I've been predicting a Hillary meltdown for a while.
She's just too tightly wrapped around the axle. Even her "spontanaety" is a pitiful pose. Not to mention her multiple accents. Sheesh!
The first time she's really pressed on an issue and asked some difficult questions, instead of the softballs she always gets...she's going to lose it and melt down a la the Wicked Witch of the North.
It's REALLY hard to bet against a pure politician like Clinton. This pre-season stuff is not her strong suit - her non-committal, low substance campaign is built for the playoffs. Once the field narrows, Mark Penn will reign her back in.
However, I do think Obama will be a worthy adversary and has the fresher brand to market. Unlike Hillary, his smile appears genuine and unforced; he is a strong orator that needs no "tweaking" when pandering to a particular audience; and much like Bush in 2000, he doesn't carry a lot of baggage into the campaign.
But it will be great theatre to watch each one compete for the crown of "Most Liberal," only to pull a 180 to rebrand themselves as the "Most Moderate" after the nomination.
But Obama strikes me as an empty suit....he's fresh...but not really there, there.
Weighing them both, however, I believe Obama is much less dangerous than Hillary Clinton. The woman is pure avaricious, self-aggrandizing, power-hungry, and a B**** to boot. Every time I hear her speak it raises the hackles on my neck. I suppose I'm one of those whom the media describe as a Hillary Hater. And they would be correct.
I can't wait for her to flame out. And I still believe she will. She's TOO everything...scripted, controlled, focused, liberal, nasty, etc., etc.
I obviously can't disagree and happen to concur with your adjective use. I have a feeling that 99% of eligble voters have already rendered judgement on whether they could vote for Hillary or not. The remaining 1% are currently crossing the border.
And once the media fascination ends...he'll be exposed as such.
A "pretty boy" (BTW....that's not my opinion....I think he looks kind of intrinsically and basically stupid...but I guess that's because I hear what comes out of his mouth).
He'll blow it hugely in a debate, once there are "real" questions asked and he must respond with more than a talking point. As I said before, there is no "there, there".
Just what the looney-bin leftist love to hear...must be getting his talking points from John Kerry via good old Viet Nam days...ooops..forgot Kerry is spewing the same exact stuff TODAY! (Wa. Journal this morning and Ubermann show tonight)
Gosh... I thought Colin Powell was aiding and abetting him.
So we withdraw but keep a force there in case of emergency? (then we send in more forces than we have there now but deal with the booby-traps and the populace who we turned our backs on. Sounds like a recipe for bloodbath all around)
"The more I study science, the more I believe in God." Einstein
I would personally choose Obama over the "Hillster" (I refuse to call her by a female name, as I don't belive she is even HUMAN, nevermind a female one.) We all know what it (hillster) is cabable of, and what she WANTS. Obama is running because he is young (uggg what a STUPID reason to vote for somebody... My mom did it for Bill though) BLACK, BLACK, and BLACK. Thats IT. To me he does not pose as much of a threat as "it" because he is just a sheet flapping in the wind right now with zero guidence. He wouldn't know how get something done if he wanted to. However, I also believe his smiles genuine, and his personality is above trash can status. Unlike the Hillster, who is the phoniest of the phony. I'd rather have a honest (hopefully) Democrat (Does not compute... syntax error.. shutting down........
.......
.......
.......
*Reboot*
include #/logic
I believe Rudy is going to Win anyway, so it really doesn't matter to me. It was fun to compare the two. Hillster will implode on the first real question fired at her. Once everybody hears her screaming "VRWC!!" they will clonk themselves on the head and ask "what the hell was I thinkning?!"
I voted that Obama has some chance, but that chance will depend mainly on the skills of those running his campaign.
Let's face it, the Clinton campaign goons are pollished pros, but they aren't totally infallible. The Hildebeast is carrying a huge amount of baggage, probably more than any presidential candidate in the history of our republic.
If exploited correctly, this could work to the advantage of her opponents. After all, she has a lot of opposition among many democrats, even the two moderates who might be left in the entire democrat establishment (I don't know if there actually are two moderates left in that collection of misfits, kooks and malcontents that calls itself a political party-I am just being kind here).
If Obama's people are even half-assed competent, they will deftly exploit her inherent weaknesses at just the right times.
Should they fail to do so, Barack Hussein Obama will be yesterday's news, three days before it even happens.
Help Fred defeat the RINOs, along with the Hitllary-Obama Axis, & win the White House in '08.
It's very early, and Democrats know that Hillary motivates the Republican base much more than any other candidate. Much as they may love the Clintons, they want power, and for the pragmatic ones that means the guy without baggage (or even Richardson) has more chance than Hillary. Besides, they've been quiet for a long time -- especially compared to Bill's bimbos -- but aren't we assuming there will be no well-timed "lesbo eruption"?
JMR
Obama has no chance to win the nomination against Hillary. What she and her team can't dig up to use against him they will make up. If that doesn't work they will work out a deal behind the scenes for some sort of deal and payoff, like with Vilsack.
Some say they see a Hillary/Obama ticket. I don't think she can stand the limelight shining on his rising star that much. I don't know if that will be the reality after people get to know him but that may be her perception.
Editor at Large
Comments Policy
The Clinton Election Team
July 18, 2007 - 20:19 ET by Free StinkerThe Clinton Election Team will crush Obama.
Hillary put up will Bill's Drug use, Adultary, etc. etc. so she could be in power too. She won't give up without a fight.
_______
Fred Thompson and Ann Coulter walk into a bar. The bar is instantly destroyed because that much awesome cannot be contained in one build
Against Hillary, not a
July 18, 2007 - 20:26 ET by botgAgainst Hillary, not a chance. The chance is that Hillary self-destructs
"The more I study science, the more I believe in God." Einstein
Bruce, I've been
July 19, 2007 - 22:25 ET by BlondeBruce,
I've been predicting a Hillary meltdown for a while.
She's just too tightly wrapped around the axle. Even her "spontanaety" is a pitiful pose. Not to mention her multiple accents. Sheesh!
The first time she's really pressed on an issue and asked some difficult questions, instead of the softballs she always gets...she's going to lose it and melt down a la the Wicked Witch of the North.
I just hope I catch it live.
Blonde Indeed the
July 19, 2007 - 22:29 ET by botgBlonde
Indeed the hilda-melt will be wonderful if it is caught on tape.
Sorry your PM is not yet working, i can read mine so yours should be working soon.
"The more I study science, the more I believe in God." Einstein
Bruce, It's annoying
July 19, 2007 - 22:40 ET by BlondeBruce,
It's annoying as all get out! I can see that there's a message there....I just can't access it to read it.
As for the Clinton meltdown....I cannot wait. I think we need to start a pool.
*(1) When
*(2) Over What
*(3) Rank it on the Howard Dean Scale....1 to 10.
Blonde, Hillamelt
July 19, 2007 - 23:23 ET by botgSounds like a forum just made for you to to post
"The more I study science, the more I believe in God." Einstein
It's REALLY hard to bet
July 19, 2007 - 23:05 ET by mulerider24It's REALLY hard to bet against a pure politician like Clinton. This pre-season stuff is not her strong suit - her non-committal, low substance campaign is built for the playoffs. Once the field narrows, Mark Penn will reign her back in.
However, I do think Obama will be a worthy adversary and has the fresher brand to market. Unlike Hillary, his smile appears genuine and unforced; he is a strong orator that needs no "tweaking" when pandering to a particular audience; and much like Bush in 2000, he doesn't carry a lot of baggage into the campaign.
But it will be great theatre to watch each one compete for the crown of "Most Liberal," only to pull a 180 to rebrand themselves as the "Most Moderate" after the nomination.
Cogent points,
July 19, 2007 - 23:12 ET by BlondeCogent points, mulerider.
But Obama strikes me as an empty suit....he's fresh...but not really there, there.
Weighing them both, however, I believe Obama is much less dangerous than Hillary Clinton. The woman is pure avaricious, self-aggrandizing, power-hungry, and a B**** to boot. Every time I hear her speak it raises the hackles on my neck. I suppose I'm one of those whom the media describe as a Hillary Hater. And they would be correct.
I can't wait for her to flame out. And I still believe she will. She's TOO everything...scripted, controlled, focused, liberal, nasty, etc., etc.
I obviously can't disagree
July 19, 2007 - 23:30 ET by mulerider24I obviously can't disagree and happen to concur with your adjective use. I have a feeling that 99% of eligble voters have already rendered judgement on whether they could vote for Hillary or not. The remaining 1% are currently crossing the border.
I think the empty suit
July 19, 2007 - 23:33 ET by botgI think the empty suit moniker is perfect for Obama, what has this guy done?
"The more I study science, the more I believe in God." Einstein
what has this guy
July 19, 2007 - 23:40 ET by Blondewhat has this guy done?
Um, Bruce...he obviously took a shower....you know, he's clean.
and a shave and a haircut
July 19, 2007 - 23:43 ET by botgand a shave and a haircut to boot
I'm more worried about what
July 19, 2007 - 23:54 ET by Free StinkerI'm more worried about what he will do.
Such as socialized medice.
_______
Fred Thompson and Ann Coulter walk into a bar. The bar is instantly destroyed because that much awesome cannot be contained in one build
Bruce, He's still an
July 19, 2007 - 23:57 ET by BlondeBruce,
He's still an empty suit.
And once the media fascination ends...he'll be exposed as such.
A "pretty boy" (BTW....that's not my opinion....I think he looks kind of intrinsically and basically stupid...but I guess that's because I hear what comes out of his mouth).
He'll blow it hugely in a debate, once there are "real" questions asked and he must respond with more than a talking point. As I said before, there is no "there, there".
Kinda matches what i said
July 19, 2007 - 23:59 ET by botgKinda matches what i said below
"The more I study science, the more I believe in God." Einstein
To comment on the original
July 19, 2007 - 23:45 ET by botgTo comment on the original poll Obama doesn't have enough to BEAT Hillary.
Obama only get a chance if Hillary beats herself, then when the tough questions come can he answer?
"The more I study science, the more I believe in God." Einstein
Barack Obama said Thursday
July 19, 2007 - 23:54 ET by botgBarack Obama said Thursday the United States cannot use its military to solve humanitarian problems and that preventing a potential genocide in Iraq isn't a good enough reason to keep U.S. forces there.
"The more I study science, the more I believe in God." Einstein
bot....Isn't that just
July 19, 2007 - 23:59 ET by bigtimerbot....
Isn't that just precious.
Just what the looney-bin leftist love to hear...must be getting his talking points from John Kerry via good old Viet Nam days...ooops..forgot Kerry is spewing the same exact stuff TODAY! (Wa. Journal this morning and Ubermann show tonight)
Gosh... I thought Colin Powell was aiding and abetting him.
So we withdraw but keep a
July 20, 2007 - 00:02 ET by botgSo we withdraw but keep a force there in case of emergency? (then we send in more forces than we have there now but deal with the booby-traps and the populace who we turned our backs on. Sounds like a recipe for bloodbath all around)
"The more I study science, the more I believe in God." Einstein
with that depressing note i
July 20, 2007 - 00:07 ET by botgwith that depressing note i bid you all a goodnight
Night bot... Catch ya on
July 20, 2007 - 00:08 ET by bigtimerNight bot...
Catch ya on the other side...
God willing that is.
Well of course it would be
July 20, 2007 - 00:07 ET by bigtimerWell of course it would be bot....
You think any of these leftists give a good rats rear?
Not one lick do they.
Despicable creatures all...look at the ones that are not even running for Prez or are up for re-election.
Btw...just so you know, I heard this by Obama..nary much of a word about it since then either in the msm....as usual.
mule, Speaking of Mark
July 19, 2007 - 23:18 ET by bigtimermule,
Speaking of Mark Penn I saw this today regarding Hillary and another lawsuit settled/dropped.
Never ends...
Illegally reading emails..lol...as long as it is a pollster.
It is always okay if it is a dem. doncha' know.
The Teflon Don has nothing
July 19, 2007 - 23:45 ET by mulerider24The Teflon Don has nothing on Clinton's legal team. I have no idea what kind of retainer those lawyers are one, but they are worth every penny.
You got that right
July 19, 2007 - 23:49 ET by bigtimerYou got that right mulerider.
Obama "Big ears" Husein" wins in my book
July 20, 2007 - 12:58 ET by Six String SpiffI would personally choose Obama over the "Hillster" (I refuse to call her by a female name, as I don't belive she is even HUMAN, nevermind a female one.) We all know what it (hillster) is cabable of, and what she WANTS. Obama is running because he is young (uggg what a STUPID reason to vote for somebody... My mom did it for Bill though) BLACK, BLACK, and BLACK. Thats IT. To me he does not pose as much of a threat as "it" because he is just a sheet flapping in the wind right now with zero guidence. He wouldn't know how get something done if he wanted to. However, I also believe his smiles genuine, and his personality is above trash can status. Unlike the Hillster, who is the phoniest of the phony. I'd rather have a honest (hopefully) Democrat (Does not compute... syntax error.. shutting down........
.......
.......
.......
*Reboot*
include #/logic
I believe Rudy is going to Win anyway, so it really doesn't matter to me. It was fun to compare the two. Hillster will implode on the first real question fired at her. Once everybody hears her screaming "VRWC!!" they will clonk themselves on the head and ask "what the hell was I thinkning?!"
What the MSSM doesn't report can kill you.
Strong chance
July 18, 2007 - 21:00 ET by dagdaObama has a strong chance because Hillary is going to implode. She is at the top of her numbers and has nowhere to go but down.
Our real problem, then, is not our strength today; it is rather the vital necessity of action today to ensure our strength tomorrow. Dwight Eisenhower
Of course Obama has a
July 18, 2007 - 21:20 ET by bigtimerOf course Obama has a chance against Hillary...besides that he has Oprah on his side now....lol.
Either one or both together is okay with me...neither one will ever be President...one already has anyway.
Obama has "some" chance.
July 19, 2007 - 23:51 ET by Dave RI voted that Obama has some chance, but that chance will depend mainly on the skills of those running his campaign.
Let's face it, the Clinton campaign goons are pollished pros, but they aren't totally infallible. The Hildebeast is carrying a huge amount of baggage, probably more than any presidential candidate in the history of our republic.
If exploited correctly, this could work to the advantage of her opponents. After all, she has a lot of opposition among many democrats, even the two moderates who might be left in the entire democrat establishment (I don't know if there actually are two moderates left in that collection of misfits, kooks and malcontents that calls itself a political party-I am just being kind here).
If Obama's people are even half-assed competent, they will deftly exploit her inherent weaknesses at just the right times.
Should they fail to do so, Barack Hussein Obama will be yesterday's news, three days before it even happens.
Help Fred defeat the RINOs, along with the Hitllary-Obama Axis, & win the White House in '08.
It's very early, and
July 19, 2007 - 07:48 ET by sarcasmoIt's very early, and Democrats know that Hillary motivates the Republican base much more than any other candidate. Much as they may love the Clintons, they want power, and for the pragmatic ones that means the guy without baggage (or even Richardson) has more chance than Hillary. Besides, they've been quiet for a long time -- especially compared to Bill's bimbos -- but aren't we assuming there will be no well-timed "lesbo eruption"?
JMR
Obama's Chances
July 19, 2007 - 09:22 ET by River CityObama has no chance to win the nomination against Hillary. What she and her team can't dig up to use against him they will make up. If that doesn't work they will work out a deal behind the scenes for some sort of deal and payoff, like with Vilsack.
Some say they see a Hillary/Obama ticket. I don't think she can stand the limelight shining on his rising star that much. I don't know if that will be the reality after people get to know him but that may be her perception.
Obama of the Air
July 19, 2007 - 16:48 ET by Lame CherryIn knowing past history, it seems when people get too in the way of the globalist candidates that their planes start crashing.
Isn't it amazing not one US officer in the military to one government official has died since the Clintons left office.
Obama gets too popular and past history indicates a plane crash follows
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
Hussein over Hillary in the primaries
July 19, 2007 - 22:22 ET by Pragmatic-ManThe conservo's will be pushing him up, over Hillary, because he will be easier to defeat than Hillary in the general election.