Olbermann: Bin Laden’s Driver Is ‘Victim’ of Bush Admin ‘Urinating’ on Constitution


On Thursday’s Countdown show, one night after accusing President Bush of not doing enough to protect America from Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaeda organization before the September 11th attacks, MSNBC host Keith Olbermann seemed sympathetic to the plight of bin Laden’s former driver, Salim Hamdan, during the show’s regular "Bushed" segment which purports to update viewers on what the Countdown host sees as Bush administration scandals. Following Hamdan’s sentencing in a military court during which the judge expressed an apology to the bin Laden aide as he handed down a sentence that would make Hamdan eligible for release in six months, the American military indicated Hamdan may still be kept prisoner at Guantanamo Bay indefinitely in spite of the ruling, prompting Olbermann to accuse the Bush administration of "urinating" on the Constitution, and making Hamdan one of the "victims" of its "medieval" justice system. Olbermann: "So, besides urinating on the Constitution and the rights and freedoms every American soldier has ever fought to win and protect, the Bush administration has now decided that when its victims have actually served their sentences, doled out under its own medieval, quote, "justice," unquote, system, it still might not choose to set them free, thereby giving that Constitution and our country a second pass on the way out." (Transcripts follow)

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Ironically, just the day before on Wednesday’s show, the Countdown host marked the seventh anniversary of a Presidential Daily Briefing from August 6, 2001, which has previously been hyped by the media as having been a warning that the 9/11 attacks were about to happen. During Wednesday’s "Bushed" segment, Olbermann claimed that the President was given a report "which he either did not read, did not understand or did not believe." And, although the report’s reference to surveillance of buildings in New York City was later found to be just the tourist activities of a group of Yemenis, Olbermann deceptively quoted a portion of the PDB which referred to "patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York."

Claiming that the PDB contained "all the information you could have wanted," Olbermann charged that President Bush "slept": "The President’s daily briefing seven years ago today, August 6th, 2001, entitled ‘Bin Laden determined to strike in U.S.’ mentions bringing the fighting to America, retaliating in Washington, wanting to hijack a U.S. aircraft, preparations for hijackings, surveillance done in New York, groups of supporters in the U.S. planning attacks – all the information you could have wanted. All of it in George Bush`s hands, seven years ago today, with 36 days left to interrupt or alter 9/11. So when you rhetorically ask, as Mr. Posner did in his exceptional book, ‘Why America Slept,’ the answer is actually a correction. America did not sleep, George Bush slept."

But, as recounted in the April 12, 2004, CyberAlert, former Republican Governor James Thompson of Illinois, a member of the September 11th Commission, dismissed the PDB’s relevance to the 9/11 attacks in an interview on the April 10, 2004, CNN Saturday Night with anchor Carol Lin. Thompson contended that much of what was in the report "relates to things that were three years old," and pointed out that the "suspicious activity in New York with people surveilling federal buildings" turned out to be tourists from Yemen. Thompson saw the report as not having "anything to do with September 11."

Below is a transcript of relevant portions of the Wednesday and Thursday, August 6 and August 7, Countdown show from MSNBC, followed by a transcript from the April 10, 2004, CNN Saturday Night:

#From the Thursday, August 7, 2008, Countdown:

KEITH OLBERMANN: And number one, Gitmo-gate. Yesterday, we had the first conviction from the infamous military commission system, devised by Mr. Bush and Mr. McCain. Salim Hamdan, who admitted to being a driver for Osama bin Laden, convicted of being a driver for Osama bin Laden. Sentencing was today. The government demanded 30 years. The military commission judges said five and a half, with five years off for time already served. An apologetic chief judge, Captain Keith Allred, told Hamdan, quote, "I hope the day comes when you return to your wife and your daughters and your country." Then he added, "Inshallah," Arabic for "Godwilling."

Ah, but not so fast. The Pentagon says even after Hamdan’s sentence is over, he will still be a prisoner, still branded an enemy combatant, to be released only if a military administration review board says so. So, besides urinating on the Constitution and the rights and freedoms every American soldier has ever fought to win and protect, the Bush administration has now decided that when its victims have actually served their sentences, doled out under its own medieval, quote, "justice," unquote, system, it still might not choose to set them free, thereby giving that Constitution and our country a second pass on the way out.

#From the Wednesday, August 6, 2008, Countdown:

KEITH OLBERMANN, IN OPENING TEASER: Speaking of bin Laden, "Bushed." Anybody remember what happened seven years ago today? Hint: 36 days before 9/11. It mentioned the World Trade Center, hijackings, attacks in Washington, groups of bin Laden supporters – and the President ignored it.

...

OLBERMANN, BEFORE COMMERCIAL BREAK: "Bushed": An anniversary bigger perhaps than 9/11. The day the President not only didn’t connect the dots, but threw the dots away.

...

And number one: Legacy-gate. As the struggle goes on to build the Bush presidential "liberry," here’s a reminder of the true legacy of the 43rd President of the United States. Take a look at the calendar, August 6th. Does that date ring a bell? Seven August 6ths ago, Mr. Bush was on his monthlong vacation at Crawford, Texas, when he was given a report which he either did not read, did not understand or did not believe.

Its first paragraph mentioned, "His followers would follow the example of the World Trade Center bomber," about "bring the fighting to America." Its second paragraph referred to the individual profiled in the report as wanting, quote, "to retaliate in Washington." Its 10th paragraph detailed sensational but uncorroborated threat reporting, including that the individual wanted to hijack a U.S. aircraft.

Its 11th notes "patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York." And its 12th and final paragraph mentions, "A call to our embassy in the UAE in May, saying that a group of bin Laden supporters was in the U.S. planning attacks with explosives."

The President’s daily briefing seven years ago today, August 6th, 2001, entitled "Bin Laden determined to strike in U.S." mentions bringing the fighting to America, retaliating in Washington, wanting to hijack a U.S. aircraft, preparations for hijackings, surveillance done in New York, groups of supporters in the U.S. planning attacks" – all the information you could have wanted. All of it in George Bush`s hands, seven years ago today, with 36 days left to interrupt or alter 9/11. So when you rhetorically ask, as Mr. Posner did in his exceptional book, "Why America Slept," the answer is actually a correction. America did not sleep, George Bush slept.

#From the Saturday, April 10, 2004, CNN Saturday Night:

CAROL LIN: "A two-page report on the threat al-Qaeda posed to America. The President got it just one month before the 9/11 attacks. Now at first, it reads like a laundry list of red flags. Al-Qaeda, recruiting and plotting attacks in the United States. The White House declassified that document tonight."

AFTER SEPTEMBER 11 COMMISSION MEMBER JAMES THOMPSON ARGUED THERE WASN’T MUCH TO THE MEMO, LIN COUNTERED: Even though the evidence seems circumstantial that Osama bin Laden specifically says that he wants to attack in the United States, that young Muslims were being recruited in New York, that bin Laden specifically mentioned Washington, D.C., that the FBI had 70 separate investigations on al-Qaeda related activities here in the United States, that did not add up to what you witnessed on 9/11, as we all did?

JAMES THOMPSON: No, because the first four of those possibilities were three years old. And the fact that the FBI was conducting 70 full field investigations by al-Qaeda activities would have reassured me, not startled me or frightened me, if I were the President of the United States. I would have assumed that things were going forward, but all the other things in the PDB released tonight relate to things that were three years old. And even some of the things in the PDB we learned subsequently didn't pan out.

For example, the PDB talks about suspicious activity in New York with people surveilling federal buildings. Well, the FBI found those people. They happened to be two Yemeni citizens. They were tourists. And the FBI questioned and released them. And they had nothing to do with September 11. In fact, nothing in the PDB report tonight has anything to do with September 11.

...

THOMPSON LATER CONTINUED: So I think out of all the PDBs that we have, and we have many more than this one, and of the 2.5 million pages of pages of documents that we have, and the thousand witnesses that we've heard, with more to come, this is not something that would have triggered anything in anybody's mind from the president of the United States on down, about the possibility of September 11.

LIN: Then Governor, given the outcome, I mean when you see the memo, and you in hindsight you know what happened, what went wrong then? I mean, these were all red flags that did ultimately, whether they were true at the time or not added up.

THOMPSON: Nothing in the PDB is a red flag, but we know from other evidence that there were reports at FBI field offices about suspicions of people taking flight training, for example. And there's no doubt that mistakes were made in not transmitting information that FBI field offices had up to the head of the FBI...


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

His...

stupidity and incompetence would be laughable if not for the fact that people will absorb his delusions as their own. 

 

If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love youBut if you really make them think, they'll hate you.

Don Marquis 1878-1937

His audience is just as

His audience is just as dense and consumed with BDS.  I doubt keith or his audience have ever read the constitution. For an anti-American dolt like Olbermann to suggest that the President of the United States, a man that history will judge well long after anyone remembers who keith Olbermann was, urinated on the constitution would be funny if it wasn't such a crude reminder of Keith's limited intellect. 

MSM hates US, adores our enemies.

It's rather sickening to see how the MSM foams at the mouth pondering the jailing of an elected official based on rumors, and then see them get teary eyed when KNOWN MURDERERS (and their associates) get 66 months in jail. Am I missing something here? Did I fall asleep and wake up in upside down land?

1. These terrorists were picked up on a BATTLEFIELD.

2. They do not wear uniforms and hides amongst women and children. Therefore they are entitled to NOTHING except a bullet.

3. It was the damn liberals who screamed for 'trials' of these sub human pieces of garbage, and when the outcome that they wanted doesn't prevail, they piss and moan about how it was 'stacked against the defendant'.

He was Osama's driver for crying out loud. I'm sure he had 'Jihadists only' card on him. Check his pockets...

"To beat Violence, You must ignore the focus groups. You must send in the Mossad, turn off the BBC, CNN, and don't look back."

Olbermann gives the term

Olbermann gives the term "aid and comfort to the enemy" a new meaning. Bin laden hired this guy to drive him, which tells me one thing this guy hates us, and if given the opportunity would have tried to kill us. Who knows what he will do once he is released.

And here I was thinking that.....

this guy was Obama's driver. But seriously folks, we would all be lucky to just get 5-1/2 years after being caught with surface to air missiles in our trunk! Yes sir, "Inshallah" indeed Captain Allred. OMG, KO has the biggest case of BDS in the USA, oh, and he's truly a POS! I think if GWB was out there getting his knob polished by some young fat intern, instead of protecting us these past 7-1/2 years, good old Keith might have had a soft spot for him.


This town needs an enema! - The Joker

Yup, a few surface-to-air

Yup, a few surface-to-air missiles in the trunk is no worse than getting caught with an open can of Bud on the front seat.

If the US Army were to

If the US Army were to abide by the Geneva Conventions in the manner in which the libs profess that we should and other nations do, Salim Hamdan long ago would have been summarily shot as an illegal combatent for fighting out of uniform.

All that woul dhave been required would be a panel of company grade officers to hold a hastily assembled panel and convict him.

Then walk him to a tree and shoot him.

BD, I have often wondered

BD, I have often wondered why we always use a tree, a wall or a post? And why the blind fold? Why not just shoot him when the verdict is read?

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

BD The good old days...

It's funny how rules are just being 'forgotten' about isn't it?

 

EXCEPT when it comes to a political witch hunt and gotchya politics. Effed up if you ask me

"To beat Violence, You must ignore the focus groups. You must send in the Mossad, turn off the BBC, CNN, and don't look back."

From what I read, we have

From what I read, we have several options.  One to immediately excecute him on the battlefield.  Two, we can hold him for an indefinite period of time or until the hostilities cease and then decide what to do with him.  Three we can try him in a court, doesn't say anything about what kind, and then despense whatever justice we think he deserves.  This would include his execution.

So the bottom line if he is not executed on the battlefield then he does have the right to some form of a trial.  A trial of our choosing in the manner of our choosing and the place of our choosing.  So the current method and in fact all other methods used or proposed were legal.  SCOTUS was wrong on all counts in this matter.

One thing taht does bother me about the pronouncemts is that from my limited understanding of the trial and its procedures is that it closely mirrors the same trial any member of our military would recieve.  And in taht case it really torques me off what the detractors are saying.  They are saying taht the system is not good enough for terrorists but good enough for our military?

Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.

You are correct, SCOTUS was

You are correct, SCOTUS was wrong in their decision that detainees have access to civil courts in determining the legality of their detention.

If review was necessary, it should have been done by the Military Courts of Judicial review.

The decision made by SCOTUS now essentially invalidates the entire Military justice system.  Courts martial will now be subject to review by civil courts?  Thats BOGUS with a capital B.

Heard on the news...

in Virginia
you get a heck of a lot more time in the State prisons for the transportation
of LEGAL firearms within the State. Don't put your hunting rifles and
your target shooting handguns in your truck still assembled, and PLEASE don't
be a non-resident that is traveling from point A to point B and only transiting
the State when you are stopped on I-95.

The judgment and sentencing is -- screwy, but then, as a Senior NCO I knew
that if any Airman got into trouble that the best advice is ask for a judgment
by a panel of "officers" not Senior NCOS. The Officers would normally be junior
officers, O-1 to maybe O-3 (in the USAF 2nd Lieutenants to Captains)
and VERY lenient towards the poor SOB that “got caught” and didn’t know any
better. Senior NCOs demand more since we
know that the SOB is capable of more. No idea what rank they chose for the tribunial but I'm not surprised if it turns out to be "junior officers."

NOW... since there are rumors going around that this guy DID cooperate and provided some very good information -- hmmm, maybe then the lenicy, and that he might stay in "protective" custody until hostilities cease.

 

Executive experience

This just shows how little executive experience the critics have. When Olbermann claims that Bush was "warned," Olbermann shows that he doesn't know how executives behave. The president is warned constantly, about every issue, by strident advocates who contradict each other all the time. He has, on any given issue, two and perhaps three different advocates coming into the Oval Office. Each urges the president to follow their advice, and suggests that every other advocate is insane.

  • Many advocates warned Bush that we should send more soldiers into Iraq, but just as many warned us not to send too many, for fear that the Iraqis would resent a "heavy footprint."
  • For every economist who urges a tax break, there are others who urge a new tax.
  • That's why there are at least three entrances to the Oval Office. Every door has someone behind it, urging something.

The real argument is that when presented with different points of view, Bush goes with the view that most closely resembles his (and his advisers') previous assumptions. Now to be fair, to some degree, every executive in the world does that. Here's why: executives aren't experts themselves. They make many decisions with limited and/or insufficient information. They take what amounts to a guess. They hedge their bet as much as they can, but it's still a guess. The real argument against Bush is that he instinctively follows the advice from the most senior advisers, and discounts what people of lower rank have to say. He's slow to listen to "alternative" points of view.

  • The smart way to deal with that kind of executive is to prove what you say. If you want the executive to follow your advice, give overwhelming evidence. But if you come in empty-handed, with no proof, and all you can offer is your opinion, forget it. He ain't gonna listen. The fact that you turn out to be right makes no difference. What matters is whether you had proof. Almost all of these critics, especially those who turned out to be right, had thin evidence compared to their opponents. That's why they lost the bureaucratic battle.

Remember, Bush thinks he's the CEO. What's Rule #1 in dealing with CEOs? Cover their ass.

What worries me is that Obama seems to represent the other extreme. Young executives with no experience tend to listen too much to "alternative" opinions, and to discount the advice of greybeards, because they don't want to admit to their own inexperience. They waste the collected wisdom, and promote untested and unreliable theories. They also become "last man" managers, where decisions are effectively made by whomever was the last person giving advice.

Great post, KC Mulville!

KC,

Excellent, excellent points.  Well done!  I learned a lot from this.  Thank you. 

KC & Ted

Yeah, I agree..... very good post!  

 

* * * SOCKS THE CAT '08 * * *
For REAL Change

I'll take door number three

I'll take door number three Monty.

Keith Olbermann: "Al Qaeda is a victim"

You heard it folks. Keith Olbermann said that Al Qaeda is a victim. Keith Olbermann is a terrorist sympathizer.

I bet this fine man will

I bet this fine man will need a JOB when he gets out of the slammer, maybe Doberman will hire him as his own driver.

Come on, show us how you limo liberals work. Show us your compassion. He has shown that he can drive a car and with any luck he will have a few of those surface to air missiles left over from his trunk. Think of how you can tell all of your leftist pals and the whole batch of you can ride around with him, he can teach you the Arabic lyrics to death to American, you can show him all the movies that your pals make of how America sucks. Think of the fun.

 

 

Ronald Reagan, 1962: I did not leave the Democratic party, the party left me.

Insert: your name, 2008, and the Republican party.

Romney / Jendal  2012 (if,we survive)

Speaking of urinating......

Olby, if you were on fire I wouldn't urinate on you.... promise

urinate

Something tells me if you told him you wanted to piss on him, he'd like it.

Mr.L

I don't know about urinating

I don't know about urinating on the Constitution, but this case does worry me.  We've spent millions and millions of dollars setting up this system, and the best case they can bring is against a driver???  I would bet the big concern was to make sure the first case was a victory for the government, and after all this time the best case they could bring was against this guy?  It just doesn't inspire much confidence. 

A conviction is not the point

The point of holding this guy was not that he had committed some kind of crime.  But as Bin Laden's driver, he could hold a treasure trove of information.  After 5 years, I think we've gotten all we can out of him and it's time to let him go (thus the lenient sentence).  Unfortunately, his home country of Yemen doesn't want him back.  So now we are stuck with him and have no idea where to put this guy, which is why he will probably remain at Gitmo for the forseeable future.

 


 

"To send men to the firing squad, judicial proof is unnecessary." Ernesto "Che" Guevara


Bruzilla this is the test

Bruzilla this is the test for the system and like any trials tests they are best done with small unimportant items.  This is why the little fish was tried first so we could refine the system as needed and adjust to any real grievances that may come back to queer any future more important cases.  So its not the sentence or verdict or lack of one, it is the test and thereactions to that test.

Could someone just urinate

Could someone just urinate on him. OOPPSS they already have - just check out his shows ratings.

The Sad Part

The really sad part of the Olbermann disgrace is that NBC marches this guy out for election coverage (supposedly unbiased) and sporting events as though he is some sort of talent or expert.  The left should have learned from talk radio that hate does not sell.  I simply cannot watch anything with a man so filled with so much vile and stupidity participating and lending his "thoughts".

Hey Keif!

The fact that he wasn't executed instead of being picked up and is alive today shows that he's got it better than if the opposite were true. After all, look at what happened to Daniel Pearl or Nick Berg after they were 'tried'.

www.ArmchairEnergist...

Don't Shoot Me...

...I'm just the piano player.

I spent some time in Washington last summer. One of the nights I was there my host hosted a cocktail party. I knew her political leanings, so I dreaded a night of constantly being on the defense or biting my tongue.

During the evening I started talking a young lawyer who was somehow (I can't remember) working on the case that ultimately ended up in the Supreme Court. She was very liberal, but as I talked to her I realized that she had grave concerns about the case.

"Why?" I asked.

"Because," she said after a lot of thought, "those guys are animals." She then elaborated how in dealing with the prisoners at Gitmo that she realized that they were where they belonged. The whole thing really compromised her political philosophy. I tried to persuade her to leave the dark side.

My host later asked me why I won't come to work in Washington. I told her that D.C. is no place for a Kentuckian. Abe Lincoln was a Ketnuckian. His wife was a Kentuckian. They went to Washington and he got shot and she went crazy.

I'm sure Olbermann equates Obama bin Laden's driver with his limosine driver. Deep down, Keith is probably that simple.

Olberman? WGAF???

He's a benefidiary of the ADA and Bush's "hire the handicapped" initiative so he's biting the hand that should slap the snot out of him.

you are so right

I've said it for years.....true, Bush isn't that bright, articulate, or wise...but where does all the venom come from? Why does the MSM hate him?

Answer:He's faithful to his wife. Clinton was a pass to be a pervert, Bush makes them uncomfortable in that arena.

If Obama become POTUS, and

If Obama become POTUS, and someone at Fox was to have the bad manners as to accuse him of urinating on the Constitution, what do you think would happen to that Fox employee?  Anyone wanna take a guess?

Something...

...tells me that an Executive Order would be forthcoming.

No EO, they'd just cite Lese

No EO, they'd just cite Lese Majeste - An offense or crime committed against the ruler or supreme power of a state. Punishable by death in Thailand, why not here?

Ironic

What I find ironic is, in one breath he's bashing the Bush admin. for some "midevil" justice system and he has been bashing the admin. for the last 5 years for NSA wire tapping and jumping the gun on arresting people who he thinks are "innocent". Then in the next breath of fowl air, he's saying that Bush slept during the lead up.

Well, excuse me Mr.Olbermental but, if they knew exactly what and where the terrorists were going to do it and Bush admin went after them before they actually committed the act, you'd have been crying that Bush was a fascist and that he had arrested people who tried to kill people. Olbermental would've laughed at Bush prob. saying that Bush went too far and that these people were implicated and there's no proof. Where's the due process.  I agree with one of the commentors above. I think Olbermental should be thrown in jail for sympathizing with the enemy.

All that said, let's remember that he's one of the least watched programs in the evening news biz and possibly only a couple hundred thousand left winged fringe were watching.

Mr.L

No Gooberman...

...Osama's driver is a "victim" of being a terrorist and assisting with the planning and killing of thousands of American citizens at home and abroad.

BTW - Does Sept. 11, 2001 still ring a bell with you Gooberman???? Here's a little reminder.

http://images.google...

Or have you, along with all your brain dead compatriots in the treasonous MSM, forgotten all about the terrorist attack on US soil?????

KO Should Know!

KO spends all of his time crapping on Bush, so he should know shit and pee when he sees it!

KO, just another happy liberal.  Yea, that's the kind of America we want!  Full of A$$holes like KO and Michelle Obama!!!

How does he urinate on the

How does he urinate on the constitution if we're still allowed to keep our guns, LOLbermann?

The Rocky Mountain Collegian: Illustrating Idiocy

Olberman has probably never read the Constitution

I'm almost sure that he has no clear understanding of what it specifically says, nor the overall meaning and intent of the framers and the system that they set up. All that Olbermoron does is parrot the liberal left-wing talking points and continue to espouce idiotic ideas that are mutually exclusive as is pointed out above. He (and the far left loons - as epitomized by the Kossaks) appear to have no problem with their cognative dissonance.Bush is supposed to be a moron and a master conspiracy leader at the same time. He is supposed to be a failure at going after Al Qeada and yet going too far with the Al Qeada members we have as enemy combatants held at GTMO.

The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Alan Keyes '08.

Wacky

This guy is such a wack-a-doodle-do, his rantings are more like a spoiled uninformed 5 yr. old than a grown up.  It's hard for me to believe that any intelligent human being would do other than find him laughable....just comic relief.  He's given WAY too much attention.  Stop reporting what he does and he will crawl back under his rock.

Olbermann

Is this really what we mean by "freedom of the press?" I just cannot fathom a world-wide TV network allowing this kind of drivel about ANYONE - much less the President of the USA! If anyone is urinating on the constitution, it is Olbermann himself with this bitter, evil diatribe against his own country. I haven't watched MSNBC since Olbermann came to the network, and I don't intend to watch it ever again! Does this kind of stuff do ANYTHING to help the USA? I certainly don't think so - regardless of politics.

More Olberputz BS

But I would pay good money to see a water buffalo urinate on Olbermann

Olbermann is the one pissing on the Constitution

Freedom of speech and the press was won at the cost of blood and lives on battlefields, and the purpose of these rights is to tell the truth. Since Olbermann is lying, he is the one pissing on the Constitution.

The truth is:

  • Olberman is using more oil than most of us from the middle east creating more middle east tension than most of us causing more Usama style attacks than most of us
  • It was Usama who attacked us on 9-11, not President Bush, but then what can use say to a "delusional, terrorist lover?"
  • Olberman has a huge memory loss: All his favorite big time Democrats, Kerry, Clinton, Gore, etc, supported attacking Afghanistan, where Usama and his driver were operating.
  • As for the Usama's driver's rights, since he was both not in uniform when captured and carrying weapons to be used against American soldiers, the field commander could have shot him on sight as a spy, but President Bush is the one who showed leniency and so he only stood trial for being a civilian acting illegally against soldiers who were acting legally
  • Is Olbermann a "traitor" who would have us set Usama's driver free so he could go back to killing US troops?

IMHO, Olbermann is a "low-life, slug" for pissing on "my" Constitution. He does not deserve this country.

This "the field commander

This "the field commander could have shot him on sight as a spy" was one option, but, he was most likey of more value in information.  If prisoners are not taken then we lose valuable information.

Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.

There IS no constitution,

There IS no constitution, according to Libtards like Olberbama. 

To them, that thing we call the Constitution is an antiquated document the meaning of which can bend and twist depending on what the people in power (hopefully, to them, untra-left-wing lunatics) want it to mean.

So, whenever you hear a lib complaining about someone urinating on the Constitution you can disregard what they say - they have absolutely NO credibility on the subject.

Is that urination he

Is that urination he perceives the same as his urination on journalism?  Just checking.  I doubt he thinks so.

Their is no traitor liberals won't defend.

Why is it that liberals are so abusively intolerant of any delusion that does not match their own?

The Constitution is for AMERICANS.

First off, terrorists should not be entitled to OUR rights as American citizens. Terrorists should be penalized under the rules of their own countries. If this was the case then most of them would already be dead!

Secondly, since when is aiding and abetting a criminal not a crime punishable by law?

The big print giveth, and the fine print taketh away.

Fulton
J. Sheen