On the March 28 World News Saturday, ABC gave rare attention to the plight of drought-stricken farmers in California who have been denied access to a major water supply by a judge citing the Endangered Species Act to protect a type of fish. During a story recounting the unusual level of problems facing these farmers – a recession coinciding with drought – correspondent Lisa Fletcher informed viewers: "And for the first time ever, farmers may be completely cut off from one of their sources of water. Farmers don't have access to this water that runs right through the center of their farmland. It is being allocated to the delta smelt, a little fish protected by the Endangered Species Act. Conservationists say the smelt are dying in the irrigation pumps, so a judge ruled they must be shut off for much of the growing season."
Fletcher then told of an almond farmer who is now forced to spend $600,000 digging his own well. Fletcher: "That hits almond farmers, like Shawn Coburn, particularly hard. Ninety percent of the nation's almonds come from this valley, and almond trees need a lot of water. ... So Coburn is spending $600,000 to dig a new well, and he hopes to buy himself some time."
The report ended with a soundbite of Firebaugh, California, city manager Jose Ramirez pleading for more water: "All our people want here is a job. That's all we want. You let the water flow, food will grow, and jobs will flow after that, and we're in business."
Below is a complete transcript of the story from the March 28 World News Saturday on ABC:
DAN HARRIS: In California, the problem is not too much wet weather, but not enough of it. A drought combined with the bad economy have delivered a one-two punch to the Central Valley, where much of the nation's food is grown. 100,000 acres went unplanted last year, and this year, it could be 750,000 acres. Economists say that will mean $1.5 billion in lost income and the elimination of 40,000 jobs. Lisa Fletcher is in California tonight.
LISA FLETCHER: In just a glance, you know something is very wrong.
PETE RAMIREZ, CROP DUSTER: It's like a desert. A couple of years ago, it was all farmland and everybody had a job.
THEDA LAWRENCE, MENDOTA: What are the people gonna do? How are they gonna eat whenever there's no farming?
FLETCHER: A quarter of the nation's fruits and vegetables are grown here in California's Central Valley. But the farmers here have been hit with two crises at the same time. They're in their third year of severe drought. And now, they must also cope with the worst recession in a generation. That has driven unemployment to staggering levels – 35 percent in some places, numbers that recall the Great Depression. And for the first time ever, farmers may be completely cut off from one of their sources of water. Farmers don't have access to this water that runs right through the center of their farmland. It is being allocated to the delta smelt, a little fish protected by the Endangered Species Act. Conservationists say the smelt are dying in the irrigation pumps, so a judge ruled they must be shut off for much of the growing season. That hits almond farmers, like Shawn Coburn, particularly hard. Ninety percent of the nation's almonds come from this valley, and almond trees need a lot of water.
SHAWN COBURN, ALMOND FARMER: If you have a crop that needs water year in and year out, you, it either dies, or you try to find a way to keep it alive.
FLETCHER: So Coburn is spending $600,000 to dig a new well, and he hopes to buy himself some time.
JOSE RAMIREZ, CITY MANAGER FOR FIREBAUGH, CALIFORNIA: All our people want here is a job. That's all we want. You let the water flow, food will grow, and jobs will flow after that, and we're in business.
FLETCHER: Lisa Fletcher, ABC News, in California's Central Valley.
—Brad Wilmouth is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.




DAN HARRIS: In California, the problem is not too much wet weather, but not enough of it. A drought combined with the bad economy have delivered a one-two punch to the Central Valley, where much of the nation's food is grown. 100,000 acres went unplanted last year, and this year, it could be 750,000 acres. Economists say that will mean $1.5 billion in lost income and the elimination of 40,000 jobs. Lisa Fletcher is in California tonight.














Editor at Large
Comments Policy
fish
March 31, 2009 - 09:34 ET by east tennessee johnWell, at least the envirocrazies are consistent. Forget the fact that in doing this, mankind suffers. Of course, in their salons of liberalism they'll look upon this as a good thing, as they eat their caviar(fish eggs) . Apparently aborting humans isn't enough, now they doom fish roe. Oh, the humanity!!
I wonder...
March 31, 2009 - 09:45 ET by dborschjr68Would the liberals be more offended if I dumped a bunch of dead smelt at the steps of Congress, or if I were to dump the remains of aborted humans at the steps of Congress?
An extreme example, true, but I think I made my point.
------------------------------------------------
"When Government fears the people, there is liberty. When people fear the Government, there is tyranny." Thomas Jefferson
Brace yourselves for the backlash of your ignorance, liberal puppets.
Liberate Tutume Ex Inferis.
Good morning dbors
March 31, 2009 - 10:05 ET by cocodrieSounds good to me.
Jesus Loves You so much He died for you
Where is the Water table in Cali?
March 31, 2009 - 09:40 ET by Evil_Skippy$600,000 for a well?
Sounds like alot of money for a well.
Go on, pull the other one.
(Can anyone verify the price of a well in Cali?)
Great minds think alike.....and fools seldom differ
Wells in California
March 31, 2009 - 09:47 ET by sherylsimsIt costed us about 15,000 for our well (in Cali.) We had to go down over 400 ft. 7,000 of that cost was for the pipes and pump and stuff. Now the water table has receded though so we have to dig it deeper once we get some money. In the meantime we have water trucked in to our tanks for about 5cnts a gallon.
Thank you Sheryl
March 31, 2009 - 09:55 ET by Evil_SkippyWe had a well drilled here in Texas about 15 years ago, our cost was about $8,000.
Great minds think alike.....and fools seldom differ
I guess that digging a well
March 31, 2009 - 11:13 ET by MazziI guess that digging a well big enough to support a farm operation would be much more expensive than one to bring bathwater for a family of four.
"I would rather be historically accurate than politically correct" ~ My husband's T-Shirt
Mazzi
March 31, 2009 - 11:45 ET by sherylsimsMy husband said the exact same thing. There is no way a well would support the water needs of a farm. We barely got enough when we were getting water from ours. Our neighbors all have wells (all deeper than ours) but nobody where we live wastes water at all. There isn't any to spare.
Of course, this makes perfect sense. Duh.
March 31, 2009 - 09:48 ET by dborschjr68So let me get this straight: Farmers, the backbone of America, are being denied water for their crops of food that humans eat, to protect the lives and ensure the survival of smelt? (Apparently in the state of California, smelt have an overwhelming majority of the vote. Gotta keep their base happy, right?)
Growing up in Michigan, I ate smelt on a regular basis and can attest to their yumminess. However, I would easily forsake their survival for the financial survival of a human being, namely, a farmer.
Why am I not surprised that this is going on in CALIFORNIA? Has that state ever NOT been full of lunatics and Earth-worshippers?
Unbelievable.
------------------------------------------------
"When Government fears the people, there is liberty. When people fear the Government, there is tyranny."
Thomas Jefferson
Brace yourselves for the backlash of your ignorance, liberal puppets.
Liberate Tutume Ex Inferis.
Fish over People? !!!
March 31, 2009 - 09:58 ET by bradbenj5952"Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen." Romans 1:25 After all, fish are more important to God than man, right? Wrong! This verse and others like, "Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth." 1 Timothy 4:3 These verses and many others are prophetic of the last days and define the twisting of Truth that are characteristic of those who will oppose God and His people in these end times. Remember that man was created in the image of God...fish were not.
"Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house." Acts 16:31
IDIOTS!
March 31, 2009 - 09:59 ET by jessieHJessie R. Hamby I have an answer to this crisis! GATHER ALL THE (smelt?), and put them in the judges swimming pool. Then the farmers can have the water. If the judge wants to save the fish, he won't mind. There shouldn't be that many, since they are so close to extinction. Who the hell, in their right mind, would pass such an assinine law? Oh, wait, a liberal idiot.
No problem...
March 31, 2009 - 11:16 ET by Willis_Leon_JohnsonJust cut off access by the 'judge' and his family to the local grocery stores to allow the normal people to have better access to the remaining foods on the shelves.
Maybe when his family, including any grandkids are starving in his arms the message will get through.
http://gjresult.com
So WHY does the government
March 31, 2009 - 11:30 ET by MazziSo WHY does the government want to own the
water and the rights to use it? To save the fish? Or to expand upon
it's powers over the people? Why have we let them do this?
For years the left has taken advantage of the "good, decent people" of America. They garner sympathy for the poor plagued critters, and these good people go with their gut reactions, never considering what negative impact their agreement will have. Here are some negatives: 1- farmers will be unable to produce food effieiently, increasing their cost and prices at the grocery store. (that should impact these suburban feel-gooders). 2 - We have handed over more power (and more of our rights) to a bunch of clowns who can't make a simple, rational decision even with 2 inches of paperwork and a rubber stamp from above attached to it.
It's time to do something about this, and all the other abuses of power that have been building up. It's time to make our voices heard.
http://the912project.com/
"I would rather be historically accurate than politically correct" ~ My husband's T-Shirt
Maybe Bwaney Frank could
March 31, 2009 - 11:33 ET by SickofLibsMaybe Bwaney Frank could loan the almond farmers some of that million dollar earmark for "scallop research" he shoved into Mass.' porkulus serving.
"Results of Mass. Scallop Research Study definitively show scallops to be an aquatic species."
Barney Frank..loaning money
March 31, 2009 - 12:25 ET by dborschjr68Barney Frank..loaning money to almond farmers...well, he DOES have a certain taste for nuts, now doesn't he?
(Yes, I'm a 40 year old man going on 12. Admit it. You thought it was funny.)
"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." George Orwell
"Brace yourselves for the backlash of your ignorance, liberal puppets." Me
It is time people stood up to these judgments
March 31, 2009 - 13:43 ET by Conservative VoiceThe people need to rally out front of the court house and the governors office. Dump a dump trucks worth of fish to the judge.
Great idea, CV!
March 31, 2009 - 14:20 ET by dborschjr68It can be a Modern Day California Bream (smelt) Party!!
Hundreds of folks, dead fish, protesting....ah yes, nothing says "American anger" like a good batch of rotting fish!
And this might catch-on. Imagine pelting our illustrious politicians on a daily basis with dead fish:
"Ladies and gentlemen, the President of the United States"...and suddenly, whoosh-whoosh-whoosh, several medium sized cod/tilapia/baramundi come flying out of the crowd, hitting and smattering the POTUS aside his head, all the while the cameras roll tape. Even the Secret Service would be hard-pressed to not giggle.
Awesome idea, CV.
"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." George Orwell
"Brace yourselves for the backlash of your ignorance, liberal puppets." Me