Liberal & Conservative CNN Analysts Hit Conservatives

  • Bookmark and Share

During CNN's Super Tuesday election coverage, both liberal and conservative commentators took shots at conservatives as liberal Paul Begala declared that Mike Huckabee "don't believe in evolution or photosynthesis or gravity or anything," and liberal Carl Bernstein declared that Republican candidates were "trying to satisfy Rush Limbaugh and Laura Ingraham rather than the people of the country." Conservative Bill Bennett quipped that conservative opposition to John McCain is a "kind of Trotskyism," and a "purification" of the Republican party. (Transcript follows)

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

At about 8:15 p.m., CNN anchor Anderson Cooper brought up the subject of "very personal attacks against" McCain from Focus on the Family's James Dobson, who declared his unwillingness to vote for the Arizona Senator earlier in the day. As Bennett explained that McCain would reach out to conservatives, he criticized fellow conservatives: "Frankly, I think these folks, and a lot of them are my best friends, need to move a little forward on their own. There's a kind of Trotskyism going on here, you know, purification of the party." Bennett went on to point out inconsistency in conservative talk radio hosts praising Democrat Joe Lieberman and inviting him into the Republican party, even though he is more liberal than McCain, while being tougher on the Arizona Senator.

At about 9:45 p.m., former Bill Clinton advisor and current Hillary Clinton supporter Paul Begala talked about the historic tendency of Republican presidential primaries to feature a conservative candidate and moderate candidate battling each other, and then took a shot at Huckabee, declaring: "Nobody is more conservative than Huckabee. He don't believe in evolution or gravity or photosynthesis or anything."

At about 11:15 p.m., in response to anchor Lou Dobbs' question about whether the Republican race was "over," CNN contributor Bernstein declared McCain the likely winner and criticized Republicans for trying to make conservative talk radio hosts happy: "McCain is going to get the nomination ultimately, but the question is: One, what is it worth? What does it mean? And all of these candidates are trying to satisfy Rush Limbaugh and Laura Ingraham, rather than the people of the country. And so the question becomes, is the Republican party going to come out of this thing in a kind of shambles that either Obama or Hillary Clinton can really exploit. ..."

Below is a transcript of relevant portions of CNN's February 5 coverage of Super Tuesday:

8:15 p.m.
ANDERSON COOPER: The battle for John McCain, moving forward, if he does very well tonight, I mean, there were some very personal attacks against him today. James Dobson on the Laura Ingraham radio show saying, "I'm convinced Senator McCain is not a conservative, and, in fact, has gone out of his way to stick his thumb in the eyes of those who are. He has at times sounded more like a member of the other party. I cannot and I will not vote for Senator John McCain, as a matter of conscience." How does he make inroads among those conservatives?

BILL BENNETT: Well, he's going to CPAC, the Conservative Political Action Committee, this week, Thursday. He's going to address them. It's a big meeting. He'll get a lot of attention. And he needs to reach out. He needs to say the right things, but he also needs to tell people to look at his record. Frankly, I think these folks, and a lot of them are my best friends, need to move a little forward on their own. There's a kind of Trotskyism going on here, you know, purification of the party. Here's an interesting thing. Connecticut just came in for McCain -- 42-41 conservatives for McCain. I didn't know there were conservatives in Connecticut. I'm thrilled to hear it, and I'd love to meet them, really, on some occasion, but, could it have something to do with Joe Lieberman's endorsement of McCain in Connecticut. And here's the thing I want people to think about, if they're conservatives particularly. Everybody loves Joe Lieberman on the conservative side. The talk show hosts can't get enough of Joe Lieberman. "Hey, Joe, will you join the Republican party?" If he did, he would be to the left of John McCain. So what exactly is this objection to John McCain, other than he sometimes takes pleasure, you know, in going against the orthodoxy? But I think reality, if he gets the nomination, reality sets in. The Dobson thing was very unfortunate.

[ROLAND MARTIN]

BENNETT: Ronald Reagan wasn't Ronald Reagan either before he became Ronald Reagan, if you will. And the Ronald Reagan that we now revere did some things which really violated the orthodoxy. I don't want to list them because I won't be able to answer all the mail, but he did a lot of things that, you know, that you wouldn't have on the checkoff list if you were a conservative.

...

9:45 p.m.
PAUL BEGALA: Here's the thing where McCain is lucky. Always in the Republican party, it seems to me, there's a fight between a conservative and a moderate. There's Goldwater and Rockefeller. There's Reagan and Bush. There's Bush and McCain. This time, there's one moderate, McCain, and two conservatives. And so Romney wants to be the conservative, and the conservative poobahs like Limbaugh and Coulter and Dr. Dobson of Focus on the Family, they've all anointed Romney to try to stop McCain, but the voters got in the way. I love it. Sometimes voters just don't listen to the big shots.

ROLAND MARTIN: But he's also not, McCain is more conservative than Romney.

BEGALA: Nobody is more conservative than Huckabee. He don't believe in evolution or gravity or photosynthesis or anything.

...

11:15 p.m.
LOU DOBBS: First of all, Carl, give us your thoughts. Is the Republican race, in your judgement, over?

CARL BERNSTEIN: Probably. McCain is going to get the nomination ultimately, but the question is: One, what is it worth? What does it mean? And all of these candidates are trying to satisfy Rush Limbaugh and Laura Ingraham, rather than the people of the country. And so the question becomes, is the Republican party going to come out of this thing in a kind of shambles that either Obama or Hillary Clinton can really exploit. ...

—Brad Wilmouth is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Talk Radio conservatives

Everybody is talking about "talk radio" like Rush Limbaugh, etc. The point Rysh is making, and I agree, is that whoever is the republican candidate should be more "conservative" ...more "Reagan" like. McCain is too much towards the left..which may win independents but gives up on some core conservative issues like tax breaks and immigration. Thompson would have been the perfect candidate but too late now. We republicans will realize the opportunity missed by not backing Thompson earlier. Rush also makes a great point that we shouldn't be giving into someone like McCain just to ensure a republican in the White House. His message is "don't compromise" your values.

Miket53   http://mtaricani.blogspot.com/

Mike, I see your point

Mike, I see your point about wanting Republicans to be more conservative....BUT:

I posted a comment (well, actually, a rant LOL) yesterday about WHY I think the Republicans are moving left. They are reading the writing on the wall. Other than on a few social issues, the American electorate is moving left. It's hard for Republicans to fight against a party that's promising a "living wage" (enough for a family of 4 to survive on?) "arrordable housing" (affordable to whom?) free medical care, (free lunch?) a "right" to a college education, not to mention "relief" from a mortgage debt that you shouldn't have taken on to begin with. I'm sure they'll have a plan soon for relief from all that credit card debt that people have saddled themselves with (force the CC companies to just "write it off" so people can have a fresh start?)

This is, apparently, what Americans now want from their government, and the Republicans know this. And they know standing there like the mean parent saying "It's not good for your character to have everything given to you!" is not the way you win elections.

Who is going to vote for spinach over chocolate cake? And FREE chocolate cake, at that!

This is like a divorced couple, with the parents competing for the affection and loyalty of the kids by competing over who can give them the best "stuff." Dad's going to be the "meanie" if he says Junior shouldn't have his own car at 16, and Mom goes and buys him one. That's what's going on here. The Republicans are just doing what Americans want...getting on board to give them "stuff" hoping to win a few of them away from Democrats. Because they know there aren't enough real conservatives in the country to elect them otherwise.

And elected and re-elected is what they want to be. Don't blame them. They are just giving the American people what they apparently want.

moving left

It's called lack of principals! Also the last 30 to 40 years of indoctrination in the school system is finally paying off for our enemies, they are destroying us without ever firing a shot!

I thought Paul Begala

I thought Paul Begala was taken off CNN due to his connection to the Clinton's. I guess it is ok since he was showing his bias against Conservatives. BTW Begala, where did you go to school...it is "he doesn't", not "he don't". What a moron.

I thought so, too.  But

I thought so, too.  But remember, this is the Clinton News Network.  By the way, I'm sure the "he don't" was meant as a dig at "backward" Southerners who vote for Huckabee (though I detest Huckabee, so I'm inclined to agree with the Forehead on that point).

Their having their orgasmic

Their having their orgasmic moment.  This will be the first election since before Lincoln where there will be no Republican in the race. (With the possible exception of Ford in '76)

The Clinton News Network must be having a hangover today.

Begala view of conservatism

I'm still amazed at how these guys work out of their narrow, childish views on conservatism. They still picture conservatives as a group of white slaveowners trying to resist "progress." Liberals still picture themselves as brave discrimination-breakers. That's hippie-level analysis.

Begala is not qualified to discuss conservatism because he plainly doesn't understand it.

Conservative MSM stereotype

And they would not know that it was the Republican party "radicals" that were pushing for freeing the slaves. It is crazy that historically the African Americans have supported Dems who support free hand outs in return for support of Dems. Vs. Reps who (use to) beleive in freedom, small govt., hard work, education, economy, & jobs. Would you rather have freedom, personal power, economic success, your own home and pride OR live in a slum & get your govt. welfare? Is that freedom? I HOPE the REPS return to their roots like Ron Paul and support smaller government so we can have true freedom & a strong economy for a long time to come vs. certain economic disaster down the "everything is free road." Why work? Think about it... how long is that system going to hang together?

BILL BENNETT WAS RIGHT.

BILL BENNETT WAS RIGHT. Especially considering the number of numbnutz who actually believe that Romney is a conservative....NOW. 

ROMNEY ON IMMIGRATION AND EVERYTHING ELSE HE IS NOW LYING ABOUT.

..Immigration: As late as last year, the candidate who now ridicules amnesty proposals said: "I don't believe in rounding up 11 million people and forcing them at gunpoint from our country. With these 11 million people, let's have them registered, know who they are. Those who've been arrested or convicted of crimes shouldn't be here; those that are here paying taxes and not taking government benefits should begin a process toward application for citizenship, as they would from their home country.'' Wasn't that pretty much the Bush party line? 

  • Gun control: He supported bans on so-called "assault weapons." He supported the Brady bill. He spurned the National Rifle Association. As late as 2002, he was still defending Massachusetts' confiscatory gun laws. But, last year, he joined the NRA and claimed to favor easing licensing requirements. ( Timing suspicious? Apparently not to you KOOL AID DRINKERS! btw what was going on last year that would make ROMNEY THE LIAR join the NRA I forget, OH, THAT'S RIGHT HE STARTED RUNNING FOR POTUS!)
  • Minimum wage: In 1994, he opposed an increase, but offered as a compromise tying a hike to the rate of inflation. By 2002, he supported an increase. In 2006, he vetoed an increase. Like some other notable politicians of the recent past, he was against it before he was for it, before he was against it.
  • Same-sex marriage: In 1994, he opposed the federal marriage amendment and promised to help establish "full equality for America's gays and lesbians." In 2002, he provided legal recognition to same-sex couples in Massachusetts, even though he was not required to do so under a state Supreme Judicial Court ruling, as he has suggested (LIED). As governor, he even threatened to fire officials who would not issue same-sex marriage licenses and perform civil ceremonies. Yet, now, in 2007, he miraculously supports the federal marriage amendment.
  • Homosexuals in the military: In 1994, he supported "don't ask, don't tell," saying it was a step toward "gays and lesbians being able to serve openly and honestly in our nation's military." Today he claims he doesn't want to change the policy to permit homosexuals from serving openly in the military.
  • Tax cutting: In 1994, he opposed a cut in the capital gains tax. In 2002, he refused to sign a "no new taxes" pledge. In 2007, he claims to support a cut in capital gains taxes. He has taken the "no new taxes" pledge. And he says he supports making President Bush's tax cuts permanent."

 In the age of fetal imaging, where every one with any serious political interests have SEEN PICTURES of BABIES SUCKING THEIR FINGERS IN THE WOMB, we're supposed to believe that Romney the Liar was moved by CELLS ON A FRIGGIN' SLIDE?????!!!!! How you people can rail against a religious man or a war hero who had a couple of policies you didn't like, which were UPHELD by SCOTUS by the way, in favor of a LIAR who would tell you whatever you want to hear at the moment is beyond me.