Why Is Media Being Tougher on Center-right Protesters?

They're pacifists and favor anti-war protesters
2% (4 votes)
Each political side is more suspicious of opponents' protesters
3% (5 votes)
Ideological loyalty to President Obama
57% (104 votes)
Partisan loyalty to Obama
34% (61 votes)
They're sick of protesters generally
2% (3 votes)
Other (Leave comment)
2% (4 votes)
Total votes: 181

Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Thank you for playing

enjoy playing your home boad game version

Other Poll Questions...

The Pope is:

_ Baptist

_ Jewish

_ Catholic

_ Other

The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.

That last one was too easy

Now you have to choose between partisanship and ideology.

The media loves a FIGHT

Although there is an overwhelming pro-bama media bias in most of the mainstream news outlets, the other thing at play is the cynical nature of the press and the desire to elicit an emotional reaction in readers, negative or positive. 

It's the same phenomena that middle school and high school students do when someone screams, "FIGHT!" Quickly a crowd forms, sides are taken and the spectacle begins. Lots of screaming and shouting as long as the participants are perceived to be "in battle". The crowd loses interest as soon as the punches stop or the principal comes and breaks it up.

The press cynically participates and tries to instigate the same crowd-drawing by twisting the report.

If it isn't a fight, then it is naked-boobies or a sex-scandal, or some other such base nonsense.

They also know that the average news viewer out there reads at the 8th or 9th grade level. The stories have to be simplified and boiled down to something below that level so they are easy to grasp and latch on by the widest audience possible. 

See the news business isn't about the news, it is about delivering eyeballs to advertisers. Fights, naked boobies, sex scandals, racism, etc, are easy marks to draw crowds.

If they delivered in-depth reporting of say, the dynamics of global macro-economics and currency exchange, they cut their audience down to 1/100 of 1% of what it is for say, "Megan Fox's naked boobies," or a more spiteful and cynical, "Tea party protesters are a bunch of n-word haters!"

If it won't fit in a 1-line text message on the average cell phone, they know it won't deliver maximum eyeballs for the next 2 minutes of commercials for beer, soap, cereal and process cheese food.

 

 

 

 

 

Partisan loyalty.

It couldn't possibly be ideololgy because, quite frankly, the vast majority of modern "journalists" don't have the mental capacity to comprehend an idea, let alone have one of their own.

Pure-D-partisanship.

Pure-D-partisanship.

Obama defines who they are

The MSM took this unknown guy Obama and now his agenda is their playbook. Liberal media always pushes their agenda and ignores actual news that doesn't fit their message. This is why their ratings fall and Fox News (which they hate) is completly owning them. Look at how the media ignores ACORN when the news is bad but give them airtime when they took buses to AIG executives houses.

"Don't tell me it's cold outside, give me the temperature and let me decide what I want to do."

partisan all the way

I said Partisan simply because of the 8 years during Bush.  The ideology would apply during Clinton's years, so it didn't change.

At all.

Except for Fox News.(Referring to TV)

-Jon

I would have chosen

numbers 3 and 4 if I could have.

Jack 

They would rather ignore it

They would rather ignore it than be tough about it.

www.theholyrosary.org

"The Rosary is my weapon."

-St. Padre Pio

You know, I don't think it

You know, I don't think it has that much to do with Obama.  They were liberal hacks while he was in diapers.  They will be after he's back in diapers.

 

Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read. - Groucho

RhB... Right you are...I

RhB...

Right you are...I just got a kick of how you stated it.

'Go Green...Recycle Congress'

I couldn't decide whether

I couldn't decide whether it was partisan loyalty or ideological loyalty...so I just picked other.

Why choose the lesser of two evils?

I couldn't decide whether

Curse the Elder God of Double Posting!

Why choose the lesser of two evils?

Guess I'm Part Of That 2% Who Cares For Neither Side...

Basically, I'm a free-thinker, as Phil Hendrie might say. I only go by these things issue-by-issue. If you ask me, the only protesters that ever mattered were those civil rights activists back in the early 1960s (before they were hijacked by the Democrats, when it was about Martin Luther King Jr. and Rosa Parks). Since then though, everything has been hijacked by special interest groups from either side of the spectrum. If you ask me, this whole 9/12 thing is no different than those anti-war protesters picketing outside an army-recruiting center in Berkeley. I could care less about either, but I have to anyway because I keep hearing morons from either side having to spew diarrhea of the mouth when they go, "Oh no, they can't recruit my special, spoiled little college student into the army!" or "Oh my, the president is trying to crucify Jesus with Health insurance!"

You might want to consider using Occam's Razor once in a while.

You so-o-o-o-o above it all

"Free Thinkers are those who general never think at all. " --Lawrence Stern 

I was there and I disagree IMHO

They were fed up They ...we had had enough. We realize we should have been doing this since 05 or 06 ( actually since the early 30s) but I digress. It's called a tipping point. The only thing transparent about this Admin is if you can get the whole story from the media( fat chance) they tell you what they are trying to do and we didn't like it.

 Polls show most Americans did not favor most of Congress' agenda for decades but they continue to incrementally shove this down our throats. The only mistake Obama made was overreading his mandate and moving too fast. If you gradually increase the water temp of a pan of water with a frog in it , it will boil alive never realizing what was happening to it.

Turn off your TV news, cancel your paper and think for yourself.

Wow! These labels, evoked

Wow! These labels, evoked in concert by spokesmen for (MSM and other loyalists, and BHO executive staff) and followers and admirers of the President, do bring another dimension and extend the meaning of "playing the race card", don't they?

When positive reactions toward the offender (to one signal event of "calling out" the President, done in a moment of overwhelming frustration and disappointment, because of a grossly misleading statement by the President) and the person creating the event, are disparaged in every way en masse from so many directions, are they (the royali... (oops) loyalists) indulging in the same behavior? Where IS the Civility? (Headline of an Editorial in our local paper)

There really is no rational response to this flood, is there?

That reaction is based on the following observation: When your own or someone else's ideology is based on relativistic assumptions and subjectively defined value judgements, and your opinion is the only "truth" (in which you know you can't be totally secure), then your tactics devolve to the use of words, self-defined semantics and power, but sheer facts are never allowed if they don't fit your "truth".

The point of this is, that there is no use in wasting time in arguing or debating with those who use the types of rhetoric and polemics that we are seeing right now. They (the loyalists) are going to do the same thing to anyone who disagrees or gets in the way, i.e., bully and intimidate from every corner, and hang the truth.

Our response on the words and semantics front, should be the truth, the hard, harsh, absolute truths, repeated over and over and over again, not for the benefit of the attackers, but for the benefit of those who are being attacked.

Tidbits of Truth:
There is NO "anthropogenic" Global Warming. NONE.

media and BO

The fawning liberal white guilt media has the house invested in BO, so they must do everything in their power to denigrate and marginalize any opposition to BO to the audience they have left. Besides that, even though, through the support of their advertisers we pay their bloated salaries for telepromter reading, as card carrying members of the elite clas, they literally despise us even though we're more knowledgable about most things than they are. They're pampered scorekeepers, little more.