MSNBC's Olbermann Over the Edge? He Tags Bush 'Liar,' Calls for Impeachment Again

  • Bookmark and Share

On Tuesday's "Countdown," MSNBC host Keith Olbermann delivered his latest "Special Comment" rant against President Bush, branding him a "liar" because the President raised the possibility of withdrawing some American troops during his speech in Iraq, after the President had also spoken, in Robert Draper's new book, "Dead Certain," of "sustaining a presence" in Iraq. Olbermann assumed Bush's two statements -- about withdrawing some troops and "sustaining a presence" -- could not be consistent, thus contending Bush had revealed an "evil secret." Olbermann: "A man with any self respect, having inadvertently revealed such an evil secret, would have already resigned and fled the country! You have no remaining credibility about Iraq, sir!" (Transcript follows)

Olbermann took exception with Bush's declaration that troop levels would be based on "a calm assessment by our military commanders" and not "a nervous reaction by Washington politicians to poll results in the media," as the Countdown host labeled the President's words as a "depraved indifference to democracy." Olbermann: "That, perhaps, was the most perfectly-crafted phrase of his presidency. For depraved indifference to democracy, for the craven projection of political motives onto those trying to save lives and save a nation, for a dismissal of the value of the polls and the importance of the media, for a summary of all he does not hold dear about this nation or its people, nothing could top that."

The MSNBC host opened his rant referring to the President's "startling admission of the true motive for this war," and labeled a Bush quote from Draper's book as "horrifying." Olbermann: "He presumably did not know that there had already appeared those damning excerpts from Robert Draper's book 'Dead Certain:' 'I'm playing for October-November,' Mr. Bush said to Draper. That, evidently, is the time during which he thinks he can sell us the real plan, which is, to quote him, ‘to get us in a position where the presidential candidates will become comfortable about sustaining a presence.'"

The "Countdown" host called for the President's impeachment again: "Mr. Bush, our presence in Iraq must end, even if it means your resignation, even if it means your impeachment, even if it means a different Republican to serve out your term, even if it means a Democratic Congress and those true patriots among the Republicans standing up and denying you another penny for Iraq, other than for the safety and safe conduct home of our troops. This country cannot run the risk of what you can still do to this country in the next 500 days. Not while you, sir, are playing."

Olbermann also exhibited an overreaction to Bush's use of the word "play" as he cited Bush's quote from Draper's book that he was "playing for October-November." Olbermann: "And there it is, sir. We've caught you. Your goal is not to bring some troops home, maybe, if we let you have your way now. Your goal is not to set the stage for eventual withdrawal. You are, to use your own disrespectful, tone-deaf word, 'playing' at getting the next Republican nominee to agree to jump into this bottomless pit with you, and take us into it with him, as we stay in Iraq for another year, and another, and another, and anon. Everything you said about Iraq yesterday, and everything you will say, is a deception, for the purpose of this one cynical, unacceptable, brutal goal: perpetuating this war indefinitely. War today, war tomorrow, war forever! And you are playing at it! Playing!"

Below is a complete transcript of Olbermann's "Special Comment" from the end of the Tuesday, September 4 "Countdown" show on MSNBC:

KEITH OLBERMANN: Finally tonight, a "Special Comment" about Mr. Bush's trip and his startling admission of the true motive for this war, which was revealed during his absence. And so he is back from his annual surprise gratuitous photo-op in Iraq, and what a sorry spectacle it was. But it was nothing compared to the spectacle of one unfiltered, unguarded, horrifying quotation in the new biography to which Mr. Bush has consented.

As he deceived the troops at Al-Asad Air Force Base yesterday with the tantalizing prospect that some of them might not have to risk being killed and might get instead to go home, Mr. Bush probably did not know that, with his own words, he had already been proved to be a liar, that he had been lying, is lying, will be lying about Iraq.

He presumably did not know that there had already appeared those damning excerpts from Robert Draper's book "Dead Certain."

"I'm playing for October-November," Mr. Bush said to Draper. That, evidently, is the time during which he thinks he can sell us the real plan, which is, to quote him, "to get us in a position where the presidential candidates will become comfortable about sustaining a presence."

Comfortable, that is, with saying about Iraq, again quoting the President, "stay longer."

And there it is, sir. We've caught you. Your goal is not to bring some troops home, maybe, if we let you have your way now. Your goal is not to set the stage for eventual withdrawal. You are, to use your own disrespectful, tone-deaf word, "playing" at getting the next Republican nominee to agree to jump into this bottomless pit with you, and take us into it with him, as we stay in Iraq for another year, and another, and another, and anon.

Everything you said about Iraq yesterday, and everything you will say, is a deception, for the purpose of this one cynical, unacceptable, brutal goal: perpetuating this war indefinitely.

War today, war tomorrow, war forever!

And you are playing at it! Playing!

A man with any self respect, having inadvertently revealed such an evil secret, would have already resigned and fled the country! You have no remaining credibility about Iraq, sir!

And yet, yesterday at Al-Asad, Mr. Bush kept playing, and this time, using the second of his two faces.

The President told reporters, quote, "They (General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker) tell me if the kind of success we are now seeing continues, it will be possible to maintain the same level of security with fewer American forces."

And so, Mr. Bush got his fraudulent headlines today: "Bush May Bring Some Troops Home."

While the reality is, we know from what he told Draper, that the President's true hope is that they will not come home; but that they will stay there because he is keeping them there now in hope that those from his political party fighting to succeed him will prolong this unendurable disaster into the next decade.

But, to a country dying of thirst, the President seemed to vaguely promise a drink from a full canteen, a promise predicated on the assumption that he is not lying.

Yet you are lying, Mr. Bush. Again. But now, we know why.

You gave away more of yourself than you knew in that Draper book. And you gave away still more on the arduous trip back out of Iraq hours in the air, without so much as a single vacation.

"If you look at my comments over the past eight months," you told reporters, "it's gone from a security situation in the sense that we're either going to get out and there will be chaos, or, more troops. Now, the situation has changed, where I am able to speculate on the hypothetical."

Mr. Bush, the only "hypothetical" here is that you are not now holding our troops hostage. You have no intention of withdrawing them. But that doesn't mean you can't pretend you're thinking about it, does it?

That is your genius, sir. As you see it, anyway. You can deduce what we want. We, the people, remember us? And then use it against us.

You could hold that canteen up and promise it to the parched nation. And the untold number of Americans whose lives have not been directly blighted by Iraq or who do not realize that their safety has been reduced and not increased by Iraq, they will get the bullet points: "Bush is thinking about bringing some troops home. Bush even went to Iraq."

You can fool some of the people all of the time, can't you, Mr. Bush? You are playing us!

And as for the most immediate victims of the President's perfidy and shameless manipulation, those troops -- yesterday sweating literally as he spoke at Al-Asad Air Base -- tonight, again sweating figuratively in the Valley Of The Shadow Of Death, the President saved, for them, the most egregious "playing" of the entire trip.

"I want to tell you this about my decision, about my decision about troop levels. Those decisions will be based on a calm assessment by our military commanders on the conditions on the ground, not a nervous reaction by Washington politicians to poll results in the media."

One must compliment Mr. Bush's writer. That, perhaps, was the most perfectly-crafted phrase of his presidency. For depraved indifference to democracy, for the craven projection of political motives onto those trying to save lives and save a nation, for a dismissal of the value of the polls and the importance of the media, for a summary of all he does not hold dear about this nation or its people, nothing could top that.

As if, sir, you listened to all the "calm assessments" of our military commanders rather than firing the ones who dared say the emperor has no clothes, and the President no judgment.

As if, sir, your entire presidency was not a "nervous reaction," and you yourself nothing but a Washington politician.

As if, sir, the media does not largely divide into those parts your minions are playing, and those others who unthinkingly and uncritically serve as your echo chamber, at a time when the nation's future may depend on the airing of dissent.

And as if, sir, those polls were not so overwhelming, and not so clearly reflective of the nation's agony and the nation's insistence.

But this President has ceased to listen. This President has decided that night is day, and death is life, and enraging the world against us is safety. And this laziest of presidents actually interrupted his precious time off to fly to Iraq to play at a photo opportunity with soldiers, some of whom will on his orders be killed before the year, maybe before the month is out.

Just over 500 days remain in this presidency. Consider the dead who have piled up on the battlefield in these last 500 days.

Consider the singular fraudulence of this President's trip to Iraq yesterday, and the singular fraudulence of the selling of the Petraeus report in these last 500 days.

Consider how this President has torn away at the fabric of this nation in a manner of which terrorists can only dream in these last 500 days.

And consider again how this President has spoken to that biographer, that he is "playing for October-November," that the goal in Iraq is "to get us in a position where the presidential candidates will be comfortable about sustaining a presence." And consider how this revelation contradicts every other rationale he has offered in these last 500 days.

In the context of all that, now consider these next 500 days.

Mr. Bush, our presence in Iraq must end, even if it means your resignation, even if it means your impeachment, even if it means a different Republican to serve out your term, even if it means a Democratic Congress and those true patriots among the Republicans standing up and denying you another penny for Iraq, other than for the safety and safe conduct home of our troops.

This country cannot run the risk of what you can still do to this country in the next 500 days.

Not while you, sir, are playing.

Good night and good luck.

—Brad Wilmouth is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Good Nigt and Good Gravy!

What a silly little ball of hate. 

When a liberal speaks, the truth is busy elsewhere.

Somehow I don't have any difficulty

Somehow I don't have any difficulty picturing this man in a straitjacket while he makes these lunitic rants.

MSNBDS

Olbermann has been in the advanced stages of BDS for some time now.

And MSNBC? Well, consider the source.

This nitwit is gonna give

This nitwit is gonna give himself an aneurism!

There is a trend within

There is a trend within liberal TV these days of treating the news like any other form of brain-dead entertainment. Olbermann's "news" program is a modern incarnation of such idiotic fare as "Mr. Ed" and "Car 54 Where Are You" in the guise of news reporting.

I only hope that the people who watch this journalistic abomination realize what an embarrassment Olbermann truly is. That he is on network TV is an indictment of the crassness of network management. Anyone who takes him seriously can only be regarded as profoundly naive and ignorant.

God how I despise liberals.

Like roid rage without the muscles

Well you see, when Keith was only knee high to a grasshopper, his mother had his butt hermetically sealed. Now he just spews crap from his mouth instead.

Roid Rage Olbermann

Perhaps instead of sterroids he's suffering from hemorrhoids.  He will melt down someday, right now he's getting max $ from the network for the garbage he's spewing. 

What a blithering idiot!

What a fool! This Olbermann character sits behind his little desk, safely protected by the US military, free to say the things he pleases in all his treasonous virulence, blathering on in what seems to be one incredibly long unbroken sentence.

What a tantrum he throws, when our leader decides to allow the commanders on the field -those men and women who actually see the situation day by day- rather than throwing up a pair of hands and dooming Iraq!

Olbermann's ending of "good night and good luck" is oddly appropriate in this situation, as it echoes the words of another cowardly fool who sat behind a desk and spewed bileous lies- a much praised (by ignorant liberals) man with the last name of Murrow, who made his mark in history by ensuring that the happy folks at the KGB had no problems spying on our government.

Good night and good luck indeed, Olbermann- you hope to cement yourself in the annals of history by casting stones at Bush, when you do nothing but cement yourself in with the likes of Sheehan, Fonda and Baldwin. History will judge you very harshly indeed, if Iraq's citizens are faced with the defeat you would force upon them.

George my boy call out Keith Olberman

I fondly remember Patton sincerely wanting to call out Rommel........tank to tank, man to man........alone in the desert battlefield with the winner taking all........ending it the way men would.

In that in the same Patton daydream it would be so American to see George Bush call out Keeter Olberman. Simple challenge, on this side we have George Bush and one Colt 45, 10 paces as like the English we mean to settle this and not prance around like the French at 20 paces and on the other side we have Keeter Olberman with some fitting Makarov in one of those odd Soviet calibers.

Rules are simple. Olberman wants Bush out like so many of the cowardly left in impeachment or death.....let Keeter back it up. He gets Bush and gets what he wants. Bush puts a 320 grain load into Olberman then just like Patton.......Bush gets everyone of these MSM types 6 foot under.

How much do you want to bet that Keeter Olberman would be on challenged file a restraining order and when the US Marshalls dragged him to the contest he would bolt for a plane to France along with several hundred liberals who talk awful brave in "getting a President" but when it is like the days of Henry V, these little cowards would wet their pants if offered a joust.

But all we have is Bush taking it........and Keeter Olberman hiding behind real men on Football Night while they do the fighting and he sits there spewing nothing he has to back up.

The world was better off when we had poetic warriors. The scum hid in little Mexican villages drunk and real men led the body politic.

Jessie Benton Fremont would understand that as did Elizabeth Bacon Custer.

But it will never happen and that is the moral of the meandering in Keeter Olberman knows there are no consequences for his actions. Consequences must return to the body politic and the carcase of media.

 

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

Keith Needs Help

If one of your co-workers exhibited the same type of dementia as Keith, you'd recommend that he get professional help. Instead, MSNBC exploits Keith's condition in order to boost their ratings and advance their political agenda. 

Why doesn't one of these activist groups protest MSNBC for taking advantage of a mentally ill person?

Vote for "<insert name of conservative who stands up to the media>" for President in 2008.

I still like to know how

I still like to know how MSNBC defends their "Star Reporter" the new "Murrow" who doesn't interview anyone on the Right,never leaves his newsroom to cover the big stories(like Iraq) and clearly shows his bias on his program...

MSNBC makes it clear they regard KO's show as a news program not an opinion show like O'Reilly's on FOX so that means they... have a "Reporter" that is allowed to express his political views on air during the newscast and can choose not to interview anyone who has an opposing viewpoint from his and they don't think anything is wrong about that?...I mean the man handed Bill Clinton a check before an interview ON AIR...is that professional journalism ?..would Murrow have done that?

 

*********** John Edwards '08 ***********
"More woman than Hillary,more black than Obama!"

A cancer on journalism

MSDNC, and their enablers, NBC, are rapidly going off the charts in their overt hatred of President Bush, our soldiers, airmen and sailors, and those of us who are something they will never be .... patriots.

From the drooling, ogling, draft-dodging peace corps coward Matthews, to an failed sports-reader pretending to be the ghost of Murrow, to a mother network that is nothing more than a campaign committee for the socialist democrat party, this entire organization is a disgrace to the media and America.

 

the importance of the media

"for a dismissal of the value of the polls and the importance of the media"

And there it is, Olbermann. We've caught you. Olbermann is furious that Bush trusts the military rather than the media. Olbermann is angry that Bush will listen to General Petraeus instead of ... well, Keith Olbermann. That infuriates Keith!

We all know that Olbermann's chief motive is advancing Olbermann. He imagines himself a journalist, and you can actually hear him cooing when he's among journalists (Jonathan Alter, Dana Milbank, etc.). It's a classic case of ego-projection, where you portray a group as superior and exalted, so that when you join that group, you "justify" your own self-image as superior and exalted. Olbermann's embarrassing attempts to 'channel' Edward R. Murrow are as revealing as they are disturbing.

This is another case of the media retaliating against anyone who questions their self-imagined "authority." Remember when Bush said that he doesn't pay much attention to the media? They were furious. Bush said that if he wants to know what Condoleeza Rice thinks, he can just ask her, instead of relying on what some reporter thinks she meant. The media retaliated (Helen Thomas' example here) by trying to spin what he said as "Bush doesn't read." The media is filled with true believers in the divinity of the media. They believe they have the right to determine what America thinks. That's why they went into the media in the first place. They want to dictate what you think.

Thank God for reality.

How bad do you suck when the

How bad do you suck when the National Enquirer is a more reputable news source than you and your little internationally broadcast news program?

Tell me this; when will our

Tell me this; when will our side deal with traitors as traitors? When will traitors get their punishment? How many soldiers will have to die at the hands of an enemy bolstered by the words of morons like Olberman before we act and do something about these traitors?

It's one thing to discuss this behind closed doors with your fellow Americans, and that, I would never want to dissuade, but this, open and freely seen tirade against our President and against our Country has once again crossed over the line.

Does not one of our reps have a sac left? 

____________________________________________________

"We can only reason from what is; we can reason on actualities, but not on possibilities." ~ Thomas Paine

NBC would not

air the commercial for the veterans' group pro-surge although CNN and FoxNews did. Their excuse? They do not want to air controversial or advocacy commercials. But they have no problem with airing controversial advocacy news programs it seems.

MSNBC's ratings remain in the tank. Obviously the powers that be at that network have a political agenda that trumps ratings. 

I could understand if Olberman brought in viewers, but he doesn't. He's Beale, that character from Network, the only difference being that that raving lunatic attracted high viewership.

What the hell is going on at NBC and MSNBC?

What does McCain have to say about a network shilling for one party over the other--for free and using the public airwaves?

 

 

 

This clown

 Remember begining Sunday night this clown will be on Football Night in America on NBC. I don't plan on watching it. I hope a lot of other fans don't either. I am getting tired of the networks trying to mix politics with sports. This included when Rush was on ESPN.

 Overbite has 5 nights a week to rant and rave. It is not my fault that no one is watching.  

A bonafided and certified member of the beer guzzling, NASCAR watching middle class.

Should have stayed at ESPN

KO should have stayed at ESPN, where he had some credibility. Some.

Somewhere along the line, he must have thought he could outdo Frank Deford. Well, he has proven over and over that he couldn't carry (or wear) Deford's jock.

One Has To Ask Themselves

What is it with Corporate America?  Do any of the suits at General Electric watch this nonsense?  And if they do, what's the reaction?  Good going Keith, you  nailed him again?  If people such as Olbermann and Matthews are the face of General Electric, then Jeff Immelt and his group of executives have left something out of their Corporate Standards. 

  Let the silly little

 

Let the silly little man rant... the longer they keep him on, the more he self destructs.

I no longer allow his face on my TV or in my house - he is persona non grata, but it warms my heart to see him on the pages of NB for I know his time is limited.

Fake but Accurate

Olbermann?  Never watch him.  He's like a Dan Rather re-run.

Interesting WoodyM,

What do you consider accurate in his statements and what do you consider fake about him?

Since you're interested, Karma, I ask you the same question

What do YOU consider accurate and what do you consider fake about him?

I saw this rant.  Did you?  Did you watch the obviously manufactured "outrage" he spewed?   Did you watch and listen to the irresponsible bilge he spewed?  Or the lies he told?   If so, what were your favorite parts?  If not, your question is pretty dumb, because you have nothing to base an opinion on.

Glad you asked RJ

I make it a point NOT to watch or listen to him anymore, so no, I did not watch or listen to this episode. I did read most of what he said on this post and that is why I do not give him any of my time. I believe little-to-nothing he says is accurate. I believe his tone and mannerism are faked for the camera but his hatred and words are real. My question was aimed at "Fake but Accurate." I guess I just don't understand the "accurate" part. Can you expound? By the way, how can you stomach watching him?

My mistake, Karma

I thought you were going to defend Olberman.  My apologies. 

I don't usually watch him, either.  I just happened to catch his rant on Morning Joe today.   He literally turned my stomach.  I truly believe the man is insane. 

Pathetically, Scarborough and the fawning liberal "journalist" he was talking with pretended that Olberman had actually said something of significance.  It's pretty clear that Joe S. has sold out to keep the gig.

P.S. I think Woody's "fake but accurate" line is from Rather's attempted defense of the phony military papers regarding President Bush.

Thanks RJ

I didn't/don't watch Rather either, so I didn't attribute that line to him. My fault for not keeping a closer eye on the enemies in my view. Thanks for pointing that out to me.

In addition to KO's insanity, I wholeheartedly agree with you on Scarborough's sell-out but I think there's more to it than just keeping his gig. I just can't put a finger on it yet.

My apologies to WoodyM also. I'm not as sharp as him and others here.

Olbermann will be the next

Olbermann will be the next Marv Albert.

I am more and more amused by

I am more and more amused by Keith's hate filled, ignorant tirades.  He has become a cartoon of the fringe left.  I knew the President going to anbar province would be seen as a big f-u to terrorists and their enablers like Reid and wacko media folks like Olberman and sure enough he stepped right in it and embarrassed himself again.  I know there is an advertising goal to reach the lowest common denominator watching tv, but I would think some rational person at msnbc would give Keith a clue once in a while.

  His name is Olberman. 

  His name is Olberman.  No need to say anything else.

Screw diversity, celebrate competancy

Hateful @ssclown disrespects again...

STFU Keith!  You wouldn't know the truth if it bit you in your hateful ignorant lefty @ss.  You have never had any credibility except amoung your American loathing liberal troll friends.  If only you dispised the Islamofacists half as much as our President your opinion might be worth something.

Fair and Balanced

After one of these rants, I laugh that the democrat candidates let him moderate one, or two of their debates, but are afraid to debate on Fox News. 

There is no

difference between Olbermanns left wing extremism and an Al Queda propaganda video.

 

There is no question Olbermann is Al Zawaharis representative in America.

 

Olbermann is a traitor who should be captured, tried, convicted and summarily dealt with as a traitor

 

I love how O is so stupid he

I love how O is so stupid he cannot rationalize the idea of bringing home some troops and sustaining a presence at the same time.  He does of course realize that we have a sustained presence in Europe and Asia to this day, but that the number of troops are far less than in the early to mid-1940's...right?

Silly

Don't even think, for a moment, that President Bush even knows who this little queer (yes, queer) is, let alone worry about him.

Olbermann is nothing but a little, insignificant twerp that no one listens to. He is nothing but a little wart on the backside of a puking drunk.

By the fact that he occupies a place on msnbc, tells you volumes about msnbc. Talk about a wee little frog in a wee little pond (mud puddle is more like it). 

This, coming from a man who

This, coming from a man who has no remaining credibility about anything.

A bloviating hatebag. 

Yes! Have some.

Olbermann rants with all of

Olbermann rants with all of the deluded self-assurance of someone who really believes that he, unlike everyone else, has it all figured out. Much like every other conspiracy theory kook, he reads evil things in words and actions - that just aren't there...

 

The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.

- Arabian Proverb

Keith, Just say YES! ... And

Keith, Just say YES! ... And in triple doses ...

Nobody listens?

The fact of the matter is that a lot of people listen to Doberman. There are many reasons. Among them are:

1. There's nothing else on TV (unless you count the "reality" *.*.!*). 2. People always rubberneck at traffic accidents. 3. Some folks need some fodder each day for their anti-liberal fix 4. There are a lot of (non-thinking) people who actually agree with him. 5. Did I mention there's nothing else on? Read a book!

Curt

The lights are on but.........

Unfortunately, his program has gained viewers recently because his competition, O'Reilly, has become a professional vacation taker and, when he shows up for his show, devotes the bulk of his once good program to rappers, reverends, rapists and broads with boobs.

 

 

 

Brilliant!

And there it is, sir. We've caught you. Your goal is not to bring some troops home, maybe, if we let you have your way now.

This would be a brilliant insight, except for the fact that the words "some" and "all" do not mean the same thing. As it is, it's just another example of the kind of head-scratching idiocy that this a$$hat is known for.

So close, though.

Man, he's lame.

This is sort of an aside, but I was watching The Soup on E! last weekend, and it was another amusing episode of trashing celebrities, talk shows and other foolishness, when at the end, host Joel McHale had a "Special Comment" segment on Lindsey Lohan, Britney Spears, et. al., and tag teamed with Keith Olbermann. It was supposed to be a funny segment, but someone apparently forgot to tell Keith, who either was played it straight or has lost all ability to deliver comedy. And naturally, he got an anti-Bush crack in there as well.

It really deflated the momentum of the show. Good thing it was near the end. Even Joel had that look of, "is he actually being serious?" when Keith was finished.

Man, he's lame.

*****

"Why would the library ban a book like The Six Bunny-Wunnies Freak Out?" - Linus Van Pelt

little keith is just angry

little keith is just angry because his pre football show was a bomb and
in most areas they put it on after the game. No one
watched....poor keith. Or he just has PMS.

Olberloon is obviously

Olberloon is obviously popping viagra and cialis like tic tacs...

Hey Keith, accept reality... that stuff ain't ever gonna work for ya pal!

Keith is just pissed he will never be half the man GWB is...EVER!

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

What a pompous ass, his

What a pompous ass, his righteous indignation might play well in the left wing peanut galleries he obviously frequents but most of us can see it for what it is; another off-the–deep-end, ramp-up-the-ratings trawl for more viewers. Perhaps he will manage to convince a few sedative manufacturers to start advertising on his show though.

He is a lunatic... Plain

He is a lunatic...

Plain and simple as that.

I heard his maniacal leftist diatribe last night.

He is NUTS.

Where does one even

Where does one even begin...?

...a dismissal of the value of the polls and the importance of the media...

This has already been touched on by another poster, but - far from being Bush caught telling us how he truly feels - Keith has revealed here how he sees his role in this nation and this war. The previous administration governed by opinion polls; as Dr. Phil would say, "How'd that work out for you?" (Answer: it left us with a stock market bubble ready to burst, a de-fanged military unable to fight a two-front war, and an al-Qaeda that believed America was a "paper tiger".)

"...decisions will be based on a calm assessment by our military commanders on the conditions on the ground, not a nervous reaction by Washington politicians to poll results in the media."

I'm comfortable with that, Keith, but obviously you're not. In saying this, Bush is saying, "I've learned the lesson of Vietnam. I've learned that you win wars by letting the professional soldiers do their jobs and keeping the politicians the hell out of the way."

As if, sir, your entire presidency was not a "nervous reaction," and you yourself nothing but a Washington politician.

Taking on al-Qaeda after 9/11 was a "nervous reaction"? Taking down a tyrant who would've gladly handed nukes over to bin-Laden had he had the chance was a "nervous reaction"? With all due respect, Keith (which isn't saying much), President Bush has spent the last six years cleaning up the messes 'your guy' left behind.

~~~

If you don't stand behind our troops, feel free to stand in front of them!