LAUER: ...She talked about the re-emergence of diplomacy as a central tenet in U.S. foreign policy; about not giving up hope on peace in the Middle East; about the possibility, as we just heard, of direct engagement with Iran. Did you see any area, Senator, where she didn’t show, I guess, a complete mastery of the issues?Lauer followed up by asking Kerry, “It was called a love fest by some people, and one of the local newspapers here in New York said nothing but softballs from the senators. I mean, has she been questioned harshly enough or thoroughly enough to make -- to take on this number one role in diplomacy for the U.S.?”
KERRY: No, I think she did a terrific job, as I think she will do as secretary of state. She clearly demonstrated a different path from the past administration in terms of engagement with Iran. I think even talking about how they’re going to walk a line in the Middle East as an honest broker in the effort to end the violence. I thought it was -- it was a very strong performance, and we anticipate voting her out of the committee tomorrow and trying to get a vote as soon as we can.
BROKAW: She is -- smart and well prepared. She’s -- within her staff, it’s legendary -- her preparation, and I think she was sending a strong signal to the world that we’re open for business again, in terms of dealing in diplomatic ways with some of our most vigorous adversaries, obviously. She’s going to breeze through there. With that little dust-up about Bill Clinton’s foundation -- both Democrats and Republicans thought that that should be raised, but she’s going to get there. The important thing is for everyone to understand, this is all pre-game. This is the kind of game plan that everybody’s putting in place. When they take office and bump up against these objective difficulties that we face around the world, that's the real test of an administration.
VIEIRA: But what about -- what about the criticisms that Matt brought up by some, that they were just kind of, sort of throwing her softballs?
BROKAW: Well, I -- look, I think that we’ve seen that. But you have to remember eight years ago, when it was Don Rumsfeld, Colin Powell, and Dick Cheney -- everybody said that's the ‘A Team’ and they breezed through pretty quickly as well. And what they -- what you try to do in a confirmation hearing -- if you don’t have something that can bring them down, is to get, as we did yesterday, a big picture of where this administration wants to go and how it wants to get there. They did raise, obviously, the possibility of the conflict of interest because of her husband’s foundation. But beyond that, there were not a lot of other places for them to go. This is the -- she gave an expression of what Obama has been talking about for more than a year now, about how he would change his diplomacy, and the president has a right to name a secretary of state and to construct a foreign policy that he believes is in the best interests of the country, and it’s the one that the country voted for.
Despite Brokaw’s characterization that top Bush administration officials “breezed through” their Senate confirmation hearings, the mainstream media, and the Today show in particular, was a lot tougher on the pick of Condoleezza Rice as Bush’s second Secretary of State. During a promo, then-anchor Katie Couric referred to the former Stanford professor as “fried Rice,” and the show went out of its way to try to portray her as “angry.”
Brokaw also only briefly touched on the "possible conflicts of interest with foreign donors to her husband’s charities," which Mitchell had brought up in the earlier segment. This was the only time that the issue came up at all during both interview segments.