My reason for checking "Other" was because it seems that the media don't feel personally invested in or affected by racial diversity so they can trumpet it from a distance. 

Political diversity is more personal with them and may determine even their pay-checks.

...come to think of it, that's hypocracy so I should have checked the third option.

I guess I just wanted to hear myself talk...yawn!...sorry.  Need coffee. 

"Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war"  - Shakespeare

It is not possible for the liberal media to imagine that the Right could have a shred of "rightness" about it.

If you are not of the liberal mindset, you are ignorant, evil or wrong and therefore not worthy of serious consideration, courtesy or responsible dialogue.

Period.

They don't give a damn about anything but power. Divide & conquer the masses one small group at a time till your sum total is the majority. In fact, liberalism is just a bunch of small single issue zealots pandered to by a plutocracy in order to gain power. Yes there will be some overlapping and occasional internal kerfuffles but the stranglehold is so intense that the constituents can't flee from their own delusion.

A hysterical for instance: In Philly a new building going up intended to use new waterless urinal systems. It was to be a green building the likes of which Philly hadn't seen yet. Well that mad the greenies happy but the plumbers union was furious. Now mind you only half of the bathrooms employ urinals and every single bathroom still has toilets and sinks but that wasn't enough. Well Mayor John Street, literally the most corrupt politician EVER compromised. "have the plumbers run the lines and we just won't hook them up" WT@#$%!!! PANDERER

Witness the casual pushing aside of the "black vote" now too as the libs court the "hispanic vote" and try to lock it away.

You can't save the Earth unless You're willing to make other people sacrifice. Dogbert the Green Consultant summing up the elite left.

• Because the MSM is smarter than the rest of us. 
• Because the MSM know what's best for you.
• Because the MSM know what's best for them. 
• Because it's inconvenient.
• Because the MSM knows what the definition of is is and MRC readers donot.
• Because the end justifies the means.

The left actually thinks political diversity is dangerous, but my googling efforts are failing to find the infuriating Leonard Pitts column from the Miami Herald to that effect. While he's absolutely wrong, he put it quite well. The kind of political diversity provided by people who don't fit on a left-right line is especially dangerous to them. I voted "other."
JMR

Other: Marxist ideology doesn't tolerate diversity of opinion.

Liberals do believe in political diversity - far left to center left. It's just a matter of correct & wrong. Liberals are correct, Socialists are mostly correct, Conservatives are wrong!

Conservatism from center right to far right is simply WRONG-THINKING, and therefore not deserving of any consideration.

Racial diversity is correct - letting Conservatives have an equal voice is wrong.

The common people are too easily swayed by the incorrect propaganda of the political right, and therefore must be shielded from that wrong-thinking. The common people will be better off when they realize that the smart people ( liberal politicians, academics, and media) are best suited to rule.

The first 3 choices are actually asking me to decide how libs view Political Diversity, and don't offer me a choice that reflects their thinking about Racial Diversity.

IMNSHO, libs are in love with the concept of racial diversity because it makes them feel good to identify people as being "in need". Then they get to be paternalistic and condescending, which warms their hearts. Yet their actions do nothing to enable and empower those "less fortunate", because otherwise they would lose their "poor huddled masses" and wouldn't have anyone to "express their concern" about.

Racial diversity is totally separate from political diversity. Libs want to crush political diversity because they resent anyone taking away their power to establish myths (such as racial diversity and AGW), which are the things that make them feeeeeel that they can be seen by others as good people.

Upon what do I based these strong opinions? I am in a very small non-lib minority in this town and have to face them everyday. I have had many encounters and know their song. And it annoys them that I don't just go away! (Anyone else want to move in, dig in, and challenge them in one of their deepest strongholds? Sometimes it can be quite satisfying!)

Liberals only believe in social diversity when it occures within the 36% tax bracket. Who would not want to practice diversity with Oprah, Cosby,etc.? How many of their friends use food stamps? Do they even know anyone who HASN"T gone to college? And of course, they don't know a single person who voted for George Bush