During the 7:00 p.m. hour of Saturday’s CNN Newsroom, anchor Don Lemon pushed the view that Barack Obama should try to emulate European gun laws as a way of reducing gun violence in America as he discussed the subject with four guests. During an interview with former FBI agent Gregg McCrary, who expressed support for an assault weapons ban, Lemon suggested Obama learn from the Europeans: "The one person who can probably weigh on this and may have the most influence is the President. Since he's over there in Europe now, and they're, you know, they're not perfect, but it seems that their gun laws seem to be at least working in a way that ours are not."
While Lemon tried to sound nonpartisan at times – once declaring, "We're just trying to find a solution here. No one is on one side or the other. We just want a solution" – and seemed to try to quell accusations of partisanship and liberal and conservative labels, at one point he seemed to single out conservatives to chide for criticizing liberals for advocating more gun control:
Every time we do something on gun control, it always boils down – when it comes to the e-mail, at least – that I get, we get as a response, it's a conservative issue or it's a liberal issue. "Liberals want to ban guns and take away my rights," conservatives say, "this is my right." But no one has the right to terrorize and kill people. And you heard the FBI agent say, people are being killed. Not conservatives or liberals.
The CNN anchor had already used a similarly odd wording about people not having "the right to terrorize and kill people" earlier as he seemed to be about to express a relatively centrist view that law-abiding Americans should be allowed to own guns but that there should be laws to make guns more difficult for dangerous people to obtain, before shifting into what sounded more like a liberal talking point as he seemed to take a jab at people who use the phrase "right to bear arms":
Not saying that – you know, everyone talks about the Second Amendment, their right to bear arms, the right to bear arms, but that's not the right to go around and kill people and terrorize people just because you have the right to bear arms.
During the 10:00 p.m. hour of Sunday’s CNN Newsroom, when guest Ben Ferguson of the Ben Ferguson Show pointed out that Britain’s violent crime rate increased substantially after the country implemented strict gun laws in 1997, Lemon did not get the point that the change in gun laws did not reduce crime and may have contributed to its increase, as he suggested that British gun laws still might improve the situation in America. Lemon: "It's drastically up, but, Warren and Ben, but, Warren, it's still much lower than ours even though it's up now."
In the June 26, 2006, National Review Online article, "No Safety Lock," John Lott – author of More Guns, Less Crime – cited the crime statistics from Australia, Britain, Ireland and Jamaica which showed substantial increases in violent crime after more strict gun laws were implemented. In the case of Britain, Lott informed readers: "The British government banned handguns in January 1997 but recently reported that gun crime in England and Wales nearly doubled in the seven years from 1996 to 2003. Since 1996, the rate of serious violent crime has soared by 88 percent; armed robberies by 101 percent; rapes by 105 percent; and homicide by 24 percent."
Stephen Halbrook, author of Target Switzerland: Swiss Armed Neutrality in World War II, in the article, "Guns, Crime and the Swiss," published in the Wall Street Journal on June 3, 1999, observed that, according to 1996 statistics, crime rates in gun-rich Switzerland are substantially lower than in the more restrictive Britain, and, even in the case of America which has a higher murder rate, the rate of burglary and assault were lower than in Britain.
Halbrook: "Moreover, using data through 1996, the U.S. Department of Justice study Crime and Justice concluded that in England the robbery rate was 1.4 times higher, the assault rate was 2.3 higher, and the burglary rate was 1.7 times higher than in the United States. Only the murder and rape rates in the United States were higher than in England."
After relaying crime statistics for Britain, America and Switzerland, Halbrook observed: "Switzerland, which is awash in guns, has substantially lower murder and robbery rates than England, where most guns are banned."
Returning to Saturday, as he introduced the segment with McCrary, Lemon pointed out that the gunman who struck in Pittsburgh "had recently expressed fear his guns would be taken away," and, minutes later, repeated that "Friends say the suspect in today's Pittsburgh shootings had earlier expressed fears about a new federal gun ban."
After interviewing McCrary, the CNN host held a discussion with three guests – two who expressed support for passing an assault weapon ban, pitted against Florida Republican Party chair Jim Greer, who presumably was there to argue a more pro-gun rights position – but even Greer, while he vaguely argued that America should not emulate Europe, was not aggressive in arguing that too many gun laws could hamper the ability of the general population to defend themselves, and at one point seemed to vaguely advocate "very extensive gun laws": "I think we need to make sure that we have very thorough background checks, that we have very extensive gun laws."
During the segment, Lemon again brought up the issue of Europe’s gun laws: "Why not look to Europe? ... Because when you look at gun violence in Europe, below the U.S., less guns than the U.S." After noting that America has experienced a higher frequency of mass shootings, he added: "They've got to be doing something right."
Lemon read information on Europe’s more restricteive gun laws, which apparently came from the Time Europe Web site, but he ignored an article, which is easily accessible from the same Web page, informing readers that Swtizerland has a high gun ownership rate and low crime at the same time.
In the May 13, 2002, article, "Safety in Numbers: Switzerland Proves that Guns and Peace Can Mix," Helena Bachmann wrote: "There's a paradox in this peaceful and safety-conscious country, which boasts one of Europe's lowest crime rates: firearms are as ubiquitous here as chocolate and edelweiss. Weapons and ammunition are routinely issued to, and kept at home by, Swiss men aged between 20 and 42 for their military service. The idea of having guns at home is tied to the long-held belief that enemies could invade tiny Switzerland fairly quickly, so every reservist had to be able to fight his way to his regiment's assembly point."
She later relayed: "Although some statistics show Switzerland's rate of gun-related deaths is higher than that of neighbors Germany, France and Austria, the number of murders is still low compared to the staggering number of firearms in the country. Last year 47 homicides were recorded — up from only 40 in 2000 — and police say in all cases privately owned firearms were involved. "
Below are transcripts of relevant portions of CNN Newsroom from Saturday, April 4, and Sunday, April 5:
#From the 7:00 p.m. hour of CNN Newsroom from April 4:
DON LEMON: Two days and two heavily armed gunmen, 16 people killed, including three police officers. We're going to recap that story and bring you some new information. Plus, is it time to reinstate the federal ban on assault weapons after these and other recent shooting rampages? We've been getting a lot of responses from our viewers, saying, maybe we should. We're going to speak to a legendary former FBI agent who always weighs in on this and is very outspoken about it. We want to hear his words following these shootings. Back in a moment.
[COMMERCIAL BREAK]
LEMON: All right. If you're just joining us, we want to tell you about three police officers were gunned down and killed today in an apparent ambush at a Pittsburgh home. The alleged gunman, who was wearing body armor and armed with an AK-47, later surrendered. The motive here still unclear, but some of his friends said he had recently expressed fear his guns would be taken away. Police had been responding to a domestic dispute call at the home.
And then we go to Binghamton, New York. Grief has overtaken the community where 13 people were killed yesterday at an immigrant community center. The gunman who killed himself was an immigrant from Vietnam who had complained about not being able to find work and about people making fun of his poor English. He was also wearing body armor. Deadly shooting rampages appear to be on the upsurge. Just last week, a gunman killed eight people at a North Carolina nursing home. On March 21, another gunman killed four Oakland, California, police officers. And earlier in March, an Alabama gunman killed 10 people. Gun control advocates are calling on Congress to reinstate the federal assault weapons ban, which expired five years ago.
Friends say the suspect in today's Pittsburgh shootings had earlier expressed fears about a new federal gun ban. Greg McCrary is retired from the FBI, where he served in various investigative capacities throughout the United States. He is also the author of "The Unknown Darkness," which focuses on the profiles of criminals. He joins us by phone tonight. Thank you very much for joining us. Would stricter gun laws or even bringing back the assault weapons ban, if that was reinstated, would that help us? Would that help out at all in these situations?
GREGG MCCRARY, FORMER FBI INVESTIGATOR: Well, it might. Because the issue, obviously, is to keep these weapons out of the hands of these mentally disordered individuals that are committing these crimes. I think there are a couple of points we need to keep in mind here. One, these things, they're a low probability, high consequence event. They don’t happen very often.
LEMON: They're rare, you say.
MCCRARY: Right.
LEMON: But they come in clusters.
MCCRARY: They come in clusters, and that's what we have to be aware of, because we're in the middle of one of these clusters right now. What happens is individuals who are on the edge and they see somebody else do it, they think it's a good idea and it pushes them over the edge. So these things come in clusters. So everybody needs to be vigilant now about this situation until we get, at least till we get on the other side of this.
LEMON: So you're saying stricter gun laws and a reinstatement of the assault weapons ban, you said they might, they might help.
MCCRARY: The might help.
LEMON: Are you hedging there? Why are you saying "might."
MCCRARY: The only hedging is that, you know, you can ban, you can do this, but, then, a mentally disordered individual can steal a gun, they can get it, you know, in other ways. I certainly think that's, you know, the issue. If we keep the guns out of the hands of these people, then even if they come in and they want to hurt somebody, if they're just armed with a baseball bat, they’re going to do far less damage than they will if they got an AK-47.
LEMON: Okay. You know what, this is a perfect time to bring this up. The President is visiting Europe right now, and is going all over Europe talking about issues that affect the U.S. and the world, the economy among them. He responded to the violence that happened yesterday in Binghamton, New York.
Doing some research here on gun laws, looking at almost every country in Europe, it lays it out, specifically. You know, not legal, not legal, not legal. But then, once you get to the United States, which is at the very bottom, alphabetically, it says that gun laws, gun control is legislated and enforced at both the federal and state levels, resulting in a complex, often contradictory body of regulations. And you don't see that in any of the European states, and, in many ways, their crime rate’s lower than ours, less gun violence. Their police officers don't even carry guns in some places.
MCCRARY: Yeah, that's correct. You can just look in any given state. I live in Virginia, for example, is one state where we have all sorts of exceptions. There are laws, but there are all sorts of exceptions to the laws. Certain rules apply if you go to a, you know, buy over the counter in a gun shop, but if you go to a gun show over the weekend, then those rules don't necessarily apply. So there's all sorts of loopholes, and we have a very patch quilt sort of approach to this that we really need to address.
LEMON: So it's something that is very concise, might be the order here. Not saying that – you know, everyone talks about the Second Amendment, their right to bear arms, the right to bear arms, but that's not the right to go around and kill people and terrorize people just because you have the right to bear arms.
MCCRARY: No, that's absolutely correct. Yeah, you know, that's absolutely right. You know, weapons in the hands of responsible citizens, you know, that's fine. But we've got to keep them out of the hands of these mentally disordered offenders who commit these horrific crimes.
LEMON: So what is our lesson again? As I said, because the one person who can probably weigh on this and may have the most influence is the President. Since he's over there in Europe now, and they're, you know, they’re not perfect, but it seems that their gun laws seem to be at least working in a way that ours are not.
MCCRARY: Well, they can certainly inform us as to what works and what doesn't. In the short-term, we just all need to be vigilant about this. And certainly the press coverage needs to be non-sensational. You need to report this, but what we know pushes these guys over the edge is this sort of sensational coverage. So responsible reporting and taking a look at these laws and being vigilant right now, I think those are good ways to go.
LEMON: Yeah, and you would think that, Mr. McCrary, you know, some people would say, oh, well, that’s, you know, one way is liberal, one way is conservative, it's really, it’s a human issue, it’s a life issue. Not a liberal versus conservative issue.
MCCRARY: Nobody is out killing liberals or conservatives. These guys are just out killing our fellow citizens. And that's the issue. That's the problem.
LEMON: Very well put. Gregg McCrary, we appreciate it.
MCCRARY: You're welcome.
LEMON: It is one of the biggest hot-button issue in politics. We're talking about gun control and the assault weapons ban. Should it be reinstated? Would that be an infringement on our Second Amendment rights? Everyone has an opinion and so do these guys. We'll find out what they think and what they're hearing. No-holds-barred, folks. And, as always, we want you to weigh in as well. We will get your responses, Twitter, Facebook, MySpace or ireport.com. We're back, moments away.
[COMMERCIAL BREAK]
LEMON: All right. We know this is always a very hot-button issue, so, you know, nothing personal, but we're going to take all of your responses. We're just trying to find a solution here. No one is on one side or the other. We just want a solution. So if you have some good responses that are constructive, we will take them. Okay, here's what some of you are saying. Kadergueye says, "Definitely, assault weapons should be banned from public use. Five fatal shootings this month. What's next? People are going nuts."
Jaredmbennett said, "Thousands die a year from handguns. Maybe at most, 50 with assault weapons. Don't punish everyone because of a few nut jobs."
JuWolf43 says, "Yes, they should be banned. We are the laughing stock of the world, allowing these types of massacres. U.S. gun laws don't make sense."
Cairoglyphics says, "Banned? I don't know, maybe we don't ban guns, we ban people instead."
Twitter, Facebook, MySpace, ireport.com. I'll be checking it while we're on right now, because I'm going to get to this next group. Hello, everyone. I'm Don Lemon. Thanks for joining us here in the CNN Newsroom. I want to expand our discussion now on the upsurge in gun violence and what, if anything, can be done about it. These are my guests tonight –columnist and writer David Sirota, syndicated columnist Michelangelo Signorelli, and chairman of the Republican Party of Florida, Jim Greer.
Thank you all for joining us this evening. So let's have a very good discussion about this, and hopefully we can make a difference, change some folks' minds if they’re from one way or the other, or to keep people from being, you know, one way all the way this way and then one way all the way that way, and we can maybe meet in the middle. Okay? Fair enough?
Jim, I'm going to start with you. Because, as I was talking to the former FBI agent there, and every time we do something on gun control, it always boils down when it comes to the e-mail, at least, that I get, we get as a response, it's a conservative issue or it's a liberal issue. "Liberals want to ban guns and take away my rights," conservatives say, "this is my right." But no one has the right to terrorize and kill people. And you heard the FBI agent say, people are being killed. Not conservatives or liberals.
JIM GREER, FLORIDA REPUBLICAN PARTY CHAIRMAN: Well, absolutely. I really don't think it's a conservative/liberal issue. I'm a strong supporter of the Second Amendment, the Republican Party is a strong supporter of the Second Amendment, but we've got to find a solution to the issues where dangerous criminals are getting guns and they're hurting and killing people. I don't look to Europe to tell us how we should solve this crisis. I think we need to make sure that we have very thorough background checks, that we have very extensive gun laws.
LEMON: Okay, hang on. Why not look to Europe? Because – and I'm going to get your response. I'm going to get you guys in here. Because when you look at gun violence in Europe, below the U.S., less guns than the U.S. They have problems, too. They've had several of these mass killings. I think David Sirota said nine in the past, what, 10 years, you said, David?
DAVID SIROTA, AUTHOR OF "THE UPRISING": Eleven in the past-
LEMON: Eleven in the past 10 years. I just reeled off five or six in the past month. They've got to be doing something right.
GREER: Well, I can tell you one thing, when you travel to Europe, I was in Paris recently, and you look on the corner and the police are carrying Uzis and machine guns on every other corner. So when we talk about Europe and how they're enforcing gun laws and so on, they have a different relationship with their citizens. They have armed police officers with assault rifles on every corner, on every street. So there's not a lot of people doing a lot shooting right then because they'd get shot a lot quicker because of their approach to law enforcement.
LEMON: And, Michael, but in some places in Europe, and I've been there, the police officers don't even carry guns and you see very little violence.
MICHELANGELO SIGNORILE, COLUMNIST: That's absolutely true. Look, the problem is the laws and the restrictions are very, very lax. And we now have assault weapons available in this country. We know that's the problem, as well, with Mexico and the drug gangs. We know that people have access to guns who shouldn't have guns. Certainly, the Virginia Tech killer. His mental stability wasn't checked.
And we have right now a real paranoia on the right that is whipping people up. We have Representative Michele Bachmann. I'd like Mr. Greer to address this, a member of his party, saying our opposition needs to be armed and dangerous. We have 1.2 million background checks more in the last four-month period, because the right has been whipped up into thinking Barack Obama's going to take away their Second Amendment rights, and that's not true. We're talking about restrictions, not taking away all the guns.
LEMON: I want to let David Sirota get in on this because, David, you were saying, that's not necessarily true. I think you may agree with Mr. Greer here to some point, at least. Because you're saying Europe has the same problem as us.
DAVID SIROTA, COLUMNIST: It's a mix here. This is a mix. I mean, I think our gun laws, the end of the assault weapons ban has been a very bad thing for our country. But I think simply saying that it's a problem only of our laws is not really getting to where this problem is. I mean, I used to live in Montana. It's got a very high prevalence of people owning guns, and it’s got a very, very low amount of gun violence.
So the amount of guns and the access to guns is only one part of this issue. There's the whole other issue of mental health, of people feeling alienated. I mean, we're a country that's under a severe amount of stress right now, and that is going to create a whole lot of problems. And I think one of those problems is this kind of thing that we're seeing. So it's a bunch of different issues. And if we're going to address it, we can't just say, well, it's gun laws or it's not gun laws, or, it's a bunch of different things.
LEMON: Okay, I’m just going to say this-
GREER: I agree with that. I think that's pretty reasonable.
LEMON: I'm looking country by country, and I'm just saying, we have probably the worst problem than anyone else. And I’m just being, it's just the truth. If you look at the statistics: Japan, registration of firearms, yes. Singapore, yes. UK, yes. Netherlands, yes. Spain, yes. Germany, yes. Italy, yes. Israel, yes. Australia, yes. Canada, all guns by 2003, which will be a yes. Obviously, this is older, this is from 2002. France, yes, except sporting rifles. So Canada would be yes, now. France would be yes. Switzerland, yes. Finland, yes. USA, handguns in some states. Licensing of gun owners, in some states. Everybody else, yes. So what are we not getting?
GREER: Well, I don’t think we need to look to those countries. Don, you said registration. I mean, we have registration-
LEMON: Well, it's registration and licensing.
GREER: Well, we need to have strong enforcement of gun laws, thorough background checks, but our Founding Fathers were very clear, the citizens of this country should have the right to bear arms to ensure that they maintain a democratic society.
SIGNORILE: Don, you just made all the sense in the world with the list. It makes complete sense. We have the most lax gun laws in the developed world, and we have the most violence. It's that simple. And the Second Amendment was not about people having assault weapons and being able to go out and shoot up a bunch of people. It has been distorted. We need the laws.
LEMON: Mr. Greer, I'm going to give you the last word on this.
GREER: Sure, we need laws. I believe we should have very stringent laws on guns, and we should make sure that we do background checks on people that possess them and put people in jail that violate those gun laws, but we should not ban guns in this country. We should protect the Second Amendment to ensure that our government is not the only ones with guns.
LEMON: Okay, stand by, Mr. Greer. I'm getting responses from viewers as well. I want to talk to you guys more about the President's in Europe. We're going to talk more issues than just gun control. This came up because of the shootings we've had in the last couple of days. More from our panel now, including the big focus on the President's European trip, the economy, drugs, and gay marriage. We're going to talk all of it. Can we learn anything from Europe?
#From the April 5 CNN Newsroom during the 10:00 p.m. hour:
DON LEMON: Talking about the gun violence happening here in the U.S., the President addressed that overseas. Let's talk about that. Gun control, bringing back the assault weapons ban, Ben?
BEN FERGUSON, THE BEN FERGUSON SHOW: You name a place around the world where gun control has worked. The fact of the matter is, law-abiding citizens actually abide by the laws.
LEMON: You say there's no place around the world where gun control has worked?
FERGUSON: Look at the U.K., look at the U.K. when they passed massive gun control laws. Look at their violence, is drastically up. Look at the rate, it's drastically up.
LEMON: It's drastically up, but, Warren and Ben, but, Warren, it's still much lower than ours even though it's up now.
—Brad Wilmouth is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Europe
April 10, 2009 - 13:42 ET by grumpyoldbStrict gun control laws...... The kind that allow people like Hitler, and Mussolini to take charge of a country....
The 2nd amendment is why that will never happen here (although God knows they keep trying)...
Buy a gun, piss off a liberal..
Politicians love unarmed voters....
Historical Supreme Court decisions
April 10, 2009 - 13:42 ET by Willis_Leon_Johnsonon "gun control" as well as just exactly WHO is the "militia".
http://www.constitut...
Summary: U.S. Supreme Court on the
Right to Arms
by Fielding Lewis Greaves, CRPA Life Member
In statements relating directly (or indirectly, in the cases of Murdock,
Bivens, Carlson, and Hafer) to the Second Amendment right to Bear Arms, the
United States Supreme Court has said:
citizenship, rights which "the courts would be bound to maintain and enforce,"
including the right "to hold public meetings upon political affairs, and to
keep and carry arms wherever they went." (Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 691,
705 (1856))
that like the rights of assembly and petition, the right to arms existed long
before the Constitution, adding: "Neither is it in any manner dependent upon
that instrument for its existence." (United States v. Cruikshank, 92 US 542,
553 (1876))
1976, &1992 - that the first eight amendments express fundamental,
individual, personal rights guaranteed by the Constitution. (Twining v. New
Jersey, 211 US 78 (1908), Powell v. Alabama, 287 US 45 (1932), Grosjean v.
American Press Co., 297 US 233 (1936), Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963),
Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 US 166 (1968), Moore v. East Cleveland, 431 US 494
(1976), and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, No. 91-744 (1992); in a concurring
opinion Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 US 479 (1965); and by implication in Wolf
v. Colorado, 338 US 25 (1949)
bearing arms." (Presser v. Illinois, 116 US 252 (1886))
ancestors, has existed "from time Immemorial," and is one of our "fundamental"
rights (Robertson v. Baldwin, 165 US 275 (1897))
militia (U.S. v. Cruikshank (1876); Presser v. Illinois (1886); U.S. v. Miller,
307 US 174 (1939)). Federal militia law (10 USCS 311 &312) says all
able-bodied men aged 17 to 45, with some exemptions (per Section 312), are
militia members, and 22 states today already include females equally with males
in the militia.
to appear bearing arms supplied by themselves and of the kind in common use at
the time." (U.S. v. Miller (1939)
Constitutional right is prior restraint, and is a flat tax on exercise of that
right, and is therefore unconstitutional (Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 US 105
(1943)). this was a First Amendment case on the freedom of press and religion.
and other Amendments, in the Preamble, and elsewhere in the Constitution, means
all the individuals who make up our national community. (U.S. v.
Verdugo-Urquidez No. 88-1353 (1990))
for self-defense (Beard v. United States, 256 US 335 (1921))
force in his self-defense, adding: "Detached reflection cannot be demanded in
the presence of an uplifted knife." (Brown v. United States, 256 US 335
(1921)).
right guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution may be held personally liable for
damages. (Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of
Narcotics, 403 US 338 (1971) and Carlson v. Green, 446 US 14 (1980))
Reprinted with permission from the July 1995 issue of "The Firing
Line", the monthly newsletter of the
California Rifle and Pistol
Club.
http://gjresult.com
.. and Let's not Forget
April 10, 2009 - 14:15 ET by allanfDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ET AL. v. HELLER 07-290 which states:
The task of the statists is now assert that the second amendment does not apply to the States.
Lemon sounds like candidate
April 10, 2009 - 13:43 ET by Chris NormanLemon sounds like candidate Obama: "This isn't about partisanship. Let liberals and conservatives sit down and work together to find a solution that will please liberals".
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
Don...go suck a
April 10, 2009 - 14:04 ET by bigtimerDon...go suck a lemon.
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
Switzerland
April 10, 2009 - 14:09 ET by sdbI'm glad they mentioned Switzerland's mandatory gun ownership laws.
How low? 10%? 5%. I really wish they would quantify it a little better. They mention numbers (up to 47 from 40), but this means nothing without comparison. Both numbers and percents should be used together. A few years ago the local paper reported that murders went up 50% in my small county over only a year's time. Seems staggering until you realize it went up from 2 to 3.
There's no paradox here. 'An armed society is a polite society.' Knowing that any intended victim is armed is a great deterrent to crime.
How many people die every
April 10, 2009 - 14:11 ET by BruzillaHow many people die every year due to crimes committed by criminals who are kept out of jail by their 4th or 5th Ammendment rights? Should we also do away with these? How about free speech? How many people die every year for saying the wrong thing to the wrong person? Should we ban that right to? All in the name of saving lives?
Like the guy says... no one has a right to go about killing people, which is why they are punished for this action. The punishable, non-protected, action is killing someone, and shouldn't be owning a firearm.
Murders Per Capita
April 10, 2009 - 14:20 ET by JustAlFrom Nationmaster.com:
# 1
Colombia:
0.617847 per 1,000 people
# 2
South Africa:
0.496008 per 1,000 people
# 3
Jamaica:
0.324196 per 1,000 people
# 4
Venezuela:
0.316138 per 1,000 people
# 5
Russia:
0.201534 per 1,000 people
# 6
Mexico:
0.130213 per 1,000 people
# 7
Estonia:
0.107277 per 1,000 people
# 8
Latvia:
0.10393 per 1,000 people
# 9
Lithuania:
0.102863 per 1,000 people
# 10
Belarus:
0.0983495 per 1,000 people
# 11
Ukraine:
0.094006 per 1,000 people
# 12
Papua New Guinea:
0.0838593 per 1,000 people
# 13
Kyrgyzstan:
0.0802565 per 1,000 people
# 14
Thailand:
0.0800798 per 1,000 people
# 15
Moldova:
0.0781145 per 1,000 people
# 16
Zimbabwe:
0.0749938 per 1,000 people
# 17
Seychelles:
0.0739025 per 1,000 people
# 18
Zambia:
0.070769 per 1,000 people
# 19
Costa Rica:
0.061006 per 1,000 people
# 20
Poland:
0.0562789 per 1,000 people
# 21
Georgia:
0.0511011 per 1,000 people
# 22
Uruguay:
0.045082 per 1,000 people
# 23
Bulgaria:
0.0445638 per 1,000 people
# 24
United States:
0.042802 per 1,000
Now, which of these countries has the least obstructive gun laws? So much for European superiority or the fairy tale that disarming citizens decreases crime. The media , with the publicity they give these murders, the aid and comfort they give America's enemies, and their outright lies, have lead to more wrongful deaths than ALL of the legally owned guns in the U.S.
ah...
April 10, 2009 - 14:26 ET by katainkentbut those are not all gun murders. You are foiled, sir! Everyone knows that murder by gun makes you more far more dead than murder by say... a toilet tank lid.
/sarc
Socialism Kills
April 10, 2009 - 14:32 ET by JustAlCurses, foiled again!
But this is interesting:
http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/DBG.TAB1.2.GIF
It seems Socialism is the biggest killer of them all. Absolutely, we should follow Europe's example. After all, one among us is already practicing his bows to royalty.
If you look at the
April 10, 2009 - 17:05 ET by TheHistorianIf you look at the statistics which ABC published about 10 years ago, the majority of gun deaths in the US are in the young black male category. See the stats on this NC presentation at
http://www.schs.stat...
The real problem is lack of enforcement on gun crime and the gangs, not the lack of enforcement of arcane sales and registration laws. After all, do you think that young, black males get their guns legally?
Ask the people who claim we jail black males disproportionately about these statistics and watch them change the subject. We don't need to regulate guns. We need to fix the minority family problem which the liberal do-gooder has foisted on the black community and which black leaders accept because it keeps them at the table in the Democrat party.
"What experience and history teach is
this - that people and governments never have learned anything from history,
or acted on principles deduced from it."
G. W. F. Hegel
Yep, we need...
April 10, 2009 - 14:28 ET by HillbillyKingGun control just like Europe:
March 11, 2009: Germany
September 23, 2008: Matti Saari, 22, killed nine fellow students and a
teacher before shooting himself at a school in Kauhajoki, Finland.
February 14, 2008: Former student Steven Kazmierczak, 27, opens fire in
a lecture hall at Northern Illinois University in DeKalb, fatally shooting
five students and wounding 18 others before committing suicide.
November 7, 2007: Pekka-Eric Auvinen, 18, shoots and kills eight people
and himself at a high school in Tuusula, Finland.
April 16, 2007: Cho Seung-Hui, 23, fatally shoots 32 people in a dorm
and a classroom at Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, then kills himself in the
deadliest mass shooting in modern US history.
November 20, 2006: Sebastian Bosse, 18, goes on a rampage at his former
high school in Emsdetten, Germany, near the Dutch border, shooting and
injuring four students and the school janitor. Police commandos later found
Bosse dead.
April 26, 2002: Robert Steinhaeuser, 19, previously expelled from a
school in Erfurt, Germany, kills 13 teachers, two former classmates and a
policeman, before committing suicide.
April 20, 1999: Students Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold open fire at
Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado, killing 12 classmates and a
teacher and wounding 26 others before committing suicide in the school's
library.
March 13, 1996: Thomas Hamilton, 43, killed 16 nursery children and
their teacher in Dunblane, then shot himself.
Ummmm...how did Europes gun laws stop the shootings? Oh they didn't. You mean f@cked up crazy people will kill people regardless of what the laws are? They will. No sh!t? So how do we stop em? Arm ourselves you say? What are you, one of those crazy f@cked up people?
The sane are the certifiable ones in this world.
If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you.
Don Marquis 1878-1937
Read this too....
April 10, 2009 - 14:44 ET by jcheneyan old book review from back in '94. Since it's old, you'll have to google to get it.
Second Amendment Ammo
By Roger Schultz
The Samurai, The Mountie, and the Cowboy: Should America Adopt the Gun Control Laws of Other Democracies, by David Kopel (Buffalo: Prometheus, 1992).
Contra Mundum, No. 11, Spring 1994
Democrat Controlled Cities -> Most Dangerous
April 10, 2009 - 14:52 ET by Retired GeekTEN WORST LARGE CITIES FOR MURDER, 2002
CITY PER 100,000
----------------
1) Washington, DC - 45.8
2) Detroit, MI - 42.0
3) Baltimore, MD - 38.3
4) Memphis, TN - 24.7
5) Chicago, IL - 22.2
6) Philadelphia, PA - 19.0
7) Columbus, OH - 18.1
8) Milwaukee, WI - 18.0
9) Los Angeles, CA - 17.5
10) Dallas, TX - 15.8
Cities With Most Poverty -> Democrat Controlled
April 10, 2009 - 14:54 ET by Retired Geek1. Detroit, MI (1st on the poverty rate list) hasn't elected a Republican mayor since 1961.
2. Buffalo, NY (2nd) hasn't elected a Republican mayor since 1954.
3. Cincinnati, OH (3rd) hasn't elected a Republican mayor since 1984.
4. Cleveland, OH (4th) hasn't elected a Republican mayor since 1989.
5. Miami, FL (5th) has never had a Republican mayor.
6. St. Louis, MO (6th) hasn't elected a Republican mayor since 1949.
7. El Paso, TX (7th) has never had a Republican mayor.
8. Milwaukee, WI (8th) hasn't elected a Republican mayor since 1908.
9. Philadelphia, PA (9th) hasn't elected a Republican mayor since 1952.
10. Newark, NJ (10th) hasn't elected a Republican mayor since 1907.
Deport Illegal Aliens -> Stop 12 Murders per Day in US
April 10, 2009 - 14:56 ET by Retired GeekSolution to 12 Murders PER DAY
Solution to 12 Murders PER DAY in America.
Deport ALL Illegal Aliens.
Solution to unemployment in America.
Deport ALL Illegal Aliens.
Solution to Banking Crisis.
These banks specialized in giving 'Illegal Aliens' credit cards and home loans.
Bank of America
Wachovia
Wells Fargo
Citigroup
J.P. Morgan Chase
Liberty Financial
Mortgage Guarantee Insurance Corp.
Plaza Bank
Barack Obama has given 'A Huge Share' of the bailout money to subsidize these banks or for another bank to salvage them.
American Taxpayers are paying for the costs accrued for 'Illegal Aliens' to cover their credit card losses and save the 'Illegal Aliens' from losing their homes.
Barack Obama always wanted to Ban Guns 1
April 10, 2009 - 14:57 ET by Retired GeekObama Past History on Guns
While serving as director of the Joyce Foundation board (1994-2001),
Obama gives millions of dollars to gun control organizations like the Council Against Handguns and the Violence Policy Center.
(Between 1994 and 2001, the Joyce Foundation gave $18.6 million to about 80 anti-gun and anti-Second Amendment projects, including $1.5 million to the Violence Policy Center.)
The Joyce Foundation is closely linked to the “Soros Open Society Institute,” which advocates a worldwide ban on civilian firearm ownership.
Obama in 1996
-------------
In September of 1996, as a candidate for the Illinois State Senate, Barack Obama completed a candidate questionnaire.
He stated on that questionnaire that:
"...opposes electronic eavesdropping, opposes capital punishment, opposes mandatory sentencing guidelines, opposes the manufacture, sale, and possession of all handguns, and supports banning assault weapons."
Obama as State Senator in 1999
------------------------------
Obama votes against a bill that specifically allows homeowners the right to use a gun in self-defense during a home invasion.
The Illinois Governor vetoes the bill; Obama votes to uphold the veto.
Obama proposes increasing Illinois firearm and ammunition excise taxes by 500 percent. (A $55 tax on a $500 rifle would increase to $330.) The tax would thus change from a fee to fund wildlife preservation programs into a gun-punishing penalty.
Barack Obama always wanted to Ban Guns 2
April 10, 2009 - 14:59 ET by Retired GeekObama as State Senator in 2002-2003
Obama votes for a bill in the Illinois Senate that would ban most hunting rifles, shotguns, and target rifles.
The bill would also authorize the Illinois State Police to raid homes and forcibly confiscate banned guns.
Obama also votes for a bill that would shut down all Illinois firearm manufacturing businesses (Springfield Armory, Armalite, Rock River Arms, and Les Baer).
Obama votes for a bill (S 2579) prohibiting Illinois citizens from purchasing more than one gun per month.
Obama votes for a bill that bans most single-shot and double-barreled shotguns as “semi-automatic assault weapons” (even though they are not semi-automatic), along with hundreds of models of rifles and handguns. (Had the bill had passed, Illinois residents would have had 90 days to turn their guns in or face felony charges.)
Obama votes to make a criminal out of a homeowner who uses a gun in his own defense in his own home.
It is interesting that Barack Obama usually voted present to hide his Liberal views, he always voted on Gun Control laws.
Barack Obama always wanted to Ban Guns 3
April 10, 2009 - 15:01 ET by Retired GeekObama in 2008 as POTUS candidate
In April of 2008, Obama remarks that residents of small-town America, because of lost jobs, “…get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or (become) anti-immigrant.” His imprudent comment, full of patronizing condescension and contempt, draws severe criticism from gun-owners and church-goers.
Obama's Attorney General
Eric Holder is antagonistic toward the Second Amendment right to bear arms, and had supported the Washington, D.C. ban on all hand-guns, even for self-defense in the home.
(That law was later found unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.)
Holder supports federal licensing of all handguns, three-day waiting periods, one gun per month purchase limits, national gun registration, and strict limits on gun shows that would effectively shut them down.
Obama against Concealed Carry
In 2004, Obama says he is "…consistently on record and will continue to be on record as opposing concealed carry,” and that he would back "federal legislation that would ban citizens from carrying weapons, except for law enforcement.”
He also votes, in March, to allow prosecution of citizens who use guns for self-defense in their own homes (SB 2165).
Ha!
April 10, 2009 - 16:42 ET by someloudthunderThe only thing we'd learn from Europe - if we adopted their gun laws is that people still get killed. Look at Germany. Banning guns doesn't solve the problem because look at England. We'll just kill each other with knives.
The propagandists at CNN
April 10, 2009 - 20:00 ET by jdhawkThe propagandists at CNN failed to point out because they have long forgotten that their jobs are to report the news not editorialize with a far leftist sland every topic under the sun. If they had just reported the news, they might have mentioned that in Europe many young men have automatic weapons including machine guns and grenades, etc. as part of their "kit" because they are in the army of their respective European countries. European countries maintain a very small part of their army on active duty and the rest are our equivalent of the national guard. Because of the possibility of the Soviet Union invading their countries on a moments notice for decades on end, they have kept their automatci weapons and grenade at their homes.
Note, all military firearms are strictly controlled here in the United States and under lock and key at all times unless specifically used for training or a mission.
So, to the contrary, it is here in the United States that real fire power is kept under lock and key while our European counterparts keep theirs in their homes.
From the above, you could say that it is the United States that has the most restrictive gun control laws.
An astute observation
April 10, 2009 - 20:12 ET by Sergeant ROCKThe people of Switzerland for instance, don't embrace the irrational fear of firearms like the leftists here do. But rather embrace their usefulness and neccesity, providing assault rifles to it's citizens along with standardized training.
"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason
That's illegal already, Don
April 10, 2009 - 22:21 ET by nkviking75LEMON: Not saying that – you know, everyone talks about the Second Amendment, their right to bear arms, the right to bear arms, but that's not the right to go around and kill people and terrorize people just because you have the right to bear arms. [Emphasis mine.]
Mr. Lemon, it may have escaped your notice, but it's already illegal to use guns in those ways. Also, it's a lot easier to kill and terrorize with guns when you know law-abiding Americans are denied the right to protect themselves with their own guns.
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.
Gun control
April 11, 2009 - 09:21 ET by rayrushA gun is used to protect life and property over 2 million times a year in the U.S. : Souce F.B.I. Never hear this stat in mainstream media
Violence first starts in
April 12, 2009 - 18:33 ET by rbosqueViolence first starts in the heart. The gun is mearly a tool. Liberals don't have a great record on supporting human life so that's total BS.
Maybe if liberals stop supporting the culture of death, we will have fewer deaths.