Does NBC Really Have to Cut Fred Thompson from 'Law and Order' Reruns?

By Noel Sheppard | July 19, 2007 - 10:51 ET

Without much fanfare, NBC made an interesting announcement Tuesday: if Fred Thompson becomes a presidential candidate, his episodes of "Law and Order" will no longer be rerun.

As reported by the New York Daily News Wednesday (emphasis added throughout):

"If Fred Thompson formally declares his intention to run for President, NBC will not schedule any further repeats of 'Law & Order' featuring Mr. Thompson beyond those already scheduled, which conclude on Saturday, Sept. 1," [executive producer Dick] Wolf said.

Wolf assured that NBC would take all "appropriate steps consistent with FCC regulations."

"Consistent with FCC regulations" appears to relate to the Equal Time rule:

Thompson played D.A. Arthur Branch on the show for five years. If Thompson is legally declared a candidate, and NBC airs episodes that feature 10 minutes of him, under the equal-time requirement the network would then have to feature all the other Republican candidates for an equal 10 minutes in some shape or form.

I'm not an attorney, but I'm not sure that's true. In fact, the opening section of the code suggests otherwise:

§ 315. Candidates for public office

(a) Equal opportunities requirement; censorship prohibition; allowance of station use; news appearances exception; public interest; public issues discussion opportunities

If any licensee shall permit any person who is a legally qualified candidate for any public office to use a broadcasting station, he shall afford equal opportunities to all other such candidates for that office in the use of such broadcasting station: Provided, That such licensee shall have no power of censorship over the material broadcast under the provisions of this section. No obligation is imposed under this subsection upon any licensee to allow the use of its station by any such candidate. Appearance by a legally qualified candidate on any-

(1) bona fide newscast,

(2) bona fide news interview,

(3) bona fide news documentary (if the appearance of the candidate is incidental to the presentation of the subject or subjects covered by the news documentary), or

(4) on-the-spot coverage of bona fide news events (including but not limited to political conventions and activities incidental thereto), shall not be deemed to be use of a broadcasting station within the meaning of this subsection.

The first paragraph states:

Provided, That such licensee shall have no power of censorship over the material broadcast under the provisions of this section.

Obviously, NBC does have censorship and editing control over the material in "Law and Order." As such, this appears to exempt this kind of a program from Equal Time.

Furthermore, if a "bona fide news documentary (if the appearance of the candidate is incidental to the presentation of the subject or subjects covered by the news documentary)" is also exempt, it seems logical that a fictitious drama would be similarly so.

To get a firm answer, I will be forwarding this to some known lawyers in the blogosphere for their comment, and welcome legal opinions from those qualified to render them.

However, given the network's current position, after the many hours NBC gave to potential candidate Al Gore during his Live Earth concerts, if Gore indeed runs, will Republican candidates be given compensatory equal time?

Yes, that's a rhetorical question.

Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

  Obviously, NBC does

 

Obviously, NBC does have censorship and editing control over the material in "Law and Order." As such, this appears to exempt this kind of a program from Equal Time. This sounds to me that if NBC stops showing these episodes, they are committing censorship. How much free time has been given to Democrat candidates through interviews and Town Hall meetings by NBC and their affiliates?

Their own statement demonstrates their overt contempt for anything conservative or Republican. First off, their argument for not showing Fred is lame. Secondly, they basically say, using their own argument, that if they show Fred, they will then have to give all the other Republican candidates equal time, which they obviously do not want to do. By my interpretation of "fairness", Republicans should be given the same amount of free air time as the Democrats have been given. Forget about individual candidates from one party or the other. The focus should be on giving each party equal time first. Then worry about individual candidate fairness.

 

The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers

They are early

I predicted this to all my friends about 6 weeks ago. The only thing I was wrong about was that I predicted that they would do it right after he announced his candidacy.

I wonder if all the networks are going to cancel their scheduled rerun of the movie Pinochio because of Hillary's candidacy.

The MSM is so afraid of

The MSM is so afraid of Fred Thompson that it's making me giddy.  It's getting to be like Ann Coulter.  All you have to do is mention his name, or show a picture of him, and they all quiver.  Kinda reminds me of Sienfeld, when Jerry starts going walletless...

George - "It's not right.  Important things go in a case.  You've got a skull for your brain, a sleeve for your comb, and a wallet, for your money."

Jerry - "You know the very fact that you oppose this makes me think that I'm onto something."

Everytime something happens that genuinely upsets the MSM, it needs to be repeated.  They're unraveling before our very eyes.

Haha I love that episode,

Haha I love that episode, but c'mon jpatch, don't lump Costanza into the same category as the MSM, George is better than that! :-D

Oh for Pete's sake, he's

Oh for Pete's sake, he's in the show maybe 1.5 minutes total during a typical episode. 

Since government is coercion, politics is largely the exercise of deception regarding the intended use of coercion - George Orwell

The SF Chronicle has been

The SF Chronicle has been losing some $50M per year in order to print their unwanted vulgar socialist agenda. Radio and Internet thrive. Why should anyone with half a brain be surprised at the fact that NBC is willing to cut their own throats for political purposes?

JDW

News media: Scoreboard for terrorists

 

He's playing a character on

He's playing a character on a television show for goodness sake, not campaigning.  This is just a lame attempt to eliminate any type of exposure to Thompson.  As was mentioned, they had no problem with owl gore.  

"If a man does his best, what else is there"?

General George S. Patton Jr.

I SMELL FEAR

I SMELL FEAR

Let them delete all

Let them delete all references to Fred that they want, it won't help.

Run Fred run! 

The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.

NBC shows their true colors...

As the reading of the law shows, it is only campaign appearances (whether in news segments or otherwise) that are covered. So the only reason to make this move would be to limit the exposure of this particular candidate. The only reason why a network would care about that, would be if they were executively and editorially against that particular candidate. So, with this statement, NBC shows that they are undoubtedly biased toward Democrats.

 

The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic

UPDATE - NBC

UPDATE - NBC executives, in an apparent concession to Thompson fans, have decided all NBC political reporters that have donated to current Democrat(ic) Presidential nominees will be prohibited from covering the ongoing Presidential campaign.  Therefore, NBC will not be reporting on the Presidential campaign this cycle.

However, NBC reporters will be allowed as much air time as they request to offer their traditional opinions on the Presidential campaign solely as interested observers.  NBC executives stated their decision will have no negative impact on the campaign and the audience should not notice any difference from the reporting done by NBC in previous elections.