We really need an all of the above category.  The favorite word of a liberal is "outraged". It is tough going through life always "outraged". 

I think they are simply rude and ill-mannered, enhanced by their feeling of entitlement and sense of privlege. They've been told at various times that they can always have their way, and when challanged on this, they become angry and act like spoiled children.

I voted "Other" for all of the above. It isn't one single thing...it's all of the listed options and more.

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." --Thomas Jefferson

I had to go with angrier audience, but it is more ALL of the above.

One has to understand the liberal psychology. Liberals are failures at being individuals. I will bet when the founders of this site and bloggers were told NO or had failures like Matthew in revamping the site having to rewrite the program none of them quit.

They indured the failure, the shame and the frustration and overcame to God's glory.

A liberal as a child instead cried, blamed someone else and then looked for other failures to join, so they would not be alone and then empower themselves.

Take for example this site. It expects a certain manners and expects people to live up to them. KOS and Huffington let everyone in as those people are profit bound first to empower them and they find safety in numbers.

Liberals get angry because they are scared. They know they are failures and they only feel safe when they have a Bill Clinton in power which they somehow think they share in. Bill is a winner so they are winners........that is one reason of many why they hate George Bush even though he passed most of their liberal agenda. Bush being a winner makes them a looser.

A liberal then exists in fear all their life. They can't call the police as their debauchery will get them arrested. They loathe the military as it brings order and liberals only gain power in anarchy. They hate Christians as they remind them of God who they deny exists (the know He does) but will have to face Him in judgement.

All of that is why they legislate "sin" to be legal, because it is a salve to their psyche that if Hilllary says it is ok to destroy yourself literally as a sodomite for example then all is a lie to give comfort another day. I have always maintained liberals are the worst hateful people to gay people in they tell them to basically go die, instead of asking about what it is that makes them define all they are by a sex act. No normal hetero defines themself by a sex act no more than they would allow themselves to be defined whether their navel was in our out. Liberals though cling to government policy, agencies, groups and cliques who enable all they do instead of trying to help each individual overcome weaknesses.

That is the all of the above which will not fit into a poll question, but I always feel great sympathy for the foul mouthed mean people on there as they are just venting hatred at others, because every night they have to live in nightmares they hate themselves and awake to that same terror each day.

That is what is on KOS and that is what is driving Democrats. Bill Clinton even admitted he has changed from the angry person who was savaging women. If Bill Clinton can do it with apparent influence from being around the Bush family, perhaps there is hope in the chastisement rod of Newsbusters for the liberal sites.

Newsbusters as already got them shutting down blogs so no liberal can comment and is warning liberals to stop screaming the F word in every blog.

It has to be changed though in the heart..........I will not say Bill Clinton is reformed, but at least with positive direction he is not as bad as he was. Every liberal has to change one at a time in not being afraid of themselves and forgiving themselves for being absolute failures living as cowards in groups. That is a very hard addictive psychopathy to stay out of.

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

All of the above

They're just overly whiny

If you can't baffle them with BS, bully them with bad language so they will shut up and not confuse you.

I have been bullied with bad language on blog sites. If I state an opinion that doesn't coincide with their rhetoric, I get ganged up on, until finally I just leave, which translates to them as defeat. There is no logic to the argument. I have had better debates with my teenager.

I have to justify every opinion I have, and there is no accountability on their side. I need to read Ann Coulter's "How To Talk To A Liberal, If You Must" one more time and take notes.

A culture of entitlement. Check.

They're pissed because the war is [still] getting more attention than they usually get. Think about it.

because it makes them feel strong, and it makes them feel mature, and it makes them feel like they are one of the big kids

Supreme Court,  National Security,  Borders,  Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.  

For the sixty years I have known my mom, the worst word I have ever heard spoken by her was "damn" [twice]....My father, God rest his soul, never uttered a profanity.  (If he did, which I doubt, my brother, sister, and I never heard it.)

In my teenage years, the guys who swore more frequently, generally tended to be conservative, but the language didn't particularly bother me (unless it was spoken in mixed company).  During college, in my estimation, the use of profanity was about evenly divided between liberals and conservatives.  Unquestionably, the most foul language to which I was ever exposed, was that employed by my drill sergeants in basic training--and they were certainly not liberals.  But neither their language nor politics lessened my respect for them.

Over the past few decades, it is almost impossible to quantify, but, in my view at least, crude speech, incivility, and hateful rhetoric comes in all political stripes.  And profanity does not necessarily suggest a lack of intelligence, for example Dick Cheney appears to be extraordinarily bright.

Being a Democrat who has listened to a great deal of conservative talk radio, I can assure you that liberals have no corner on the "politics of personal attack" market.  I have listened to one talk show host lament the fact that firing squads weren't available to take care of Bill Clinton and agree with a caller who "joked" about commandeering a C-130, flying over the White House and "putting an incendiary shell up that boy's [Clinton's] ass".

On the other hand, in the Wild West atmosphere of the internet, there has been plenty of outrageous and indefensible rhetoric employed by the Left.  The remark on Whiskey Dog directed at Noel Sheppard is a prime example.  It angers and saddens me.

No Vulgarity here. John Roberts has some inscripted laughter at Mitt Romneys expense. I thought it was pretty funny. Not sure how many of you agree with me though. Click on the video on bottom of article.

 John Roberts loses it

OK, I voted "Less intelligent" only because "Public School educated" was not available.

LYDSEXICS UNTIE!

They are not Christians. That is why they use profanity.  The Bible says, "by their fruits you will know them (those who are Christians)"