...world's tallest midget.

I voted for the Creative News Network. I don't allow the sewer known as cable television into my home, so I only catch the broadcast news networks when I travel for work.

I watch the national news on ABC, CBS, and NBC to see how they're going to spin a story. It's almost comical because they often seem like parodies of themselves. I sometimes stumble into a story on Good Morning America or Today or whatever CBS calls their morning pabulum, and I wonder if if I've turned to a Saturday Night Live skit mocking the medium.

Doesn't it worry you that the evening news anchors come from those morning shows?

I stopped watching all the broadcast and cable news channels except fox a long time ago.  I get 95% of my news online so I don't have first hand knowledge of these networks' bias.

 If I were to pick CNN or MSNBC I would be no different than those who criticize FNC without ever watching it.  A pet peeve of mine is when someone says they hate FNC or Bill O'Rielly and when asked if they ever have watched them they say NO!!!

There are 10 types of people.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.

FNC is right down the middle in news and slightly right of center in opinion, but since all the others are left of center to off-the-board fascist it appears to the leftists that FNC is biased. It all depends on your point-of-view. Like looking at the moon and saying, "It's only the size of a quarter."

If you can't get beyond your own biases, then you can't analyze those of others. That's why conservatives live in the objective evidence-based world. Truth is the enemy of the alternate reality crowd. Unfortunately, they own the Media, schools, and government, and can indoctrinate the country in their "beliefs" (i.e. lies), and keep them ignorant and dependent so as not to be able to uncover the truth. That's why we've only had 1 conservative president, and 2-4 years of a conservative congress in the last century; and not coincidentally, those were the pinnacle of American government and the economy.

Dahhh!

As I see it, there is little, if any, difference in the level of bias exhibited by MSNBC and CNN.  The distinction is all in the presentation.  Where CNN delivers a much more "buttoned-up" product with slick-suited insiders and less overt host hyperbole, the network slides its breathtaking bias in rather subtly...through "authoritative" field journalists like Michael Ware and Christianne Amanpour (when Ware isn't too busy "getting better acquainted with" other networks' journalists, that is), a bevy of foreign correspondents to saturate audiences with "what the rest of the world thinks", and skillfully dishonest screen crawls.  MSNBC tarts up its bias by employing self-important, unintentionally funny caricatures to deliver finger-wagging lectures to an administration that has better things to do than watch.  MSNBC is the news equivalent of public access, while CNN is inherently more dangerous, as its presentation creates undeserved credibility. 

"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan

Even CNN is less biased than MSNBC...unless Amanapour is on. Then it reverts back to the Communist News Network once again. Other than that, CNN is just a tad better than they used to be.

I had to vote them although just about all the news are biased in one way or the other. I dont think there is one out there that will tell you the WHOLE truth about anything, just what they want you to read or hear. Do they tell any of the good we have done in Irac or anywhere else for that matter?

Guns and violence are not necessarily the answer but they are one solution to the problem""" DILLIGAF

The network that I see every day......ALL (Always Lying Liberals) was not listed, just to give you a heads up ;)