Poor Terry, gettin' no love!
Are my NB brethren not voting for poor Terry because there is no bias, or because most of us do not even know if Terry is a she or a he, let alone WHO he/she is?
LOL-Well, as of this comment he/she has received 15 votes.
Guess we just aren't as up on things as some of our fellow NB comrades.
BTW-I voted for Olbersqueeze.
When I'm president, privatization is off the table because it's not the answer to anything.-Hillary Rodham, September 3, 2007 AARP Legislative Conference.
Moran is a Anchor wannabe. He anchors on the weekend sometimes, I think. I voted for KO here, but honestly, they are all pretty damn biased. There is not a lot of difference from one to another in how blatantly they slant their reports in favor of the left and against conservatism.
I chose Olbie. He is obviously not pretending to be a centrist. Couric claims to be a journalist which used to imply no bias, but she is clearly the most biased of the newsies.
If conservatives are RIGHT, then liberals must be WRONG. Thompson/Rice
"You can lock out a theif but you cannot lock out a liar".
I know no better way to describe these people than that. They have assumed a role in an institution that is supposed to be ABOVE ALL DECEPTION and have turned it into the biggest joke of the last 50 years (and it did not just start recently).
The problem is that it is not a joke. The problem is that the plurality of the American public that is tragically underinformed is easily bamboozled by these demons and critical elections, followed by potentially fatal policy has and will result.
One saving grace is that the very extreme, like Olbermann and to some degree, Matthews are so over the top to be clownish and to believe what they say would require one to also believe in the tooth fairy.
On the other hand, Fox News and the personalities incorporated there come off as extreme to only those observers who are on the extreme left. I challenge anyone to produce outright lieing by the folks at Fox. Certainly, they will have a tendency to come down on the Conservative side of issues as a general observation BUT they are upright and open about it. AND the rainbow in the sky is that their resulting pounding of all other news outlets is the encouraging factor.
The real danger, and the liars that you cannot lock out are the people at NBC, CBS, ABC and CNN because they attempt to wear the cloak of sincerity. The others are the junk shows that uninformed, stay at home, TV addicted (people) that get their information from places like The View.
The saving grace is probably the overreaching that the MSM is indulging in now because they believe that they have finally gotten Conservatives and the Republican party by the throat and they are going for the kill. Their real opium is their hate for the President and their prayers that the American Public is complicit with them.
This, I pray, will prove to be their (Kennedy's Heel) and they will have underestimated the American Public's pursuit and eventual acceptance of THE TRUTH.
C'mon, not even close. Olbermann calls himself a "news anchor" and labels "Countdown" a "news show". Not a commentator or a news commentary show.
This should be named the "Keith Olbermann Monthly Most Biased Journalist" poll.
The man is a fraud. Complete, total, 100% unadulterated fraud. Walter Duranty was more credible (okay, so I wasn't even alive when Duranty was reporting; you get the point).
Is this a trick question? The answer would definitely be "all of the above"! But looks like the question tries to solicit or engage NB readers in moronic discussion. The names above are beyond just biased, they are leftoids beyond lefties- an arm of the lefty democracks. Nough said...
He's a scumbag who used to work the White House beat and used to compete with David Gregory over which network "journalist" could ask the most obnoxious partisan question. He often won. Now he's on Nightline and writing blogs about how the absolute vindication of the the three Duke Lacrosse players should not be seen as vindication at all...they're wealthy white people after all, so their mere existence is criminal.
Keith Olbermann by a landside. His rants are leaps and bounds ahead of the rest. And his jealously of O'Reilly is comical. He is very passionate when he spouts his ignorance.
This poll needs an "All of the Above" entry. They're all scumbags. Among the ones listed, however, I'm pretty sure Olbermann is the least sane, most ignorant, and the one mostly likely to be caught in a motel room with a barnyard animal.
Even though Olbermann protests that he is not a commentator (despite his opinionated commentary) and that he is, instead, a journalist, I wouldn't include him (or Matthews) in this group. Despite Olbermann's demonstrated insanity, I can live with his partisan rantings. I can live with Matthew's silly partisanship (except when he is brought on for supposedly neutral analysis). It's the subtle (and not so subtle) bias from the supposedly (heh-heh) neutral media - the reporters and anchors - that is so very dangerous, because it's where so many Americans get the news that they base their voting choices on.
They are all part of the loony lefty America apologists. They truly see America as a horrible nation causing most of the problems in the world today. They put America last in everything they say and do.
This has crossed over from liberal ideology to all out war on America itself.
I would have voted Olberman, but I think Olberman can rightly be considered a commentator (a la Michael Medved, but without the smarts). Matthews, on the other hand, seems to have the pretension of being a non-partisan journalist.
Even in voting for Olberman, this is a trick question as everyone in the world is biased whether it is biased toward John Wayne movies or biased toward wearing pink undies under our Bill Clinton suit.
Correctly: Chris Matthews is the most close to Dan Rather insane.
Katie Couric is the current collective phrase definition of "b*tch" as she had people at NBC betting on when she would profit from her husband's death.
Terry Moran is.........well the word is moron crossed with a pansy in a liberal costume.
Keith Olberman is the biggest manipulator hiding as a frightened little boy uncomfortable in their own skin.
Matthews is the biggest sell out for power like Al Gore, Terry Moran is the most neutered male, Katie Couric is the most trying to grow gonads female and Keith Olberman is the biggest snake oil salesman.
Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Poor Terry, gettin' no
September 27, 2007 - 09:07 ET by Roger the ShrubberPoor Terry, gettin' no love!
Are my NB brethren not voting for poor Terry because there is no bias, or because most of us do not even know if Terry is a she or a he, let alone WHO he/she is?
Rog,
September 27, 2007 - 11:40 ET by Dave RLOL-Well, as of this comment he/she has received 15 votes.
Guess we just aren't as up on things as some of our fellow NB comrades.
BTW-I voted for Olbersqueeze.
When I'm president, privatization is off the table because it's not the answer to anything.-Hillary Rodham, September 3, 2007 AARP Legislative Conference.
No clue who Terry is and
September 27, 2007 - 21:47 ET by The PresbyterNo clue who Terry is and since he/she/it is on this list, I will attempt to steer clear of said liberal creature.
Moran is a Anchor wannabe.
September 28, 2007 - 13:19 ET by rimskyMoran is a Anchor wannabe. He anchors on the weekend sometimes, I think. I voted for KO here, but honestly, they are all pretty damn biased. There is not a lot of difference from one to another in how blatantly they slant their reports in favor of the left and against conservatism.
Shrug
September 27, 2007 - 09:09 ET by dwillmoreThey all have biased reporting, but I am not sure which are really biased and which are just playing up to the nuts for ratings.
the answer is ...yes.
September 27, 2007 - 09:16 ET by ConservativeRexthe answer is ...yes.
Olbie
September 27, 2007 - 09:29 ET by LionKingI chose Olbie. He is obviously not pretending to be a centrist. Couric claims to be a journalist which used to imply no bias, but she is clearly the most biased of the newsies.
You can lock out a theif
September 27, 2007 - 09:58 ET by cvgbuckeye"You can lock out a theif but you cannot lock out a liar".
I know no better way to describe these people than that. They have assumed a role in an institution that is supposed to be ABOVE ALL DECEPTION and have turned it into the biggest joke of the last 50 years (and it did not just start recently).
The problem is that it is not a joke. The problem is that the plurality of the American public that is tragically underinformed is easily bamboozled by these demons and critical elections, followed by potentially fatal policy has and will result.
One saving grace is that the very extreme, like Olbermann and to some degree, Matthews are so over the top to be clownish and to believe what they say would require one to also believe in the tooth fairy.
On the other hand, Fox News and the personalities incorporated there come off as extreme to only those observers who are on the extreme left. I challenge anyone to produce outright lieing by the folks at Fox. Certainly, they will have a tendency to come down on the Conservative side of issues as a general observation BUT they are upright and open about it. AND the rainbow in the sky is that their resulting pounding of all other news outlets is the encouraging factor.
The real danger, and the liars that you cannot lock out are the people at NBC, CBS, ABC and CNN because they attempt to wear the cloak of sincerity. The others are the junk shows that uninformed, stay at home, TV addicted (people) that get their information from places like The View.
The saving grace is probably the overreaching that the MSM is indulging in now because they believe that they have finally gotten Conservatives and the Republican party by the throat and they are going for the kill. Their real opium is their hate for the President and their prayers that the American Public is complicit with them.
This, I pray, will prove to be their (Kennedy's Heel) and they will have underestimated the American Public's pursuit and eventual acceptance of THE TRUTH.
If not, GOOD MORNING PRESIDENT CLINTON!
A+
September 27, 2007 - 09:39 ET by CaringwhiteguyThere is no wrong answer, therefore anyone who takes the poll gets an A+.
C'mon, not even close.
September 27, 2007 - 10:05 ET by SMGalbraithC'mon, not even close. Olbermann calls himself a "news anchor" and labels "Countdown" a "news show". Not a commentator or a news commentary show.
This should be named the "Keith Olbermann Monthly Most Biased Journalist" poll.
The man is a fraud. Complete, total, 100% unadulterated fraud. Walter Duranty was more credible (okay, so I wasn't even alive when Duranty was reporting; you get the point).
SMG
Shouldn't the question really be....
September 27, 2007 - 10:09 ET by Prester John....who's the biggest moron?
BRAVO .....
September 27, 2007 - 10:27 ET by Joe SantoraCouldn't have said it better!!
Like the olbermeister
September 27, 2007 - 10:16 ET by Warner Todd HustonLike the olbermeister himself... this one is a no-brainer.
This is an Olbie moment if
September 27, 2007 - 10:40 ET by bassndudeThis is an Olbie moment if there ever was one.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
Is this a trick question?
September 27, 2007 - 10:53 ET by Senior ChiefIs this a trick question? The answer would definitely be "all of the above"! But looks like the question tries to solicit or engage NB readers in moronic discussion. The names above are beyond just biased, they are leftoids beyond lefties- an arm of the lefty democracks. Nough said...
Who in the hell is
September 27, 2007 - 10:53 ET by RosTerry Moran?
Someone even more irrelevant that Couric/Mathews?
Terry is with ABC
September 27, 2007 - 12:22 ET by SouthJersey1953Terry Moran is on ABC Views (err, I mean News)
No RINOs in '08
He's a scumbag who used to
September 27, 2007 - 13:15 ET by fitzfongHe's a scumbag who used to work the White House beat and used to compete with David Gregory over which network "journalist" could ask the most obnoxious partisan question. He often won. Now he's on Nightline and writing blogs about how the absolute vindication of the the three Duke Lacrosse players should not be seen as vindication at all...they're wealthy white people after all, so their mere existence is criminal.
Keith Olbermann
September 27, 2007 - 12:04 ET by kgKeith Olbermann by a landside. His rants are leaps and bounds ahead of the rest. And his jealously of O'Reilly is comical. He is very passionate when he spouts his ignorance.
This poll needs an "All of
September 27, 2007 - 12:24 ET by marvlThis poll needs an "All of the Above" entry. They're all scumbags. Among the ones listed, however, I'm pretty sure Olbermann is the least sane, most ignorant, and the one mostly likely to be caught in a motel room with a barnyard animal.
Well, it looks like Keith
September 27, 2007 - 12:37 ET by MikeBWell, it looks like Keith is number one, in spite of the amount of number two he spouts.
"A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan
Haha
September 27, 2007 - 13:47 ET by BacchusI selected Matthews number one and he's a steaming pile of #2 too.
Keith is an actor in my books, bought and paid for.
Even though Olbermann,
September 27, 2007 - 12:48 ET by Chris NormanEven though Olbermann protests that he is not a commentator (despite his opinionated commentary) and that he is, instead, a journalist, I wouldn't include him (or Matthews) in this group. Despite Olbermann's demonstrated insanity, I can live with his partisan rantings. I can live with Matthew's silly partisanship (except when he is brought on for supposedly neutral analysis). It's the subtle (and not so subtle) bias from the supposedly (heh-heh) neutral media - the reporters and anchors - that is so very dangerous, because it's where so many Americans get the news that they base their voting choices on.
The America last movement
September 27, 2007 - 12:58 ET by libliebusterThey are all part of the loony lefty America apologists. They truly see America as a horrible nation causing most of the problems in the world today. They put America last in everything they say and do.
This has crossed over from liberal ideology to all out war on America itself.
My Vote for Matthews
September 27, 2007 - 15:10 ET by Dr_LibertyI would have voted Olberman, but I think Olberman can rightly be considered a commentator (a la Michael Medved, but without the smarts). Matthews, on the other hand, seems to have the pretension of being a non-partisan journalist.
The line is obviously blurry here.
<insert witty signature here>
This is a trick question
September 27, 2007 - 15:49 ET by Lame CherryEven in voting for Olberman, this is a trick question as everyone in the world is biased whether it is biased toward John Wayne movies or biased toward wearing pink undies under our Bill Clinton suit.
Correctly: Chris Matthews is the most close to Dan Rather insane.
Katie Couric is the current collective phrase definition of "b*tch" as she had people at NBC betting on when she would profit from her husband's death.
Terry Moran is.........well the word is moron crossed with a pansy in a liberal costume.
Keith Olberman is the biggest manipulator hiding as a frightened little boy uncomfortable in their own skin.
Matthews is the biggest sell out for power like Al Gore, Terry Moran is the most neutered male, Katie Couric is the most trying to grow gonads female and Keith Olberman is the biggest snake oil salesman.
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
Being unique is the name of the game
September 27, 2007 - 16:48 ET by pocomocoWho is the most biased? My vote is for Couric.
Who is the most hateful? My vote is for Mathews.
Who the most uninformed: My vote is for Moran.
Who is the most perverted? My vote is for Olbermann.
In the news media, as in Hollywood, being unique is the name of the game. And as my votes show, each one has more than accomplished that task.
[_X_] Brian
September 27, 2007 - 18:52 ET by Night Watchman[_X_] Brian Kilmeade
http://www.youtube.c...
THIS IS A BIT MISLEADING...
September 27, 2007 - 22:17 ET by danybhoyThey are biased, this one seems to be about who is the hated the most.
"Some of us are wise, some of us are otherwise" Mark Levin