Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

February 10, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS
Home » Blogs » Bill Hobbs's blog
  • CNN Reporters Call CPAC a ‘Conservative Petri Dish’
  • Chris Matthews Reacts to JFK Mistress: Kennedy a Hero Who 'Still Arouses the Country'
  • Covering Up JFK’s Roguish Behavior for 50 Years Not Long Enough for NBC’s Viewers
  • Bozell: It's 'Hilarious' CNN Suspended Roland Martin for Inoffensive Tweet; Maybe 'Lefty Loons at MSNBC' Can 'Scoop Him Up' Now
  • CNN Responds to Bozell Letter Demanding Coverage of Catholic Outrage at Obama; We Reply
  • Barbara Walters: It's 'Heartbreaking' to Force Women to View an Ultrasound Before an Abortion
  • MRC Study: ABC and NBC Anything But Fast and Furious On Gunwalking Scandal
  • Bozell Column: The Secular Media vs. Religious Liberty

Bad News Bias: A Tale of Three Economic Surveys

By Bill Hobbs | June 19, 2008 | 16:42

Change font size:  A |  A

Survey question: If the media had the results of three independent surveys of corporate executives about the economy and two of them were more negative than the third, which one wouldn't get much coverage?

In the last few days, three such surveys have been released. Two of them - the Business Roundtable's quarterly CEO Economic Outlook Index and the Duke University/CFO Magazine Global Business Outlook survey - got pretty good coverage in the media.

The third survey, conducted by the University of North Carolina's Kenan-Flagler Business School for the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, less so.

The Duke/CFO magazine survey got coverage from the Charlotte Observer, New York Sun, New York Times, Forbes and CNN (and CFO magazine, naturally).

The Business Roundtable survey also got coverag in multiple media.

The AICPA/UNC survey? Not so much. In fact, the only media outlet I've found that covered it is Financial Week.

How do the surveys' results differ?

The Roundtable's quarterly CEO Economic Outlook Index tumbled five points to 74.5, its lowest level since October 2003 and the sharpest drop in the index in almost two years. Forbes's headline on the Reuters story: Corporate America taking grimmer view of economy.

However, the story notes, "Any reading above 50 indicates growth."

The story continues:

The survey found CEOs had also cut their forecast for overall U.S. economic growth. They now expect gross domestic product to rise 1.3 percent in 2008, down from a prior forecast of 1.5 percent.

Thirty-one percent said they expect their companies' U.S. headcount to fall over the next six months, while 28 percent expect it to rise. In the first quarter, 22 percent of CEOs had expected their staffing levels to decline.

Sixty-eight percent said they expect their sales to rise over the next six months...

The headline could as easily have read "Corporate America sees economy continuing to grow slowly."

The same story also reported on the second survey, the Duke University/CFO Magazine Global Business Outlook, with the same gloomy tone, even though that survey, too, contained positive data. CFO magazine's story says this:

On the bright side, CFOs show somewhat less pessimism than they displayed in the previous quarter, despite the generally gloomy environment. After several quarters of declining optimism, 53 percent of CFOs say they are more pessimistic about the U.S. economy this quarter, and 21 percent say they are more optimistic. In the last survey, released in March, optimism reached a six-year low. At that time, 72 percent of finance chiefs were more pessimistic about the U.S. economy than they were the quarter before, while 8 percent felt more optimistic.

Now, what about the AICPA/UNC survey? It, too, finds both negative and positive views. From Financial Week's story:

Just over half of the 1,400 C.P.A.s in corporate financial positions surveyed early last month by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) said they expect some growth in revenue, profits and employment at their own organizations over the next 12 months. ... And while 57% of them said they were pessimistic or very pessimistic about the prospects for the nation's economy this year, roughly equal to their views of last quarter, 45% said they were optimistic or very optimistic about their own company's prospects, according to the survey, conducted for the AICPA by the University of North Carolina's Kenan-Flagler Business School.

Arthur Jones, a senior economist at CBRE Torto Wheaton Research, said the disparity in outlooks revealed by the survey may be a reflection of the fact that the economic downturn is “very industry specific.”

For example, the auto, financial services and construction industries have been particularly hard hit in the current downturn and are shedding jobs, but other industries, such as health care, technology and services, have been largely unaffected.

Mr. Jones said that from a strictly employment perspective, “things aren't quite as bad as they seem to be,” as the job losses seen so far this year are nowhere near what they were in the last downturn in 2001-2002, and jobs provide the underpinning of the economy.

When it comes to the economy, the good news is the news isn't all bad. The bad news is the news media tends to cover the bad news more than the good.

Share this
  • Business Coverage
  • Economy
  • Recession
  • Bill Hobbs's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Donate to NewsBusters

Comments

The media has a real

Submitted by maggied on Tue, 02/15/2011 - 11:48am.

The media has a real influence on business environment just because they supply information that lead to optimism or pessimism in investments. They had a choice to display three surveys; two of them were more negative. In these difficult times when we need to encourage optimism and the media chose give more coverage for the negative surveys, that’s too bad, there are people that make their investment decisions based on this kind of information. We need successful people like Jared Bartie more than ever to set an example that success is possible even in difficult times like these.
  • Login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB

 

 

  • Where are the blacks for Roland Martin? (NRO/Media Blog)
  • Turkish Islamists turn church into mosque (Commentary)
  • CNN suspends Roland Martin (Big Journalism)
  • Birth control mandate is unconstitutional (National Center)
  • Obama's Catholic 'problem' (S.E. Cupp)
  • Debt crisis not inevitable for America (Williams)
  • Catholic 'Obamacan' says he may have to reconsider in 2012 (CNA)

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Recent comments

  • and 2
    3 min 59 sec ago
  • that's funny
    19 min 26 sec ago
  • Hate to say this....
    1 hour 19 min ago
  • More proof
    2 hours 15 min ago
  • Jer---
    3 hours 17 min ago
More >

Obama's Bully-the-Catholic-Church Pulpit
more cartoons
  • Dan Savage Says FRC Leader 'Dances a Jig' at Teen Suicides
  • Cornel West Scolds Al Sharpton: 'Tell the Truth About the White House'
  • Politico: Is Nancy Pelosi A 2012 Asset, or Not?
  • CNN Demeans Republicans as Drag Queens
  • Democrat: Fox News Is 'The Enemy,' Hates 'Working Men and Women'
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Editorial Associate
Aubrey Vaughan

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.