Once You Go Conservative Black, You Better Watch Your Back
With the mainstream media giddily reporting on an alleged affair involving Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain, how long can it be before they break the news that their 2004 vice presidential candidate conceived a "love child" with his mistress, Rielle Hunter?
The left is trying to destroy Cain with a miasma of hazy accusations leveled by three troubled women. Considered individually, the accusations are utterly unbelievable. They are even less credible taken together. This is how liberals destroy a man, out of nothing.
After the first round of baseless accusations against Cain, an endless stream of pundits rolled out the cliche -- as if it were the height of originality -- "This isn't he said-she said; it's he-said, she-said, she-said, she-said, sheñsaid."
Au contraire: We had two "shes" and only one "said."
Remember? Only two women were willing to give their names. And as soon as they did, we discovered that they were highly suspicious accusers with nothing more than their personal honor to support the allegations. Only one of the two would even say what Cain allegedly did.
The first one was Sharon Bialek, who claimed that Cain grabbed her crotch in a car.
Then we found out Bialek was in constant financial trouble, had been involved in a paternity lawsuit, was known as a "gold digger," had a string of debts and had twice filed for personal bankruptcy. Also, she admitted she knew Obama's dirty tricks specialist, David Axelrod, from living in the same building with him.
Her personal history is relevant because she produced no evidence. We had to take her word. (Which was not helped by seeing her standing with Gloria Allred.)
The second one, Karen Kraushaar, made unspecified allegations of a "hostile environment" when she was working for Cain, but refuses to say what those allegations were. This despite the fact that the National Restaurant Association waived her confidentiality agreement, thus allowing her to go public.
That's one "she," but no "said."
Cain said he had once told Kraushaar she was as tall as his wife -- which would be one of the more worthy sexual harassment claims settled by an American company in recent years.
Why won't she say? We're not talking about rape. Kraushaar can't say, "I don't want to relive being told I was the same height as his wife!" With all the nonsense that passes for a "hostile environment," either Kraushaar tells us what Cain allegedly did, or her blind accusation is worth less than nothing.
As if that weren't enough, then it turned out that Kraushaar had also filed a complaint at her next job just three years later, charging that a manager had circulated a sexually explicit joke email comparing computers to men and women. She demanded a raise and the right to work at home.
Maybe Kraushaar is the most unlucky woman in the world. But the simpler explanation is that she is not a credible witness on the workplace atmosphere.
And now we have Ginger White stepping forward to claim that she had a 13-year affair with Cain. Cain admits he was friends with White, but he categorically, adamantly denies having an affair with her.
White has the whole combo-platter of questionable accuser attributes: She's another financially troubled, twice-divorced, unemployed single mother, who has claimed sexual harassment in the past, declared bankruptcy once, was accused of stalking and had a libel judgment entered against her just this year. So far in 2011, she's had nine liens put on her property.
But we're supposed to ignore all of that because she's the third woman of questionable character to make an implausible allegation. Liberals say there's a pattern, but the only pattern is of their making far-fetched accusations of a sexual nature against Cain.
White's proof that she had a 13-year affair is that she has two of Cain's books signed by him -- one with the incriminating inscription, "Friends are forever! Everything else is a bonus," and the other, "Miss G, you have already made a 'big difference!' Stay focused as you pursue your next destination." (I know -- filthy!)
If that's proof of an affair, I've had thousands of them without even realizing it.
Also, White produced evidence that Cain had texted or called her cell phone 61 times during four non-consecutive months -- but did not reveal what those texts said. ("Would you please return my lawn mower?")
Again, if that's proof of an affair, I'm having hundreds of them at this very moment.
This is the sort of evidence you get with an actual sexual predator: Bill Clinton's accusers had gifts, taped phone conversations with him and a semen-stained dress.
Gennifer Flowers produced taped telephone calls with Clinton totaling thousands of words between them, with him counseling her on how to deny their affair: "If they ever hit you with it, just say no, and go on. There's nothing they can do ... But when they -- if somebody contacts you, I need to know ... All you got to do is deny it."
Paula Jones had multiple same-day witnesses -- including the state troopers who worked for Clinton and had already told the press about a "Paula" they brought to Clinton's hotel room. And that was for a single incident.
Monica Lewinsky had lots of gifts from Clinton, including a hat pin, two brooches, a marble bear figurine, a T-shirt from Martha's Vineyard and Walt Whitman's "Leaves of Grass," all of which she mysteriously placed with Clinton's secretary, Betty Currie, during the investigation, as well as a semen-stained dress, which Monica kept.
Ginger White claims she had a 13-year affair with Cain -- and all she has are two books with inscriptions that could have been written to an auto mechanic who waited in line at a Cain book signing. Even her business partner during the alleged affair says White never mentioned Cain's name.
These women are like triple-A ball players with the stats being: number of bankruptcies, smallest bank account, number of liens, most false claims, number of children out of wedlock, degrees of separation from David Axelrod, total trips to human resources and so on.
That wouldn't be dispositive -- except for the fact that their only evidence is their word.
But this is how liberals dirty you up when they've got nothing: They launch a series of false accusations, knowing that Americans with busy lives won't follow each story to the end and notice that they were all blind alleys.
The liberal media is an old story, but it's still a big story when it comes to creating the impression of scandal out of thin air.
Most people say, "Where there's smoke, there's fire." I say, "Where there's smoke around a conservative, there are journalists furiously rubbing two sticks together."
COPYRIGHT 2011 ANN COULTER
- Ann Coulter's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
POLITICO
Submitted by ROSSMAN on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 11:54am.
Started this fraud, and nothing they said has been proved. TOTAL SETUP!! They should be put out if business for total unsubstantiated character assassination!! If I had a 13 year affair, it would be provable if true!! WHERE THE HE-- IS THE BEEF!!!!!!!
Can no MSM reporter see the trend?
Submitted by HockeyKid on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 12:16pm.
Not in the current crop of Cain accusers, but in Axelrod's circus stunts when it comes to getting Obysmal elected. He's been getting opponents withdrawn from races since the very first campaign. Obysmal never actually ran against anyone (except a last-minute sub for the race for his US Senate seat) in an election until the presidential election, thanks to Axelrod's sleazy character assassinations. The moment it was revealed that Bialek knew Axelrod, I knew all the crap being slung at Cain was bogus. It also tells me Axelrod (and therefore Obysmal) is deathly afraid of Cain.
"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me
I agree with everything Ann has said.
Submitted by NeoKong on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 12:22pm.
It is a coordinated smear job that puts the K in skank.
However.....
I never believed any of it as I knew it was a political assassination but it did demonstrate that Cain can be easily knocked off his game.
Let's face it.
His team sucks.
He told us he was going to surround himself with highly qualified people to identify problems and offer real solutions.
Haven't seen any of that.
As a matter of fact I cannot think of one single surrogate that Cain has that gives me confidence.
The man is not doing his homework.
When exactly is all this brilliance going to begin.....?
Not really
Submitted by Rukus on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 4:20pm.
The people he is able to surround himself with now (friends/volunteers etc.) are not exactly the same types he would be able to surround himself as POTUS. Entirely different sets of personnel. But I do agree the current bunch isn't doing him any favors with all of the bogus crap. They aren't politicians and probably have never had to deal with anything like this. We'll see if they can get it together and adjust accordingly.
Boring
Submitted by Vandamage2000 on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 1:00pm.
Where is John Edward's career now? In the toilet
Where is Anthony Weiner's career now? Non-existent
What happened to Clarence Thomas? He got on the Supreme Court
I know you want to cry victim while accusing liberals of crying victim, but this is getting us nowhere. There was a settlement regarding Cain. The public deserves to know more about those settlements.
Famous people get accused of stuff all the time. Even Justin Bieber. Do you think thats a liberal conspiracy too?
Very Boring
Submitted by sentry_99 on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 1:18pm.
John Edwards? Cheated on dying wife, had child with mistress and illegally paid her off.
Anthony Weiner? Photographic evidence of the deed.
Clarence Thomas (and Herman Cain at this point)? Nothing but unsubstaniated accusations.
The big difference, if you were not intentionally ignoring it, is the treatment of these people by the media. The public deserves to know alot. It's too bad they only dig for that info when it comes to people with R's after their names.
Good Point
Submitted by V the K on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 1:19pm.
All it takes is an unsubstantiated allegation to destroy a Republican. With Democrats, the rule is, "Proof or it didn't happen." (And if it did happen, it's still probably OK.)
Double Standard? What double standard.
Submitted by V the K on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 1:18pm.
What happened to Mark Foley for sending inappropriate txt messages? Out on his keister. What happened to Gerry Studds for actually having sex with a underage congressional page? Re-elected 9 times.
Congressman Gus Savage was caught procuring sex from minors? Pardoned by Bill Clinton, given a high-paying job with Rainbow PUSH.
Sam Adams, mayor of Portland OR, had sex with underage campaign aide? Outrage? Nope. He's a Democrat.
Gavin Newsom had sex with the wife of an aide and sought treatment for alcoholism? Punished? No, elected Lt. Governor of California.
And let's not forget Ted Kennedy. He killed one woman, and made a "waitress sandwich" with another. Punished? No, re-elected and lionized by the liberal left.
BTW: The Reason Beebs isn't in trouble is because the skank bailed when he agreed to take a paternity test.
at least
Submitted by jimtrees on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 1:55pm.
John Edwards waited until his wife was 30 seconds from dying before he told her. What a guy! The Kennedy's were all rapist murders before it was news to Chris Mathews. Robin Roberts has much more karma coming her way.
BrainDamaged2000, The LSM
Submitted by Scuba Dude on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 3:38pm.
BrainDamaged2000,
The LSM sat on the John Edwards story, it took the National Enquirer to break the story and even then the LSM ignored it as much as possible.
Anthony Weiner - the LSM did not push the story until it was no longer possible to ignore it. Remember Weiner lying about it not being him? Of course you probably accepted it as gospel as most libturds do. Thank goodness for alternative news.
Clarence Thomas? A bit before my time (as far as following politics) but as another poster stated, Unsubstantiated accusations.
Try again.
Revolting...
Submitted by Henry Clay on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 1:08pm.
Is this the level that Newsbusters has stooped to? To publish an article by a disgraced polemist who created her own footnotes to support her scurrilous accusations; I would find this taste bitter, if was not so tart!
Friends this whole article is an attack on the character of three women. Nowhere does she take issue with the facts; she lobs assaults at these women’s bank accounts, monetary handicaps, and basically calls them slut gold-diggers. Is this the state of the self-anointed conservative “intelligentsia”? Mr. Buckley would be ashamed.
Finally, where there is smoke there is fire. Use some common sense; three different women with the only connection between them being Herman Cain. I ask you this, if Mr. Cain was a Democrat, would you doubt these ladies claims?
What facts can she take issue with?
Submitted by sentry_99 on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 1:25pm.
It's he said she said at this point. It has been since these claims were made. Use common sense. Three women, with a history of false accusations and reasons to lie.
If Mr. Cain was a Democrat, you probably wouldn't even know about these womens claims.
Hank
Submitted by Free Stinker on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 1:50pm.
Hank, did you stop taking your meds again?
/// Sarah Palin Fan since July 11, 2007 /// خال
if
Submitted by jimtrees on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 2:01pm.
Mr. Cain were a democrat you would never know about it.
Well, we might know about it,
Submitted by NC Cop on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 2:05pm.
Well, we might know about it, but our one party media would do it's best to paint the accusers as money grubbing, lying, whoring people who were being used by the conservatives as part of their vast, right wing consipracy.
H Clay...
Submitted by Dave the mailman on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 2:28pm.
...using your logic, all it would take is three men coming forward and claiming you had sex with them, and you'd be branded a butt-pirate.
I bet I could find 3 guys to claim that. Just let me go to an ATM first......
Missed
Submitted by StarAZ on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 3:55pm.
Are these women rich now? Missed that part. I guess I was distracted by a guy saying they were mental...while he tried to hang tough.
Where's the Dress, Henry?
Submitted by Blonde on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 2:39pm.
Or the smoking cigar, so to speak?
What? There isn't one?
Never. Mind.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
henry clay you liberal troll
Submitted by h8commielibs on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 3:55pm.
You are an ignorant idiot at best. And that is again at best. I see you sitting around in your size 60 stained underwear screaming that the republicans made you ugly and fat. All the evidence of this smear campaign by communist democrats, ie, your friends. You cant step away from your fruit loops long enough to read the facts. Keep commenting, we will keep seeing your ugly ass on display.. Get a life, you liar supporting looser.
Wow. I love you too.
Submitted by Henry Clay on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 6:54pm.
Wow. I love you too. Although, your screen name implies that you cannot spell out the word hate so you must substitute the number 8 for the ate. Charming.
Absent facts and evidence, doubt is healthy.
Submitted by Mike Bratton on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 5:52pm.
Since there are no substantive facts, and no corroborating evidence, you are out of order, Hank.
While I don't always agree with Ms. Coulter, at least she signs what she writes with her real name. Until you do, you don't get to toss Molotovs in her direction by calling her integrity into question, since you don't demonstrate any yourself in hiding behind a pseudonym. And since you know as much about William F. Buckley as you do about my golf game, you don't get to invoke him or otherwise suggest how he would feel about this situation; you don't know, so don't pretend you do.
It is wise to doubt these three sets of "claims" because they are fact- and evidence-free, not because of the political party of their common target.
--Mike
The only polemicist here is you, Hankie.
Submitted by drsamherman on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 5:59pm.
She is a licensed attorney and is trained to question the veracity of accusers and witnesses alike. Or did that little factoid escape your ever-shrinking little brain?
So far, two of the women accusing Cain of misconduct have many strikes against them, not the least of which is hiring Gloria Allred to gin up publicity and the other is a cornucopia of character defects which go directly to impeach their credibility. That is how the legal system works, Hankie.
You can always move to Cuba if you think their justice system or media are more to your liking.
On Coulter
Submitted by Henry Clay on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 6:52pm.
My dear, dear friend. I was not aware that we are in a court of law? Being as it may I would like to gleefully thank you for illuminating my point. Ms. Coulter is a lawyer, being such in typical reptilian fashion; she neither advocates anything constructive nor offers any substance to an issue. It is her job to poison the well with her sulfur pen.
Just a point, Mud, to match your---
Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 7:05pm.
head ---
The statement "Where there's smoke, there's fire" is not a truism; and as an adage, is inaccurate.
Much like your posts.
Inaccurate, that is.
MD
The quote
Submitted by mandrake on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 9:11pm.
"Where there's smoke, there's fire" is neither a truism or adage. It is a metaphor. eg) For Dr. House..where there's fever there's infection. For NB'ers ..where there's democrats there's corruption...and so on.
mandrake---
Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 11:15pm.
Maybe you should consider consulting a dictionary before making rash statements.
"Where there's smoke , there's fire" is not always true, therefore not a truism.
So I stated.
You claim the saying is not an adage, either, but rather a metaphor..
adage - {noun} - a saying often in metaphorical form that embodies a common observation. (Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary)
I stated that, as an adage (even meaning metaphorically speaking), the saying was inaccurate.
As is your post.
For someone who tries so hard to indulge in biting repartee, you are distinctly lacking in the ability to represent a verbally aculeate life form.
MD
Where there's fever, there's NOT always infection...
Submitted by drsamherman on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 11:14pm.
Fever can also emanate from non-infectious endocrine conditions.
Medical moment of clarification over.
Good evening docsam
Submitted by cocodrie on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 11:27pm.
You are right about the infection but he is correct in that there is always corruption where there are democrats.
Jesus Loves You so much He died for you
The new math: Democrat = corrupt.
Submitted by drsamherman on Fri, 12/02/2011 - 9:51pm.
You could even consider the combination to be redundant.
So, are we to take it that the next time you're in court...
Submitted by Mike Bratton on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 7:32pm.
...you'll be representing yourself?
Since attorneys are "reptilian" and such.
--Mike
Not really
Submitted by mandrake on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 8:59pm.
The next time I'm in court I'm going to hire the guy that got O.J.Simpson off. I'll bet he's a real good guy.
That should be interesting.
Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 9:06pm.
You do know he's dead don't you?
I didn't kill him..honest!
Submitted by mandrake on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 9:12pm.
.
Can the crap, Hankie.
Submitted by drsamherman on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 8:19pm.
I did not illuminate anything for you but the exit sign. And 86 the hippie bliss-out garbage, because nobody buys it, least of all those of us who see this kind of deflective behavior in patients every day of the week.
Her analysis was spot-on, that being that at least two of the women who have come forward to make accusations against Cain have less than sterling reputations and therefore their credibility is almost lower than yours on this forum.
As for the reptilian nonsense, can't you liberals think of any real biological examples? If you are so wired to scientific fact, perhaps you would bother trying for something other than the tired reptilian cliche that you stole from another website.
ya know
Submitted by RHawkins on Fri, 12/02/2011 - 1:16pm.
I was all for your opinion until this. (not that I agree, but you are absolutely entitled to express it) Ok, I can see that all people are biased and 'the other guy' is wrong and you are always right. Fine. But then you acknowledge that she is a lawyer and make aspersions about attorneys (Oh, I agree really I do) but don't forget that your favorite Democrats are lawyers just the same...in particular our current president. So Obama is reptilian too according to your own statement.
I'm the last one to play the race card, but...
Submitted by V the K on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 1:12pm.
Isn't it kind of weird that Herman Cain is treated like a sexual predator and Bill Clinton is treated like a lovable horndog?
Weird? No, Because Bill
Submitted by dscott on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 2:22pm.
Weird? No, Because Bill Clinton was the first Black President and Herman Cain is an Oreo Cookie. Not weird at all... According to liberal and feminist stereotyping, black males are expected to sow their wild oats. So what's Cain's excuse for being married for over 40 years and not cheating on his wife? Cain's sin is he didn't admit to the stereotype, you see minstrels are supposed to tell you what you want to hear.
/sarcasm/
Liberals ARE racists.
claims
Submitted by grammajane on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 1:33pm.
against clinton were all over the media by his victims. Black eyes, numerous tapes, seman all over a dress, and lies by him and his staff. None of these stories of interest have been stated by any of Cain's so-called victims. Clinton is a demo and no one doubts these claims as they are true. Yet, the media to this day praises him as the greatest president ever. Clinton's behavior was/is a disgrace and there is no proof Cain has done anything. Cain has a log way to go, to match up with clinton and his discusting actions as pres. of the US
There are no facts in these attacks
Submitted by Fredy on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 2:12pm.
Think about that for one second. The msm has pushed hundreds of stories, repeated unverified claims over and over, without one single hard piece of evidence.
Journalists care about facts, propagandists do not care about facts.
The msm no longer cares about facts.
Yeah--troubled...that's it...
Submitted by StarAZ on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 3:53pm.
If you people saw a sex tape you would say that was not evidence--more evil press doctoring. Come on. What bothers me is he thought this would all be A-OK.
If you people saw a sex tape
Submitted by h8commielibs on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 4:02pm.
Too many ifs in that statement. You see Star, there is and never will be a sex tape here. This is all communist democrat drummed up lies. Lets take your statement, IF there was a tape. I for one would be infuriated that Cain was lying and hiding this. Guess what, there is NO BASIS other than your liberal trolls in the msm. Star, try again. Your are an ignoramus communist liberal.
Yeah, yeah, troll..liberal
Submitted by StarAZ on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 4:49pm.
I am almost mortified to be on the same side with some you. If only because of the lack of originality and wit.
Bahahahah
Submitted by Tenebrous on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 8:45pm.
In that statement, you demonstrate how you are on the side of no-one here, except for maybe Jer. You are an effete liberal who is concerned with matters of decorum and popularity instead of truth.
Visions and Principles blog
And what side would that be, troll?
Submitted by Jer on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 10:20pm.
You would be hard-pressed to recognize "truth" even if it walked through your front door on stilts.
Jer
You guys are laughable
Submitted by StarAZ on Fri, 12/02/2011 - 11:42am.
I guess you all cheat so you don't think it's a big deal. I don't even know. I would never vote for Obama...and I don't give a flip about your weak little personal insults...I know they are coming from people who can't suss out a situation and just believe what they believe. This is why I don't come to Newsbusters very often, though--not a challenging level of discourse.
StarAZ...
Submitted by Jer on Fri, 12/02/2011 - 6:52pm.
Why is your post addressed to me?
Jer
Shouldn't you be whining
Submitted by ckc1227 on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 4:57pm.
Shouldn't you be whining about a welfare check or something Star?
"I am almost mortified to be on the same side with some you"
Not sure why, considering you slip up every now and then and show you're not on the same side...like now, for instance. It's ok, Star, you can come out of the closet. It's not like you're fooling anyone anyway, except maybe yourself.
And if a frog had wings...
Submitted by Mike Bratton on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 5:54pm.
...he wouldn't scrape his backside when he jumps.
--Mike
You are a liar.
Submitted by Tenebrous on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 8:42pm.
You said "if there was a sex tape", and then you proceed to guess at my behavior. Ok, genius, you're wrong. If there was a sex tape, then that would be E V I D E N C E. So far, there is no E V I D E N C E.
And you are on my side? You don't care if arguments are backed up by proof, which means, categorically, that you are NEVER on my side.
You are a liar. Hurry on over to CNN so that you can figure out what you're supposed to think now.
Visions and Principles blog
Definition of "miasma "
Submitted by gopcongress on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 2:19pm.
I've not heard this word before, so I'm sure most people haven't.
Here's the definition:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/miasma
mi·as·ma [mahy-az-muh, mee-]
noun, plural -mas, -ma·ta [-muh-tuh]
1. noxious exhalations from putrescent organic matter; poisonous effluvia or germs polluting the atmosphere.
2. a dangerous, foreboding, or deathlike influence or atmosphere.
"The news and truth are not the same thing." -Walter Lippmann (1889-1974) FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER
The solution is obvious --
Submitted by Mike009 on Fri, 12/02/2011 - 9:20am.
The solution is obvious -- Cain should switch and become a Democrat. Except by Democrat standards he's an amateur. There are no photos of his crotch on the internet like we had with Anthony Wiener. There's no girl drowned in the backseat of his car, like we had with Ted Kennedy. No love child like with John Edwards. No semen stained dress in the Oval Office like we had with Bill Clinton. Cain's name isn't client #9 in some hooker's black book like with Elliott Spitzer...I could keep going but you get the idea.