Fred Thompson Challenges CNN's Campaign Coverage


During a live interview on Friday's American Morning, Fred Thompson lived up to his reputation as the GOP presidential candidate most willing to challenge the media, as the former Senator complained to CNN anchor John Roberts that the show used a clip of him joking about Fed Chair Ben Bernanke to make it appear Thompson was not interested in a stimulus package for the economy. Thompson: "You sit there and you take an hour's worth of tape, of course, and we have a little fun every once in a while, and sometimes you guys pick that out and have a little fun with it yourself..." When Roberts suggested he was being "dismissive" of a stimulus package, Thompson continued: "You know better than that. ... From time to time, things come up, and I poke fun at it... And you guys pick it out, you know, and leave it lying out there. We proceeded to talk about the economy and talk about a stimulus package, which I've been talking about for two or three days, but if this is your highlight event, it's your highlight event." (Transcript follows)

The interview, which seemed to suffer a bit from a satellite delay as Thompson was appearing from Seneca, South Carolina, started on a note of levity as Roberts described the state's primary as a "moment of truth" for Thompson, and the former Senator quipped that "every moment is a moment of truth." Roberts showed a clip of Thompson at a campaign event joking about wanting to change the channel away from Bernanke's speech over to Law and Order because Bernanke's speech was "a little boring." Roberts set up the clip: "Just as you were speaking, Ben Bernanke was on the television screen behind you talking about his support for an economic stimulus package. Let's take a listen how that unfolded."

UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: And as we sit here, you know, we can take a look at the monitor, and Chairman Bernanke is talking right now. I would imagine you would probably say that the economy perhaps is the most important issue that's facing us?

THOMPSON: Yeah, that's right. But, you know, you could probably get a Law and Order rerun on TNT there if you really wanted to switch that around a little bit.

[LAUGHTER AND APPLAUSE FROM AUDIENCE]

UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Oh, I don't know if you want to do that. Chairman Bernanke's from South Carolina, so-

THOMPSON: Looks a little boring to me. I don't care-

Roberts continued: "I know, Senator Thompson, you were just joking a little bit there, but you did sound to be a little bit dismissive of the idea at least of an economic stimulus package."

Thompson responded: "No, John. You sit there and you take an hour's worth of tape, of course, and we have a little fun every once in a while. And sometimes you guys pick that out and have a little fun with it yourself, so that's fine. Now, you want to talk about the issue? We went ahead and talked about the issue in some de-"

Jumping back in, Roberts: "Yeah, well, that's what I'm saying. You seem to be dismissive of this idea of a package."

Thompson: "No, I was not being dismiss- You know better than that. We were having a little fun, a little humor. From time to time, things come up, and I poke fun at it, including at myself. And you guys pick it out, you know, and leave it lying out there. We proceeded to talk about the economy and talk about a stimulus package, which I've been talking about for two or three days, but if this is your highlight event, it's your highlight event. Would you like for me to talk about the stimulus package?"

When Roberts interjected that "the question I was trying to ask you, Senator, is you don't seem to have a lot of faith in a stimulus package," Thompson responded that "that's not totally accurate either," and that "I'm not sure what part of that, that you're talking about," before elaborating on what he wants in a stimulus package.

Below is a transcript of the relevant portion of Roberts's interview with Thompson from the Friday, January 18 American Morning on CNN:

JOHN ROBERTS: It could be the moment of truth for the Thompson campaign. He is banking on South Carolina and the Republican party faithful to rev up his campaign. He is expected to be in a fight for the evangelical vote with Mike Huckabee. Joining us now from Seneca, South Carolina, is former Senator Fred Thompson. Senator, good to see you. I want to start off this morning by playing a little excerpt from something that happened at a campaign event yesterday-

FRED THOMPSON, with crosstalk: By the way, every-

ROBERTS: Go ahead?

THOMPSON: Every moment, every moment is a moment of truth for the Thompson campaign.

ROBERTS, laughing: All right, well, we're glad to hear that. Well, let's play this particular moment of truth. Just as you were speaking, Ben Bernanke was on the television screen behind you talking about his support for an economic stimulus package. Let's take a listen how that unfolded.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: And as we sit here, you know, we can take a look at the monitor, and Chairman Bernanke is talking right now. I would imagine you would probably say that the economy perhaps is the most important issue that's facing us?

THOMPSON: Yeah, that's right. But, you know, you could probably get a Law and Order rerun on TNT there if you really wanted to switch that around a little bit.

[LAUGHTER AND APPLAUSE FROM AUDIENCE]

UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Oh, I don't know if you want to do that. Chairman Bernanke's from South Carolina, so-

THOMPSON: Looks a little boring to me. I don't care-

ROBERTS: I know, Senator Thompson, you were just joking a little bit there, but you did sound to be a little bit dismissive of the idea at least of an economic stimulus package.

THOMPSON: No, John. You sit there and you take an hour's worth of tape, of course, and we have a little fun every once in a while. And sometimes you guys pick that out and have a little fun with it yourself, so that's fine. Now, you want to talk about the issue? We went ahead and talked about the issue in some de-

ROBERTS, WITH CROSSTALK: Yeah, well, that's what I'm saying. You seem to be dismissive of this idea of a package.

THOMPSON: No, I was not being dismiss- You know better than that. We were having a little fun, a little humor. From time to time, things come up, and I poke fun at it, including at myself. And you guys pick it out, you know, and leave it lying out there. We proceeded to talk about the economy and talk about a stimulus package, which I've been talking about for two or three days, but if this is your highlight event, it's your highlight event. Would you like for me to talk about the stimulus package?

ROBERTS: No, no, no, no, no, the question I have for you, the question I was trying to ask you, Senator, is you don't seem to have a lot of faith in a stimulus package.

THOMPSON: Well, well, that's not totally accurate either. We've had extensive discussions over the last two or three days. I'm not sure what part of that, that you're talking about, but I can relate what I think about it and what it looks like to me. I've been talking about the fact that it's part of a bigger picture, that we need to make sure that we know what we're talking about before we rush in and increase the debt, that we should not load this package up like a Christmas tree, like we often do, that if we can target it to those who will put the money back into the economy, that is something we need to seriously consider. Now, I think that now the Bush administration, as I understand it, is considering a package of about $150 billion. There's not much detail to it yet. I would hope that it would be more in the form of tax rebates or fewer witholdings in terms of income taxes and put it more directly into the economy. I think that a child tax credit increase of about $500 for about a year would also do the trick. I think those are the things that you have to look at, but everybody on the Hill and everybody in Washington wants to rush willy nilly, you know, at some of these packages that will cost billions and billions of dollars. We need to make sure that we're targeting it in the right way.

Roberts turned the discussion to President Bush's stimulus plan, and then to some of Mike Huckabee's remarks criticizing the candidates who have spent time in Washington.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Kick his ass Fred

I don't know how Fred Thompson can stand being around these lying, manipulative girly boys like John Roberts.

I would have loved to have had Fred reach through the screen and pull Roberts over and kick his ass.

"Dismissive" now there is a girly word from Roberts.

 

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

hmmm ...

I'm thinkin' ...

If Thompson doesn't get the GOP nod, and if Thompson doesn't get asked to run as VP, perhaps he could be the new Republican President's Press Secretary ... ?

 

P.S. Fred Thompson:  "Helen who?  Somebody get that prunish troll the hell out of here!"

I think it will be

I think it will be Romney/Thompson

 but Thompson for Press Secretary is a great idea 

"Get off the phone you big dope!!!!!!!!!!" Mark Levin

What is wrong with so called Republicans

If Fred does not get the nomination then I really don't understand what is wrong with Republicans.  Here is a man who has charisma, camera presense (important in todays political environment) is a solid through and through conservative, yet he is polling behind McCain in South Carolina?  For God's sake people!  tell me the polling is skewed or something.  I am rapidly losing faith in the Party.  Tell me it's not this bad,,,

Those of us who get it protect those of you who don't

Fred did this to himself

Fred should have entered the race earlier and been much more authoritative early on in the debates but as I said originally months ago his wife is not going to play well with women.

Huckabee: Raising Taxes OK
The Anti "Man-Made" Global Warming Resource

It seems to me that Fred

It seems to me that Fred Thompson is unwilling to be someone who he is not. He is unwilling to compromise his core beliefs either. I respect him for those things.
Most of the politicians we have running will say anything they think will get them elected. If that is the case, who is to say what they will do once elected? We have had too much of that, in both parties, and I, for one, am awfully tired of it. I want to know what the candidates stand for. As the song says, "If you dont stand for something, you will fall for anything."
And that is my two cents worth.
Pete

These are not Fred's Problems

His ideals and stance on issues is fine but he took to long to start stating them authoritatively. He entered the race too late and has image problems - he looks old and tired and has a very young wife (not his first either). The law and order vote will only get you so far. Not to mention he is not Baptist or running around preaching about Jesus. Nor does he look like the doofus used car salesman that Huckabee does.

I have learned that so long as you say God and Jesus enough you can get 20% of the GOP vote.

Maybe if Fred declared war on the Baby Killers and Sodomites he might be doing better. Those people voting for the Huckster do not care about any of the issues Fred is talking about.

Huckabee: Raising Taxes OK
The Anti "Man-Made" Global Warming Resource

"His ideals and stance on

"His ideals and stance on issues is fine but he took to long to start stating them authoritatively."

While I agree with your statement, I don't think that it is too late for him to get his message out. In today's enviroment, he could get his message out quickly. I am at a loss as to why he doesn't seem to be campaigning as heartily as he should. I mean, if he didn't want to run, why did he enter? All online quizzes I have taken show Thompson to be most aligned with me, therefor I am greatly disappointed he is not doing well to this point. I still believe that he has time to move up, but I am not holding my breath.

Fred's Problems

After hearing and reading a lot about Fred. You find out that he had no ambition to be president but that so many wanted him to run that he said he would take on the job. That explains it all to me. I am hoping that he will reconsider being a VP.

Huckabee: Raising Taxes OK
The Anti "Man-Made" Global Warming Resource

me too I am hoping for a

me too

I am hoping for a Mitt/Fred ticket

 

 

"Get off the phone you big dope!!!!!!!!!!" Mark Levin

Dead on Pete!

 

Too often the candidates kneejerk to the medias perception of what they should do.

Fred determined that he would be the president if the people wished it so, and is running his campaign along that principle. He has stated who he is and what he believes. How he acts and what he does is consistant unlike most of the other candidates. You or I may have done things diferently, but it's his drum to beat. My vote for him in the primary will be based on his stands on the issues I hold important, not on the polls or whether he, in the medias eyes, wins some popularity poll.

Is he an ideal candidate? Heck no! Does he symbolize the feelings of most conservatives? Yup! 

This sums up Fred's problems

"Fred determined that he would be the president if the people wished it so"

Huckabee: Raising Taxes OK
The Anti "Man-Made" Global Warming Resource

They said Obama would win

They said Obama would win N.H. .....

What charisma?

What charisma?

Charisma, huh...

Isn't that the stuff that lets people with no moral convictions manipulate other people with no will? Charisma was what got that epitome of moral fiber, William Jefferson Clinton, elected and re-elected, so my opinion of such is rather low. That said, Thompson has what I call "charisma that counts". You can see it in moments like this when he stands up to the morons intent on wrecking his campaign through manipulation of public perception and when he lays out his stance on an issue. He doesn't have the photogenic face or talent for talking his opponents into the gutter and himself onto a pedestal with empty rhetoric, things that are normally associated with charisma. Instead, he comes across as sincere in his convictions and more than willing to give the media a concussion from having their bias slapped across their collective face, two things I should hope the American people are looking for in a President.

I'd love to believe that the public has had enough of "flash over substance" candidates and can instead evaluate them based on message, sincerity, and capability, but with a media hell-bent on feeding the celebrity-worship rampant in this country, I'm not delusional enough to think image doesn't count. That's just another reason I detest how the media has treated the GOP in general and Thompson in particular: Ignore them as long as you can, then make them look bad when you can't. I understand Thompson's late entry hurt his coverage some, but that doesn't excuse the way the major networks have kept away from covering him at all as much as possible or the way they make sure every time they are forced to give him air-time, they spin it to look bad. The ironic part is that the guy still manages to turn it back on them and poke fun at the obvious bias, spin, and lies they use. Who needs a better reason to vote for someone than that the media hates him because he won't let them get away with their normal jackassery? That alone should be an indicator of excellent candidate material.

www.rhjunior.com Great comics with a hefty dose of Christian and anti-nutjob goodness.

"With your mind as high as Mt. Fuji you can see all things clearly. And you can see all the forces that shape events; not just the things near to you." -Miyamoto Musashi

Yeah, he still does nothing

Yeah, he still does nothing for me. He seems like a good guy, but I feel like someone had to talk him into running, like he's doing a favor for an in-law.

That doesn't inspire me to vote for him. 

I get the same sort of vibe

I get the same sort of vibe from him, actually, though I don't think anyone talked him into it. I really think he'd rather not run, and that makes me like him even more. Anyone who doesn't really want to be President but wants to help the nation and sees no better way gets points in my book. Anyone who genuinely wants to be President immediately sends up the red flag for me.

www.rhjunior.com Great comics with a hefty dose of Christian and anti-nutjob goodness.

"With your mind as high as Mt. Fuji you can see all things clearly. And you can see all the forces that shape events; not just the things near to you." -

But shouldn't you WANT to be

But shouldn't you WANT to be leader of the free world? It shouldn't see like a chore. It should be something you relish.

 

Relish

Like Genghis Khan, Adolph Hitler, Stalin?

I think you're better off with someone who follows a sense of duty than one with a Napoleon complex.

I ♣ My Seal

CA, bingo. My point is

CA, bingo. My point is that a number of the candidates seem to want the office simply to be President, either as a novelty or as a power-trip. To put it simply, I HATE people like that. Control freak parents have given me something of a pet-peeve on the topic. Fred comes across as a guy who would much rather not take the office, but views it as his duty to help the country as best he can, and there are few, if any, positions better suited to that sort of action than the President's.

www.rhjunior.com Great comics with a hefty dose of Christian and anti-nutjob goodness.

"With your mind as high as Mt. Fuji you can see all things clearly. And you can see all the forces that shape events; not just the things near to you." -Miyamoto Musashi

Cortillaen, I believe that

Cortillaen, I believe that you and Cool Arrow have the right perspective. I would rather have a President, or anyone elected to any office for that matter, who was pushed into office (somewhat like our first) than one who boasts what a great leader he/she will be. Elected positions, for the most part, should be viewed as taking a temporary job that very few would like to do. Kinda like the show "Dirty Jobs".

Historically Speaking

Right on Cor.. Wasn't that the way George Washington approached the office and we've not improved on him in over 200 years. Clinton and Carter are two that were driven by massive ego's and neither was qualified to hold the office and the country is still paying the price for it. Unfortunately, driven by massive wealth and prosperity and the unhistorical belief by many in this country that we can't lose what we have, shine is more important than substance.

Now why would you go

Now why would you go negative? Relish doesn't instantly mean horrible dictator.

Why Fed Thompson didn't get

Why Fed Thompson didn't get in this race earlier, and with the gusto he is capable of, is beyond me. Had he started this when everyone else did, and been as forceful, we wouldn't really be talking about anyone else.

At this point, a Romney/Thompson ticket makes the most sense. You almost have to have a Southerner on the ticket to win, and I can't see Romney, if he wound up as the nominee, picking Huckster to run with him.

Gary,

I am not in total disagreement with your sentiment here, but I think I know what Fred would say if you posed that question to him:

"Hey, the race ain't over yet."

Give the man a chance.

None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free. -J.W. von Goethe

We'll see what happens

We'll see what happens tomorrow.

I like Fred, a lot. Everyone can rationalize his actions, but frankly, in today's 24 hour a day media, you gotta get out there and be seen. I would love Fred as President, but I am a realist.

"...but frankly, in today's

"...but frankly, in today's 24 hour a day media, you gotta get out there and be seen."

I would suggest, again, that this is far less a result of his actions and more a result of the MSM being horrified of letting him get mainstream appeal. I am loathe to accept your proposition that said media can dictate the next President through such underhanded tactics. However, given their pull and demonstrable bias, a class-act suit against several big names might be worthwhile either way, and timing it well could diminish their ability to exert their full influence. Gross dereliction of duties, anyone?

www.rhjunior.com Great comics with a hefty dose of Christian and anti-nutjob goodness.

"With your mind as high as Mt. Fuji you can see all things clearly. And you can see all the forces that shape events; not just the things near to you." -Miyamoto Musashi

Great minds think alike! I

Great minds think alike! I have though for awhile about some sort of lawsuit. Not sure how far it would get. I'm afraid the First Amendment would stand in the way.

But if some sharp lawyer is reading this, I'd kick a buck or two in for the cause.

Fred's the man!

His willingness to smack down 'reporters' should be reason enough to vote for Fred.

Chai

“The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you’ve got it made.” —Groucho Marx

Bravo, Fred! Well done!

Bravo, Fred! Well done! :D

The Rocky Mountain Collegian: Illustrating Idiocy

My opinion, precisely (as

My opinion, precisely (as noted above). In a rather odd sort of way, the media can fulfill its supposed role. You just have to invert their opinion of any given candidate to make use of it. Personally, the outright attempt to ignore Thompson as much as possible speaks volumes on how scared they are of this guy, and anyone who terrifies the faux-newspeople appeals to me. Given his growing record of handing out verbal smackdowns on their bias-ridden coverage, I suppose that appeal is well-deserved.

www.rhjunior.com Great comics with a hefty dose of Christian and anti-nutjob goodness.

"With your mind as high as Mt. Fuji you can see all things clearly. And you can see all the forces that shape events; not just the things near to you." -Miyamoto Musashi

Frankly, I could not care

Frankly, I could not care less if Fred Thompson was, in fact, being dismissive of the so-called "stimulus package." I think it is a horrible idea all the way around. All it will do is give the democrats an opportunity to score points with their constituents, most of which perpetually walk around with their hands out.

What is worse is that it will, with the exception of the temporary tax relief (which is somewhat ill-targeted in the first place) have no perceptable affect on the overall economy, in my opinion.

What we need is permanent, top to bottom serious tax reform. Anything else is nothing more than a band-aid on a wound that increases in size daily.

I am rather glad to see that he went after the liberal MSM directly. It is too bad the rest of the republicans do not borrow a page frm Fred in this area.

None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free. -J.W. von Goethe

Go Fred Go! I have loved

Go Fred Go!

I have loved the way he has told the msm where to go...but by the same token I wished he would of turned it around and used them...a lot earlier...

Not his nature to play games...that's why I have always had the deepest respect for him, I have listened to him on the Senate floor for along time...I hope and pray he makes good in SC...he is really the only one running on the conservative side that makes me really smile for our country if he made it as President...

Time will tell soon enough...

Primary voters

I guess what disappoints me the most is the fact that those of us paying atention to the primaries are the most politically invloved and still there is support for pro-amnesty McCain over someone like Fred.  Unless you live in a cave, how can a person NOT know who is running and what the candidates stand for.  I could understand if it was the general elections where the politically ignorant go out & vote, but the primaries?  I am soooo disappointed in my fellow Republicans.  I guess I am just too conservative for my own good.  I hope you're right Khyris.

Those of us who get it protect those of you who don't

SOP, don't be fooled...

by the MSM catterwalling about mcrino's "support", he had the same "support" in 2000, remember? i would throw in that all of the meaningless polling is inaccurate, so don't fall for it. Real republicans will come out for just about anyone but mcrino.

 

roberts = msm a$$ hole

clearly, all roberts wanted was to incessantly parrot "you don't want a stimulus, you mean republican". he did not care one iota about Thompson's ideas and position on the economy, just his petty little anti-Fred message. Fred came close to falling into his little liberal trap too. but not quite...

 

Go Fred!

Fred Thompson is one

Fred Thompson is one Republican the Clintons, and thus the Clinton News Network, fears...that's why they've been attacking him incessantly, implying that his campaign is never going to get in gear.  They've also been attacking Romney and Rudy because they want our nominee to be (God Forbid) McCain or Huckafraud.  Sorry McCain and Huckafraud supporters, but we're not going to beat the Democrats by being better Democrats.