MSNBC Team Mock, Laugh at McCain Victory Speech

  • Bookmark and Share

During Tuesday's live coverage of the New Hampshire primary, after Republican winner John McCain delivered his victory speech, MSNBC's election night team derided and laughed at the speech, with MSNBC's right-leaning analyst Joe Scarborough leading the charge. As the Arizona Senator's speech ended and anchor Keith Olbermann started to summarize it, Scarborough laughed, "That speech, oh, my God," prompting Olbermann to jokingly chide him: "Calm down. He's still on the stage. ... You can't boo a candidate while he's still on the stage the night he won, Joe." (Transcript follows)

Scarborough started to discuss the speech, commenting that "one thing I can teach, we were all talking about it over here, it is absolutely remarkable-" before Olbermann interrupted: "Don't read the speech?"

Scarborough agreed, and took McCain to task for looking down too much: "Yes, please. If this is your introduction to America in 2008, do not have your head looking straight down into a speech..."

Newsweek's Howard Fineman joked that "it looked like every advisor that he'd ever had had given him one paragraph," inspiring more laughter from Scarborough, and the Washington Post's Eugene Robinson quipped that McCain had "dropped them on his way to the podium, and then resorted them in random order." Robinson added that "it was not a good performance."

Katrina Vanden Heuvel, editor of the liberal Nation magazine, contended that the speech "deflated his victory. That's not going to move him forward heading out."

Scarborough started to turn toward a more serious analysis of the speech as he asked Robinson, "But seriously, though, talk about John McCain's speech tonight." But any positive analysis of McCain's words was not pursued as Robinson merely responded that "we've kind of covered the speech...it was a chance to do what Mitt Romney did a few minutes ago," before moving on to give praise to Romney's concession speech.

Below is a transcript of the relevant portion of the Tuesday January 8 MSNBC coverage of the New Hampshire primary, from around 9:25 p.m.:

KEITH OLBERMANN, right after McCain's speech ended: Just 301 days until the presidential election. And John McCain-

JOE SCARBOROUGH: 299.

OLBERMANN: 301.

SCARBOROUGH: I think it's 299 now.

OLBERMANN: Hush over there, Scarborough. Scarborough says it's 299.

SCARBOROUGH, laughing: That speech, oh, my God.

OLBERMANN: All right. Calm down. He's still on the stage. You're going to be, you can't, you can't, you can't boo a candidate while he's still on the stage the night he won, Joe. Do I have to teach you everything about politics, all of a sudden?

SCARBOROUGH: Thank you, Keith. Thank you. I'll tell you, one thing I can teach, we were all talking about it over here, it is absolutely remarkable.

OLBERMANN: Don't read the speech?

SCARBOROUGH: That at this moment -- yes, please. If this is your introduction to America in 2008, do not have your head looking straight down into a speech that, Howard Fineman, you said, what did it look like?

HOWARD FINEMAN, Newsweek: Well, it looked like every advisor that he'd ever had had given him one paragraph.

[Scarborough laughs] 

OLBERMANN: One sentence.

FINEMAN: One sentence. And he read them all. That's like-

EUGENE ROBINSON, Washington Post: But he dropped them on his way to the podium, and then resorted them in random order.

FINEMAN: You know what, I feel, having seen him yesterday up there, you know, he deserves it. If he wants to talk all night, let him do it, because this is his big, big, big moment.

SCARBOROUGH: And Gene, you were saying, though, I mean, after the third time he misread a line.

ROBINSON: Yeah, he should have just said whatever at that point and just move on, I think. It was not a good performance.

KATRINA VANDEN HEUVEL, The Nation: It deflated his victory. That's not going to move him forward heading out-

FINEMAN: To be serious about it for a second, these speeches here are an important time for the candidates to set the tone and introduce themselves, or reintroduce themselves, in his case, around the country.

SCARBOROUGH: Do you remember how in 2004, we had a back and forth about John Kerry's speech, and we both talked about, there are times when politicians introduce themselves to America. And when you get that introduction, and this is John McCain part two, when you get that introduction, you better get it right because that's-

VANDEN HEUVEL: Think about Obama, 2004. Think about Obama, Iowa night. Now, he read that speech. He was the only one of the three leading candidates, but he did it with a grace and a passion, which you did not see with Mr. McCain tonight.

FINEMAN: In the opposite way, I hate to bring it up again, but don't forget Howard Dean in 2004.

VANDEN HEUVEL: That mike was in the unidirectional way. Can we remember that? And Mr. Dean is doing a terrific job, 50-state strategy at the DNC.

SCARBOROUGH: Gene, we don't want to talk about Howard Dean. But seriously, though, talk about John McCain's speech tonight.

ROBINSON: No, well, we've kind of covered the speech. I mean, it was a chance to do what Mitt Romney did a few minutes ago.

The panel went on to praise Romney's speech.

—Brad Wilmouth is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

At least you got to see a Republican speak...

AFN News showed (at least) four hours of CNN's coverage of the NH Primary. We saw Hillary speak - twice.  We saw Obama speak - twice.  We saw Edwards speak - twice.  I can't recall ever seeing a Republican speak.  Wolf Blitzer and crew spent four hours talking about Democrats as if they were the only group that had a primary in New Hampshire.

Vote for "<insert name of conservative who stands up to the media>" for President in 2008.

Also

Mike Barnacle also piled on shortly afterwards, to which Olberman offered a sarcastic apology:

http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2008/01/08/new-hampshire-2008-yucking-it-up-at-msnbc-over-mccain-speech/

 

"The shadow proves the sunshine" - Switchfoot

http://www.xanga.com/mikeknaj

McCain and Huckabee Republicans?

They both seem more like Lieberman Democrats to me. 

Granted, they fill a need for conservative Democrat voters and independents due to the gaping hole in the Democrat party brought by its lurch to the left over Iraq (and by the ascendancy of a socialist professional class of reporters, environmentalists, and teachers gifted to us by the Leftist ideologues who now monopolize our university system).

Has anyone else noticed a large anti-Romney, anti-Giuliani push throughout the media?  Does that mean they are seen as the most threatening contenders from the right? 

Neither fit the bill as perfect conservatives, but they are the only two out of the bunch that don't make me feel uneasy when I visualize them at the helm. 

You have to love the

You have to love the balance displayed by MSDNC with that panel:

Keith Olbermoronn - uber kook fringe leftist

Katrina Vanden Heuvel - uber kook leftist

Eugene Robinson - uber kook leftist

Howard Fineman - leftist

Joe Scarborough - former "Republican" congressman who now sounds like every leftist on MSDNC.

TE...You're correct about

TE...You're correct about the first three--at least the leftist part.  Re Fineman...that's a stretch.  Seems pretty centrist to me.  And Scarborough...same conservative he's always been, and still claims to be, i.e. a "Reagan Republican".

Jer

}}---> I can top that Jer

I'm proud to state Olbuffoon is the only name out of that group I recognize.

How you guys can keep track of the preipheral Liberal lapdogs is beyond me.

I ♣ My Seal

Cool...C'mon, you're way

Cool...C'mon, you're way too well-informed for me to buy that--at the very least with respect to Scarborough, who is frequently mentioned here at NB.

Vanden Heuvel is on staff at the Nation, frequently a guest panelist on This Week, and is about as left as one can get.

Robinson is liberal African-American columnist at Washington Post.

I try to make some effort to keep up with both the liberal and the conservative lapdogs.

Jer

}}---> Nope Jer

I'm proud to say I know who Scarbrough is, but the only Dork I know of on his program is the Liberal daughter of Zbignew Brzinski. 

I ♣ My Seal

HEY...

He was'nt part of the story, but was mentioned by MikeknaJ, Mike Barnicle should NOT be overlooked here. Barnicle has had issues involving plagiarism & journalistic fraud. It cost him a gig he had with the Boston Globe. He is a perfect fit at MSNBC, absolutly ZERO standards, dishonest as hell, & loving every minute of it. He's no better then BathTubBoy, Chris"The Drooler"Mathews, David Shuster, Mika, & Abrams are all just worthless from a journalistic standpoint.

What the hell is GE waiting for, MSNBC has no ratings, & this is an excelent example of why. I would be pissed if I were a GE shareholder & had to see this moneypit hurting the shareprice.

 

"Some of us are wise, some of us are otherwise"  Mark Levin

One of Very Very Few

You must have been one of the very few people still watching that station. Given their diminshing ratings it is safe to say that whatever they say has no effect on the election.

No news here

Typical MSM -- Dims are sugar and spice; Republicans are frogs and puppy dog tails. By painting all Republicans as retarded, the MSM perpetuates the myth of the elite and oh-so-smart and sophisticated intellectual -- who will provide us the guidance we are so lacking in our pathetic lives.

___________________________________ 

If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber

The Difference a generation makes

What a difference a generation makes.... Obviously class skipped this one..

Odd that  MSNBC would make fun of anyone considering their ratings! 

For What Its Worth...

For what its worth, I pretty much felt the same way about McCain's speech. Just the feel of it was in stark contrast with the more extemporaneous speeches from Huckabee and Romney (and Hillary and Obama later in the evening). At first I thought that my perception was just tainted considering that I'm not a McCain backer. But then my relatively apolitical female friend made the same comment unprompted.
I think it had the ingredients of a good speech, but it did seem to ramble at some points. There was actually two or 3 times when I thought that he was finished, only to see him start up again.
But McCain's speech still got a far better reception at my house than Silky's. We were flabbergasted that he was using pretty much the exact same concession speech that he used in Iowa. After a couple minutes, my lady friend was lip-synching along with him.

The most radical revolutionary will become a conservative the day after the revolution
Hannah Arendt

I agree with you, Fidel

I agree with you, Fidel....Nothing against McCain, but I was very surprised by his (sometimes labored) reading of a lengthy--though generally well-crafted--victory speech.

On the other hand, Romney's and Huckabee's concession remarks--whether rehearsed or ex temporaneous [probably a combination]--were far more impressive.

Jer

Sounds like a Bush instant replay..

The Three stooges better realize that Bush isn't the Best Speech maker in the world, but he's been President of the Free world for eight years now.

Degredation doesn't work boys, except to reduce your ratings. 

I'd like to see Obama making an anti-military Liberal agenda speech in Texas....to non adoring fans.....soon I hope, unless he chooses to bypass Texas on his way to california dreaming.

The Obama Bubble is so big, you can see right Thru it.....where IS the substance ?  I can't wait for McCain and Obama to get on the same Debate stage.......it may not happen, but it would be worth it.....30 yr. senator against a 2 yr. novice.   

You're Right And You're Wrong

You're correct in the fact that Bush 43 isn't the most naturally mellifluous speaker in the world. But that fact was moot in 2000 and 2004 because he ran against a wooden Al Gore and a patently insincere John Kerry. Substance & pedagoguery aside, the stylistic difference between him and someone like Obama would be significant in a head to head debate. And whether we like it or not, these things matter. Watch the 1960 presidential debates between Nixon and Kennedy. It matterd then and it matters now.
As much as I admired and respect Bob Dole, I'm afraid a McCain-Obama race would be 1996 all over again.

The most radical revolutionary will become a conservative the day after the revolution

Did anyone actually see McCain Speak??????

To those whose saw the speech:

We're these "Uber-Leftists" wrong in there assessment?  Was McCain's speech delivered well?  I read some nice words about honor and country but maybe the reason McCain has struggled is that he may not be a good speaker. 

 

Don't get so blinded by your stereotypes of the media that you forget that they see what we see.

Joe Scarborough, with his

Joe Scarborough, with his stilted delivery, should hardly make fun about someone else's manner of speaking.