SNL Parodies Obama Scandals Ignored by News Media

  • Bookmark and Share

When the latest installment of Saturday Night Live parodied Friday’s presidential debate, the NBC comedy program gave attention to Barack Obama’s connections to convicted criminal Tony Rezko, corrupt Chicago politics, and Obama’s recent attempts at "playing the race card," which notably are all matters that the mainstream news media have given little attention to. While the show also took a number of shots at John McCain, several times having him propose a bizarre gimmick like challenging Obama to a pie-eating contest for example, the Illinois Senator also received several noteworthy jabs. One line involved McCain’s character, played by Darrell Hammond, referring to Obama, played by Fred Armisen, as making an earmark request titled "Tony Rezko Hush Money." Obama’s character also bragged that his tax cut plan would benefit Chicago politicians and city employees "because my plan would not tax income from bribes, kickbacks, shakedowns, embezzlement of government funds, or extortion."

The Obama character later promised that he would "play the race card" against dictators like North Korean President Kim Jong Il if necessary to guilt-trip them into dismantling their nuclear programs, as he would accuse Kim of refusing to cooperate with him because "I’m not like the other guys on the $5 and $10 bills."

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

The MRC’s March 3 Media Reality Check documented the media’s scant interest in the trial of corrupt Chicago businessman Tony Rezko, an Obama supporter whose wife assisted in a deal by which the Obama’s purchased a $1.6 million home. And the joke about Obama "playing the race card," which is primarily based on a line Obama used to employ regularly as a laugh line during appearances until he was called out by Senator McCain for the joke’s suggestion that McCain's campaign was using racism. But the line could also be considered apropos to Obama’s recent effort to "play the race card" as his campaign distorted statements by Rush Limbaugh to accuse the conservative talk radio host of racism and to try to link the comments to Senator McCain. The media’s lack of interest in this story was documented in the September 23 Worst of the Week.

Below is a transcript of relevant portions of the September 27 Saturday Night Live:

JOHN MCCAIN, PLAYED BY DARRELL HAMMOND: Jim, what the American people need to understand, and what Senator Obama does not understand, is that the real problem here is excessive government spending, especially congressional earmarks and pork barrel projects. ... And how about this? $8.2 million for something called "Tony Rezko Hush Money."

BARACK OBAMA, PLAYED BY FRED ARMISEN: John, I withdrew that earmark right after [UNCLEAR WHETHER ARMISEN SAYS "I" OR "he"] began cooperating with prosecutors, and I think you know that.

MCCAIN: Senator, the fact is, to fund all the other programs, your planning will require a massive tax increase.

OBAMA: John, once again, you’re not being truthful about my proposals. Under my tax plan, not only would every American making less than $250,000 per year get a tax cut, so would most members of the Chicago City Council, as well as city building inspectors. That’s because my plan would not tax income from bribes, kickbacks, shakedowns, embezzlement of government funds, or extortion.

...

JIM LEHRER, PLAYED BY WILL FORTE: Now, let’s turn to the topic of nuclear proliferation. Senator Obama, you have frequently been critical of this administration’s efforts to stop Iran and North Korea’s nuclear weapons programs.

OBAMA: I have.

LEHRER: What would you do differently.

OBAMA: First of all, Jim, I would use traditional diplomacy, something this administration has consistently refused to do. Should that fail, then and only then, would I try what I call "playing the race card."

[LAUGHTER]

LEHRER: And how would that work?

OBAMA: Take North Korea. I would ask Kim Jong Il to shut down his country’s nuclear weapons program. If he declined, I would say to him, "All right, I get it. I know why you’re really refusing to stop the program." And he would say, "No, what are you talking about?" And I would say, "It’s because I don’t look like all the other Presidents you’ve dealt with." And then he would say, "Wait, that’s not fair. That has nothing to do with it." And I would add, "That’s cool. I understand. I’m different. I’m not like the other guys on the $5 and $10 bills." It’s a long, delicate process. But eventually, he’ll have to give in.

—Brad Wilmouth is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

In related news, Hell just froze over

SNL being even slightly critical of Obama -- Huh? Have they had a change of heart after they virtually accused Todd Palin of incest with his daughter?

you said it well, wdhorning!

Methinks SNL is doing the old "CYA". satan's breakin' out the ice skates!

I am stunned!

I take back 3/4 of the things I said about them.I was wrong on most of it.

Yahoo Mentions SNL Palin Parody...

Does not mention Obama parody. Anything to keep Palin in the headlines in some slightly negative way.

Its a dirty job, but some liberal has to do it.

---

Ask yourself: Do I want a good paying job, or do I want a government hand out. Its that simple!

Possibly

The purveyors of comedy got wind of the Obama "truth squad" and are not happy about it.

Now if the MSM would pull up to the table and tell the truth about just how bad Barack Obama will be to this country.

nalfien submitted this parody on you tube

but you tube evidently took it down. I reckon they are guilty, too.

Off-topic

I wondered if the writers got full pay for the opening sketch.  Seemed more like a re-enactment than a spoof.  

"The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it."  -  George Bernard Shaw

 

I believe it was considered

I believe it was considered volunteer work for the Obama campaign.

 

I missed this. I tried

I missed this. I tried watching the show again last night in the vain hopes of it being fun like it once was, but the extremely-unfunny Sarah Palin skit at the beginning was the same old boring SNL that so many people have turned off. It wasn't the political stuff that made it unfunny, it was the unfunny lines that made it unfunny. Somehow, trying to make Palin look and sound like a dumb country bumpkin just doesn't seem to ring true.

I like Anna Faris, too, and was disappointed in her fiirst skit. It's a shame when one of my favorite show turnes to crap...

 

" Somehow, trying to make

" Somehow, trying to make Palin look and sound like a dumb country bumpkin just doesn't seem to ring true."

Roger,

I think Rush Limbaugh said it best when said that for any satire to have a chance at being funny, it has to have at least a grain of truth in it. 

McNotObama '08

Sarah Palin dumb country bumpkin?

I thought the skit was pretty funny.  I thought it was pretty dead on. Sure it was embellished a little, but Sarah Palin did herself no big favors with that interview. Didn't the real interview with Couric concern you at all?

Real life video games are cool

Shawn - I jusrt watched it and it's only funny to liberals

It's rediculous that they continue to harp on and belittle her experience as a Governor bordering two foreign countries and being responsible for the AK National guard.  How they find that something to laugh at when their own Top of the ticket has zero, nothing nada in terms of Foreign policy experience.   Palin's experience may be little but Obama's is a big fat zero.  There is no question that she has more than he does.

I saw nothing wrong with Palin's performance with Couric, what I saw was much wrong with Couric and the editing.  They obviously edit to make Palin look worse and they ask rediculous questions of her that have and would never be asked of Obama.  

When has Obama been asked to recount what Biden has done in his 30 year Senate history to stop this financial crisis?   Not only is it completely absurd to expect one senator to be able to recount another's 20-30 yr history, Couric started out by saying that she had to exclude the major thing he did do that she would know about.  It was the one and only thing that any of the three Senators did to try and address the problem.

Biden says many many many more completely stupid things than Palin does and the media are not even trying to trip him up. So does Obama for that matter. It's a joke. If you care about people saying stupid things then Obama and Biden are definitely not your men.

Nothing wrong Dee?

Please take another look at video.  Let me ask you the same questions I asked ClearThinker last night.

what does healthcare reform have to do with the bailout?

What does healthcare reform have to do with shoring up our economy?


What does the bailout mean to job creation?


What does the bailout mean to reducing taxes?


What does the bailout mean to trade reduction, a scary thing?


What does the trade reigning spending have to do with tax relief?


What does the trade reducuction have to do with one in five jobs created?


What does the bailout have to do with an umbrella of job creation?

I know all about the 57 states and what the Dems have done. Lets stay on the topic of Sarah Palin okay? Just to be clear, I was/am a fan of Sarah Palin, but watching the clip was disturbing and there was no clever editing. Also how is being on the border with Russia foreign policy experience.?

 

Real life video games are cool

Well Shawn - if you listen to Jack Cafferty then your mind

is closed.  There was nothing that wrong with her answer.  It was COURIC who brought up healthcare, job creation and everything else you state. 

Palin's answer was not specific - it was very general just like  many many answers from Obama (the biggest offender by far), McCain and Biden. 

In General all those things are helped by the bailout because if our economy collapses nothing else matters.  How outrageous that Cafferty would act like that answer was any worse than any other politicians answer to that question.  I can guarantee you that Obama's wouldn't be much better.  In fact both he and McCain skirted around the issue in the debates and gave non answers to how any of their expensive programs could go forward. 

Dee

I do not listen to Jack Cafferty. I only came upon that video because it is the number one youtube clip from yesterday.

"Palin's answer was not specific - it was very general just like  many
many answers from Obama (the biggest offender by far), McCain and
Biden."  

Dee are you serious? She went on about things that had 0 to do with the question that was asked. It was not only not specific, but borderline babbling. 

Can you answer even a few of the questions I asked, and again, I know you like to defect and talk about the evil dems, but lets just stay on the topic of that interview, and one more time, how does being on the border with Russia have to do with foreign policy experience?

edit

"It was COURIC who brought up healthcare, job creation and everything else you state."  

Maybe so, but how does it relate to the bailout question?

 

 

Real life video games are cool

Come on Shawn - listen to it again

Couric specifically asked her to relate it to people's worries about healthcare and your other questions.  As I said, BOTH McCain and Obama skirted the issue in the same way at the debates. So I didn't only bring up evil Democrats. But talk about babbling - that's all Obama ever does.  This little bit she did here is NOTHING compared to what he does. You should be absolutely horrified about him becoming President.

And as far as Russia being a border - No one is saying it is some type of critical experience - what it is is SOME experience. Dealing with other countries on trade issues, border issues and security issues as a Governor like she does with Canada also is not nothing.  She also has experience with deploying her National Guard.  It's not much experience but it's 100% more than what Obama has.  That's the point!  OBAMA HAS NONE!  She has little but it's still something compared to Obama's nothing.  

I did watch the video Dee

..a few times and like I said, I found it disturbing. I still like her, but it has shaken my confidence a little.

I really wish we could stick to the issue about Palins clip, but it seems it is difficult for you not to bring up Obama

Even though I don't agree with your foreign policy answer, thank you for answering the question

Real life video games are cool

Shawn, people that still

Shawn, people that still defend Palin and try to pretend that she is legit are simply being stubborn.  They're kidding themselves.

Meirs part 2.  End the ridiculousness, she has plenty of valid excuses for dropping off the ticket.

They could sort of spin her early, but now it's impossible.  The interview with Couric was a train wreck. 

She couldn't even answer simple, straight forward questions.

Ginger

Thx to another popular member here,  I learned alot about the Governor of Alaska and I like what I learned.

She does not seem to be  hypocrite and she stand by her beliefs. ie keeping a child that she knew woud be born with Downs Syndrome

It got me angry the way the msm were treating her. You are right about the interview was Couric though, it was a train wreck and it did make me think twice.

If she does as badly when she debates Biden, then the GOP is in serious trouble.

Real life video games are cool

It's all relative Shawn - we are choosing between people

So to talk about one candidates inexperience without comparing it to the other is meaningless.   There is no question that Palin has more experience than Obama at things that matter for an executive.  The only thing he has more experience in is constitutional law and campaigning, neither of which  matter for being President.  Even Obama doesn't  have enough experience in Law and will still have to have legal council to advise him. And as far as his campaigning experience and constant reforming of positions, she'll have that down within the first couple months of office.   

You say you disagree with my answer on Foreign policy but can't give an example of where Obama has more experience.  

Dee

Dee back up to limo the limo a  little bit. I am talking about how Sarah Palin came across during her interview with Katie Couric.

She had the dear in the headlights look and answered a question a little bit like Miss Teen USA a while back.

This is a common debating trait with you Dee, you are deflecting the question and pointing fingers at Obama and the Democrats.

I know Obama is inexperienced, I know he said 57 States, I know about Biden and drunk driver. All relevant points, I will be glad to answer your questions at a later time. I am not going anywhere Dee. No matter what any conservative thinks about me on this board, no one can say I am a post and runner. The thing is we are not talking about Obama are we? 

If she was not being specific what does any of what is saying have to with the bailout plan? Yes Couric touch on a lot of topics beforehand, but it does not have anything to do with the questions asked.

Real life video games are cool

Shawn you are the one deflecting

don't give me that bull.  I just explained clearly why it was relevant and you ignored it because you have nothing to say and no way to defend Obama and his lack of experience.  Obama is not qualified and you don't want to face it so you deflect by pointing at Palin's inexperience and gaffes.  As I said before, and as I'm sure you will ignore again, we are choosing between candidates so anything negative about one candidate has to be weighed in terms of the other candidate, if you don't get that then you shouldn't be voting. 

So once again, what Palin did in this interview was responded to COURIC"S call to tie it to healthcare etc.... Palin's response was no more evasive or rambling then McCain or Obama in the debate when asked how they were going to handle healthcare etc.. now that this has happened.   You can't refute that so you complain about not sticking to your talking point.  Sorry buddy.  Your talking point is bogus and I proved it.

Dee

I really don't want to start a fight with you. Again I am not knocking down your relevant point of Obama's experience, I'm just saying focus on the topic at hand.

I will try again. Please Dee I promise I will debate about Obama at a later time time. I am saying Sarah Palin came off looking foolish in that interview, that is it. You cannot seem to see that and want to believe she gave a non specific answer. Thats it Dee, I thought she came across as foolish, that is it.

Real life video games are cool

and I don't Shawn - not at all

especially in comparison to Obama and Biden who have done much worse and you know it.  You only feel she came of foolish because of Courics responses, the crappy editing and because of commentary you heard after.   There are so many attacks on her that even conservatives start to believe the crap.  The brainwashing is very effective.

editing?

Dee, I watched the whole interview and they played in complete segments. There was no cut scene. She asked a reasonable question, she asked why bailout companies and not give it to the American people. She kept going about healthcare reform, jobs and things that had absoloutly nothing to do with what she asked.

I'm sorry Dee, you got some pretty big rose colored glasses if you can't admit she looked foolish on this one.

Real life video games are cool

Sorry Shawn - you've got the rose colored glasses

all you can comment on is editing and you think you saw an unedited interview.  That's naive even for a liberal.    The person who came across foolish to me was Couric who asked stupid questions, had stupid expressions and was so biased looking for a gotcha that it was as obvious as could be.   She even came on afterward and lied about Kissinger's position.  I bet you thought Palin either didn't know or lied after that but surprise surprise - it was Catie who lied.  

If you think you are being anywhere near unbiased in this despite the fact that you can't address any of my points then you are hopeless. You call everything out of bounds except your OPINION! Then you repeat over and over your OPINION that she looked foolish but you can't back up that she was foolish with anything unless you admit that McCain and Obama were equally as foolish because they did the same thing in the debates. 

Again Dee

You are making this way more complicated than it needs to be. First of all it was you that said it was clever editing, that is why I brought it up.

I also said I would be glad to debate Obama with you at a later time and only focus on the Palin interview for now. You cannot focus on the subject and have to compare with something the Democrats did . I am not saying your suggestions are out of bounds, just not to be discussed at this moment.

It seems that you cannot seem to accept that request, so I don't see why I need to waste energy in trying. I hope you enjoy your Bears game.

Real life video games are cool

Shawn the tar is heating up right now

We are haveing the darnest time with the feathers though.The chickens dont really want to give them up.Teach them to come home to roost.Anyways I thought the reason for the bailout was open credit flow.Since with all these bad paper it has tightened up.With limited credit flow it effects all aspects of American life.Heath care,job creation,expanding production.I not a economic wiz kid so maybe someone else could put it better.Oh I going to point fingers too.I would feel left out if I didnt.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5tZc8oH--o&feature=related

Well that's because it's an

Well that's because it's an impossibility Dee...you can't find an example. 

...plus if anybody really thinks Palin is going to fail in the debates with Joe Gaffe Biden...they live in some other world...kind of like the msm saying the debate was tied with Obama, or that Obama won...we all know what to expect with the msm for the most part, excluding Fox who do try to stay fair and balanced regarding all of this...when it comes to how they are going to attempt to shape how the debate went Thursday.

The msm despises Palin they are in great fear of her...

....don't ya' just love it!

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

Stupid Chargers

Lol, Just kidding bt.  I'm only saying that caus they beat my Raiders :-( The Chargers are a very talented team. Phillip Rivers looks he will be a great qb.

BT, I have said before, I am fan of Sarah Palin and I am rooting for her at the debate, I'm just saying she came off looking pretty bad in that interview and it made me think twice about her abity to be the President if need be.

 

Real life video games are cool

Well as they say shawn,

Well as they say shawn, it's all in the eye of the beholder...

Quite frankly I am sick of the msm using the bitchy interview that Couric did ad nauseum...I have never, ever seen Couric have the expressions on her face in all my years of watching the leftist witch...they were of pure disdain in a few of the expressions she made, if you didn't notice that, it is either because you didn't want to or no offense men, you are a male...I knew what the so-called woman was doing, and it showed all over her face...

I just want to see her face when she has to say Vice-President Palin...and not long after that...I would like to see her slip into the sunset...out of the nightly news business...maybe msnbc can give the leftist twit a job after she is done at CBS.

The msm has been anything but fair when it comes to the opposite side regarding the same things.

Period.

Btw...I thought of you also during the game, I thought when I first got inside the house and turned it to the game it looked pretty dim for the Chargers...little did I know what a great game it was going to turn out to be. 

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

BT You hit a bullseye

I am 69 years old and am quite familiar with those looks. I've been on the receiving end at times usually from my wife. Women are excellent at this sort of thing.

Your right BT

.....it is in the eye of the beholder

"they were of pure disdain in a few of the expressions she made, if you
didn't notice that, it is either because you didn't want to or no
offense men, you are a male...I knew what he so-called woman was doing,
and it showed all over her face..."

To me, it was the look of confusion. Oh well, what do I know? I'm male.. and a liberal male at that. :-)

Real life video games are cool

shawn,

That was the whole point of why Couric & Gibson interviewed Palin the way they did.

To make her look bad.  Basic "gotcha" journalism.  Knowing that she didn't have the experience with their attack brand of journalism to quickly deflect their undercutting ways (instead of honestly interviewing her).

They interviewed her as if she were an old Washington insider, used to the ways (and lies, innuendos, and half truths) of the media.  Gibson with his professorial smirk, looking over his glasses, and Katie's frowning and face-making, were both intentional, in order to make Sarah Palin uncomfortable.

So they succeeded on both counts....they made her uncomfortable (who wouldn't be in that situation)....and they made you doubt her ability.

I'd like for you to consider this.  Give Palin six months in the Washington environment, and she'd kick both their asses (and any of the other entrenched DC types) back to the gutter in about five seconds flat.  I'm not sure that that ability would be any sort of improvement for Sarah Palin, but she's a quick study. 

David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive

 

Blonde

Your right, there is a possiblity for her to be good in 6 months. Sarah Palin is a good person and wants to do what is right for her country.

My point to Dee is simply she looked pretty bad, she did not know how to answer the question and she kind of babbled and was caught off guard. Dee said it was edited in a certain way and I just said there was not much editing, what you saw, was what you got.

Dee also says she did not look foolish in the interview, I disagree. I would also like to note that I have not had one negative thing to say about Sarah Palin, until the Couric interiview, so I am being objective.

Real life video games are cool

Hi BT!

I can't say that I'm not nervous about how she will do in the debate, but I love yours and other people's optimism.  I don't like the fact that there won't be balanced questioners.  I was very pleasantly surprised at Laher.  He was extremely fair.  He let the candidates bring up the controversial questions about each other and that is how it should be.

I was worried about McCain also, after having no rest and running to the debate with little preparation.  You and others were right - he handled it easily. Obama was no match despite the fact that he had much more preparation.  I'm hoping that you and others are right about this one too.  I'm just a nervous Nellie.  I have no doubt about Palin's capabilities and I think this format will be better than the biased editing done in interviews, but this is her first national debate.

 

Heck Dee... I was never

Heck Dee...

I was never worried about the debate with McC and O, but I never expected it to be what it was at times either...I was so happy with the turn-around of who got under who's skin...lol.

As to Palin, you can bet that is is Biden that is worried, shaky, not her.

Now if McCain and team would let her just be her, she will do just fine...she appeals to us because she is so natural, not the long-winded put you to sleep lying diatribe we get from 99% of the career politicians...

I cannot wait..and the msm are scared shiteless...

No matter what, they will say she did BAD, did everything terrible, look at her body language...blah blah blah...we all know it too, it's a given with the enemy within.

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

I agree BT no matter what she does, they'll spin it as bad

and Shawn will believe them.    My Internet keeps going out today and I'm frustrated so I may not be back on, plus I'm watching the Bears game. 

I don't think Palin looked

I don't think Palin looked very good in the interview, but I don't know that it really matters. She wasn't sharp, redirecting questions. 

And there are conservatives that aren't impressed, either, so it's not just Shawn and I. 

Well of course boa...I

Well of course boa...I never expected anything different from you.

...something would be seriously wrong if you did otherwise regarding all of this now wouldn't it?

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

Ditto.

Ditto.

boa... ...I'm a

boa...

...I'm a smilin'...

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

balboa's response is more reasonable

to say she "didn't look very good" is much more within the realm of being acceptable than to say she looked "foolish".    I can agree that the interview questions, editing, Katie's responses and facial expressions were all designed to make Palin look bad. Any half way reasonable person can see that .  Just look at the way they led into the interview.  That picture of Palin was bad and they talked about the false claim of an advisor in the McCain campaign getting money from Freddy while ignoring Obama's advisor's direct connections to Freddy/Fannie.  

To those of us that recognize the extreme bias, she did fine.  It could have been much better, she should have called Catie out on her stupid questions.  She will learn. 

Obama has never been sharp in an interview and he's been doing it for over a year now.  It's all realative

Hey Dee...I'm rooting

Hey Dee...I'm rooting for Da' Bears tonight too...hope the make the Eagles fly to eagle heaven tonight.

Have a great time...catch you later...

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

Bigtimer, I agree about Palin

Personally, I wish she had told that tool chimpmunk Katie Couric that she didn't have time to waste on stupid questions after Couric asked about McCain's campaign chair's connection to Fannie Mae.

Most Americans know the media is leftist and we would jump for joy if Palin would put their stupidity in its place.  McCain and his people need to let Palin be Palin because she is the only politician that has been close to relating to the American public in a long time.

Jeff Lebowski

www.angrywhitedude.com

Hey Howdy

Hey Howdy Lebowski...

Well she isn't going to have any prob's as far as I am concerned...as long as she is natural...and stays that way.

I cannot wait.

I also think she is very intelligent and isn't going to be told or molded into anything other than herself.

JMHO

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

If I were advising Gov. Palin

On how to handle the debate questions, I'd tell her the following:

Simply because she is "new" at this national debate thing, and because we are all certain the questions will be framed as they always are (with the exception of Lehrer, who was remarkably neutral, I thought), in a liberal fashion.

When a questioner asks a question from a liberal POV, Gov. Palin should say, "That's a really biased way of framing the question, the way you should have asked it was....xyz".  In other words, call the moderators out for being biased right from the get-go.  

I think viewers would really like that approach....calling them out on the inherent bias in the question.  I can see this working on all of the questions that make up the dem platform.

Secondly, I'd advise her to just be herself, not overthink things, and not be overly sarcastic (which, admittedly will be horribly difficult inasmuch as her opponent is Joe Biden).

It's going to be very interesting, and I'm betting Sarah Palin's going to knock it out of the park. 

David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive

 

shawn - Cafferty's a P.O.S. !!!!

"...I did watch the video Dee a few times and like I said, I found it disturbing. I still like her, but it has shaken my confidence a little."

Shawn, you call Palin's interview disturbing???

Why do you pretend to be someone always in the middle? I'm just not buying it, and especially not with this one.

Just say you really didn't like Palin all this time, and you really really reeeeally don't like her now. Why not?

I'll give you disturbing... 

I'm repulsed by a) that P.O.S. jerk Jack Halfwit, and b) CNN for giving such an ugly, angry, propanganda/hate-spewing, far-left, no-nothing a daily, prime-time platform. It's f-ing outrageous!!!

A politician gives an average rambling answer to a stupid news person's rambling question -- YES, Couric threw in all of the "oh, but the middle class? the middle class???" b.s. to start -- and this disgusting idiot says:

"That is one of the most pathetic pieces of tape I have ever seen for someone aspiring to one of the highest offices in this country."

Man. Just man.

Like Dee has clearly pointed out, Obama is RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT, NOT VICE PRESIDENT (I guess JacksSh*t thinks VP is "one of the highest offices"??) and gives complete rambling, going-nowhere speeches and answers to questions on a daily basis, all the while continuing to be fawned over and not called-out on it. EVER.

Despicable. Man, I'm steamed. (Can you tell?)

 

NOW PLAYING:
Governor Palin Get Your Gun

 

Actually Pretty Funny

I just watched the "debate" and it was pretty good.   Politics aside the actors nail the characters.  I would say it was 60/40 McCain jokes, but that is to be expected.

http://www.nbc.com/Saturday_Night_Live/video/clips/presidential-debate/7...

LOL

 

(SNL)     Payback Clinton style. LOL

Remember in 2004 the Dummycrats told the people to vote them in power if we wanted change. Well now people  are seeing the change we got.

 

Housing bubble busts.

Energy prices doubled.

Corruption through the roof. 

Clinton politics all over again.

Liberal Media's, You just got to love hating them.

NSL, BET, CNN, CBS, The View, The Oprah Show, NBC, MSNBC, The Huffington Post, NYTIMES and yet a few others have and continue to ignore, fabricate the truth or just all out lie throughout this entire campaign to benifit Obama.  I do so have to addmit that CNN suprized me the most as I had came to trust them for the most fair and balanced news source. It was truely unbelievable watching as they mocked and degraded the accomplishments and experience of one candidate(McCain) while upholding and excusing the moraless and criminal behavior of the other. (Obama)

A vote for Obama is a vote of sheer stupidity.

And more....

...and how about "The Nation" taking swipes at Democrats all of a sudden?  Think they're feeling buyer's remorse?  Think lots of people are feeling it?  Wonder what Bill Clinton is feeling?  Or whom?

You know things are out of whack when...

...a Democrat Congress want Bush's bailout plan more than the Republicans, and SNL more accurately portrays a debate than the MSM.

It was funny but still made Obie look good

The skit was pretty funny and you have to admit that SNL has a spot on looking Obama.

But I do take issue on SNL trying to be fair in this skit to both sides. During this faux debate there was the CNN headline captions at the bottom of the screen. It took Obama quotes and drastically exagerrated them to make it appear funny but... the McCain quotes were actual quotes that the real Obama himself is saying in his stump speeches that make McCain look bad in real life.

Uh, what?

"Have they had a change of heart after they virtually accused Todd Palin of incest with his daughter?"

What? I saw that sketch, and it seemed pretty obvious to me that they were lampooning the media's willingness to publish any rumor, half-truth, and lie to smear Palin. 

"I think government is a necessary evil, like, say, motion picture agents." -John Wayne

maybe not

John, if SNL had actually committed an act of comedy in lampooning the media then the public would have gotten the joke and the lawyers at NBC would not have to have embargoed the skit.  It was not only a flop in a comedic sense but it showed more about them than it did the subjects of the skit.

Comedians and Obama

The last piece of decent actual comedy to come from SNL was last season when they did a parody of one of the Clinton/Obama debates and all of the media interviewers were fawning over Obama.

But now Seth Myers is the head writer. He is from Boston and he hates Bush for denying him a career on SNL playing 'President Kerry' every week for at least four years.  Myers is an unrepentent liberal and he just isn't funny. 

And they are way out of touch in their over the top hatred for Sarah Palin.  Their effort to turn her into some kind of Anna Nicole Smith intellect.  

Apparently, there is no longer any supervision going on there and Lorne Michaels is just seeing how it goes without an adult in the room.  Cuz the non-political skits are sucking pretty hard as well.

The skit was moderately

The skit was moderately funny about Obama. I actually laughed at the bits about Obama more than the ones about McCain.  

I liked the "race card" joke better when I told it a week ago

http://jimtreacher.com/archives/001604.html

Nice to have readers in high places, I guess!

Ah the good old days

Once upon a time, a very very very.......long time ago, a group of brash young comedians called the "Not Ready For Prime Time Players" took pot shots at all aspects of American Culture in the 1970s.

One of the favorite targets lampooned on this show was

wait for it....

Jimmy Carter! Yep. He visted 3 mile island, was turned into the Amazing 50ft President and had an affair with a black maid. (played by Garrett Morris) He went to visit a typical Latino family, but worried about his hemmorhoids insofar as the effects of chorizo upon his conditon...they made fun of the man, his policies and the comedy of errors that dogged his single term.

Now I have nothing against the Sarah Palin gags as long as they are also willing to go after Obama. Palin is a big girl. She can take a little political satire. That goes along with the job she seeks.

The fact that Obama can't take it proves that he isn't ready to be president.

SNL used to lampoon both sides of the political coin and it is good to know they still are trying to do just that.

I am (as most here) a big Reagan fan, but one of the funniest SNL bits was Reagan pretending to be a senile old fool in front of the reporters, and then behind close doors operating a corrupt but well oiled executive machine, speaking foreign languages with ease, and being forced to wake up his exhausted staff who were simply too slow to keep up with the evil mastermind!

This was the ultimate cliche of every ridiculous charge the left used to throw at Reagan, and SNL used the left's own paranoia against them in order to create one of the funniest political skits ever.

I'll bet Reagan saw it and laughed his ass off!

I remember the Reagan skit. Those were the days...

...back when SNL was still funny and relevant.  Everyone got skewered at some point.  But by the early to mid '90s, I tuned out as the writing seemed to go downhill; it felt like they were just filling airspace most of the time, and their politics were shallow and unidirectional.

The key to good parody is relevance and at least a tentative connection to reality.  If they are going to just mindlessly bash conservatives with invective and innuendo (as they frequently have) then they are not going to any laughs beyond the DailyKos crowd.  Tina Fey will have a solid job for at least the next 4 years if she and her writers remember that.  But if they go instead for the kind of totally unfounded & invented innuendo like with the child molestation thing, the show will continue to wither.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.