got the brawn. We are just auto-mechanics, hunters, fishermen, farmers, and firemen. Like you guys have a chance of scaring us with your mind powers. Ooooh.
Good evening William
April 20, 2009 - 20:05 ET by cocodrieYou must be a big fan of Communist News Network.
Jesus Loves You so much He died for you
hello william
April 20, 2009 - 20:15 ET by candanceCome back to do some more complaining about Fox News I see. And it's off topic, as usual.
We need to come up with a game of bingo to play with trolls like william. In every thread they inevitably mention O'Reilly, Limbaugh, Beck, Coulter, and Hannity at some point. The first to get them to say all five names is the winner.
Off Topic?
April 20, 2009 - 20:26 ET by williams411Look candance, I understand that you're not so...oh, how can I put this in a polite way?...intelligent savvy. But, the article that newbusters posted was about sean hannity...so, mentioning sean hannity or faux news is actually staying on topic. But, its ok...I don't really blame you. I mean, when you watch faux news for so long...it sometimes tends to decrease your brain size.
Trix are for kids, fox is for fools
on topic?
April 20, 2009 - 20:36 ET by candanceThis thread is about Hannity asking NBC to apologize for what Garofalo said. It has nothing to do with anyone calling Obama a socialist.
Follow the flow chart dear:
Fox News --> Sean Hannity --> Janeane Garofalo
Obama doesn't appear anywhere there.
I realize HuffPo hasn't given you talking points about Garofalo yet, but until they show up maybe you should refrain from making such random comments.
I understand that
April 21, 2009 - 15:44 ET by red_dragon311I understand that you're not so...oh, how can I put this in a polite way?...intelligent savvy.
you just lost all credibility, (andi have never jumped on any one for spelling mistakes....but "intelligent savvy " please stop trying to sound undumb.
the rest of your posts will mean nothing now.
so what you wanted to say was "Look candance, I understand that you're not so, intelligent savvy"
Just what in the hell does it mean to be "intelligent savvy"
the word "savvy" comes from the Spanish "Saber" to know so to not be intelligent savvy would be to not know intelligent?
"The simple fact that" making up phrases "and things of that nature" does not "per se" make one more "intelligent savvy"
what a douce-bag
FINALY A REAL CANDIATE FOR PRESIDENT!!!!!!!!!
http://zod2008.com/index.htm
I understand that
April 21, 2009 - 15:46 ET by red_dragon311I understand that you're not so...oh, how can I put this in a polite way?...intelligent savvy.
you just lost all credibility, (andi have never jumped on any one for spelling mistakes....but "intelligent savvy " please stop trying to sound undumb.
the rest of your posts will mean nothing now.
so what you wanted to say was "Look candance, I understand that you're not so, intelligent savvy"
Just what in the hell does it mean to be "intelligent savvy"
the word "savvy" comes from the Spanish "Saber" to know so to not be intelligent savvy would be to not know intelligent?
"The simple fact that" making up phrases "and things of that nature" does not "per se" make one more "intelligent savvy"
what a douce-bag
FINALY A REAL CANDIATE FOR PRESIDENT!!!!!!!!!
http://zod2008.com/index.htm
I understand that
April 21, 2009 - 15:46 ET by red_dragon311I understand that you're not so...oh, how can I put this in a polite way?...intelligent savvy.
you just lost all credibility, (andi have never jumped on any one for spelling mistakes....but "intelligent savvy " please stop trying to sound undumb.
the rest of your posts will mean nothing now.
so what you wanted to say was "Look candance, I understand that you're not so, intelligent savvy"
Just what in the hell does it mean to be "intelligent savvy"
the word "savvy" comes from the Spanish "Saber" to know so to not be intelligent savvy would be to not know intelligent?
"The simple fact that" making up phrases "and things of that nature" does not "per se" make one more "intelligent savvy"
what a douce-bag
FINALY A REAL CANDIATE FOR PRESIDENT!!!!!!!!!
http://zod2008.com/index.htm
Sean must have blinders on.
April 20, 2009 - 19:59 ET by pbthinkerTom Brokaw probably doesn't have a problem with MSNBC or CNN coverage, he's a liberal. He has his chance to make a name for himself, and show Fox News what fair and balanced really was, when he was on Meet the Press. We all saw how that turned out.
Election 2008-God's way of showing us that elections count.
To me, all of the
April 20, 2009 - 20:25 ET by SmartypantsTo me, all of the discussion above of whether or not Tom Brokaw should speak out against Olbermann's and Garofalo is missing the point. I agree Brokaw, or any news anchor, is not obligated to respond to "pundits" that appear on their networks. The problem is that Garofalo is not a "pundit". She is an extremist, an off the charts extremist. Her views are racist, full of hate and empty vitriol. There is no substance to her message whatsoever; she is unhinged, uneducated and uninformed. She has no business being given a forum on national television to air her personal vendettas and to launch baseless charges. In this sense, I think Hannity is being reasonable in calling on the face of the NBC to disavow the comments of Garofalo and to caution Olbermann on his antics.
The most successful war America has ever waged is quickly becoming President Obama's war on capitalism.
disagree smartypants
April 20, 2009 - 20:29 ET by candanceThere is no substance to her message whatsoever; she is unhinged, uneducated and uninformed. She has no business being given a forum on national television to air her personal vendettas and to launch baseless charges.
Lefties say the exact same thing as Ann Coulter. No matter how much I might dislike what Garofalo says, I do not believe in telling anyone they have no business speaking on TV.
I did not say that she has
April 20, 2009 - 20:39 ET by SmartypantsI did not say that she has no business speaking on tv. I said the network has no business giving her a forum for her hatred. We have freedom of speech in this country; however, there is no given right to be heard. Too many of us fail to comprehend the difference. Nobody is trying to silence Garofalo. She is free to stand on the corner and yell whatever she wants to the passing crowd.
And yes the left would say the same about Ann Coulter. The problem is they are wrong. Ms. Coulter backs up what she says with facts and reason. She is a satirist, much like Michael Moore is (and I do not deny his right to free speech); she does not spew blind accusations, even if she does say some outrageous things at times. Garofalo is not in the same category, not at all. Calling a bunch of people she has never met "racists" and "rednecks" on national tv is wrong. And candance, let's not forget that Ann Coulter has been royally castigated by most of the media, for making far less offensive comments than did Garofalo.
The most successful war America has ever waged is quickly becoming President Obama's war on capitalism.
We have freedom of speech
April 20, 2009 - 20:44 ET by CT PatriotWe have freedom of speech in this country; however, there is no given right to be heard.
Now this is definitely food for thought.
Unite. Prepare. Study. Worship. Survive.
wait....
April 20, 2009 - 21:11 ET by candanceHow is she supposed to speak on TV unless that network gives her a mic? That's splitting hairs.
You see Ann Coulter's logic and backup. Lefties don't. Thus they go around saying she shouldn't be on TV and since they are in charge they can make that happen.
Free speech for all or free speech for none. It's that simple.
candance
April 20, 2009 - 21:38 ET by motherbeltWalter Williams explained it very well.
A right confers no obligation on another. For example, the right to
free speech is something we all possess. My right to free speech
imposes no obligation upon another except that of non-interference.....[ ]...
He then talks of bogus rights, such as the "right" to housing or medical care, which obliges others to provide that which one can't provide for oneself:
Let's apply this bogus concept of rights to free speech and the right
to travel freely. If we were to apply it to my right to free speech, my
free speech rights would confer financial obligations on others to
supply me with an auditorium, microphone and audience. My right to
travel freely would require that others provide me with airplane
tickets and hotel accommodations.
Quoting it this way is a little clunky. Read the whole thing.
So while Garofalo has the right to speak her mind, she doesn't have the "right" to do it on television. No show is obliged to have her on to accommodate her decision to speak her mind.
They might say "Wow, that sucks!" But at least they'll say "Wow!" -Duff Goldman, the Ace of Cakes
I see it differently MB
April 20, 2009 - 21:44 ET by candanceOf course I agree that housing and medical care are not guaranteed rights. And no one is truly guaranteed the right to be on TV.
But MSNBC apparently sees value in having her on air. They are willing to give her an outlet. Thus it really isn't up to us to say she shouldn't be on there.
Garofalo
April 20, 2009 - 21:07 ET by God Bless the USAGarofalo is nothing more than an actress with a soap box. And like most of Hollywood, she is liberal and MSNBC loves liberals. We all have opinions ... the difference is SHE has a soap box.
brokaw will ignore the bait
April 20, 2009 - 21:56 ET by katainkentWhy do all the networks seem to think its all about them. Its us, the listeners/viewers that should determine this crap is unacceptable and cease watching so they stop giving it airtime. Until MSNBC becomes a public network we can still string them up by their sponsors. Now Gar-awful-o has had more press in the last three days for something utterly ignorant and moronic than she probably has in her entire career in being a shoddy comedian and truely terrible actress. In reality she should be a non-entity.
I love to help the helpless but I'm not gonna help the clueless ~Dennis Miller
Class Action Suit
April 21, 2009 - 14:13 ET by djm159Is anyone up to join a class action suit against Ms. Garofolo and NBC for defamation of character, or should we just sit back and allow the ignorant, low-life left to continue to rale against conservative values. Ms. Garofolo and Mr. Olbermann would do well to remember that conservative values are a lot better than no values or redeeming points, which unfortunately describes the two pathetic attention grabbers. For my money I don't hate the "black man in the white house." I hate the fact that the "black man in the white house" doesn't have enough experience or class to be the "black busboy" at the white house much less the president which he won by affirmative action and entitlement, not to mention white guilt. He is a narcissistic appeaser who is destroying our country. We will never have another free election with the dictator now in the White House. Jugo Chavez could learn alot from Obama about being a dictator. They are both ignorant but Obama wins the stupidiy prize as the second Anti-American President, Clinton being the first. At least Chavez defends his country - can't say that about Obama or Clinton (slick willy or the Hildebeast).
Class Action Suit
April 21, 2009 - 14:13 ET by djm159Is anyone up to join a class action suit against Ms. Garofolo and NBC for defamation of character, or should we just sit back and allow the ignorant, low-life left to continue to rale against conservative values. Ms. Garofolo and Mr. Olbermann would do well to remember that conservative values are a lot better than no values or redeeming points, which unfortunately describes the two pathetic attention grabbers. For my money I don't hate the "black man in the white house." I hate the fact that the "black man in the white house" doesn't have enough experience or class to be the "black busboy" at the white house much less the president which he won by affirmative action and entitlement, not to mention white guilt. He is a narcissistic appeaser who is destroying our country. We will never have another free election with the dictator now in the White House. Jugo Chavez could learn alot from Obama about being a dictator. They are both ignorant but Obama wins the stupidiy prize as the second Anti-American President, Clinton being the first. At least Chavez defends his country - can't say that about Obama or Clinton (slick willy or the Hildebeast).
Class Action Suit
April 21, 2009 - 14:17 ET by djm159Is anyone up to join a class action suit against Ms. Garofolo and NBC for defamation of character, or should we just sit back and allow the ignorant, low-life left to continue to rale against conservative values. Ms. Garofolo and Mr. Olbermann would do well to remember that conservative values are a lot better than no values or redeeming points, which unfortunately describes the two pathetic attention grabbers. For my money I don't hate the "black man in the white house." I hate the fact that the "black man in the white house" doesn't have enough experience or class to be the "black busboy" at the white house much less the president which he won by affirmative action and entitlement, not to mention white guilt. He is a narcissistic appeaser who is destroying our country. We will never have another free election with the dictator now in the White House. Jugo Chavez could learn alot from Obama about being a dictator. They are both ignorant but Obama wins the stupidiy prize as the second Anti-American President, Clinton being the first. At least Chavez defends his country - can't say that about Obama or Clinton (slick willy or the Hildebeast).