|
“Exposing & Combating Liberal Media Bias”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why Aren't There More Conservative-oriented Documentaries?Producers can't find financing 9% (289 votes) Not enough producers 6% (175 votes) Right doesn't value media enough 9% (264 votes) Liberal discrimination 72% (2227 votes) Other (leave comment) 4% (136 votes) Total votes: 3091 |
|
Comments Policy
Is there more than maybe
October 4, 2007 - 13:15 ET by Chris NormanAre there more than maybe two or three film makers who are conservative? I'm sure a lot of us would like to make a documentary, but wouldn't know how to even go about it. Never mind the financing and distribution. We may just have to wait for liberals, who made the mistake of being fair, getting shut out by the liberal media infrastructure, and becoming more conservative.
Chris - I think you're on to it...
October 4, 2007 - 14:16 ET by Gary HallChris - I think you're on to it... there just are not that many folks in the movie business (including documentaries) who are other than liberal - if not downright lefitsts. The choice of quesitons is a little short, by only noting "producers."
The question at hand, is why there is not more of an organized effort by those on the conservative side to make a showing of being willing to put the money up to encourage the few to address this shortfall. Off the cuff, I could think of 20 quick much needed docs. (;~>
Perhaps getting students
October 4, 2007 - 17:47 ET by Chris NormanPerhaps getting students out of film school before they're forced to make the usual documentaries by necessity. The conservatives would have to come out with some kind of distribution network. Perhaps straight to the shelf and internet. Fox did pick up the canceled episode from PBS, perhaps they'd be willing. Conservatives are always quarantined and forced into a kind of isolation ward...
its a
October 4, 2007 - 17:58 ET by TruthMongerits a hostile environment
these entertainment libs are huge bigots
they won't hesitate to lynch you
A service of the new NB respect police
Documentary making is a
October 4, 2007 - 13:16 ET by Dan The Man 2Documentary making is a poor line of work for a paying job. I imagine that all the youtoobe stuff is akin to a dockumentary but good luck on it airing on a major station, unless of course you have some kid wiping out ala Jackass. Wasn't it just recently that PBS axed a conservative type view of Islam Radicals?
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.
documentaries and movies in general
October 4, 2007 - 13:17 ET by RousseThis is merely tangental, but I do have some ideas about "conservative" movies and what would be characterized as "good" movies or "family-friendly." The movie industry pumps out all kinds of garbage in the name of entertainment ... movies that lose money for just about everyone except the actors. Then every few years a studio makes a truly decent movie and we who eschew the garbage truck movies spend our money, and give high-fives and good reviews, and applaud like crazy. So what does Hollywood do with all the money we give them for making a decent movie? They use it to underwrite more filth until they run out of money, at which point they trot out another family-friendly money-maker. Maybe it's time to follow the money in Hollywood.
It's a little more
October 4, 2007 - 13:28 ET by balboaIt's a little more complicated than that. You can't just say "Let's make a family friendly movie" and then it happens. It still has to be a good movie.
There are conservative film
October 4, 2007 - 15:07 ET by TruthMongerThere are conservative film production outfits you can support if you just google it
It's hard to be a conservative in sho-biz
most of us are in the closet - it's hard to work in a small dark room
A service of the new NB respect police
No thanks. I'd rather just
October 4, 2007 - 22:16 ET by balboaNo thanks. I'd rather just support good movies, regardless of political affiliation.
Why not?
October 5, 2007 - 09:03 ET by general companyYou can't just say "Let's make a family friendly movie" and then it happens. It still has to be a good movie.
Are you suggesting it isnt likely? Or are you suggesting that conservatives cannot make worth while viewing? It has to be fairly obvious to even you that conservative film makers are not wanted in Hollywood, or any where on TV.
I'm saying it isn't that
October 5, 2007 - 12:30 ET by balboaI'm saying it isn't that simple. Just because a movie is family friendly doesn't always mean it's any good, or that it's going to be commercially successful. Did you see "The Iron Giant"?
OTHER
October 4, 2007 - 13:22 ET by CTWhere would there work be seen, who would air it or screen it? What film vestival would promote it? Who would review it?
There is no unbiased venue for the work of a Conservative-oriented Documentary.
I voted financing
October 4, 2007 - 13:25 ET by Matthew SheffieldLibs can discriminate all they want but with the internet being what it is now, you can distribute documentaries through it.
Additionally, there now is a conservative film festival the Liberty Film Festival.
A great new documentary called "Indoctrinate U" has also just come out. I went to the premiere and it is very well-done. Doing an interview w/the producer of it next week for NB actually.
Thank you for the link Mark
October 4, 2007 - 13:40 ET by CTInteresting site I will look into it further. The internet does provide an outlet, but not sufficient enough to finance most documentaries.
It was actually Matthew, and
October 4, 2007 - 14:56 ET by sarcasmoI've heard that film festival is excellent (nice name, too!).
JMR
Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.
How many went to see Celcius 41.11 in the theater?
October 4, 2007 - 14:56 ET by Dee BunkWhen I went there were only three people besides my husband and I. Two were liberals who walked out as soon as they realized it was a conservative film and one was a guy by himself.
I need a day out by myself
October 4, 2007 - 15:12 ET by drillanwrI need a day out by myself this weekend . . . Might just check out 3:10 To Yuma.
As a little girl I spent a lot of time with my Grandparents. My Grandfather "ran" the living room TV. Westerns! Needless to say "The Duke" and "Bogie" were his favorites. So, I'm drawn to westerns and war flicks ... and the original 3:10 To Yuma was a good movie, so I'm curious about the modern remake.
BTW ... I was the only "dame" in the sparsely populated theater when I went to see "Lord of The Rings: Return of The King" (devoured Tolkien when I was a teen ... Vonnegut too) ...
drill- 3:10 to Yuma was good did you see Rescue Dawn?
October 4, 2007 - 15:56 ET by Dee BunkI liked 3:10 to Yuma but I never saw the original. I like everything from Westerns to Foreign and artsy fartsy stuff. I saw all the LOTR's and liked Tolkien and Vonnegut as a teen) Vonnegut is a little too wacky in his old age. If you haven't seen Rescue Dawn you should try and see that also. It's based on a true story about an american pilot who was shot down in vietnam and it was surprisingly unbiased.
My Father picked up one of
October 4, 2007 - 16:30 ET by drillanwrMy Father picked up one of my Vonnegut books off the stack in my room ... He leafed through it, the "colorful" language jumping off the pages at him, of course. He about hit the floor when I told him that several of them were on my high school American Lit. class reading list ...
Also, I like Christian Bale's acting. Ever since "Empire Of The Sun". He really has resurrected "Batman" from the campy comic book ashes. I can't wait to see Dark Knight. He's a good actor. I'll have to check out "Rescue Dawn" ... Thanks.
I can't wait for dark Knight either
October 4, 2007 - 16:35 ET by Dee BunkChristopher Nolan is an awesome director.
No one - I rest my case
October 4, 2007 - 15:57 ET by Dee BunkAnd people here care about politics unlike most of the public
I voted "other."
October 4, 2007 - 13:26 ET by sarcasmoI'm still amazed an excellent book called Unintended Consequences hasn't been made into a movie, but if you think there were barriers in the way of Red Dawn, you haven't read John Ross' book....I'm very happy that he seems to have found love.
JMR
Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.
Ken Burns' The War
October 4, 2007 - 13:31 ET by Hero SquadI'm not necessarily concerned about the politics of a documentary filmmaker, so long as he doesn't skew his film to reflect those views. I've been watching Ken Burns' The War, and though I have much more to watch (hey, it's 16 hours long!), what I have seen thus far has been very straightforward, compelling storytelling from those who were there.
Burns' seems to be aware of his brand and does not want to taint it by telling only part of a story in order to tilt it toward a particular way of thinking.
However, after seeing the snippets of his next project, "National Parks" (Fall 2009 release), I'm wondering if that's about to end. Could be a fantastic subject; or it could be a way to frame the global warming debate in a specific way. I hope he sticks to his winning formula.
*****
"I heart famous people."
C'mon...Burns is a tool of
October 4, 2007 - 19:02 ET byC'mon...Burns is a tool of the vast left wing conspiracy! If you didn't see the left wing bias then you weren't watching what I was watching. He showed DEAD AMERICANS---need I say more? He showed not only African Americans soldiers fighting but MEXICANS too! This guy is in a fantasy world! I'm surprised he just didn't come out and say we actually lost the war and the proof is that Hillary Clinton is leading the charge into the U.S. becoming a socialist nation! Someone should make a real documentary about WWII without all the left-wing bias.
Boring, blars
October 4, 2007 - 19:26 ET by BlondeWe need a better class of trolls, here.
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
Hi Blonde - Is this one another hater incarnation?
October 4, 2007 - 19:29 ET by Dee BunkHe sounds just like him.
Hey Dee!
October 4, 2007 - 19:32 ET by BlondeLong time no see!
Nah....blaster is a reincarnation of BT's old pal....blarsen.
Sheesh...these trolls never go away.
Out, damn spot!
:P
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
Blonde - it has been a long time
October 4, 2007 - 20:49 ET by Dee BunkI rember blarson. These people are so obsessed. It drives them crazy that we have an outlet. I've been dealing with this really obnoxious troll over on youtube Newsbusted106 who is so bothered by Newsbusted it's hysterical.
Dee,
October 4, 2007 - 20:58 ET by BlondeLong time, no see is sometimes sooooo much fun.
Try this one out on the obnoxious troll....I typed it the other night...& Free just kinda rolled with it. But it is rather funny.
"We need a better class of troll, here".
Guaranteed to drive them totally insane.
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
Blonde - it is a good one and so true
October 4, 2007 - 21:04 ET by Dee Bunkthey are really the bottom of the barrel.
Ms. Dee, are you and Blonde
October 4, 2007 - 21:17 ET by JABMs. Dee, are you and Blonde saying hippies stink? BTW, my hair is about 1/4" long, does this ensure I am excluded from that group? :-)
"Too bad Ignorance isn't painful..."
Hi JAB it's been a really really long time
October 4, 2007 - 21:25 ET by Dee Bunksince I've seen you here. Do you even remember me? I remember you as one of the originals. You were the one who showed me how to give myself a name. Many of us posted under anonymous back then. We must be on hiatis at different times
I'm not thinking that Burns
October 5, 2007 - 09:32 ET by Hero SquadI'm not thinking that Burns is the tool here.
*****
"I heart famous people."
Nobody's fault but our own
October 4, 2007 - 13:32 ET by Dee BunkConservatives don't give enough support. It's just like with Newsbusted. Sure it's very popular on youtube but it could be much better and blow people away if everyone would go over there and take the time to support it. The liberals take their time to trash it.
I had an extremely liberal friend admit that Inconvenient Truth was very boring but still considered it a "must see" for everyone. It doesn't matter how boring or stupid something is they will go and support it. We don't even support things that are decent.
I sure hope everyone goes to see Indoctrinate U. We can't keep complaining when we don't support things. It's the same argument that we give with talk radio. Liberal shows fail because of economics. We have to prove that conservative shows, documentaries, films can be profitable. Once they become profitable they will get better and better.
Indoctrinate U
October 4, 2007 - 16:36 ET by DontFeedTheTrollsI am waiting to see 'Indoctrinate U' and have sent a request to Netflix asking them to add it to their list of rentals. If you belong to Netflix please do the same. If they carry it more can see it.
D
Keep the ILLEGALS out, join NumbersUSA to send free faxes to your reps.
Good idea DFTT
October 4, 2007 - 17:28 ET by Dee BunkI do belong to netflix and I will. It's also good to rate and review it on Netflix and IMDB after you see it. Did you sign up on the Indoctrinate U site with your zip code? They can try to get a screening if 500 people in a particular area sign up.
I totally agree. There's
October 5, 2007 - 09:12 ET by rwestI totally agree. There's so much money behind conservative ideas right now, there's no reason that quality conservative films aren't being made and distributed and the ones that are being made aren't getting much grass/netroots support. I'd hate to think it's defeatism like the poll results seem to imply.
Straight from an ass ... their mascot.
October 4, 2007 - 14:23 ET by CrashHere's the poop. Mocumentaries rely on hype, exaggeration and falsehoods.
Conservatives are interested in the whole truth and nothing but the thruth. Which leads them to the bottom line - fast. Not to mention, it doesn't take us that much time to grasp a concept, or cut through the bull. We have families to tend to.
It took Al Gore over an hour and one-half to sell the stupid notion that he (Al the Amazing) can rid the world of carbon dioxide; which is the dumbest line I've ever heard in a "scientific" carbon based film.
Other means...
October 4, 2007 - 14:23 ET by jmtThe reason I voted other is that the whole documentary community (just like the rest of Hollywood) is so steeped in leftist thought/socialist yearnings that an alternative point of view is not even considered. It's out there with flat earthers and such.
Basically its so far from the norm that taking a conservative POV doesn't even enter their thought processes.
jmt
http://www.jmichaelt.org
Liberal Discrimination
October 4, 2007 - 14:23 ET by drillanwrLiberal Discrimination leads to
Not enough producers (who wants to be known as "conservative" in an industry/business that hates them ... can you say "black-balling"?)
Producers can't find financing (If you are a conservative producer, chances are you ain't gonna get any of that juicy funding from groups that are either liberal driven, or groups that don't want to be viewed/labeled as biased/conservative, but thinking they can be viewed as moderate or non-political, simply because they don't hand out funding to conservative projects ... Remember, Mel Gibson had one of the biggest box office records in the history of the movie business for "The Passion Of The Christ" ... and he HAD to fund it himself because NO ONE would touch it.)
Right doesn't value media enough ... they just either see it as a losing cause to try and break into (bad mistake, as seen above mentioned in the Gibson movie) ... or they don't want to be bothered. (It's democrats in the congress who beat a path to the cameras and mics for every little thing they can spit out for soundbites ... The republicans just seem to not dignify much of anything with a response ... really BAD mistake.)
Anyhow, Pat Dollard's Iraq war Marines docu "Young Americans" is being given its finishing primping and will be out to view soon (don't ask me where, I have my suspicions, but it seems to be a bit of a secret) ... Let's just wait and see how it's received in the public, and in the stinking cage that is the critics. I'll bet the public loves it and the critics hate it ... A good sign Dollard is on the money.
drill - I voted doesn't value media enough but only because it's
October 4, 2007 - 14:41 ET by Dee Bunkthe closest thing to conservatives being unsupportive. I have no doubt that if people had known for sure how well Passion would do, someone would have jumped on it. The phony liberal campaign against the violence (that they don't have problems with in any liberal films) that they hoped would keep Christians away.
They don't care about controversy if it's a liberal issue because they know liberals will support it and they'll still make money.
Why Conservatives do not Make Documentaries
October 4, 2007 - 14:51 ET by Lame CherryI would ask people to reflect on World War II which produced a great many millions of Conservatives and then look at Ken Burns latest "documentary".
Conservatives are a modest people. They do not run around bragging about what they did in life...........you will notice liberal Daniel Inouye was featured, but no hero George Bush or hero Bob Dole.
Now why is ole Ken leaving them out?
Conservatives do not seek the attention. The old west is only recorded by a few voices while most of the Conservatives who created America simply died with their stories.
You can see who was featured in Burns primary documentary.......a whiner from Minnesota who flew planes and a whiner from Alabama who fought on the ground.......BOTH of these people were so troubled by war they made a documentary to vent and wrote a book. Burns just picked up their liberal information about killing being bad and they could no longer hunt.
If you examine Joe Foss who is a Medal of Honor recipient, Governor of South Dakota and NRA President, he loved to hunt, loved to do all the things he did before shooting down record numbers of planes and was quite normal..........he never once spoke about his war experience except in this manner:
"That FDR pulling me and Pappy out of combat, hell we would have shot down the whole damn Jap air force if he would have stayed out of it".
The Pappy referred to is Greg Boyington of television Black Sheep Squadron....another Conservative hero quite content in his own skin.
Liberals are troubled and always have to be bitching about something or they will go insane completely.....that is why they make documentaries. The real heroes like George Bush said are the dead US soldiers and he was but a survivor.
Most of those US Soldiers then and now actually love what they were doing, even in combat. Yes it was scarey and impossible, but they took to it just like they were born to it and became better citizens for it as they had nothing to prove.
Once you have been shot over and hear that sound of a bullet not like the movies.......it forever changes you and makes you more alive like you ever as a mortal ever thought could be. It is exhilerating and men like Teddy Roosevelt simply cherished it as a passage into manhood.
Conservative are of this class and are content with the life God gave them. They are the nobel Roman warrior who served his nation and then came home to his farm to live in comfort.
Liberals on the other hand are tormented, thinking they are God with powers of life and death and that they can change the world..........and in that they make documentaries.......confessing over and over again their inner demons.
That is why liberals make documentaries. It is puke from their wreched souls.
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
So this why Rush Limbaugh
October 5, 2007 - 09:50 ET by moderate to profaneSo this why Rush Limbaugh bithches endlessly about everything in the whole world? This is why Ann Coulter is endlessly acting like a media whore? This is why Sean Hannity is endlessly beating the war drums for republicans and against war if it by a dem? This is a BS answer. There are shills everywhere and they come in every political ilk. One may say that Rush, Sean and Ann are not real conservatives, but most would not. I would say that they are really nothing more that political hacks who masquerade themselves as pundits.
In addition, people who for policies in a war or a government do not bitch. Or maybe they just don't care enough. The conservatives in Germany back on the 1930's didn't seem to mind Hitler and did not bitch. Maybe they should have! Bitching about stuff does make one a pussy but rather someone who cares.
There are not a lot conservative documentaries because there is no audience. That is the answer. Ken Burns War documentary is extremely balanced and very good.
Another TROLL identified
October 5, 2007 - 09:59 ET by Sergeant ROCKOf course there's no audience. How else do you explain Rush's (and conservatives in general) dominance of talk radio, FOX News shows like O'Reilly or Hannity & Colmes crushing the competition? Then we have Air America...
Talk about absurd? <roll eyes>
Indoctrinate-U
Our Education. Their Politics.
I said no audience for
October 5, 2007 - 10:09 ET by moderate to profaneI said no audience for documentaries not conservative talk. There is a huge market for that. Rush, Sean and Ann do real well in the media, just the others conservative media figures ( Bill O'Rielly, Michael Medved, Melanie Morgan, Micheal Savage, etc, etc ). No argument there.
I just not think that conservatives care to believe that any documentary is good enough for them unless it comes from the lips of their media darlings like Rush , Ann, Sean etc.
Air America is not real competition for the conservative talk nor does it need to be according NewBusters. The entire media world is against conservatives so why would liberals need Air America. They gots Howard Stern and Katies Couric, Micheal Moore and Ryan Seacrest fightin' for them. Or at least acording to this web site.
Audiences
October 5, 2007 - 10:37 ET by Sergeant ROCKThat's akin to saying that baseball fans wouldn't be interested in a documentary about baseball.
Further, I would surmise that there really isn't such a thing as a conservative documentary per se. Unless, you're talking about conservative philosophy or conservatism in general.
Indoctrinate-U
Our Education. Their Politics.
Remarkable Troll he is,
October 5, 2007 - 10:09 ET by MightyMouthRemarkable Troll he is, living up to Godwins Law in his very first post on the thread. That may be a new record.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Unfortuantely I am not
October 5, 2007 - 10:20 ET by moderate to profaneUnfortuantely I am not comparing anyone to Nazis. I was talking more about apathy. If people are apethetic, then damage can be done. In the US recently, apathy by conservatives lead to laws and reforms they did not like, like Roe V Wade. Conversely, apathy by liberals lead to the current administation and its policies, which are very fitting to conservative ideas about government. They want the population to think a like and pull togather. Conversely liberals tend to push for a more chaotic form of government where most disagree and different ideas are tried. Of course most of their ideas fail.
And lastly I have been a member of this web site for over 3 years.
"The conservatives in
October 5, 2007 - 10:30 ET by MightyMouth"The conservatives in Germany back on the 1930's didn't seem to mind Hitler and did not bitch."
...Is not comparing conservatives to Nazis? Ok, whatever...
Frankly I find your assertions confusing, simplistic and nothing more than generalizations.
And this line:
"Conversely liberals tend to push for a more chaotic form of government where most disagree and different ideas are tried"
...Is laughable, liberals have a single mindset and do not want to hear differnt ideas. The "Fairness Doctrine" is one example where they want to stifle other popular viewpoints through legislation.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Basically no one spoke up
October 5, 2007 - 10:42 ET by moderate to profaneBasically no one spoke up against the Nazis in Germany. Liberals blew it as well. They should have done something, but they did not.
As far as liberals disagreeing, I see a lot of disagreement among liberals. If they agreed all of the time, then why do they hate each other so much. They tend to put each other down far more that consevatives. Joe Lieberman has a lot of liberal ideas but he for the Iraq war and he chastised by the left. There are social liberals and fiscal liberals and they do not agree on alot of things. Of course some may think that they do. Carter did not have his party's support and he failed misable as president. Indecisive as hell. Other Dem leaders have failed as well. Kennedy failed to garner much Dem support before he did, but Johnson sure did. It would be an interesting discussion to see which party stands by its man more. I would guess it is the Republicans. I believe that the conservatives stand by thier man more as well.
The last time I checked, only Bill O'Rielly consistently push against some of the Bush initiatives. Rush, Sean and Ann chimed in as does Bill Kristol. Am I missing something on Fox News? I do not every remember a Republican president not getting the backing of his party, like I can remember dem presidents getting dissed by their own. Clinton was chastised by everyone.
Bush has had some fiscal conservatives critize his budget but not many. And he was chatised about Myers' nomination. In general, I do not hear conservatives or Republicans come against the President. Hagel is the exception I guess and he is flummoxed by the conservative media. Rush has called him Senator Betray-Us.
Bush has gotten "dissed" by
October 5, 2007 - 11:01 ET by MightyMouthBush has gotten "dissed" by his own party plenty, examples:
Shamnisty.
Blank check to congress (near virgin veto pen).
Not explaining and defending his policies.
Bumbling treatment of Rummy. (which helped lose the congress).
Harriet Myers.
Border Agent fiasco...
Examples abound...
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
True conservatives have
October 5, 2007 - 11:29 ET by moderate to profaneTrue conservatives have railed against his Immigration policies and his education reforms. Harriett Myers nomination pissed off the religous right alot, but he fixed that with his subsequent nomination of Alito.
I do not understand the "Blank check to congress (near virgin veto pen)" as being against the President. Doesn't it mean more that he is getting what he wants?
The same goes for defending his policies. If he still gets his policies through the Congress, doesn't that mean the Republican congress agreed?
Of course he now has broke out his veto pen with the Dems controlling both houses, as would be expected.
Rummy should have left a long time before he did, but I did know that conservatives were generally against him. That is news to me. Interesting. Was NewBusters readers against Gonzales as well? Or was he okay? How about Colin Powell?
The best example of Dem hate for each other is Carter. Right after Watergate the Dems should have controlled the government and made hay, but they fumbled control and they got Reagan, most libs worst nightmare. If Carter and Congress would have made nice, they could have stayed in power. But too bad for them they fumbled and that lead to their fall from power and the conservative take over of Congress in the early 1980's. Hell alot of Dems voted with Reagan and the libs lost most of their power and influence in the Beltway. Clinton did not change that much. He just inflamed everyone. He was everyone's worst nightmare. He promised gays in the military and he delivered " Don't ask, Don't Tell". He pushed to end welfare by the Rebulican Congress and, well, he delivered it to them. He had scandel after scandel, but overall he was a pretty good redneck. Congress did not back him, but the people loved him in the end.
Expansion on my
October 5, 2007 - 11:56 ET by MightyMouthExpansion on my post:
Harriett Myers was not as qualified for the job. So conservatives like Ann Coulter called the president on it.
The "blank check" to congress refers to uncontrolled spending and yes the pres has gotten what he wants. That's why conservatives are pissed. He spent too much not related to national defense and security. Entitlement spending has increased under this president not decreased. To his credit, the tax cuts have proven good for the country.
Defending his policies to the American people and taking on the lies of the MSM. The American people for the most part don't give a rip about partisan politics in DC.
Yes Rummy should have left BEFORE the Election. That's what we were pissed off about. Although I personally didn't have a problem with him the timing was horrible.
Gonzales was a mistake and many conservatives have pointed that out. He did not pursue illegal security leaks for fear of appearing too partisan. In general the administration has had a lackadaisical approach to national security leaks (the reasons for this are beyond me).
So your assertions that the conservatives have been idly standing by ,swallowing the admins policies hook line and sinker are off base and unfounded.
And btw this site is about pointing out media bias more than validating administration policy.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
I'm still waiting for PBS to
October 4, 2007 - 16:01 ET by the_red_stateI'm still waiting for PBS to show the documentary about radical Islam.
I chose Other
October 4, 2007 - 16:02 ET by american-americanI think the kind of people who write documentaries definitely lean to the left.
Conservatives, however, write books, which go on to become NYT Bestsellers.
And then the left claims that conservative powerhouses buy those books in bulk, so they have and explaination as to why they make it to the bestseller list.
Other: It's easier (and
October 4, 2007 - 16:19 ET by Mean Gene Dr. LoveOther: It's easier (and less expensive) to make things up than it is to pay people to research the truth and make accurate portrails of the truth...plus fiction is way more exciting than truth...especially if it makes the right look bad/the left look like guiltless saints.
"There are millions of people in Iraq who have sacrificed in the hope that the United States will finish its work here. We should never forget that." -- Lt. Gen. Raymond Odierno, Commander U.S. III Corps
Conservatives simply do not
October 4, 2007 - 16:27 ET by Atomic CrusaderConservatives simply do not blabber away like liberals and therefore have less need of propaganda tools such as documentaries.
The producer class is by
October 4, 2007 - 17:54 ET by BDThe producer class is by its very nature living vicariously and have the hormones of fifteen year old boys raging and lacking in virtues. This is not conducive to being a conservative.
A good example is in the mini-series Band of Brothers, the producers inserted a sex scene between the young company clerk and a vivacious young blonde german woman. Nowhere in any of the reference material used to create the book by Stephen E Ambrose was such a event referenced. It was supernumary to the script and was simply inserted to titillate the immature viewer.
MAJ Dick Winters, who was asked about the scene told the interviewer that when asked by the producers, he found it inappropriate, did not advance the story in any way, and asked it to be deleted. Naturally, for a simple chance to see a naked blonde woman, it was kept in the final cut of the film.
This Poll Is Worthy of National Front Page News
October 4, 2007 - 21:34 ET by BondPlainBondI often wonder why the polls taken here at NewsBusters aren't front page news with the worldwide media.
"72 Percent of Americans Feel There Are Fewer Conservative-oriented Documentaries Because of Liberal Discrimination"
NewsBusters polls usually have a greater number of respondents than the polls cited in the MSM for the "national polls" for Iraq, Afghanistan, Great Britain, or any major US city. At the time of this post, at NewsBusters; there are currently 70 users and 1947 guests online (Total votes: 1934).
Iraq poll September 2007: In graphics
The latest of four opinion polls commissioned by the BBC and ABC has provided a revealing insight into the everyday lives, hopes and fears of people living in Iraq. The poll was conducted by D3 Systems and KA Research Ltd for the BBC, ABC News, and NHK of Japan. Some 2,112 Iraqis were questioned in more than 450 neighbourhoods across all the 18 provinces of Iraq between August 17 and August 24, 2007. The margin of error is + or - 2.5%. (Population of Iraq: 27,499,638 (July 2007 est.)
CNN - Poll: 60 percent of Americans oppose Iraq war
The corporation polled 1,047 adult Americans by telephone. The poll was conducted August 2 and 3. Its margin of error is plus or minus 3 percentage points, and plus or minus 4.5 percentage points for questions asked of half-samples. (Population of United States: 301,139,947 (July 2007 est.)
CNN - Poll: Majority mistrustful of upcoming Iraq report
The poll was based on interviews of 1,029 Americans by telephone between August 6 and 8. The sampling error was plus or minus 4.5 percentage points, except for the questions based on the respondents' support or lack of support of the war, which was plus or minus 3.5 percentage points. (Population of United States: 301,139,947 (July 2007 est.)
I would say that it is
October 5, 2007 - 10:01 ET by moderate to profaneI would say that it is because the CNN polls are done with randomly picked persons and not on a biased web site. This a scientific method of using probability to predict what a large population may feel. It uses advanced matematics and other complicated things like Calculus and differential equations. I know that probability uses theories and you mught not buy into them, but most people do. Just a guess though. I am sure if a simliar poll was taken a liberal web site it be the exact opposite of the ones here. But I am just guessing that a bunch of conservatives at a conservative web site would have similiar opinions and may not represent the population as a whole.
A Conservative Documentary...
October 5, 2007 - 10:27 ET by heldmywReflecting Conservative values?
Respect for law, courtesy, honesty, morality, dignity, kindness, fairness...
No infidelity, fornication, greedy machinations, triangulations, or orgies?
Fact is, a Conservative Documentary would be pretty darn dull.
Decency is.
That's why Liberals excel at this genre.
The problem is not in
October 5, 2007 - 11:01 ET by Jack BauerThe problem is not in conservatives making documentaries. The problem is and would be getting main stream distribution deals and/or television broadcast deals.
Witness the recent PSB shenanigans when they actually commssioned and put up the money for a documentary on Islamic extremism versus "moderate" muslims. It was made, and they refused to show it.
A committed film maker can and should be able to make a documenatry for very little money.