Why Are Some Journalists Admitting (Anti-Clinton) Media Bias?

They support her and don't like pro-Obama bias
34% (654 votes)
It is blatantly obvious
64% (1231 votes)
Some of them actually dislike all bias
2% (30 votes)
Total votes: 1915
Topics:

Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Obvious to the most Casual Observer

February 29, 2008 - 10:24 ET by JayTee

When an Ex-President blows their cover....because Wild Bill is getting Microphones shoved in his face by MSM...and the MSM slanted reporting is gettng nailed by an adoring Husband....The news is the "News Reporters" and their Bias.

And then you have the Obama worshipers in the MSM at odds with the Clinton lovers, and they see the corresponding Bias.  

They become Conflicted when there is more than one MSM primary agenda to push, and suddenly there is a Bias for all to recognize...where none was suspected....at least suspected by the MSM.  

 

 

It was so obvious when the

February 29, 2008 - 10:46 ET by pbanks7

It was so obvious when the MSM was doing it for the Clintons. Now that they're doing it for Obama, the Clinton supporters cry fowl. 

They're almost treating her as bad as they treat Republicans. Tee-hee! 

  MSM - shaping all the perceptions you need to believe.

How Hard This?

February 29, 2008 - 11:57 ET by okiehawk44

Republicans have a dislike bordering on hatred for Hillary.

Most Democrats feel the same way.

Barack H. Obama proved in Iowa that she was beatable.

Mr. Obama is now beating her and most in the MSM who thought they had to support her are now realizing that they do not and they are not.

It's Hillary people. She is neither a good person nor a good candidate. PERIOD!

WHY THE HYPE??

February 29, 2008 - 13:04 ET by STANISZ

CHARLIE I, would assume that old, HILLARY&BILL had the black vote in thier back pocket and she did,nt have any FBI files on BLACK dem,s. 

There's

February 29, 2008 - 13:11 ET by lotr

There's "anti-Rodham-Clinton" media bias?  I know that there's pro-Rodham-Clinton bias, but negative-bias is news to me.  Somebody please enlighten me...

I had to go with the - they

February 29, 2008 - 13:12 ET by Chris Norman

I had to go with the - they support Hillary - reason. The anti-conservative bias in the media is blatantly obvious also, so why won't any current MSM journalists admit that ? Because no one in the MSM supports conservatives.

None of the above

February 29, 2008 - 13:25 ET by desertdweller

You forgot the media's propensity for "American Guilt Syndrome".

Media highlights the guilty, it's the best (only?) way they know to draw attention to themselves.

Telling the Truth = Bias = Ultimate Nightmare

February 29, 2008 - 14:11 ET by PSPCpl

The Clintons have always managed to control the agenda at the DNC and the MSM.  The first is waking up to the fact that "the People" do not feel that it is worth it to have Hil in the White House just to get Bill back.  The second is coming to grips with the fact that "the People" aren't buying the old sow no matter how much lipstick they put on it.

Some "brave souls" in both camps (more like rats crying out as they are leaving the sinking, burning ship) are beginning to admit publically that Hilary's campaign is DOA.  They are starting to fall in behind the presumptive heir.  This truth is being labeled media bias by the Clintons.

Telling this truth is indicative of a bigger problem for the Clintons: they are losing control.  This lose of control is more frightening to them than anything else because it means they are beconing irrelevant. As this becomes increasingly obvioius more truth will come out, and with it, their legacy will be just that.

Perhaps they are Obamatrons,

March 1, 2008 - 10:08 ET by Nonanon

Perhaps they are Obamatrons, robot-like followers of BO.