I could see a third and fourth one.  

www.theholyrosary.org

"There is no problem, I tell you, no matter how difficult it is, that we can not resolve by the prayer of the Holy Rosary." -Sister Lucia

The folks wont stand for it. We would rather by out the Obama admin, then give them another red cent

 My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful

"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg

The problem with government motors isn't the motors part, it's the government part.

So who other than hapless Slo-Joe and Colonel Obama didn't know there was no stimulus in the 'porkulus bill'? Short list

What's the guess -- who thinks unemployment will top 14% by the 2010 elections?

Can you imagine the REAL stimulus from giving incentives to the oil companies to drill here drill now and to the power companies to build massive numbers of new nuclear power plants? At least then we can put the l;ie to the Democrats energy Independence by shoving a windmill up their arses, a very large windmill indeed,

This is a difficult question to answer. But, the definitive answer is "sort of". Congress, (Pelosi) will strong arm one through the congress, and it will go down in flames in the Senate. Even with the so called "super majority", there are enough dems there aginst it.

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

The fact that we have no money didn't stop them the first time, so why would it matter now? Besides - we can print plenty of money to spend, so that's not really a problem for our fiscally responsible government.

I don't think we'll see another "porkulus" this year. The first one has barely begun being spent and the economy will show little response to it this year. Passing another one will be political suicide. The statists who put these morons in power won't allow them to risk their future statist dominance.

Look for Pork II next year...when the inflation starts to climb, unemployment continues to rise, the ignorant get more panicked, and more government is once again touted as the only way to save us. At that point, we can only hope that the ignorant are so destitute that they can't even make it to the polls to vote.

Rational Liberty: Where Reason and Government Collide - The best website ever!

Other.

There is no need for another stimulus since all they need do is accelerate the spending on the one they have without taking any political risk of voting on another one.  Between the farce of the Stimulus bill authorizing unbridled deficit spending and Obama's trillion a year deficit spending intended through the rest of his reign of economic destruction for the next 4 years, more than enough people will be brought to their knees to form a majority to beg for hand outs. 

Obama being the consumate Chicago politician knows when people can not advance based on their merit if given a chance in a growing economy will willingly survive by seeking privilege in a contracting economy.  Thus the point of extending privilege is being the one who extends it giving them the unlimited power over others.  The one who hands out the bread to the starving has all power over those who seek his beneficance. They will do whatever he says and keep him power to continue receiving their bread.  This is how a dictatorship is willingly accepted by the populace.

As long as wealth is being destroyed, the Federal Reserve can print an equal amount of dollars without causing hyperinflation, thus Obama and the Dems need no more tax increases or bills since they will be simply replacing wealth they destroyed through their policies with fiat dollars.  Cap and Trade or continuing the drilling ban will ensure wealth is destroyed thus allowing the Dems to continue to spend with the Federal Reserve supplying the replacement dollars.

Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.

as proof I cut and pasted Joe Liarman's (Lieberman's) response to a letter I wrote cutting the Cap and Trade to shreds(of course facts and logic elude Mr. Lieberman):

Dear Mr. Folkwein:

Thank you for writing to me
regarding your opposition to climate change legislation. I respectfully disagree with your position
and view climate change as the most important environmental challenge of our
time.

Climate change is a very serious
problem - not just for our environment, but for our economy and our national
security, as well - and the way we produce and consume energy is making the
problem worse.  We need to pass legislation to reduce our greenhouse gas
emissions and transition to a clean energy economy.  To do that, we will
have to build a broad coalition.

To succeed, a bill will need
diverse support, which means bringing everyone to the table and really
listening to what they have to say.  We have to sit down with the
environmental community, the business community, and the scientific community. 
We have to talk to Members of Congress on both sides of the aisle about how
best to address this crucial issue.

This could be a watershed
moment.  We have near scientific unanimity that humans are causing climate
change, we have a Congress poised to take action, and we have a President
pushing for progress.  In his inaugural address, President Obama told us
"each day brings further evidence that the ways we
use energy strengthen our adversaries and threaten our planet."  He is
absolutely right, and I look forward to working with the President to: (1) promote energy innovation so that we can
produce and consume energy more cleanly and efficiently; (2) protect energy
consumers from rising power prices; (3) prepare our communities to respond to
the impacts of climate change; and (4) create jobs as we transition toward a
clean energy economy.  I also support including provisions in
climate change legislation that would ensure a cap-and-trade system does not
increase the deficit.

Climate legislation should improve
our environment and grow our economy at the same time. 
In these tough financial times, some have asked whether it makes sense
to focus on the environment.  The fact is, ignoring climate change until
our economic situation improves will ultimately be far more expensive - and
destructive - than taking steps to address it now. 

Climate change does not just threaten our
environment, it endangers our economy and national security, as well. 
Left unabated, its impacts will ravage coastlines and coastal communities,
destroy large swaths of roadways and railways, and seriously degrade land
resources and biodiversity.  Additionally, climate-induced droughts will
cause famine, threatening already scarce resources and further destabilizing
developing nations that are unable to quickly adapt.  Every day we fail to
reform our energy habits, we guarantee the solution will be far more expensive;
and if we wait much longer, there may be no solution.

If we are able to pass climate change
legislation this year, we will ensure the integrity of our environmental legacy
for generations to come.  I am working hard to make certain we move toward
that important goal.  

As you may know, on April 17, the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released a preliminary finding that
carbon dioxide emissions harm human health and welfare. Though the finding has not yet been finalized,
if and when it is, EPA will be able to regulate greenhouse gas emissions under
the Clean Air Act. One option the agency
will have for doing so will be to set reduction targets. I believe strongly that cap-and-trade would be
the better approach. It allows
businesses to comply with reduction targets in the most economically efficient
way possible, which, in turn, helps keep American-made goods competitive and
keeps energy prices down.

Thank you again for sharing your
views and concerns with me. I hope you
will continue to visit my website at http://lieberman.senate.gov
for updated news about my work on behalf of Connecticut and the nation. Please contact me if you have any additional
questions or comments about our work in Congress.

Sincerely,

Joseph I. Lieberman

UNITED STATES SENATOR

He uses unfounded information to back his reasoning and ignores all evidence against what he is saying. They just don't care.

"You see Obama is going to tax those not paying taxes...those making over 97,000 dollars ayear. Once you make that much you don't pay taxes...he's going to make them pay. And I will finally get a break." -My mom who is on welfare and food st

They will TRY to pass another 'stimilus' to do what the first one was supposed to. The first bill was not passed for the economy or for jobs or anything else other than VOTES. Notice how most of the spending is 'earmarked' for 2010 and 2012? the first was nothing more than a vote-ulus package. 

"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within."-Cicero

but that hasn't stopped them yet. 

I keep wondering just how far Obama will be able to go before the public truly wakes up.  At inauguration I was putting down bets for Mid July and now I think I'll have to revise. Obama seems completely insulated from criticism now.  The state run media is happily plugging along.  As long as pet nancy and pet harry are happy I am sure he'll get everything he wants from congress.

___________________________________________ 
Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past - George Orwell - 1984

what pork?

Working in an industry funded by DOL...the summer youth payback program is a total farce!

Try again a plan that failed, with hopes that it works this time. Um, is that not the definition of insanity?

...how about we have a recall vote on Senator/Congressperson so and so....