WaPo Prints Maliki 'No Civil War' in Iraq Story on Page A15


I suppose that Karen DeYoung's story could have been buried deeper in the Washington Post, but it would take some effort:

Civil war has been averted in Iraq and Iranian intervention there has "ceased to exist," Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki said yesterday.

"I can't say there is a picture of roses and flowers in Iraq," Maliki told the Council on Foreign Relations in New York. "However, I can say that the greatest victory, of which I am proud . . . is stopping the explosion of a sectarian war." That possibility, he said, "is now far away."

While political reconciliation is not yet complete, he said, progress is being made. "Reconciliation is not a decision that can be made, but a process that takes continuous efforts and also needs strategic patience," Maliki said.

He said cabinet ministers who have left his government in protest will be replaced, and he expressed confidence that the Iraqi parliament will pass legislation that he, the Bush administration and Congress have demanded.

Maliki, who will speak to the U.N. General Assembly tomorrow, deftly dodged questions about last week's incident in which employees of Blackwater, a private U.S. security firm, allegedly killed 11 Iraqi civilians. While "initial signs" are that "there was some wrongdoing from Blackwater," he said, he will await the results of a U.S.-Iraqi investigation. He dismissed a statement by the interior minister in Baghdad that Blackwater will be banned from Iraq, saying the positions of the ministry and his office are "the same."

Iraqi security forces, Maliki said, are increasingly capable of operating without U.S. support. But he agreed with the Bush administration that an early U.S. withdrawal would be unwise.

Iraq's political leadership, he said through an interpreter, "wants the process of withdrawing troops to happen [simultaneously with] the process of rebuilding Iraqi Security Forces so that they can take responsibility." No one, he said, "wants to risk losing all the achievements" they have made.

Whether or not you agree with al-Maliki's assessment (and there is plenty of room to doubt his pronouncements from both the right and the left), you would think that the Iraqi Prime Minister's statements that the threat of a full-on sectarian war " had ceased to exist" along with Iran's involvement in meddling in Iraq, would be page A1 material.

After all, American politics, foreign and domestic, are being driven by the actions and reactions of Democratic and Republican politicians to news in Iraq.

You might think that a strong claim of positive news--and there is no way to say this is anything other than that sort of claim--would be wildly trumpeted by the Post, if for no other reason than to generate ad revenue and hits that would come from such a controversial claim.

—Bob Owens is an investigative blogger who writes at Confederate Yankee.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The President of a Friendly Country........

Maybe Columbia University will give Maliki equal time  ?

Give the Students a "back to back" comparison of two Mideast countries.....that is, if the University is really interested in Education, Debate, free Speech, opposing opinions....?

We will see which UN speech gets the most MSM coverage..Iraq or Iran.       

What good is a Free Press, if it is a False Press ?   David Foote  GoE

Bob, Do you know on which

Bob,

Do you know on which page they printed the story that Petraeus' surge numbers differ significantly from those of the Pentagon, making it appear that he either lied intentionally or used misleading statistics?

OR the pentagon lied or used misleading stats? 

Somebody's lying and if it's Patraeus, it looks like MoveOn might not have been that far off in their advertising.

Leon... You may want to

Leon...

You may want to take that to the Woodshed.

Your statement had nothing to do with Mr. Owens post.

Trying to derail as usual. 

Wrong BT, It's definitely

Wrong BT,

It's definitely related. 

Bob is claiming the WAPO isn't accurately relating the facts of life on the ground (aka not showing enough good news), hence their placement of the no civil war stuff on a later page.

Well, the effectiveness of the surge is directly related to sectarian violence which is directly related to the prospect of civil war in Iraq.

So I'm on topic on two fronts:

1)  WAPO accurte reporting

2)  Iraq civil war?

 

However, I shall respect

However,

I shall respect your request and I will move this to the woodshed.

 

Thank you Leon... You may

Thank you Leon...

You may get quite a lot of replies.

I think you will anyway...knowing you.

LOL...